Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Baobab

(4,667 posts)
Fri Mar 25, 2016, 09:51 AM Mar 2016

Differences between Hillary and Obama? Let me start this, Hillary is Female.

This is a thread to discuss the differences between Obama and Hillary if any exist.

I can think of one big difference, Hillary is a WOMAN. So that makes her different than most (Male) politicians.

Perhaps in some women it would mean less ego, more cooperation?

If Hillary won she would be the first Female President in a country overwhelmingly dominated by Male politicians.

So right there she genetically looks a lot different than traditional Male politicians. Females of the species have two X chromosomes, while men have one X and one Y. Also, females create oocytes. Males don't. A very important difference.

Women's endocrine system also produces estrogen which makes Women more resistant to hardship in some ways. Their bodies carry more fat so in times of famine, they live longer.

51 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Differences between Hillary and Obama? Let me start this, Hillary is Female. (Original Post) Baobab Mar 2016 OP
This message was self-deleted by its author astrophuss42 Mar 2016 #1
Those two X chromosomes mean nothing when it comes to war and peace. Avalux Mar 2016 #2
Yes, they can. polly7 Mar 2016 #3
That post illustrates my point perfectly. Avalux Mar 2016 #4
leveymg has posted a lot of invaluable information in that thread. polly7 Mar 2016 #12
Give me some examples! Baobab Mar 2016 #7
Biljana Plavsic shawn703 Mar 2016 #15
Now I know about her. Baobab Mar 2016 #40
Or even Queen Mary I shawn703 Mar 2016 #16
Indira Gandhi, Catheriine the Great, Eva Peron, Queen Isabella, Mary Tudor, Tierra_y_Libertad Mar 2016 #22
Men produce estradiol and women produce testosterone GreatGazoo Mar 2016 #5
Very small amounts of testosterone, as well as alpha-MSH increase women's Baobab Mar 2016 #8
I think their administrations would operate about the same. Garrett78 Mar 2016 #6
I am not any of those people. Baobab Mar 2016 #9
I'd say "as expected," rather than disappointing. Garrett78 Mar 2016 #19
I expected nothing. VulgarPoet Mar 2016 #48
I don't see much difference either. They're both center-right, authoritarian corporatists. Broward Mar 2016 #11
This is where it could be gender based treestar Mar 2016 #47
Let's talk about issues, not gender. 21st Century Poet Mar 2016 #10
Globalization of large chunks of the service industries Baobab Mar 2016 #13
And yet loyalsister Mar 2016 #14
But can she pee standing up? snooper2 Mar 2016 #17
IKR? Mother Of Four Mar 2016 #18
Yes they can SwampG8r Mar 2016 #23
oh.dear.lord. welcome to ignore Hiraeth Mar 2016 #20
Hillary scores a bit to the political right of Obama NorthCarolina Mar 2016 #21
Really? How so? pandr32 Mar 2016 #26
This is what I recall seeing NorthCarolina Mar 2016 #27
Hillary never met a war she didn't like. Obama is far less of a hawk. n/t Motown_Johnny Mar 2016 #24
Not much less. Maedhros Mar 2016 #28
Would Hillary ever have gotten us out of Iraq? Motown_Johnny Mar 2016 #35
Well, we were sort of kicked out, so I guess it's something of an open question...[n/t] Maedhros Mar 2016 #37
But the African ventures don't make the news... VulgarPoet Mar 2016 #50
Obama was right on marriage equality long ago, Hillary still does not comprehend the issue. Motown_Johnny Mar 2016 #25
What next? Women like pink, men like blue? bunnies Mar 2016 #29
The irony there? Pink was considered a boy color until recently. KitSileya Mar 2016 #31
I didnt know that about the colors. bunnies Mar 2016 #32
The idea of feminine and masculine traits and values being genetic is hooey. KitSileya Mar 2016 #33
I couldnt agree with you more. bunnies Mar 2016 #34
OT: sheshe2 Mar 2016 #41
lol bunnies Mar 2016 #44
;) sheshe2 Mar 2016 #45
Omg. bunnies Mar 2016 #46
.. mcar Mar 2016 #30
Yup! sheshe2 Mar 2016 #42
Is this OP for real? NastyRiffraff Mar 2016 #36
Looks to me like they tossed a grenade.... sheshe2 Mar 2016 #43
Obama lacks HRC's experience, he's never been on the board of WalMart HereSince1628 Mar 2016 #38
I don't think votes should be cast based on chromosomes. Vinca Mar 2016 #39
Is this some kind of joke? demmiblue Mar 2016 #49
YAY! KPN Mar 2016 #51

