2016 Postmortem
Related: About this forumNixonian secrecy, Reagan foreign policy, Bush economics
she's a threefer
redstateblues
(10,565 posts)reddread
(6,896 posts)RoccoR5955
(12,471 posts)lovemydog
(11,833 posts)JoePhilly
(27,787 posts)... insure the pro-Bernie OPs are drowned out by anti-Hillary OPs.
Great way to advance the "movement".
reddread
(6,896 posts)honesty must burn, I suppose.
JoePhilly
(27,787 posts)I guess.
reddread
(6,896 posts)go fetch!
DemocratSinceBirth
(99,710 posts)hey! I think I see a Honduran orphan!!!
go fetch
Why are you issuing commands to a fellow member of our board like he is a dog?
Do you issue commands to strangers like they are dogs in real life?
How does it work out for you?
Thank you in advance
reddread
(6,896 posts)one up trump, why dontcha?
DemocratSinceBirth
(99,710 posts)reddread
(6,896 posts)reddread
(6,896 posts)yeah, the dog whistles too.
DemocratSinceBirth
(99,710 posts)could be a lot worse, couldnt it? Loyalty oaths, LIES, electoral fraud
yeah, the dog whistles too.
We are discussing your AD HOMINEM attack on Joe Philly where you compared him to a dog as evident by your command for him to "fetch" something.
I didn't know he had the power to issue "Loyalty Oaths" , commit "electoral fraud" and make "dog whistles". All this time I thought good ole Joe was a plebeian like me.
reddread
(6,896 posts)desperate enough to hold a sign on a street corner, arent you?
You dont need me to wish you luck here.
I do wish you had the Spirit of America and democratic beliefs inside.
that would be really cool.
DemocratSinceBirth
(99,710 posts)There is no need to treat me like a dog and issue commands, is there?
<uses civil approach and sees how it works>
reddread
(6,896 posts)when Sanders prevails.
I see how the dog commands must seem familiar to you.
DemocratSinceBirth
(99,710 posts)What's with the dog commands?
I am pretty open minded but I find that particular paraphilia disturbing.
reddread
(6,896 posts)to deflect from the substance of Honduran orphans in the grips of HRC policies.
reddread
(6,896 posts)how is that ad hominem?
step it up.
Betty Karlson
(7,231 posts)Denial - it's not just a RIVER exceding its bounds.
Ken Burch
(50,254 posts)All military intevention is Bush/Cheney. All secrecy is Nixonian. All "pro-business economics" ideas are Reaganist.
sibelian
(7,804 posts)Do think calling it "smears" will change anyone's opinion? How can addressing someone's actual positions be a "smear"? A smear has to be a suggestion or an unwarranted inference, not a direct attribution according to position.
reddread
(6,896 posts)somebody needs to build a wall around her.
EndElectoral
(4,213 posts)reddread
(6,896 posts)a very long time ago.
into a liar.
EndElectoral
(4,213 posts)reddread
(6,896 posts)Considering her good works with same sex marriage and the Family.
she has put a lot into her self actualization.
Credit where due, ok?
Response to EndElectoral (Reply #5)
PonyUp This message was self-deleted by its author.
dchill
(38,513 posts)tkmorris
(11,138 posts)She does it every time the poll numbers change.
Response to reddread (Original post)
PonyUp This message was self-deleted by its author.
And more weapons contracts.
reddread
(6,896 posts)Last edited Tue Mar 22, 2016, 08:17 AM - Edit history (1)
more ISIS type excitement.
no boots on the ground.
even when there are.
Response to reddread (Original post)
PonyUp This message was self-deleted by its author.
pdsimdars
(6,007 posts)thanks. Truth to power.
reddread
(6,896 posts)thank you.
gordianot
(15,242 posts)reddread
(6,896 posts)BillZBubb
(10,650 posts)Bush economics, CHECK.
reddread
(6,896 posts)BillZBubb
(10,650 posts)Betty Karlson
(7,231 posts)... situated in Central America?
reddread
(6,896 posts)especially once Disney owns it all.
thanks for such a scintillating contribution.
Im so pwned.
