2016 Postmortem
Related: About this forumMassive NYC Sanders crowd "Smells like Woodstock." MSNBC.
Surprise! Morning Joe tries to prop up Hillary while showing the massive Bernie crowd yesterday. "It looks like Woodstock!" Said Joe. "It smells like Woodstock. Hillary's already got a lock on this."
WTF?
They admitted they don't get it. Hillary can't turn out enough people to fill up a Chucky Cheese, but Bernie it drawing tens of thousands. How is Hillary a lock?
JackInGreen
(2,975 posts)the cannibias is thick and far more of a stench, to whit:
roguevalley
(40,656 posts)Snotcicles
(9,089 posts)MADem
(135,425 posts)Justin Beiber doesn't have a hope in hell of becoming POTUS, though.
morningfog
(18,115 posts)MADem
(135,425 posts)You know that kid is gonna sell out ALL these venues:
http://www.ticketmaster.com/Justin-Bieber-tickets/artist/1369961
He will fill every seat and those fans will scream and cry and buy tee shirts and think it was the best concert EVER...and they will pay a bundle to put their behinds in those chairs.
But even if this kid were an American citizen, of age for the Presidency, he wouldn't have a hope in hell of getting elected.
morningfog
(18,115 posts)Get off my precinct!
MADem
(135,425 posts)How about Cher? Or Madonna? They can draw crowds, too.
Point is, people will pay to see them, the venues will be filled, but they still don't have enough support to be elected to national office.
Crowds do not translate into "overwhelming support." They look good, they can create buzz, but Ralph Nader managed to fill Boston Garden.
He didn't win Massachusetts.
polly7
(20,582 posts)I saw pictures of the long lines this morning ....... the people in them all look pretty intelligent, to me. I doubt they believe they're going to anything other than a political rally.
MADem
(135,425 posts)polly7
(20,582 posts)Where'd ya get THAT?
MADem
(135,425 posts)That doesn't mean Justin is going to make their lives better, or marry them, or whisk them away on a unicorn farting rainbows to a cloud in the sky where there are no problems, ever--but they pay for that fantasy, even if it only lasts for an hour or two.
Ralph Nader could pack 'em in, too. The only way he'd get to the WH is if he took the tour.
?zz=1
polly7
(20,582 posts)They're 'enamoured', stupid people who haven't got a clue about politics, what's at stake for them, the U.S., the world ....... they're just brainwashed (by something or other - it can't be Bernie if they're not politically motivated and therefore wouldn't even listen to him - cause that's what he does - talks politics) masses.
Thanks for the explanation.
MADem
(135,425 posts)Why would you do that? I thought you liked these people--why in the world would you call them names like that? And then try to pretend that your nasty and invented characterizations are MY "explanation?"
Goading and baiting is never a good look. I'd advise against it.
People become enamoured of things and people they like, be it Bieber or Bernie. It doesn't make them stupid--it just makes them possessed of a particular POV.
The bottom line, though, is this: A crowd in a stadium doesn't necessarily mean that the WORLD is onboard with the guy speaking to (or singing to) that crowd.
polly7
(20,582 posts)It's clear 'exactly' what you mean.
Your 'bottom line' is absolutely stupid - who on earth would think the 'WORLD!' is on-board with anyone addressing a crowd?
MADem
(135,425 posts)What I mean is what I say.
You should try talking about the topic, instead of about ME.
The pivot to attack the messenger any time anything less than hyperbolic Sanders praise is forthcoming is noted. It's obvious, and yes, boring.
polly7
(20,582 posts)Bernie crowds are just like Bieber's - they don't mean anything. They're just 'enamoured' masses who are star-struck by a 70'ish gentleman with funny hair.
MADem
(135,425 posts)polly7
(20,582 posts)MADem
(135,425 posts)polly7
(20,582 posts)post in reply).
So disingenuous and baiting. Not something I'd advise.
MADem
(135,425 posts)polly7
(20,582 posts)I don't care what you advise.