Response to Baobab (Original post)

Avalux

(35,015 posts)
2. Those two X chromosomes mean nothing when it comes to war and peace.
Fri Mar 25, 2016, 09:57 AM
Mar 2016

We know women can be equally as ruthless as men.

Avalux

(35,015 posts)
4. That post illustrates my point perfectly.
Fri Mar 25, 2016, 10:00 AM
Mar 2016

Gender has nothing to do with a proclivity for blood lust.

polly7

(20,582 posts)
12. leveymg has posted a lot of invaluable information in that thread.
Fri Mar 25, 2016, 10:24 AM
Mar 2016

Much of it I had no idea of. And, it's horrible.

Others have contributed a lot of details also ............ it's very, very interesting.

Baobab

(4,667 posts)
7. Give me some examples!
Fri Mar 25, 2016, 10:14 AM
Mar 2016

>We know women can be equally as ruthless as men.

I can't think of any really ruthless-female dictators right now.

But I suppose there is a first time for everything!

Baobab

(4,667 posts)
40. Now I know about her.
Fri Mar 25, 2016, 06:25 PM
Mar 2016

Last edited Sat Mar 26, 2016, 12:34 PM - Edit history (2)

Thanks for telling me about Biljana Plavsic.


I had not known about any really ruthless amoral female leaders. There seem to be far fewer national-level female despots, dictators etc. than male but that's probably less based on sexual / neurological/ etc. characteristics than it is on the so called glass ceiling, although I am sure that is changing.


Still, I think women are perhaps a lot less ego driven, generally. And quite often that's a good thing.

 

Tierra_y_Libertad

(50,414 posts)
22. Indira Gandhi, Catheriine the Great, Eva Peron, Queen Isabella, Mary Tudor,
Fri Mar 25, 2016, 12:00 PM
Mar 2016

Elizabeth 1, Cleopatra, Boadicea, Empress Dowager Tzu-hsi.

Power tends to corrupt and absolute power corrupts absolutely.
Lord Acton

GreatGazoo

(3,937 posts)
5. Men produce estradiol and women produce testosterone
Fri Mar 25, 2016, 10:02 AM
Mar 2016

although in smaller quantities than the opposite gender. Every embryo is essentially female for the first 3 months.

Testosterone is for men, and estrogen is for women, right? For the most part yes, but there is estrogen found in all men, and women do need small amounts of testosterone. There is, however, a growing need to understand the effects of estrogen in men.


http://health.howstuffworks.com/sexual-health/male-reproductive-system/testosterone-and-estrogen-balance-in-men.htm

Men are capable of lactating and nursing babies btw. And famine? you really think we need to worry about whether a President can survive famine?

As for policy differences -- please review the 2008 primaries, or Bill Clinton's recent statement that "the last 8 years have a been a disaster."

Baobab

(4,667 posts)
8. Very small amounts of testosterone, as well as alpha-MSH increase women's
Fri Mar 25, 2016, 10:15 AM
Mar 2016

libido. I don't think alpha-MSH has the same effect on men.

(It does make both sexes tan faster, though)

(Sunshine in moderation is generally good for health)

Garrett78

(10,721 posts)
6. I think their administrations would operate about the same.
Fri Mar 25, 2016, 10:10 AM
Mar 2016

Some personality differences aside, a Clinton Administration would function much like the Obama Administration has. Unless it's just sexism, and I'm not convinced that it is, I don't understand those who are pro-Obama and anti-Clinton. Sure, Clinton represents the status quo, and so does Obama. Kerry and Gore would have, as well. Yet there seem to be some who think Obama is great and that Clinton is the devil incarnate.

