2016 Postmortem
Related: About this forumGallup thinks we're idiots - Mitt now leading 52-45 LV, 49-46 RV
http://www.gallup.com/home.aspxMeanwhile, nearly every economic factor is improving...
LenaBaby61
(6,979 posts)is that it's an OUTLIER....
Just remember how they did in 2000, 2004 & 2008....
I've never trusted Gallop and never WILL...
tarheelsunc
(2,117 posts)They used to at least have some credibility, but now they don't even make an attempt to correct their results that have been so far off from reality for days.
octoberlib
(14,971 posts)Enough said.
OldDem2012
(3,526 posts)ProSense
(116,464 posts)2004 they had Bush leading Kerry 52 to 44. After all the nasty shit Republicans pulled to swing the election for Republicans, Bush's margin was only 1.5 percent.
NBC at the time:
NBC has the current race tied among likely voters. The link to the 2004 article is in this Daily Kos piece.
by rennert
NBC/WSJ today has a poll out that shows President Obama and Mitt Romney tied at 47% among likely voters. Among the larger universe of registered voters, Obama leads by 5, 49% to 44%.
How does this compare to the last incumbent's reelection campaign in 2004?
Well, luckily we can do an apples to apples comparison because there was an NBC/WSJ poll released on Oct. 20, 2004.
That poll showed President Bush and John Kerry tied at 48% (almost exactly mirroring today's poll).
In that poll, just as in today's, the incumbent led among registered voters.
But there are differences:
In the 2004 poll, Bush led among registered voters by 2 pts, 48% to Kerry's 46%.
In today's poll, Obama leads among registered voters by 5 pts, 49% to Romney's 44%.
Bush ended up winning reelection by 1.5%, slightly less than his registered voter lead of 2%.
(This also proves that the race does not necessarily break to the challenger).
If (and it's a big "if" this election follows that template, Obama would win reelection by about 3-4%. But I won't even be that optimistic. Let's assume there's a 2 point tilt towards Republicans because of "enthusiasm". Obama would still win by 1-2%, matching Nate Silver's prediction all along that this race would settle down to Obama +2%.
- more -
http://www.dailykos.com/story/2012/10/21/1147869/-Bush-Kerry-2004-Obama-Romney-2012
Cha
(297,769 posts)boingboinh
(290 posts)meadowlark5
(2,795 posts)I mean honestly, how can they be so incredibly off from all the other polls? I think someone at Gallup is getting their bread buttered by some nefarious characters to blow these poll numbers so out of the water.
tarheelsunc
(2,117 posts)meadowlark5
(2,795 posts)Even MSM is commenting on the absurdity of their polling numbers compared to about 18 others.
LenaBaby61
(6,979 posts)Obama up by +3 the last time I checked last Thursday. NOT sure what it is today.
Gallup and PEW have been exposed, and their polling/methodology as well. I'm especially disappointed in the PEW polling/methodology this entire race cycle, because they had been one of better non-biased polling firms I believe . PEW had POTUS up by +8 I believe, and I never believed that for one minute. NOW they have Rob-me up by +4, and plus they have the POTUS tied with Rob-me in terms of the Women's vote?
Shivering Jemmy
(900 posts)And I suspect their stats guys are wondering what to do about it.
Doctor Jack
(3,072 posts)"A new Gallup poll shows that Mitt Romney now has a 7 point lead on President Obama," Seth Meyers said. "That's right, Romney leads by 7 points among people who still answer landline calls from a blocked number."
renate
(13,776 posts)And probably true!
ShadowLiberal
(2,237 posts)DemocratSinceBirth
(99,716 posts).
BraKez2
(279 posts)they have #Romneisa and forgot how to poll..
libdem4life
(13,877 posts)I mean, as long as they are just making numbers up, might as well pick and choose.
EC
(12,287 posts)the GOP is pulling in states. I'm sure the GOP has figures of the percentage they've been able to get rigged without getting caught as yet and has Gallup figure in those figures to justify their win. All I'm hoping is that like in 2008 we manage to outnumber those percentages they've rigged.
On edit: Then once we do win, hopefully with the Senate and win back the House, we better tackle elections and make them federally controlled instead of states and come up with ONE UNIFORM way to vote everywhere.
DFW
(54,447 posts)But how better to justify fraudulent voter tallies when they are "reported?"
They had enough "surprise upsets" in 2000, 2002 and 2004. They know that won't fly any more.
Sooooo--instead, make those fraudulent results to be what you predicted all along. Presto !
Fringe
(175 posts)http://www.realclearpolitics.com/epolls/2012/president/us/general_election_romney_vs_obama-1171.html
We have to keep getting our message out there. It's working!!
MFM008
(19,821 posts)Its hard to believe, unless Gallup is polling MORMONS ONLY. This spread is just to keep the RCP average down.
I never believe ANY poll either Gallup or Rasmussan has on anything.
WI_DEM
(33,497 posts)numbers don't change in the next two weeks.
Cha
(297,769 posts)to also help in trying to Steal the Election?!