2016 Postmortem
Related: About this forumIt's a Revolution | Bernie Sanders
Third Way Democrats are on Bern Notice! Objects in mirror are closer than they appear!
reddread
(6,896 posts)baldguy
(36,649 posts)We not only need to keep the Presidency - we need to take back the House and the Senate, along with most of the Governorships and State Houses.
Sanders supporters should be able to name literally hundreds of candidates, at every level of government. But instead, they can't name more than a literal handful.
It's a funny revolution that has only one revolutionary with power.
I guess I'll vote for the status quo candidate now. Damn your good!
baldguy
(36,649 posts)You might be happy to see the next Democratic administration fail, and be happy to wallow in that failure. I'm not.
GeorgiaPeanuts
(2,353 posts)Read up and learn!
As a larger Sanders donor >$200, I am glad none of my money goes to the DNC, It is corrupt; Until DWS is gone I will not give it a penny of my money, all my money will go to specific progressive candidates.
baldguy
(36,649 posts)You might be happy supporting a guy that only seems to play as a one man band - but the US govt has never operated that way.
GeorgiaPeanuts
(2,353 posts)I'm not gonna repost all of them here... You can see two of them in my sig. Tim Canova and Lucy Flores. I hope that Tim Canova beats the Pants off DWS, and combined with Clinton losing the nomination she will be out of a job.
baldguy
(36,649 posts)GeorgiaPeanuts
(2,353 posts)How typical of Hillarians to move goalposts:
baldguy
(36,649 posts)That doesn't change just because you can't recognize how big the ocean is.
polly7
(20,582 posts)timmymoff
(1,947 posts)something you are to lazy to be involved with. You do not know things like us Bernie supporters taking over our county democrats positions, things like that. The activism of people who weren't normally involved. So spare us your characterization from someone who is willingly accepting republican principles by a democratic candidate. You are part of the problem.
baldguy
(36,649 posts)Should step aside for johnny-come-latelys who've been too stupid, too lazy, or too self-involved to participate? Until St Bernie came along, anyway.
Sorry, it's a little premature for your Reign of Terror.
timmymoff
(1,947 posts)and by her stances are you sure she has been fighting them or joining them?
quickesst
(6,283 posts)..... can you?
On edit: can any of you answer his question?
Why does it matter?
quickesst
(6,283 posts)Revolution
smiley
(1,432 posts)Call it what you want. I just call it voting my conscience.
quickesst
(6,283 posts).... how this revolution is going to work. What and who is going to be involved except for the minority of Americans who support Bernie Sanders? With millions of people supporting Trump, will there be blood shed? You know they are not going to just accept it quietly. There are many questions about the revolution that have not been answered, and many that have not even been asked. Shouldn't there be some kind of plan? Thanks for the answers that will help me to understand how this is all going to work.
Armstead
(47,803 posts)It starts with the premise that we all STOP acting like chained whipped dogs who are prisoners of an inert corrupt system in which lobbyists for Big Cortpotate Monopolies own politics and government.
It starts with the premise that we start opening up the system to make politicians and government accountable to the public interest.
It starts with the premise that at least ONE political party turn to average people as their source of financial backing by giving them something to SUPPORT, not just accept. (I.e. Sanders system of raising a lot of money from a lot of small donors.)
Stuff like that....and much more
quickesst
(6,283 posts)It starts with the premise that I can get all the Nasa scientists to help me build it. I don't think I'm going to the moon. You are giving simple answers to a complex situation.
Armstead
(47,803 posts)I could write (and have written over the years) many detailed responses with endless specifics and examples.
But it boils down to the starting point that our political system -- including the Democratic Party -- has become defeatist, corrupt and has helped the GOP and the Corporate Elites create an entrenched systemic corruption that stifles reform and positive change -- and denigrates the basic principles of liberalism....It has also aided and abetted a cynicism among the population that has made people apathetic and cynical about the entire political process.
If that continues unchallenged, the US will continue to suffer the consequences and the Democratic Party will become increasingly irrelevant and continue to give the GOP and CONservatives the upper hand.
You are free to disagree of course. But please don't dismiss it with meaningless memes like "I want to go to the moon." That is a surefire way to enable the continuation of the other revolution, the Reagan Revolution.
quickesst
(6,283 posts)... about who can get it done, but I believe the one thing we can agree on is that it will take time to accomplish whether it's Bernie or Hillary. I do know one thing for sure. I do not want a trump or a cruz in the White House. We still have a long way to go, but burning the progress we have made down to the ground and starting over is not a sound strategy. I wish more people could understand that there is an alternative to the "all or nothing" gamble which at the best puts us well ahead of the game, and at the worst maintains the momentum.
Armstead
(47,803 posts)There is a large range between that and perpetuating the abusive excesses of the current system as it exists.