MADem
(135,425 posts)polly7
(20,582 posts)MADem
(135,425 posts)Anyone reading this thread can see you pivot from the topic to me. It's a lame trick, and when I see it, I will point it out.
polly7
(20,582 posts)standing in line just like at a Bieber concert. You should have stopped at ...... well .... before you started.
MADem
(135,425 posts)All you've done is avoid the topic and focus on ME. Over and over again. You characterize me and put words in my mouth. Repeatedly.
You should quit while you're behind.
It's becoming obvious that you just are trying to get me to say something intemperate. I'm not annoyed, or irritated, or piqued by you, so that's not going to happen. I prefer to stick to issues, but when people--like you--start characterizing me, I don't let it slide. I point it out.
Stop characterizing me, stop getting personal, and I won't keep pointing out what you are doing. But if you do want to go on in this fashion, I've all day.
polly7
(20,582 posts)don't want replies to it.
DisgustipatedinCA
(12,530 posts)polly7
(20,582 posts)So unnecessary.
MADem
(135,425 posts)81. ummm ...... get over yourself. I just replied to your silly post. Don't post stupid shit if you
View profile
don't want replies to it.
frylock
(34,825 posts)#I'mWithHer
MADem
(135,425 posts)After all #ShesWithMe works too.
But no one's feeling any "bern" --you'd have to be at least somewhat enamoured to get to that point in the relationship~!
senz
(11,945 posts)Bit of difference, ya know?
MADem
(135,425 posts)So, no....no difference. Perception is what it is.
senz
(11,945 posts)Your comparison is silly, MADem. It sounds desperate.
cannabis_flower
(3,765 posts)the comparison is lame.
MADem
(135,425 posts)Point is, anyone can draw a crowd--some can even get people to PAY to get in the door.
Doesn't mean they can get people to the polls.
cannabis_flower
(3,765 posts)you act like Sanders hasn't won any states. Counting them up Clinton has won 18, Sanders has won 14. There are still 18 states to go. It might be hard for Bernie to pull it out but it isn't impossible.
MADem
(135,425 posts)He has won quite a few states. He does very well in caucus states, in states with homogeneous population bases, in rural states, in states where RBKA is a thing, in states where the population is low(er), He does less well in multicultural, high population density, and urban primary states. It will be very difficult for him to "pull it out"--close to, if not, impossible.
It's not about the states--it's about the delegates that come with each state.
That said, I've never advocated for him to leave the race. Not once. Stay, enjoy, kick it, keep going, keep telling those fans to donate, get young people interested in the process, keep holding those rallies. Do whatcha need to do, stick for as long as ya need to.
bigtree
(86,005 posts)...in the closed NY primary?
Still watching dead intern Joe?
Atman
(31,464 posts)I don't have cable, so I catch up at the kids house. I put Morning Joe and it puts the girls into a coma while I drink my coffee.
CorkySt.Clair
(1,507 posts)and spends the rest of the time bashing Hillary and Democrats, literally 5 days a week.
So yeah, that would be like catnip to a Sanders supporter. No surprise they dig him and the theme of the show.
KeepItReal
(7,769 posts)http://www.dslreports.com/shownews/Top-Comcast-Lobbyist-Hosting-Hillary-Clinton-Fundraiser-134215
http://www.politico.com/blogs/media/2015/05/clinton-foundation-donors-include-dozens-of-media-organizations-individuals-207228
It's old news, though and everyone should already know this stuff, they would say.
djean111
(14,255 posts)with money and power, and that all of Bernie's supporters will be falling into line.
Minus me, for starters.
Certainly Morning Joe has his orders. That's why I don't watch.
gordianot
(15,242 posts)Oh darn I forgot it is cheaper to pay off vote counters. Maybe a Streisand concert would do the trick.
senz
(11,945 posts)It's surprisingly honest, for a change.
gordianot
(15,242 posts)Just what is needed in 2016 old hippie comparisons, but am fairly certain there is a Nixonian scandal brewing some where. I do hope the millennials make better choices than the baby boomers before they embrace old establishment politics.
marions ghost
(19,841 posts)before we throw all the Boomers into a pit and cover it up, let us recall that the majority of the Millennials have Boomer parents:
haikugal
(6,476 posts)I get tired of hippy and boomer punching.
senz
(11,945 posts)Something went right, that's for sure.
marions ghost
(19,841 posts)The Millennials didn't hatch out from underneath mushrooms and graduate from Hogwarts school.
