2016 Postmortem
Related: About this forumWhoa, they really called it already?
eta It must be a whomping. Sometimes it seems like no one wants to be the first to call it for Bernie. This time they're like "I'll take that fucking scoop, thankyouverymuch".
Cal Carpenter
(4,959 posts)Does anyone have a link yet?
nc4bo
(17,651 posts)Perogie
(687 posts)means Hillary lost BIG TIME
democrattotheend
(11,607 posts)When I vote in a couple weeks, I will be voting for Bernie, not against Hillary. So many Bernie supporters are saying that we finally have a candidate we can vote for. I am pretty sure Bernie won because people liked him, not because they were voting against Hillary. Hillary didn't lose; Bernie won.
Cal Carpenter
(4,959 posts)in the service of diplomacy in the hellish realm of GDP
democrattotheend
(11,607 posts)I don't see why some Bernie supporters are so focused on Hillary Clinton instead of on our guy.
Perogie
(687 posts)I am voting for Bernie because he is more like FDR than any candidate in the last 50+ years.
Please don't lecture me on why people are voting for Bernie. Can we just enjoy the win in our own ways? If that's ok with you.
Contrary1
(12,629 posts)Cal Carpenter
(4,959 posts)Sounds like MSNBC has it on tv.
It must be a whomping. Sometimes it seems like no one wants to be the first to call it for Bernie. This time they're like "I'll take that fucking scoop, thankyouverymuch".
Joob
(1,065 posts)That shit was Hillarious
MadBadger
(24,089 posts)If those numbers were more lopsided, maybe they take their time
Jefferson23
(30,099 posts)snowy owl
(2,145 posts)Cal Carpenter
(4,959 posts)Between the first results, early voting, exit polls and various other inputs, they may decide they are confident enough to do it. They could take the chance of being wrong, but they want the scoop. Well, it used to be scoop. Now it's clicks.
They definitely take into consideration where the first results are coming from and how to extrapolate that to the rest of the state's population.