Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

mhatrw

(10,786 posts)
Sun Mar 27, 2016, 01:22 PM Mar 2016

Sanders could win the majority of pledged delegates with just a 50%-50% split in every state

remaining other than California, and a 73.8% to 36.2% victory in California.

No wonder the Hillarians have been calling so loudly for him to drop out. They know Clinton's closed primary, Bible Belt forged delegate lead is as tenuous as a halftime lead on the road against the Golden State Warriors.

37 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Sanders could win the majority of pledged delegates with just a 50%-50% split in every state (Original Post) mhatrw Mar 2016 OP
"and a 74.1% to 35.9% victory in California." Bleacher Creature Mar 2016 #1
You are very unlikely to do that sitting around thereismore Mar 2016 #3
+1 *snort* dchill Mar 2016 #9
He does. It's called 'speaking truth to power.' PatrickforO Mar 2016 #27
74.1% + 35.9 %. = 110% awake Mar 2016 #2
Typo. Now corrected. mhatrw Mar 2016 #5
Thanks for the fix awake Mar 2016 #8
If they do count 110% of the vote AgerolanAmerican Mar 2016 #21
Nice Job! CorporatistNation Mar 2016 #22
There was another post on here, actually in the Hillary Room, where alas, I've been banned... PatrickforO Mar 2016 #31
This is a very helpful site. mhatrw Mar 2016 #32
Math adds up if you know what numbers are Gwhittey Mar 2016 #6
That was the numbers in the OP before it was fixed awake Mar 2016 #10
I'm a Sanders supporter in California. TDale313 Mar 2016 #4
but them kids on the internet are making it practically free, comparatively anyway. Viva_La_Revolution Mar 2016 #23
Momentum is real TDale313 Mar 2016 #25
U of CA Final exams are the week of the 4th to the 10th. upaloopa Mar 2016 #28
Perhaps we need to get them to vote in advance. highprincipleswork Mar 2016 #30
When you consider the odds against Stephen Curry doing what he's doing... Peace Patriot Mar 2016 #7
Do you honestly think that's going to happen? MadBadger Mar 2016 #11
Well I will put it to you this way nadinbrzezinski Mar 2016 #14
He absolutely overperformed. MadBadger Mar 2016 #16
A few analysist do nadinbrzezinski Mar 2016 #24
What Cali polls are from outside the US? Links? bettyellen Mar 2016 #33
Did you honestly think Sanders would win 76% of the total delegates in ID, UT, AK, WA & HI? mhatrw Mar 2016 #15
Considering what he did in Kansas, Maine? I'm only marginally surprised. MadBadger Mar 2016 #20
There hasn't been a contested Democratic presidential primary in CA DemocratSinceBirth Mar 2016 #18
You mean President Obama correct? Springslips Mar 2016 #34
he is referring to the primary in california JI7 Mar 2016 #35
Hillary Clinton won the 08 CA primary. DemocratSinceBirth Mar 2016 #36
Never happen. DCBob Mar 2016 #12
We can make it happen. We have to make it happen. And it is eminently doable. mhatrw Mar 2016 #19
You do realize that minorities are NOT lego blocks right? nadinbrzezinski Mar 2016 #26
While what you say is true, despite the typo, edgineered Mar 2016 #13
Where is George? I don't believe any math here unless he double checks it. Too many right-brainers kerry-is-my-prez Mar 2016 #17
After this weekend, he will need about 54% of the remaining pledged delegates to win EmperorHasNoClothes Mar 2016 #29
NY state will be the big contest before California. Eric J in MN Mar 2016 #37

Bleacher Creature

(11,257 posts)
1. "and a 74.1% to 35.9% victory in California."
Sun Mar 27, 2016, 01:28 PM
Mar 2016

And I could be a starting pitcher in the major leagues. . .

. . . if I suddenly developed a 95 mph fastball.

thereismore

(13,326 posts)
3. You are very unlikely to do that sitting around
Sun Mar 27, 2016, 01:31 PM
Mar 2016

your keyboard posting crap analogies. In your analogy, Bernie already has a 99 mph fastball.

PatrickforO

(14,592 posts)
27. He does. It's called 'speaking truth to power.'
Sun Mar 27, 2016, 02:23 PM
Mar 2016

And it has caused Americans throughout the nation to become aware of some things the establishment wants to keep buried.

mhatrw

(10,786 posts)
5. Typo. Now corrected.
Sun Mar 27, 2016, 01:36 PM
Mar 2016

All Sanders needs is to split vote in all the other states and dominate in OR and CA as he just did in WA and HI.

