2016 Postmortem
Related: About this forumI've been accused of being a "Berniebro". Genitals have nothing to do with whom I support.
seabeyond
(110,159 posts)seabeyond
(110,159 posts)kerry-is-my-prez
(8,133 posts)seabeyond
(110,159 posts)polly7
(20,582 posts)seabeyond
(110,159 posts)can be a challenge.
polly7
(20,582 posts)seabeyond
(110,159 posts)polly7
(20,582 posts)Your post doesn't, however.
Are you saying we're like, three little monkeys sitting in a tree?
Pryderi
(6,772 posts)seabeyond
(110,159 posts)Buddying with her bro's. Then ironically, she asked the feminists to come out and support her when her 67 yr old cleavage was being attacked, a week later. Classic.
Sarandon can vote for whoever she wants. Doesn't mean she is not capable of sexist shit right along with the rest of us.
Pryderi
(6,772 posts)Young women supporting Bernie because that's where the boys are?
seabeyond
(110,159 posts)beam me up scottie
(57,349 posts)Theyre going to get more activist as they grow older. And when youre younger, you think: Where are the boys? The boys are with Bernie.
She implied that young women who support Bernie are hormone crazed idiots who are only following men.
If a man has said that about Hillary supporters we'd never hear the end of it.
seabeyond
(110,159 posts)beam me up scottie
(57,349 posts)seabeyond
(110,159 posts)beam me up scottie
(57,349 posts)It was sexist and insulting to reduce intelligent passionate young women to boy crazy girls.
And again, if a man - say Maher - has said that about young women who support Hillary the feminists on DU would have called for his head and rightly so.
seabeyond
(110,159 posts)beam me up scottie
(57,349 posts)Bonobo
(29,257 posts)And threw in a comment about her age (as if she shouldn't be sexual at 67).
Nasty.
seabeyond
(110,159 posts)Bonobo
(29,257 posts)It certainly sounds like you are trying to shame her for her sexuality. And being ageist.
seabeyond
(110,159 posts)out to feminists to stand with her and her right to show her 67 yr old cleavage if she wanted.
Get it?
beam me up scottie
(57,349 posts)She's just doing what men want her to do?
Is that the sexist shit you're taking about?
seabeyond
(110,159 posts)beam me up scottie
(57,349 posts)seabeyond
(110,159 posts)beam me up scottie
(57,349 posts)What do "bros" have to do with what she said?
seabeyond
(110,159 posts)beam me up scottie
(57,349 posts)seabeyond
(110,159 posts)beam me up scottie
(57,349 posts)JonLeibowitz
(6,282 posts)On Thu Mar 24, 2016, 09:05 PM an alert was sent on the following post:
"Buddying with her bro's"? So you're saying she's not capable of independent thought?
http://www.democraticunderground.com/?com=view_post&forum=1251&pid=1569970
REASON FOR ALERT
This post is disruptive, hurtful, rude, insensitive, over-the-top, or otherwise inappropriate.
ALERTER'S COMMENTS
Nobody said any such thing. This is a disgusting debate tactic, making an accusation and putting a question mark on it. Kinda like 'so, when did you stop beating your wife?' And this poster is filling up the thread with these, 'just asking questions...', posts. I think a a break from this thread is in order. That JAQing off stuff is beneath us. Please hide
You served on a randomly-selected Jury of DU members which reviewed this post. The review was completed at Thu Mar 24, 2016, 09:09 PM, and the Jury voted 1-6 to LEAVE IT.
Juror #1 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE
Explanation: Alert abuse. Attention admins...
Juror #2 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE
Explanation: No explanation given
Juror #3 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE
Explanation: seabeyond is the one who made the sexist remarks and accused Sarandon of "buddying up to bros" and other nonsense. This poster called her out on her crap.
Juror #4 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE
Explanation:
Juror #5 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE
Explanation: No explanation given
Juror #6 voted to HIDE IT
Explanation: No explanation given
Juror #7 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE
Explanation: No explanation given
Thank you very much for participating in our Jury system, and we hope you will be able to participate again in the future.
beam me up scottie
(57,349 posts)JonLeibowitz
(6,282 posts)ebayfool
(3,411 posts)I've done explaining my call, well - that coulda shortened the time involved!
And good call by this jury!
phleshdef
(11,936 posts)...to realize it.
polly7
(20,582 posts)basselope
(2,565 posts)Between being asked to support someone just because of their body parts
and
having those body parts insulted.
sheshe2
(83,791 posts)Bonobo
(29,257 posts)beam me up scottie
(57,349 posts)That's not easy at any age, good for Susan!
sheshe2
(83,791 posts)beam me up scottie
(57,349 posts)Slut shaming - Geek Feminism Wiki - Wikia
sheshe2
(83,791 posts)opiate69
(10,129 posts)beam me up scottie
(57,349 posts)Some hides are up in the double digits.
Lord of the Flies: DU Island.
polly7
(20,582 posts)I always give more than I should .... wouldn't have done that if I'd known the hate-filled posters here with their busy, busy! alert fingers would be allowed back to spew their bile unchecked. I'm honestly wondering why the owners want to chase off decent posters who bring more than hate to their site.
polly7
(20,582 posts)dresses, poses and photographs as she pleases isn't 'selling' anything. I don't know what kind of mind it takes to even make that kind of connection.
Waiting For Everyman
(9,385 posts)She's 4 years older than me, she'll be 70 in October. This boomer woman thinks Susan rocks!
She's smart and she's involved instead of being all about herself I'm glad she's on Bernie's side.