Somebody raised em and did a darn good job.
Much maligned Boomers, take a bow.
Very proud of my extended Millennial tribe and of the whole awesome generation. They are banding together and making their voices heard politically (as many of their parents did way back when). The Millennials have a good inner compass --they look for truth and honesty--and they see the games. They know that we all deserve better than what we have at present. And obviously they know they have to show up (in various ways) to be heard.
I love all generations living on the earth. We are only divided by those who would divide us for their own gain.
gordianot
(15,242 posts)She is gainfully employed has her masters degree paid for and is not living at home in her room. Her College loans are under control and lives fully in the fact based world. Mom and Dad did not fix it she did it herself. It is so sad the 20 somethings who live in the basement and live by tending bar with advanced degrees.
marions ghost
(19,841 posts)--something is wrong with this picture (and I think we know what it is).
Congrats to your daughter. Like you I know many who are not doing so well. And parents strapped and stressed trying to help them. And hard earned college degrees that lead nowhere.
Such a racket. We are living what happens when vulture capitalism takes over.
Zen Democrat
(5,901 posts)I think the "Hillary's a lock statement" was said with sarcasm. The panel discussed the amazing crowds Bernie is turning out and all agreed it's NOT over. Especially if Bernie takes New York.
RiverLover
(7,830 posts)This just makes us look uninformed.
PLUS the other day, MJ talked about how Bernie gets no respect despite winning so many states~
They explain how badly the DNC has rigged our primary.
MJ is the ONLY ONE talking about this in MSM> We should be thanking them. Not missing obvious sarcasm.
senz
(11,945 posts)I'm amazed, it's like a crack in the ceiling letting the truth in!
RiverLover
(7,830 posts)& miss when they're actually being honest & doing right.
Gwhittey
(1,377 posts)is the straw on camels back that finally got the news to say Oh maybe we should be honest.
senz
(11,945 posts)because it sounds really interesting. What radio dude in WI?
Gwhittey
(1,377 posts)senz
(11,945 posts)How excellent to hear it validated on the MSM.
Around here, scoundrels laugh at us and call us conspiracy theorists ... bless their dishonest little souls ...
Merryland
(1,134 posts)I heard a lot of challenging of Clinton. Of course, this seems to shift back & forth.
HockeyMom
(14,337 posts)It was his very first political rally. He's in his mid 30's (not Millennial), from the Bronx of Puerto Rican heritage, works in Security for a major retail store, and is in the NY Army National Guard. He posted pictures saying, "Feeling the BERN!". "It was GREAT".
"Dirty Hippy"?
Atman
(31,464 posts)28, BS degree...total Bernie fan. He's not a dirty hippie.
haikugal
(6,476 posts)Adsos Letter
(19,459 posts)Raises hand.
haikugal
(6,476 posts)Much is forgotten sometimes!
HockeyMom
(14,337 posts)TheBlackAdder
(28,211 posts).
Correction: SIX-year-old Joe Scarborough.
.
FlatBaroque
(3,160 posts)after Her meltdown.
PATRICK
(12,228 posts)I tried to explain to my son the inertial force of Clinton's NY support, both organizational and in the populace, the favors owed, the constituencies, the rallying of the state elected officials, etc. I argued that Jesse Jackson took advantage of some disaffection with the "outsider" Dukakis who seemed to have a "lock" by the time it got to NY. The people were dissatisfied, energized and gave Jackson the state. BTW Sanders endorsed Jackson over his fellow independent New Englander which is ancient history perhaps in the current mix. Each election is different. By the time it jumbles the mix it boils down to core backing, enthusiasm and the particular drama that energizes our fairly liberal voting base. It can get ornery.
But as for actually fraud or cheating or blaming crossover voters, etc. it isn't much of an issue.