 

AgerolanAmerican

(1,000 posts)
21. If they do count 110% of the vote
Sun Mar 27, 2016, 02:03 PM
Mar 2016

I can only imagine that that extra 10% would be overwhelmingly for Clinton

PatrickforO

(14,592 posts)
31. There was another post on here, actually in the Hillary Room, where alas, I've been banned...
Sun Mar 27, 2016, 03:00 PM
Mar 2016

And it said that Bernie couldn't win unless he gets these kinds of margins in EVERY subsequent primary and caucus.

I'M NEW TO THE DELEGATE MATH, SO HELP ME OUT HERE. IT SEEMS TO ME:

Clinton's delegate lead (268) just isn't that large. It is substantial, but not insurmountable. According to Google's count, https://www.google.com/#q=democratic+primary+election+results&eob=m.09c7w0/D/3/short/m.09c7w0/, the pledged delegate count is Clinton = 1,243 and Sanders = 975.

So as mentioned above, Clinton has a lead of 268 delegates. And, since a candidate needs 2,383 delegates to win the nomination, excluding super delegates, Clinton has about 52% of the delegates she needs, while Sanders has 41%.

(Since the 714 'super delegates' will likely vote the way the wind is blowing as they did in 08 when Clinton's commanding super delegate lead evaporated because it had become clear the majority of Dems wanted Obama, I'm am excluding them for now.)

OK now, out of 4,051 total pledged delegates, 2,218 are taken (1,243 + 975 = 2,218). This means there are still 1,833 unclaimed pledged delegates left.

So...to win with 2,383 delegates, if he can't turn around ANY of the super delegates, Sanders needs to win about 76.8% (1,408) of those pledged delegates in order to win, again WITHOUT the super delegates. However, if he keeps winning states and winning big in some, Clinton's commanding super delegate lead may shrink by say, half?

Since there are 714 super delegates, if we take 350 of those off the table for her, and give them to Bernie, then he hypothetically only needs to win 57% of the remaining pledged delegates, a much more 'do-able' prospect, and one which the Clinton campaign is no doubt aware of, and concerned about.

Because I'll tell you what...if it looks that close, I'm gonna be sure as heck calling up the super delegates in my state and pressuring them on behalf of Bernie.

My conclusion: Bernie can still win the nomination if we all work hard for him.

OK, SO THOSE OF YOU MORE EXPERIENCED AT COUNTING THESE DELEGATES, HOW DID I DO? AM I RIGHT?

TDale313

(7,820 posts)
4. I'm a Sanders supporter in California.
Sun Mar 27, 2016, 01:35 PM
Mar 2016

He's not gonna win by that kind of margin (not even a 65/35) I am hopeful he'll win, but it will be far closer than that. Hillary won here in '08. It's a highly diverse and populated state and really expensive to run in.

Viva_La_Revolution

(28,791 posts)
23. but them kids on the internet are making it practically free, comparatively anyway.
Sun Mar 27, 2016, 02:04 PM
Mar 2016

And remember, young and first time voters are almost never polled.

Momentum is real

TDale313

(7,820 posts)
25. Momentum is real
Sun Mar 27, 2016, 02:12 PM
Mar 2016

And I believe he can win here, but I don't see it being a landslide. Hope I'm wrong 🙂

upaloopa

(11,417 posts)
28. U of CA Final exams are the week of the 4th to the 10th.
Sun Mar 27, 2016, 02:25 PM
Mar 2016

Maybe the students will not make it to vote.

Peace Patriot

(24,010 posts)
7. When you consider the odds against Stephen Curry doing what he's doing...
Sun Mar 27, 2016, 01:38 PM
Mar 2016

...you gotta like Bernie Sanders' odds, too. Sanders has thus far baffled not only the heavily, heavily moneyed Clinton campaign but the entire heavily moneyed Democratic Party establishment, the entire Corrupt Media establishment and all the dirty rotten games they are playing!

I won't rule out a 74.1% victory in California (native Californian here) but I don't think it's going to fall out that way. I think it's going to be a lot tighter overall from hereon in, and Sanders could end up tying or almost tying Clinton and then a great big fight at the convention at which Bernie's huge lead over Trump in national polls (much higher than Clinton's) and Clinton's very high negativity numbers will become very important to the superdelegates.

 

nadinbrzezinski

(154,021 posts)
14. Well I will put it to you this way
Sun Mar 27, 2016, 01:45 PM
Mar 2016

he over performed yesterday

The map is a really though one, but he keeps over performing, the map will continue to change

Personally I do not expect CA to count whatsoever, we rarely do... but that is another story. I am not going to the polls for the primary. It is alway an afterthought. I am going there for minimum wage.

And anyway, I consider US Elections compromised anyway... so I vote to remain in practice.

But yesterday, he did better than expected. So if he continues to do that... the map starts to open. I know partisans do not want to hear this. Sorry.