Most Sanders supporters are not advocating "all or nothing." More like "We have to start someplace, and we can't keep putting it off."
quickesst
(6,283 posts).... I was addressing the "all or nothing" faction of Bernie's supporters. You know as well as I do they exist. They are right here on this board. Refusing to vote for Hillary Clinton IF she is the nominee is doing just that. Burning it all down to the ground. Who anyone votes for in the primary or the general election is no one's business but theirs, but to deny contributing to the burning down by not voting, writing in a candidate, or voting third-party is willful ignorance for the sake of ideological purity. It's being selfish. I will vote for the Democratic nominee. If you do the same, even if you have to hold your nose, then when it comes down to it we really have nothing to argue about except for our personal choice for the nomination. Have a great day.
smiley
(1,432 posts)but I don't get that impression.
In any case, from there you have to have confidence that the person you're voting for is going to try their hardest to accomplish the goals they've set forth in their campaign.
But I personally feel that a vote for Hillary in the primary is a vote for the GOP in the GE. You may feel different. Oh well. It's your vote, cast it however you wish.
If you actually have questions about how Bernie plans to accomplish his goals, I've read many informative links on DU regarding this, if I felt like spending my morning educating you I would, but unfortunately I have better things to do with my day. I trust that you have the intellect and desire to figure this out on your own.
I doubt this made any kind of impression on you. But I also doubt your question was sincere.
Have a great day! I know I will!
quickesst
(6,283 posts)When you consider not only Hillary supporters who favor a more pragmatic path to progress in this country, but all of the supporters of trump and cruz who would like nothing better than to kill all of us, you are definitely in the minority. Considering Bernie"s agenda, he would still have to get the approval of two more branches of government, and whether a democratic or republican majority, I don't think he'll get too far, and a monarchy or dictatorship will be soundly rejected. By the way, my inquiries are quite sincere. Do enjoy your day.
smiley
(1,432 posts)Sorry. I'm not for incremental change.
Your conclusion has one problem. Hillary would also have to go through those same 2 branches of government. She would face the same obstacles, and I personally feel Bernie's record on getting bills passed is far superior to Hillary's. So I'm much more comfortable putting my support behind his candidacy.
I apologize for doubting your sincerity.
quickesst
(6,283 posts)It wasn't necessary but I appreciate it. I suppose all of us will have decisions to make and work to do shortly. I'm going to support the Democratic nominee so I suppose that puts me in the " anyone but a republican" camp. That's where I feel most confident and comfortable.
smiley
(1,432 posts)I'll support Hillary if she is the nominee. But this email controversy isn't going to die. If she is the nominee, it will continue to plague her campaign. Any other candidate in any other primary facing this kind investigation would not be considered fit for party nomination to POTUS.
Bernie doesn't have any scandals he's juggling. That is one of the many reasons I feel he is the better candidate for the party nomination.
giftedgirl77
(4,713 posts)baldguy
(36,649 posts)Bernies' supposed revolution will fail.
And because Bernie has never been one to campaign for or with anyone.
timmymoff
(1,947 posts)It has millions of Americans realizing their power.
baldguy
(36,649 posts)Do you know what Clinton's supports will do if she loses? They'll jump on the Bernie bandwagon, work like hell to get him elected. And when all the Bernie people will sit back & relax believing the work is done, the mainstream Democrats that are so despised here will be the ones working like hell to get his legislation passed.
Unfortunately, with no plan for taking back the majorities in the House and the Senate, and no plans on taking back the Governorships and statehouses, most of the time Bernie's proposals will fail. The GOP congress will either impeach him, or he'll lose in 2020 & retire.
And while Bernie's nascent revolutionaries will have gone back to their self-absorbed lives (because, hey, politics is boring & there's no real difference between the two parties anyway), the mainstream Democrats like Hillary will still be there, like they have been for decades, working their ass off for to help the people who work their ass off.
timmymoff
(1,947 posts)Oh that's right they had DWS, former Clinton chair, lost 900 state legislative seats, many governorships and house and senate. So do not preach to us about what you may do when the results are obvious, failure. And like your uninspiring candidate for president, the youth isn't going to build a party based on the status quo you support. Do not tell us about hard work when the hard work was geared for the 1%, also known as her donor base. We aren't going anywhere, we already changed the message and shaped it. But like always with a Clinton we expect a huge lurch to the right if she wins. And we will not accept that
Armstead
(47,803 posts)it would make for a much better party, especially if they follows through after the election and gave the PRINCIPLES Sanders represents support on the institutional level.
We'd actually have a Democratic Party that fights for the people, and actually challenges the embedded cancer of entrenched corporate corruption.
Armstead
(47,803 posts)affordable education options for all, major financial reform and regulation, campaign finance reform...etc?
If somehow Sanders were elected, they would join the GOP in opposing a liberal agenda?
Hoooookay.
CorporatistNation
(2,546 posts)Zira
(1,054 posts)I didn't see it until now.
dana_b
(11,546 posts)It's so positive.
jillan
(39,451 posts)Zira
(1,054 posts)nadinbrzezinski
(154,021 posts)for years to come. They are not negative... which is a great break from US Politics.