Art_from_Ark
(27,247 posts)reddread
(6,896 posts)and maybe maiming a daughter?
a while back, that was.
Art_from_Ark
(27,247 posts)but some recent reports are claiming that she survived.
reddread
(6,896 posts)glad I asked. Thanks!
*note to self- NEVER BELIEVE A FUCKING WORD AS DELIVERED.
Betty Karlson
(7,231 posts)Another case of Kissinger's influence, I dare say.
Art_from_Ark
(27,247 posts)enter the US. What a huge mistake that was.
Betty Karlson
(7,231 posts)Art_from_Ark
(27,247 posts)I think that was more the work of the Dulles brothers.
Betty Karlson
(7,231 posts)The first propped up the autocratic Bourbons in France, against the call for democracy (sounds eerily familiar to the Mosaddegh overthrow), the second though nothing of bludgeoning Ireland: a scary precursor of the war crimes Kissinger would later commit?
Art_from_Ark
(27,247 posts)I have to admit, I have little knowledge of Kissinger before the late '60s. I'll have to take a look at that thesis.
Octafish
(55,745 posts)Back then, NSA just spied on everybody who wasn't one of us. So if you are interested in Justice, you are on a List. And you know what they do with those lists when the time comes.
The Last Gasp of American Democracy
By Chris Hedges
TruthDig.org, Posted on Jan 5, 2014
EXCERPT...
The most radical evil, as Hannah Arendt pointed out, is the political system that effectively crushes its marginalized and harassed opponents and, through fear and the obliteration of privacy, incapacitates everyone else. Our system of mass surveillance is the machine by which this radical evil will be activated. If we do not immediately dismantle the security and surveillance apparatus, there will be no investigative journalism or judicial oversight to address abuse of power. There will be no organized dissent. There will be no independent thought. Criticisms, however tepid, will be treated as acts of subversion. And the security apparatus will blanket the body politic like black mold until even the banal and ridiculous become concerns of national security.
I saw evil of this kind as a reporter in the Stasi state of East Germany. I was followed by men, invariably with crew cuts and wearing leather jackets, whom I presumed to be agents of the Stasithe Ministry for State Security, which the ruling Communist Party described as the shield and sword of the nation. People I interviewed were visited by Stasi agents soon after I left their homes. My phone was bugged. Some of those I worked with were pressured to become informants. Fear hung like icicles over every conversation.
The Stasi did not set up massive death camps and gulags. It did not have to. The Stasi, with a network of as many as 2 million informants in a country of 17 million, was everywhere. There were 102,000 secret police officers employed full time to monitor the populationone for every 166 East Germans. The Nazis broke bones; the Stasi broke souls. The East German government pioneered the psychological deconstruction that torturers and interrogators in Americas black sites, and within our prison system, have honed to a gruesome perfection.
[font color="green"]The goal of wholesale surveillance, as Arendt wrote in The Origins of Totalitarianism, is not, in the end, to discover crimes, but to be on hand when the government decides to arrest a certain category of the population. And because Americans emails, phone conversations, Web searches and geographical movements are recorded and stored in perpetuity in government databases, there will be more than enough evidence to seize us should the state deem it necessary. This information waits like a deadly virus inside government vaults to be turned against us. It does not matter how trivial or innocent that information is. In totalitarian states, justice, like truth, is irrelevant. [/font green]
The object of efficient totalitarian states, as George Orwell understood, is to create a climate in which people do not think of rebelling, a climate in which government killing and torture are used against only a handful of unmanageable renegades. The totalitarian state achieves this control, Arendt wrote, by systematically crushing human spontaneity, and by extension human freedom. It ceaselessly peddles fear to keep a population traumatized and immobilized. It turns the courts, along with legislative bodies, into mechanisms to legalize the crimes of state.
CONTINUED...
http://www.truthdig.com/report/item/the_last_gasp_of_american_democracy_20140105
Edited to add info that's not on television, but should be.
reddread
(6,896 posts)in the aftermath of 9-11-01, JTTF resources were directed towards spying on the local swell folks in Peace Fresno.
as many already know.
