2016 Postmortem
Related: About this forumNBC poll
So NBC is proclaiming that the race is tied at 47%. Where was their last poll? Has Pres. Obama gained ground?
Mass
(27,315 posts)This is consistent with every other poll but Gallup, which all show a more or less tied race, from Romney by 2 with Gravis to Obama by 3 with Ipsos and IDB.
mgcgulfcoast
(1,127 posts)its going the wrong way for us. NBC has consistently shown Obama ahead until now.
Mass
(27,315 posts)ProSense
(116,464 posts)"NBC has consistently shown Obama ahead until now."
...likely voter was trending down. Obama was up 5 points in early September, up 3 points in late September.
The race was expected to tighten.
The President still has a decent lead among registered voters, which in...
August was +4
Early September +6
Late September +7
Current +5
That's not bad, and Mitt's number has been 44 through all these polls.
DemocratSinceBirth
(99,716 posts)progressivebydesign
(19,458 posts)ProSense
(116,464 posts)is great news, and refutes Gallup's numbers. In fact, among registered voters it shows Obama 49 Romney 44. Mitt is in the same position he was in mid September when it was Obama 51, Romney 44.
Obama is down 2 points. Is it likely undecideds increased?
Shivering Jemmy
(900 posts)Race stable at least.
helpisontheway
(5,008 posts)All Zi keep thinking about is Gore and Kerry. Seems like the Dem always loses in the end ( whether by Supreme Court or voting machines). I feel uneasy about a tie because of that. I will take it over Romney having a lead though. Plus the fact that Obama continues to lead among registered voters makes me feel better.
BlueStreak
(8,377 posts)never did a campaign event. Those states will poll 5-10% higher for Romney than they otherwise would, and that is inflating the national numbers. But it doesn't matter. If Obama concedes a state, it doesn't matter whether he loses by one vote or 1 million.
The only thing that matters is the swing state polling, and that is pretty solid right now. Could be better in VA and FL, but it is good enough to win.
Shivering Jemmy
(900 posts)Dems win when they have a clear electoral path and when they fight.
The reelect team has handled the first part of that. Your job is to handle the second.
You got the moxie for that?
7worldtrade
(85 posts)Again, a 5 point spread between RV and LV is large by historical standards. shouldn't be more than 2%. Hopefully more people will become LVs in the last 2 weeks and will come home!
BainsBane
(53,074 posts)But they want to vote. They may not know where their polling placees are, or even know if they are eligible to vote. I talked to a couple of guys with felonies who didn't think they could vote, but in MN as long as you've completed you entire sentence including parole or probation, you are legally entitled to vote. And because we have voter registration at the polls, they will be able to. In short, it's all about GOTV.
bettyellen
(47,209 posts)mgcgulfcoast
(1,127 posts)VirginiaTarheel
(823 posts)68 Rex
(81 posts)People like that make it hard to newbs to be taken seriously.
68 Rex
(81 posts)The college still favors US.
Mutiny In Heaven
(550 posts)No way is the differential 5%.
20895DEM
(100 posts)August poll
LV = O+5
RV = O+6
Therefore, LV discount = -1 for Obama
September poll
LV = O+3
RV = O+7
Therefore, LV discount = -4 for Obama
October poll (just released)
LV = O+0
RV = O+5
Therefore LV discount = -5 for Obama
Summary RV model based on statistical sampling is fairly stable while LV model based on subjective "tweaking" is volatile.
progressivebydesign
(19,458 posts)It s NOT people that said "they'd likely vote." It's based on the pollsters OWN idea of who really votes. they have a sample of 1,200 people,a and they REMOVE at least 400 of the responses, based on their own calculation of who THEY think will vote.
problem is.. and I'll say this again... they do NOT consider the people who are in there voting early right now (the young people, the people of color, the older people who are voting for Obama,) as "likely" in their statistical little minds. This is how they blew the polls away in 2008.
