Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
12 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
How the holy frig can Gallup be showing a +7 for Romney? Just can't believe it. Please explain. (Original Post) RBInMaine Oct 2012 OP
Overvaluing the South and a dumb likely voter model ProudToBeBlueInRhody Oct 2012 #1
i can't figure it out. DesertFlower Oct 2012 #2
See #1. ChiTownChavista Oct 2012 #10
Nate explains in newest 538 article... Maximumnegro Oct 2012 #3
Um, for what and when? Deep13 Oct 2012 #4
National Tracking Today. RBInMaine Oct 2012 #6
Well, that sucks. Deep13 Oct 2012 #12
Nate And I Explained It DemocratSinceBirth Oct 2012 #5
Diebold dreamin' ? lunasun Oct 2012 #7
It is way off compared to 9 other LV polls, 5 of which have Obama ahead. SunSeeker Oct 2012 #8
The South. morningfog Oct 2012 #9
its mostly the red states he is already leading in demlion Oct 2012 #11

SunSeeker

(51,716 posts)
8. It is way off compared to 9 other LV polls, 5 of which have Obama ahead.
Thu Oct 18, 2012, 10:23 PM
Oct 2012

From Huffington Post today:



In 2010, Gallup's final poll reported Republicans leading Democrats by 15 percentage points (55 to 40 percent) among likely voters on the national "generic" ballot -- the question that asks voters whether they will support the Democratic or Republican candidate for Congress in their district. No other national poll had reported Republicans with as big a lead.

While Republicans gained 63 seats in the House in 2010, their margin in votes cast nationwide was just 6.8 percentage points (51.6 to 44.8 percent). Gallup's final estimate among all registered voters, which gave Republicans a 4 percentage point lead, came far closer.

Ultimately, solving the mystery of Gallup's currently divergent result is difficult, particularly since it does not routinely disclose the demographic or attitudinal composition of its likely or registered voter samples. Gallup regularly publishes extensive data showing results among subgroups, but its tables show only the unweighted number of interviews in each subgroup, not the weighted values.

Gallup's results are very different, at least for now, compared to most of the national polls, just as they were in 2010. The best advice may be what political scientist and blogger Jonathan Bernstein offered his readers: As "with every polling number," he wrote," "ignore it, and look at the polling averages."

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2012/10/18/gallup-poll_n_1982004.html

Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»2016 Postmortem»How the holy frig can Gal...