He countered with saying all the young workers he knows that are registered Dems dislike HRC rather intensely, that certain wealthy investors also dislike her and that her "support" in NYC is polarized(like Bloomberg's in much different way, of course). People voting because of economic advantages or favors is more significant than you care to admit in a primary where usually the turnout is much less than in the general. Yet the 'enthusiasm" factor, that they love her in NY, is rather forced. That you can see everywhere.
In sum, it should be close- or a startling big one for Sanders. It is a state, when given the chance, lusts to make a big, sometimes seemingly spiteful, difference. This state has been the dutiful victim of economic centrist policies and has ponied up money and jobs seemingly for everyone else in the world. The announcement of a new minimum wage that HRC unwisely tried to tamper down the possibility earlier in the campaign may be one of those mood factors propelling Sanders, despite the Governor and Dems supporting HRC being largely responsible for this fairly progressive victory. Or it may work the other way?
Clinton has to score big in NYC. Depressed upstate is no salvation. The young- read disadvantaged workers- intend to vote.
NorthCarolina
(11,197 posts)The vote of an SD however is worth 10,000 votes of the peeps and ALWAYS counts.
Response to Atman (Original post)
Name removed Message auto-removed
senz
(11,945 posts)Welcome to DU!
Response to senz (Reply #31)
Name removed Message auto-removed
senz
(11,945 posts)Scents do have a way of bypassing rationality!
VulgarPoet
(2,872 posts)Why am I completely and utterly unsurprised.
Zorra
(27,670 posts)"As long as people will accept crap, it will be financially profitable to dispense it." ~ Dick Cavett
senz
(11,945 posts)Jimi was so aware, alert, nuanced, real. Add that to guitar genius. I so wish he (and Janis) had lived.
Cavett, too, was right there telling the truth. Jimi's peace salute, hackneyed and forgotten now, reminded me of the distinct counterculture consciousness of the time. It seems we're just about ready for something like that again.
Ino
(3,366 posts)They were NOT propping up Hillary! Mika said she understands Hillary has a lock on this... because everyone says she does, because Hillary says she does. Joe said she does NOT have a lock on it. Those who say Bernie can't win are WRONG. That was one tiny part of a long segment praising Sanders profusely.
They talked about how ridiculous the "tone" complaint was, how Hillary can't possibly draw the same crowds as Bernie, how the DNC has rigged the process all along -- in Iowa, in superdelegates, in debates -- how her support is collapsing in state after state, how "joyous" Bernie's crowds are, the FBI investigation.
"This is Bernie Sanders' (Democratic) Party right now, and this guy's proven he's got the stuff."
This bit was very complimentary towards Bernie, very sour on Hillary. Recommended watching!
http://www.msnbc.com/morning-joe
Tom Rinaldo
(22,913 posts)Several guests admitted that it was possible Hillary could lose NY though she's still favored there in their minds. If so the consensus was this race is far from settled.
senz
(11,945 posts)Calling Hillary a lock is an attempt to invalidate the entire Sanders campaign.
Their desperation is apparent.
Ino
(3,366 posts)IMO, the OP has mischaracterized & exaggerated two small comments out of a long segment. They were very complimentary towards Sanders, and very dismissive & critical of Hillary.
senz
(11,945 posts)A bit surprised to hear it, though.
BernieforPres2016
(3,017 posts)Kind of amazing that 2 people who have a morning political talk show seemed to just now be grasping what's going on with the Sanders campaign.
Paraphrasing some of their comments: Did you see the enthusiasm? They're not cheering for jokes like at Trump's rallies. Bernie talks about an issue and the crowd goes nuts. Could Hillary ever get a crowd like that?
The most interesting thing I heard was that the Clinton campaign is very concerned about how many votes Bernie has been able to turn whenever he has time to make a lot of speeches and the ground game of his campaign has time to work. They said that the early primaries were compressed, but they are very concerned about the 2 week gap between Wisconsin and New York. Perhaps that helps explain why Hillary flew off the handle a couple of times yesterday. I think Bernie is living in her head rent free.
Autumn Colors
(2,379 posts)They must already know that stolen primary is in the bag.