Response to Waiting For Everyman (Reply #14)
Post removed
Lorien
(31,935 posts)I don't know a SINGLE Bernie supporter who wouldn't vote for Warren in a heartbeat.
I also don't know a single Hillary supporter who will actually talk about Hillary's positions on the issues.
seabeyond
(110,159 posts)jillan
(39,451 posts)the first black President? Why is it that Bernie Sanders is running for President but never once says I would be the first Jewish President?
And why is it that Hillary doesn't stop talking about her being the first woman President?
Personally I vote for the person who I think will be the best candidate regardless of their skin color, their religion or their genitals.
madokie
(51,076 posts)she have. Her time as a congress person wasn't anything to brag on, neither was her time as SoS, nor was her time as first lady so I ask what exactly does she run on?
8 years as Senator with many questionable votes. Stood with too many tyrants and too quick to suggest might makes right. Too many question of pay to play etc
I'll vote for her if I have too but it will be with a heavy heart
beam me up scottie
(57,349 posts)We've been called traitors since last May when we decided to support the progressive.
ebayfool
(3,411 posts)was a 'BernieBro' today. Texted me back "I'm all in for Trump - we need to make America great again!"
Told the little shit I'd drive upstate and whomp him one. He's very good at poking the bear. And no he's not a Trumper, he just likes to play!
(Yes, we have 'em young in this family. But I'm happy to say each generation has waited longer.)
beam me up scottie
(57,349 posts)My s/o likes to instigate trouble too, he's a real riot at family gatherings, loves to pit me against his religious right wing brothers.
senz
(11,945 posts)as are those who use it.
Lorien
(31,935 posts)since discussing the issues always leads us to:
polly7
(20,582 posts)They've accused others on here of being women who live to have men 'pat them on the head'. It's so much bullshit.
Prism
(5,815 posts)It's actually a bit weird how much of it I've seen lately. I wouldn't have expected the supporters of what could be the first woman president to dip into that well so often and with such relish.
polly7
(20,582 posts)It's like many of the values fought for by courageous women for decades don't mean squat right now - it's all about getting a woman in - I don't think they even care that they've abandoned much of what they've been 'promoting' (and often bullying with) here for so long.
Prism
(5,815 posts)As long as it is done for the Greater Good.
Which is defined by whatever the immediate need happens to be at the moment.
Women don't really support Sanders. They just want men to like them!
A respect for a woman's own mind suddenly goes poof. Just like that.
polly7
(20,582 posts)Their voices and the whole campaign they are supporting are trying to be blocked by most of the MSM. It's sad to watch. They're the type of true feminists who not only are demanding their own rights as equal human beings, but the same for all people. But they push on ......... I so admire them for it! and hope with all my heart things turn out for the best.
senz
(11,945 posts)I don't know how they can stand it.
BernieforPres2016
(3,017 posts)potone
(1,701 posts)It is also sexist in implying that Bernie only appeals to men. And only to obnoxious men, at that.
FlatBaroque
(3,160 posts)as it subtly implies that a girl is being bullied by these men and we should vote for her to support her. It is part of Hillary go-to strategy of playing the victim.
senz
(11,945 posts)It's a technique to discredit and distract us.
We have a BIG job ahead of us; we cannot afford to be waylaid by this crap.
Lizzie Poppet
(10,164 posts)I've a few juicy counterattacks, but I try to be good and not use them...usually I succeed.
Er...lately.
For the last couple days.
Mostly.
SoLeftIAmRight
(4,883 posts)it is a better world without them
Warren DeMontague
(80,708 posts)beam me up scottie
(57,349 posts)Warren DeMontague
(80,708 posts)BERNIEBRONIES! I KNEW IT!
beam me up scottie
(57,349 posts)Warren DeMontague
(80,708 posts)Looks like I'm fittin in the 32" skinnies again, too. Rockin'
beam me up scottie
(57,349 posts)Thank you Al Gore!
polly7
(20,582 posts)Babel_17
(5,400 posts)Three David Brocks!
LanternWaste
(37,748 posts)While yet others have been accused of worshiping the oligarchy and 1% in regards to support for Clinton. No need to pay attention to any of these half-witted, under-educated, sub-literate allegations.
They are used in place of objective anlysis, and should be a primary indication that the accuser is little more than low hanging fruit. At best.
Warren DeMontague
(80,708 posts)Seems to me the more people worship, the less they think.
CharlotteVale
(2,717 posts)claim that any criticism of Hillary is sexist. Such hypocrisy. I'm a woman who supports Bernie, and there are many of us, yet when Clinton supporters use the term Berniebros they deny our very existence. It doesn't get any more sexist than denying womens' very existence.
seaglass
(8,173 posts)is not a sexist term it does seem to leave all the female Bernie stans out.
Disclaimer: of course not ALL Bernie supporters are Bernie stans, I know some decent Bernie voters personally.
Oh and count me in as a vagina voter.
senz
(11,945 posts)Stop attacking us. It's an ugly diversion from the truth about your candidate.
Do something good with your life: support Bernie Sanders for president.
Yes, I mean it.
seaglass
(8,173 posts)own house.
senz
(11,945 posts)Y'all did.
I don't think we're going to forgive you.
seaglass
(8,173 posts)forgiveness so that works out for both of us.
senz
(11,945 posts)of her highness.
As for forgiveness, I am reminded of the lyrics to an old song that always reminds me of your candidate. There's a stanza that goes,
Let me ask you one question
Is your money that good?
Will it buy you forgiveness
Do you think that it could?
I think you will find
When your death takes its toll
All the money you made
Will never buy back your soul