MadBadger

(24,089 posts)
16. He absolutely overperformed.
Sun Mar 27, 2016, 01:50 PM
Mar 2016

But that calendar is really tough once NY starts. I just dont see him winning any of those closed primaries and I think she could run the numbers up in a few of them.

I think he can definitely win California, I just don't see him doing so in the numbers he would need

 

nadinbrzezinski

(154,021 posts)
24. A few analysist do
Sun Mar 27, 2016, 02:06 PM
Mar 2016

As I said, I do not expect CA to count... but if we do... I prefer my crow fricassed

But he did much better than expected and these were not white states either. The fact that one of the most diverse states in the US (Hawaii) is dismissed is no longer shocking, but highly disturbing to me.

Also he did well with the Inuit, and Alaskans in general because they are living the effects of climate change already. And anecdotally, he might do far better in California than people expect. I have seen polling that it indicates it is closing... just not in the US... which is odd.

MadBadger

(24,089 posts)
20. Considering what he did in Kansas, Maine? I'm only marginally surprised.
Sun Mar 27, 2016, 01:53 PM
Mar 2016

I knew he would crush her, just wasnt sure by how much. I would have thought he doubled up at 66-33 or so.

DemocratSinceBirth

(99,714 posts)
18. There hasn't been a contested Democratic presidential primary in CA
Sun Mar 27, 2016, 01:51 PM
Mar 2016

There hasn't been a contested Democratic presidential primary in CA decided by double digits in recent history. Jerry Brown beat Carter by 40 points in 1976 but he was the sitting governor.

Actually, there have only been four contested elections in recent history :Kennedy-Carter , Mondale-Hart, Clinton-Brown, and Clinton -Obama,and they were all relatively close with Kennedy, Hart, Clinton, and Clinton emerging victorious.

Springslips

(533 posts)
34. You mean President Obama correct?
Sun Mar 27, 2016, 04:30 PM
Mar 2016

You wrote that Clinton emerged victorious in 08, or am I reading that wrong.

Just pointing it out for clarity.

DemocratSinceBirth

(99,714 posts)
36. Hillary Clinton won the 08 CA primary.
Sun Mar 27, 2016, 05:57 PM
Mar 2016

I was only discussing contested CA primaries, not primaries where the race had essentially been decided.

80 Kennedy> Carter
84 Hart> Mondale
92 Clinton> Brown
08 Clinton> Obama

all by a margin less than double digits.



DCBob

(24,689 posts)
12. Never happen.
Sun Mar 27, 2016, 01:42 PM
Mar 2016

PA,NY,MD,NJ are all closed primaries and Hillary is polling strong in all those states.

Also, CA has huge Latino voter block which in other states with similar demographics have gone to Hillary like TX,NV and AZ.

mhatrw

(10,786 posts)
19. We can make it happen. We have to make it happen. And it is eminently doable.
Sun Mar 27, 2016, 01:51 PM
Mar 2016

You can naysay all you want, but the MATH says all Sanders needs to do is dominate OR and CA as he just dominated WA and HI, and then spilt all the remaining states and territories.

edgineered

(2,101 posts)
13. While what you say is true, despite the typo,
Sun Mar 27, 2016, 01:43 PM
Mar 2016

there are 21 other races which includes some dangerous territory. Between now and April 19th there are only 100 delegates up grabs, then we're into some Clinton strongholds. Each of those will be difficult to make up, here's why. In NY each 1% change in the vote means a change of 2.47 delegates up and down, basically 5 delegates. In a state like KY where the same 1% change moves the count 0.55 delegates, it would take about a 10% win to make up for the 1% in NY.

There is one hell of a difference between 1% in NY, CA, PA, NJ than there is in places like ND, SD, MT, and DE. Counting states is a feel-good illusion, motivating voters is the reality.

kerry-is-my-prez

(8,133 posts)
17. Where is George? I don't believe any math here unless he double checks it. Too many right-brainers
Sun Mar 27, 2016, 01:51 PM
Mar 2016

here - me included!

EmperorHasNoClothes

(4,797 posts)
29. After this weekend, he will need about 54% of the remaining pledged delegates to win
Sun Mar 27, 2016, 02:28 PM
Mar 2016

That's down from ~58% before the weekend. Not too shabby.

He will definitely need some big wins, especially if Hillary does well in NY and NJ. But the outlook is much better now.

Eric J in MN

(35,619 posts)
37. NY state will be the big contest before California.
Sun Mar 27, 2016, 06:01 PM
Mar 2016

Bernie Sanders has a big challenge in NY where Hillary Clinton was a US Senator and has her campaign headquarters.

Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»2016 Postmortem»Sanders could win the maj...