Baobab

(4,667 posts)
9. I am not any of those people.
Fri Mar 25, 2016, 10:19 AM
Mar 2016

I feel that Obama has been - to be polite, "disappointing".

>I don't understand those who are pro-Obama and anti-Clinton. Sure, Clinton represents the status quo, and so does Obama. Kerry and Gore would have, as well. Yet there seem to be some who think Obama is great and that Clinton is the devil incarnate.

treestar

(82,383 posts)
47. This is where it could be gender based
Sat Mar 26, 2016, 11:53 AM
Mar 2016

I admit a lot of conservatives would never vote for the Democrat and wouldn't have voted for Obama if he was white. But some showed an extra layer of insanity in their opposition - the birtherism, the sudden lack of need to respect the office we were lectured about for the previous 8 years, etc.

Thus Hillary may have no more ambition than any previous President, yet she will be attacked by the right for wanting the office and being "coldly ambitious." There will be the same level of hysteria where you notice OK, a Republican would never vote for a Democrat as liberal as Hillary, but there is this extra layer of hysteria. And I think a female President will be much harder for the right wing than a black man was. He was at least a man.

And as for the opposition from the left, I've never seen them call Kerry or Biden war hawks for their Iraq votes. Kerry even served in the military. But he's never called a war hawk.

21st Century Poet

(254 posts)
10. Let's talk about issues, not gender.
Fri Mar 25, 2016, 10:21 AM
Mar 2016

I think, politically, the biggest difference would be in foreign policy. My impression is that Mrs Clinton is more hawkish than Mr Obama so one would expect to see more foreign intervention, war meddling and regime change in the Middle East and North Africa. She would be more cautious than a Republican president would be but less cautious than Mr Obama is.

I think, on home-ground, there would be little difference. Mrs Clinton would be a president of continuity on things like education, healthcare, gun control, debt management and so on. If you are very satisfied with Mr Obama's legacy, you should probably vote for Mrs Clinton. Mr Sanders is an option for those who think that Mr Obama failed to deliver enough change and want the President to lean more to the left.

Baobab

(4,667 posts)
13. Globalization of large chunks of the service industries
Fri Mar 25, 2016, 10:26 AM
Mar 2016

to save money. For example, building all that infrastructure will require that. So we will lose instead of gain jobs. No more New Deal type stimulus. In exchange we get (very) cheap teachers, nurses, IT and construction.

loyalsister

(13,390 posts)
14. And yet
Fri Mar 25, 2016, 10:28 AM
Mar 2016

Obama has a more feminine disposition than Hillary. When it comes to foreign policy, he wants dialogue, she wants to use bullying and force.
When Osama Bin Laden was killed, Obama made a very sober announcement, rather than using machismo rhetoric as with "we came, we saw, he died." Obama calls out "I love you back" when heckled. Hillary gets defensive and angry at being challenged.
In short, when it comes to leadership style, she is more like the overcompensating cowboy wanna-be W, than Obama, who prefers diplomacy and reasoning over macho war mongering.
Hillary is a woman, but her leadership style is quite masculine in the worst bullying way.
As a feminist who once admired her, I was sad to discover that she is a huge disappointment as an office holder, and as a candidate for president. I'm so sad that my first potential opportunity to vote for a woman will be to vote for one who expresses fantasies of being under fire in Bosnia, and will surely take us into war.

Mother Of Four

(1,716 posts)
18. IKR?
Fri Mar 25, 2016, 10:42 AM
Mar 2016

I read this thinking ... seriously thinking ..

"This has to be some kind of joke... biology lessons?"

And yes, women can pee standing up. Are you saying urinating while vertical is a mans only thing? (gives you the stink eye)

 

NorthCarolina

(11,197 posts)
21. Hillary scores a bit to the political right of Obama
Fri Mar 25, 2016, 11:52 AM
Mar 2016

I believe, so that would be another difference.