90% of the polling groups are tied to the republicans, and where they can manipulate things is IN the Likely Voters.. they can apply their own screens, and get the result they need to show a tightening race.
WI_DEM
(33,497 posts)it's as if this election is over and Romney has won. A tie and the usual suspects act like its the end of the world. It's going to be a close election. We've had close elections where dems have won before. Instead of moaning and groaning work harder to elect dems.
BelieveMe3
(134 posts)is a depressing place today. Most articles talking like Obama losing. BUT I must say they pull from some questionable sources lately-bloggers who are right wing nuts, the Washington Examiner, not places known for objective reporting.
ProSense
(116,464 posts)"BUT I must say they pull from some questionable sources lately-bloggers who are right wing nuts, the Washington Examiner, not places known for objective reporting."
...a RW site, always has been.
Jennicut
(25,415 posts)Sigh, I have explained this too many times already to people. Go look up wikipedia.
LenaBaby61
(6,979 posts)as most others here are saying, RCP is mostly Right-winged. I pay them and their Obama-hating meme little to NO attention.
progressivebydesign
(19,458 posts)He is a HARDCORE right winger... and RCP is NOT a poll, it's a conglomeration of polls HE chooses to use!!! And the "likely voters" which skew toward republicans, are oversampled.
doc03
(35,387 posts)helpisontheway
(5,008 posts)Is the only poll that is giving Romney a lead like that. So many people (Nate Silver and others) believe the Gallup poll (specifically LV) is crap. So why do you keep focusing on that one?
doc03
(35,387 posts)on the Gallop poll? The thing is doesn't Gallop have about the best track recorc in polling?
helpisontheway
(5,008 posts)they have one of the worst records. Someone posted information about it recently.
Jennicut
(25,415 posts)were very good in the last two elections. Gallup has been pretty off with their LV models. They admitted as much yesterday and said they may tweak it.
WI_DEM
(33,497 posts)NBC News Tweet (2+ / 0-)
Recommended by:Mariken, Supavash
"Mark Murray ?@mmurraypolitics
At this very time 8 years ago, it was Bush 48, Kerry 48 among LVs in the natl NBC/WSJ poll. Buckle your seatbelts, folks"
helpisontheway
(5,008 posts)writes3000
(4,734 posts)ProSense
(116,464 posts)That's almost the same as being ahead by 5 points.
Thanks for the info.
ProSense
(116,464 posts)after seeing the RV margin, wonder why NBC decided to make the comparison.
Impious
(42 posts)Don't know what else to say.
LenaBaby61
(6,979 posts)and would gladly live under a bridge and lose all their worldly possessions IF it meant getting that "Ni@@er" out of THEIR White House. The other remaining electorate are just dumb and stupid and lazy and won't vote, and complain the LOUDEST when their ox is being gored.
It's basically that simple.
Well, that's how I think...lol...
Jennicut
(25,415 posts)All the tracking polls point to a tie (except Gallup, which has some real issues). This comes down to turnout in the swing states. I am happy Romney is not ahead, as Gallup's poll has shown. Maybe I just follow every single poll out there so this does not surprise me one bit. Like I said, if Romney was ahead, that would suck.
MjolnirTime
(1,800 posts)pfeiffer
(280 posts)"But here is something interesting. National polls do not match the state polls and it is state races that determine the outcome, via the Electoral College. In the Meta-Analysis that Andrew Ferguson and I report on this website, Obama has been ahead all along."
progressivebydesign
(19,458 posts)And the National polls are so freakin' skewed republican, it's not funny. Also, they do so many contortions with the "likely voter" that removes the majority of "likely OBAMA voters," that it reads republican every time.
This happened last time with McCain.. the 'national polls" were "tightening" according to the memes. And I remember being here on DU and we're all posting "how the fuck is McCain ahead right now???"
Dawson Leery
(19,348 posts)progressivebydesign
(19,458 posts)which are traditionally white, affluent, mid-50s, female.