Its the many who do not know what was done elsewhere that need to realize
their rights and expectations of privacy and freedom of association were nothing
but a laughing stock to law enforcement.
but thats all in the past, right?
certainly not Hillary's fault.
if anyone's, the apathetic electorates.
I cant pass that buck.
we all own what we accept.
Betty Karlson
(7,231 posts)XRubicon
(2,212 posts)Enjoy these special moments while you can.
reddread
(6,896 posts)bettyellen
(47,209 posts)reddread
(6,896 posts)I smell sulfur
senz
(11,945 posts)I was juror #7. Appreciate the alert as I might have missed this OP otherwise.
On Mon Mar 21, 2016, 05:20 PM an alert was sent on the following post:
Nixonian secrecy, Reagan foreign policy, Bush economics
http://www.democraticunderground.com/12511539441
REASON FOR ALERT
This post is disruptive, hurtful, rude, insensitive, over-the-top, or otherwise inappropriate.
ALERTER'S COMMENTS
And the message is,"she's a threefer." Idle trollery and fact-free click bait do not foster good discussions so please hide, thank you.
You served on a randomly-selected Jury of DU members which reviewed this post. The review was completed at Mon Mar 21, 2016, 05:27 PM, and the Jury voted 1-6 to LEAVE IT.
Juror #1 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE
Explanation: Its an opinion; we all have them
Juror #2 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE
Explanation: It is an opinion. Based on real things we know about the candidate.
Juror #3 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE
Explanation: witty, if hyperbolic
Juror #4 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE
Explanation: No explanation given
Juror #5 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE
Explanation: No explanation given
Juror #6 voted to HIDE IT
Explanation: Our Dem candidates are NOT comparable to repubs.
Juror #7 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE
Explanation: Concise critique of a presidential candidate comparing traits/policies to those of former presidents. Commenter has been on DU for several years. Hardly "trollery." Biased alert based in disagreement.
Thank you very much for participating in our Jury system, and we hope you will be able to participate again in the future.
reddread
(6,896 posts)love to know the sum total
leveymg
(36,418 posts)Onlooker
(5,636 posts)Foreign policy -- Rand Paul
Economic policy -- Castro
Minority issues -- Wallace (After all, Sanders is for states rights and has relatively little support from minorities)
reddread
(6,896 posts)or dignify some particular vomit?
senz
(11,945 posts)You left out lack of ethics, unprincipled, disrespect for law, near-constant lying, and monomaniacal obsession with the presidency, but it might be hard to find a former president who encapsulates all those traits.
Thank you for stating it so concisely, reddread.
reddread
(6,896 posts)Richard Milhous Nixon.
it is a staggering realization.
senz
(11,945 posts)hifiguy used to say that all the time. And he had read close to a dozen books on Nixon, so, perhaps it's true.
But I honestly believe she is more dangerous.
reddread
(6,896 posts)now.
thereismore
(13,326 posts)BernieforPres2016
(3,017 posts)The Clintons have taken selling political influence worldwide to a level none of their predecessors would have imagined.
reddread
(6,896 posts)Arugula Latte
(50,566 posts)lovemydog
(11,833 posts)FDR transparency over Trump, Cruz, Kasich anything
for $300, Alex
Uncle Joe
(58,378 posts)Thanks for the thread, reddread.
Onlooker
(5,636 posts)Threads like this, which are really ignorant, are basically trolling attempts to laying the groundwork for voting for Trump. But, of course, this thread is written by someone who seems to be impaired. After all, generally people don't accuse Hillary of secrecy. In fact, every one of her emails is public, and very little has been found. In fact, there seems to be very little that's secret about the Clintons. Her foreign policy is hardly Reaganesque -- there is nothing analagous in Hillary's belief to Granada or Nicaragua or even the ME, for that matter. Reagan's ME policy was fairly hands off and was largely directed at the Soviet Union, which the OP might not be aware no longer eists. Lastly, her economic policy is nothing like Bush's and she has the votes to prove it. But, again, the OP is probably a closet Trump supporter, so his aim is to portray Hillary as far right to make his hero more palatable.
sibelian
(7,804 posts)I wonder what happens if it exceeds Bush's count?