VulgarPoet

(2,872 posts)
50. But the African ventures don't make the news...
Sat Mar 26, 2016, 11:59 AM
Mar 2016

Meanwhile, four people in my squadron just got back from Africa a month or so ago.

 

Motown_Johnny

(22,308 posts)
25. Obama was right on marriage equality long ago, Hillary still does not comprehend the issue.
Fri Mar 25, 2016, 01:04 PM
Mar 2016

I know all her hero worshiping devotees will be outraged at my statement, but it is true.


She said "I believe that marriage is not just a bond, but a sacred bond between a man and a woman".

Later, when the polls showed that a majority of Americans supported marriage equality, and the trend in that direction was undeniable, she said she had "evolved" on the issue to support it.


This is not a reasonable statement. It is not reasonable because of the meaning of the word "sacred".


http://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/sacred

^snip^

sacred

adjective sa·cred ˈsā-krəd

Simple Definition of sacred

: worthy of religious worship : very holy
: relating to religion
: highly valued and important : deserving great respect




She has every right to view the sacrament of marriage as sacred. Any religious person would agree with her. Those unions are part of a religious belief system and viewed by persons who share that belief system as "very holy". When referring to the sacrament of marriage it is entirely correct to use the word "sacred".

Unfortunately, the topic of discussion was legal marriage. Simply put, the ability of two persons to obtain a license issued by a government agency. This is not sacred in any way, shape or form and to have referred to it as such was, is and always will be wrong.

"Evolving" on this is not reasonable and betrays the fact that Hillary does not comprehend the difference between the sacrament of marriage and legal marriage (presumably all her advisers also). She has had years, decades even, to wrap her head around this and yet she is still wrong on it. This shows that she lacks the intellectual capacity to grasp such a very simple fact as well as the integrity to stand up for something she believes is sacred.

Flame away all you hero worshiping devotees. She used the word "sacred" when she should not have and to this day she has shown that she does not comprehend why it is wrong. Argue all you want. You are wrong, and so is she.






KitSileya

(4,035 posts)
31. The irony there? Pink was considered a boy color until recently.
Fri Mar 25, 2016, 02:51 PM
Mar 2016

For a long time, calm blu was seen as appropriate for girls, and pink, so close to aggressive red, was a boy color. It changed in the 1950s. But thank goodness we have come a long way since then, even if this OP is evidence that we haven't come far enough.

 

bunnies

(15,859 posts)
32. I didnt know that about the colors.
Fri Mar 25, 2016, 02:59 PM
Mar 2016

Thank you for teaching me something new. Maybe I should have stuck to women baking / men liking sports. You know, because Im female, I like to be cooperative.

KitSileya

(4,035 posts)
33. The idea of feminine and masculine traits and values being genetic is hooey.
Fri Mar 25, 2016, 03:27 PM
Mar 2016

It's such a bunch of bullpuckey you'd think that people on a progressive website would know better, but there's always some. It's usually the same ones who argue tone and not being too strident with feminists, or who have such a low opinion on men that they think they can't control themselves when confronted by cleavage.

 

bunnies

(15,859 posts)
34. I couldnt agree with you more.
Fri Mar 25, 2016, 03:54 PM
Mar 2016

And regarding the website, I dont think progressive means what it used to mean around here. Its getting to the point that my eyes hurt from rolling. Its almost not worth it.

sheshe2

(83,791 posts)
41. OT:
Fri Mar 25, 2016, 10:44 PM
Mar 2016

I always loved the pancake on your bunnies head. The duck is great she is adorable, is she ducking and covering here? I can't say I blame her or is it him?

Awesome avatar, bunnies.

 

bunnies

(15,859 posts)
44. lol
Sat Mar 26, 2016, 11:11 AM
Mar 2016

Thanks. Though I can't take credit for it. I've had the pancake one for years and every now and then a DUer will respond to me with a pic of a bunny with something random random on its head. IIRC, it was zappaman who recently supplied the duck pic. Not sure if he was mocking me or not, but I decided to make it a keeper.

I hadn't put "duck and cover" together. But now that you mention it, it's perfect for primary season on du!

Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»2016 Postmortem»Differences between Hilla...