RiverLover
(7,830 posts)BernieforPres2016
(3,017 posts)The OP is a mischaracterization of it, as others have said.
got that herb
CentralCoaster
(1,163 posts)They seem to be talking about the phenomenon, they mention the diversity, the numbers, they are in awe.
They're also defending Bernie over the "tone" bullshit, saying he's talking about issues.
Not to defend MSNBC, but I don't think this was hippie bashing.
BernieforPres2016
(3,017 posts)And also how engaged and enthusiastic the crowd is. They contrasted it with Hillary's campaign, and even with Trump's crowds, where the applause is for some joke or off the cuff remark for Trump. Bernie's crowd is going nuts when he talks about breaking up the big banks and raising the minimum wage.
It was as if Joe and Mika had never even bothered to look at a Sanders rally before; maybe they haven't. They asked the NBC reporter who has been following the campaigns if his crowds were always like this and she said yes, though the one yesterday was the most diverse she had seen because it was in the South Bronx.
Mika said everybody all the so called experts have been saying that Hillary has it locked up. Scarborough said that despite everything the Democratic Party has tried to do to fix the race for Hillary, it is far from over.
jalan48
(13,880 posts)Last edited Fri Apr 1, 2016, 12:14 PM - Edit history (1)
On the one side we have the corporate war mongers and on the other, those dirty hippie types. The more things change the more they stay the same.
senz
(11,945 posts)Especially since the real repubs lost their minds and left a vacuum to be filled.
jalan48
(13,880 posts)When citizens choose labels over issues bad things happen to our democracy.
senz
(11,945 posts)In fact I'm tempted to put it in my sig line -- w/props to you, of course.
May I?
jalan48
(13,880 posts)senz
(11,945 posts)Take it as sincere agreement with your well-expressed thought!
jalan48
(13,880 posts)amborin
(16,631 posts)workinclasszero
(28,270 posts)That bad eh?
Myrina
(12,296 posts).... many of whom got into public service / political life because they were in their teens / college years in the 60's and were "true believers" in change then, are now the stodgiest, most status quo, pearl grasping cluckers in the "no you can't" crowd.
What the hell happened to them? Was their hope for a better society only as it related to themselves? Disappointing.
senz
(11,945 posts)It wasn't a monolith; it was a mix, as these things usually are. Some were just having fun (sex, drugs, rock&roll), some were politically aware and actively pursuing peace and justice, and some were seeking higher meaning (or any meaning) in life. So you had the everyday, good-time hippie, the protester/activist, and the flower child. With various combinations.
Many of us, though we pursued careers and adapted somewhat to the eventual corporate takeover of our society, kept the excellent liberal progressive values of the time. Good stuff doesn't just die away.
Myrina
(12,296 posts)Jeez.
senz
(11,945 posts)It's just that I've heard similar complaints about Boomers and felt it was time for someone to speak up on our behalf.
I really did not intend it as a criticism of you, Myrina -- just as an answer to a common criticism.
Okay?
Merryland
(1,134 posts)and though I've changed enormously over the years, the important values of that era - peace & love - remain my values. And when I hear Bernie, I hear peace & love. From the other camp, I hear condescencion, division, orders to "settle". I become more of a Bernie or Buster with each passing day.
senz
(11,945 posts)riversedge
(70,275 posts)senz
(11,945 posts)Right, riversedge?
Ash_F
(5,861 posts)I saw the video and think it was mostly favorable to the Sanders campaign.
Response to Atman (Original post)
Gomez163 This message was self-deleted by its author.
Little_Wing
(417 posts)Jitter65
(3,089 posts)Kalidurga
(14,177 posts)Yes, say Woodstock a few more times loud and clear and more people will go to the rallies. Say Hillary is a lock and more people go to the rallies and show up to vote.
tabasco
(22,974 posts)you are being indoctrinated, whether you know it or not.
Todays_Illusion
(1,209 posts)Lodestar
(2,388 posts)This continuing discrepancy in Bernie's big numbers and popularity vs. Hillary's much
more subdued numbers and popularity is never addressed. Something does not add up.