Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Bonobo

(29,257 posts)
Sat Apr 2, 2016, 09:04 AM Apr 2016

It is NOT dirty fossil fuel money.

When a lobbyist combines it with money from other industries, it is washed, and therefore clean money.

How can you not know that? Didn't you ever watch Scarface, the Godfather, or Boardwalk Empire? Same logic applies.

19 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
 

Gwhittey

(1,377 posts)
2. I would say that Girl Hillary was rude to is
Sat Apr 2, 2016, 09:13 AM
Apr 2016

I mean GreenPeace people like her don't make money off it and are donating their time to a cause. So I do not think that girl took money from Fossil Fuel industry.

MuseRider

(34,135 posts)
3. Of course!
Sat Apr 2, 2016, 09:18 AM
Apr 2016

D'oh! How could we have been so stupid .

Brand new, spankin' clean money. Innocent money. Well there ya go.

Kalidurga

(14,177 posts)
6. As a matter of law, campaigns are prohibited from taking money directly from corporations
Sat Apr 2, 2016, 09:45 AM
Apr 2016

Well that makes it all better. She doesn't get the money put directly in her pocket or her campaign.

islandmkl

(5,275 posts)
7. thank godfrey cambridge that the law covered every potential aspect of funneling money
Sat Apr 2, 2016, 10:02 AM
Apr 2016

to campaigns...and the associated politicians, operatives, etc.

I mean, if one can't give the money directly, then one just can't get them the money, can one?

Hill's in the clear...the law says so...surely she would not have found a way around the law...why would she endeavor to do that?

...other than for the money

Kalidurga

(14,177 posts)
8. It's like they don't read the chit they post or give it any thought.
Sat Apr 2, 2016, 10:05 AM
Apr 2016

Now I am not calling them mindless bots mind you at least not directly.

islandmkl

(5,275 posts)
9. that's good because calling them that directly would violate the TOS...
Sat Apr 2, 2016, 11:36 AM
Apr 2016

it's like saying, "You are a f***ing idiot...buy I don't mean you personally."

 

Fast Walker 52

(7,723 posts)
10. are you talking to me?
Sat Apr 2, 2016, 02:01 PM
Apr 2016

I just thought it was worth pointing the article out, not saying I agreed with it

 

Fast Walker 52

(7,723 posts)
16. ok, where you talking *about* me in #8?
Sat Apr 2, 2016, 06:01 PM
Apr 2016

If not, no problem. If you were, then you seem to have misread me.

Kalidurga

(14,177 posts)
18. I was talking about people who post things that by their text
Sat Apr 2, 2016, 06:04 PM
Apr 2016

It appears they have not read what they post. Do you post things you haven't read or understood?

Octafish

(55,745 posts)
11. It is a LOT of dirty fossil fuel money.
Sat Apr 2, 2016, 02:18 PM
Apr 2016
Banks Behind Hillary Clinton’s Canadian Speeches Really Want The Keystone Pipeline

by Paul Blumenthal and Ryan Grimm
Huffington Post 06/01/2015

WASHINGTON — Two Canadian banks tightly connected to promoting the controversial Keystone XL pipeline in the United States either fully or partially paid for eight speeches made by former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton in the period not long before she announced her campaign for president. Those speeches put more than $1.6 million in the Democratic candidate’s pocket.

SNIP...

Ali Duncan Martin, a TD Bank spokeswoman, told The Huffington Post in an email that the bank sponsored a series of speeches by both Hillary Clinton and former President Bill Clinton starting in 2008. (Bill Clinton received more than $1.6 million for speeches sponsored by TD Bank, according to past financial disclosures.) The bank was the “title sponsor or a co-sponsor of the events, with most events having a number of sponsors participating,” according to Martin. She declined to say how much the bank spent in sponsoring the speeches.

Spokespeople from CIBC did not respond to a request for comment. One event invite, however, indicated that CIBC provided tickets the company had purchased to others. “Kindly RSVP to your CIBC Advisor and advise of any dietary restrictions,” the invite stated.

Some details of Hillary Clinton’s Canadian speechifying were first reported by independent journalist Ron Brynaert. The Clinton campaign did not respond to The Huffington Post’s request for comment.

Clinton’s first swing through Canada started on March 5, 2014, with a speech that cost the Vancouver Board of Trade $275,500. While Clinton’s financial disclosure form reported the board as the payer, an invite to the event also lists “presenting sponsors” as TD Bank and Vancouver City Savings Credit Union. Following her speech, Clinton participated in a question-and-answer session hosted by TD Bank Deputy Chairman Frank McKenna.

The next day in Calgary, Clinton gave another speech reportedly paid for by tinePublic at a cost of $225,500. McKenna also came along to interview her after the speech. Martin confirmed that TD Bank also sponsored this speech.

In June, Clinton gave a speech in Toronto for a price of $150,000. The primary sponsor was TD Bank, according to an invite. Other sponsors included the Canadian Club of Toronto, Blakes Lawyers, KPMG and the Real Estate Investment Network. For the third time, McKenna interviewed Clinton after the speech.

Clinton went west to the city of Edmonton on June 18 to give another tinePublic-paid speech for a $100,000 price. The chief sponsor of this speech, according to the Edmonton Chamber of Commerce, was CIBC. Victor Dodig, then senior executive vice president at CIBC, interviewed Clinton on stage after her remarks.

On Oct. 6, 2014, Clinton traveled up north again to speak at a meeting hosted by the liberal think tank Canada 2020. CIBC, which is also a funder of Canada 2020, was the primary sponsor of this $215,500 speech, according to a Canada 2020 web page for the event. Lesser sponsors included Air Canada, the Canadian Real Estate Association, Johnson & Johnson, Ernst & Young, Stampede Group and Telus. Again, Dodig, by then promoted to president and CEO, handled the Q&A session.

Over a span of two days in January, Clinton gave three more speeches — one directly paid for by CIBC and two paid by tinePublic, but sponsored by CIBC. On Jan. 21, she spoke in Winnipeg for $262,000 and then Saskatoon for $262,500. The next day she spoke at that CIBC event in Whistler for $150,000 — the only speech directly reported on her financial disclosure form as having been paid for by a Canadian bank. Dodig pitched questions to Clinton after each of these three speeches.

CONTINUED...

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2015/05/31/hillary-clinton-speeches-keystone_n_7463108.html

hootinholler

(26,449 posts)
19. Have you ever washed clothes with heavy oil in them?
Sat Apr 2, 2016, 09:09 PM
Apr 2016

The oil contaminates all the rest of the wash.

I'm also wondering what other industries they raised money from? Maybe Big Pharma? How about ordinance manufacturers? Biotech DNA meddlers?

Such a lightly soiled load of wash.

Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»2016 Postmortem»It is NOT dirty fossil fu...