Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

RDANGELO

(3,435 posts)
Sat Apr 2, 2016, 05:31 PM Apr 2016

The reasoon why Bernie should not have to raise money for down ticket Dems.

There is no reason why down ticket Dems can't raise money the same way Bernie does, by convincing people that they are not in the pockets of big money interests.

22 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
The reasoon why Bernie should not have to raise money for down ticket Dems. (Original Post) RDANGELO Apr 2016 OP
Hillary's $18 Million "Victory Fund" could be spent helping her campaign Talk about issues. snowy owl Apr 2016 #1
Good luck trying to flip super delegates Gothmog Apr 2016 #2
Votes can flip them quicker than money. dogman Apr 2016 #3
how's that working out for y'all? bigtree Apr 2016 #9
Clintonites arguing against democracy: Still can't tell a Clinton supporter from a typical GOPer. nt w4rma Apr 2016 #14
THANKS! snowy owl Apr 2016 #6
Yes, please explain the reasoning in the OP to these super delegates Gothmog Apr 2016 #16
Which 'downticket" Dems have been helping Bernie? Red Oak Apr 2016 #4
Clinton is raising money for the national party and the state party Gothmog Apr 2016 #17
Great! When these same folks stop putting their finger on the scale, I expect Berie will, too. Red Oak Apr 2016 #20
When your platform benefits people, they will want to donate. onecaliberal Apr 2016 #5
HOW MUCH IS DEBBIE SHARING WITH TIM CANOVA? snowy owl Apr 2016 #7
The DNC is shafting progressive Democrats in open primaries, too. (nt) w4rma Apr 2016 #15
Not surprised. Why would anyone want DNC/DLC establishment handing out our money? snowy owl Apr 2016 #19
Yep. To the point of recruiting Republicans to run as Dems. kristopher Apr 2016 #21
what a lame excuse bigtree Apr 2016 #8
It's a funny revolution that has only one guy in power. baldguy Apr 2016 #10
Well good luck trying to pass ANYTHING wildeyed Apr 2016 #11
Sorry Bernie is no Democrat Demsrule86 Apr 2016 #12
Bullshit, Sanders is NOT serious about ANY revolution at all... a LEADER (which Sanders is NOT)... uponit7771 Apr 2016 #13
"Fuck you, get your own money." - Man who wants to be de facto leader of the party NuclearDem Apr 2016 #18
There has never been a top down funded revolution. kristopher Apr 2016 #22

dogman

(6,073 posts)
3. Votes can flip them quicker than money.
Sat Apr 2, 2016, 05:41 PM
Apr 2016

Your vote can be a valuable commodity once you understand it.

 

w4rma

(31,700 posts)
14. Clintonites arguing against democracy: Still can't tell a Clinton supporter from a typical GOPer. nt
Sat Apr 2, 2016, 10:57 PM
Apr 2016

Gothmog

(145,722 posts)
16. Yes, please explain the reasoning in the OP to these super delegates
Sat Apr 2, 2016, 11:32 PM
Apr 2016

The super delegates really need to know this reasoning. Please report back as to the reactions of these super delegates. I can give you the names of some super delegates who would love to hear from you and to hear this excuse for not raising money for thte party.

Red Oak

(697 posts)
4. Which 'downticket" Dems have been helping Bernie?
Sat Apr 2, 2016, 05:44 PM
Apr 2016

Why should he raise money for those actively working against him?

Red Oak

(697 posts)
20. Great! When these same folks stop putting their finger on the scale, I expect Berie will, too.
Sun Apr 3, 2016, 12:43 AM
Apr 2016

Why fund "downticket" Dems that are actively working against your campaign? When they start feeling the Bern, then help them.

If the DNC wasn't so foolish, they would be able to tap into Bernie's yuuge fundraising. As is, many would be damned before they would give a cent to the DNC until such time as they treat Bernie as they treat the empress, I mean, the inevitable, I mean Hillary.

onecaliberal

(32,934 posts)
5. When your platform benefits people, they will want to donate.
Sat Apr 2, 2016, 06:02 PM
Apr 2016

I used to give a fair amount of money, but the DNC will never get another cent. I will donate directly to candidates who want my vote and who want to win office to help people.

 

baldguy

(36,649 posts)
10. It's a funny revolution that has only one guy in power.
Sat Apr 2, 2016, 08:25 PM
Apr 2016

Winning down-ticket races is essential. You try to marginalize them simply because your guy no inclination to lift a finger to help win them, and has no clue how to do it if he did.

That's no strategy for bringing about a revolution. It's suicide. And that's not metaphorical, considering the alternative is having a Trump or a Cruz in the White House with the full backing of a GOP Congress.

wildeyed

(11,243 posts)
11. Well good luck trying to pass ANYTHING
Sat Apr 2, 2016, 08:33 PM
Apr 2016

without down ticket allies in office. Supporting them is called "loyalty". A strong GE candidate who can get many elected has "coattails". The bigger those are, he more political capital he or she has in the bank to get actual legislation passed.

You should try to learn a little bit about how political parties and our system of government works.

Demsrule86

(68,735 posts)
12. Sorry Bernie is no Democrat
Sat Apr 2, 2016, 10:39 PM
Apr 2016

He should raise money so that we can win the House and Senate...if he cared a little for this country he would do so...

uponit7771

(90,367 posts)
13. Bullshit, Sanders is NOT serious about ANY revolution at all... a LEADER (which Sanders is NOT)...
Sat Apr 2, 2016, 10:46 PM
Apr 2016

... supports the people around him not gives them the finger after using their resources.

Sanders is losing more than the primary at this point

Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»2016 Postmortem»The reasoon why Bernie sh...