Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

w4rma

(31,700 posts)
Mon Mar 21, 2016, 06:09 PM Mar 2016

Critics Aghast at 'Disgusting Speech' Clinton Just Gave to AIPAC

Touting her "deep, personal commitment" to the "Jewish state," Clinton then said that "one of the first things I’ll do in office is invite Israeli Prime Minister {Benjamin Netanyahu} to visit the White House."

The speech proved that, on matters of Israel, Clinton is "running to the right" of GOP front-runner Donald Trump, as noted by Mondoweiss' Philip Weiss, who wrote that the remarks were "filled with red meat for Israel supporters" and "contained scant reference to the peace process."

Though unsurprised by the candidate's vigorous support for the policies and tactics of the Israeli state, observers pointed to the remarks as a frightening indicator of what a Clinton presidency could mean for the Middle East.

In a statement to Common Dreams, Rebecca Vilkomerson, executive director of Jewish Voice for Peace, said that the speech "is a reminder of the current limits of the mainstream discourse on Israel, which rely on racist and Islamophobic tropes to justify unquestioning support for Israel."

"From Democrats to Republicans, the message is the same," Vilkomerson continued. "More arms for Israel, a stronger relationship between Israel and the U.S., no mention of Palestinian rights, and no recognition of the impossible contradiction of being both democratic and Jewish when the state is predicated on maintaining systems of unequal rights and rule by military occupation."

Watch the entire speech below:


http://www.commondreams.org/news/2016/03/21/critics-aghast-disgusting-speech-clinton-just-gave-aipac
15 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies

Land of Enchantment

(1,217 posts)
5. WELL. This didn't take long. Perhaps those who have not yet voted (most of the US) who bought her
Mon Mar 21, 2016, 06:26 PM
Mar 2016

'I'm a progressive who likes to make progress' BS will see through it (finally) and join the sane part of the party.


 

farleftlib

(2,125 posts)
12. That sums up Hillary's foreign policy
Mon Mar 21, 2016, 07:02 PM
Mar 2016

all war all the time. Weapons dealers need a new pair of shoes.

Response to w4rma (Original post)

jillan

(39,451 posts)
11. This is going to hurt her with the Jewish vote in the upcoming primaries. Why is this bad?
Mon Mar 21, 2016, 06:59 PM
Mar 2016

Reform Judaism remains the largest American Jewish movement, at 35 percent. Conservative Jews are 18 percent, Orthodox 10 percent, and groups such as Reconstructionist and Jewish Renewal make up 6 percent combined. Thirty percent of Jews do not identify with any denomination.

The Orthodox Jews support Israel no matter what. They love Bibi, they usually vote Republicans.

And there is the majority which falls under Reformed Jews, myself included. And I suppose Bernie falls into this category.
While we do support the state of Israel we support peace.
We want nothing more than a 2 state solution and for that reason we do not support Bibi at all. Many of us see him as the reason why anti-semitism is on the rise.

Add to that - Netanyahu has gone after progressive Jews.
http://www.al-monitor.com/pulse/originals/2016/02/western-wall-women-conservative-jews-netanyahu-yariv-levin.html#
http://www.jewishjournal.com/tag/netanyahu+rejects+remarks+against+liberal+jews

Many of us feel conflicted because we do support Israel but cannot support the tactics of this regime.
Similar to how Americans felt after Bush/Cheney won a second term.

As a Jewish woman I am proud of Bernie for not pandering to this extreme lobby today.


As for Hillary, yes, she may be able to get the votes of the Orthodox Jews away from the gop, esp if their nominee is Trump...she may even get the votes of some Conservative Jews.
But since the majority of American Jews fall under Reform - they most likely will be standing with Bernie because of today.

global1

(25,261 posts)
13. What Is The Purpose For Candidates To Address AIPAC.....
Mon Mar 21, 2016, 07:09 PM
Mar 2016

AIPAC wants to hear certain things from the candidate and the candidate basically tells them those certain things. This is pandering at its best being encouraged by and organization that wants to be pandered to. I don't get it?

 

anotherproletariat

(1,446 posts)
14. Lucky for her, the repubs' speeches make Hillary look absolutely liberal.
Mon Mar 21, 2016, 07:17 PM
Mar 2016

It's only half way through Ted's speech, but I don't think I can stand any more of the pander-fest.

Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»2016 Postmortem»Critics Aghast at 'Disgus...