Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

themaguffin

(3,826 posts)
Fri Feb 24, 2012, 02:11 PM Feb 2012

I don't understand why people (whether media or even here) think a brokered convention will

A) really happen in an era where the convention is not NOTHING more than a media event and coordinated promotion of the nominee and ultimately a campaign event.

B) would involve someone who hasn't been running - in other words someone without any delegates

Neither of those will happen. Even with GOP dissatisfaction at their poor options, a brokered convention would be incredibly risky and likely to make things worse... all in an uncontrolled and unpredictable environment.

I just don't see the establishment doing that.

6 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
I don't understand why people (whether media or even here) think a brokered convention will (Original Post) themaguffin Feb 2012 OP
you'll never make it in television with THAT sense of drama! unblock Feb 2012 #1
what does that mean? themaguffin Feb 2012 #2
they're talking about a brokered convention because it gets people to watch unblock Feb 2012 #5
The likelyhood is low zipplewrath Feb 2012 #3
I Agree the Probability is Low On the Road Feb 2012 #4
Since when do Republicans do things that make sense? HopeHoops Feb 2012 #6

unblock

(52,325 posts)
5. they're talking about a brokered convention because it gets people to watch
Fri Feb 24, 2012, 02:43 PM
Feb 2012

not because it's actually going to happen.

zipplewrath

(16,646 posts)
3. The likelyhood is low
Fri Feb 24, 2012, 02:26 PM
Feb 2012

A contested (not brokered) convention is about the only possibility, and it would require that no one show up with a majority of delegates. The system is designed to avoid that, all though it is still possible. But if that happens, then the vote swaping has to start. Mind you, it will start well before the convention, with attempting to form alliances with the smallest fish to reach the majority level. By the time you actually get TO the convention, it will probably be a done deal. About the ONLY way to have it actually go to the convention, is for at least two candidates to "split" the vote to where neither is close enough to actually pull it off. Suppose they split 40/40 with Paul having 15 and the other 5 in the remaining fools hands. The remaining fools can't "solve" the problem and Paul may want to ride it to the convention.

But I don't see any of that happening. Romney will probably pull it off ultimately, and then they'll all start to fall in line.

On the Road

(20,783 posts)
4. I Agree the Probability is Low
Fri Feb 24, 2012, 02:29 PM
Feb 2012

About the only way it would realistically happen is if Ron Paul has a sizable number of stealth delegates and prevent Santorum or Romney from getting a majority. In that case, it might take candidate mutually acceptable to two of the three candidates. They represent such different elements of the GOP that it's hard to see who that could be.

Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»2016 Postmortem»I don't understand why pe...