Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

AtomicKitten

(46,585 posts)
Sun Mar 13, 2016, 04:12 PM Mar 2016

I'm calling it. Sanders-Gabbard 2016



She will be 35 on April 12, 2016. She's a combat veteran.

Diversity: She is American Samoan and Hindu.

Beating HRC fans to the punch: Tulsi has "evolved" leftward in the same way Kirsten Gillibrand did; I have been assured it's where she's at now that matters, so I expect that would hold for Tulsi as well.

I love Nina Turner and Elizabeth Warren, but both would redundantly augment Bernie's domestic policy. Tulsi is smart, attractive, and articulate. She speaks knowledgeably about foreign policy and military matters, and would compliment Bernie's candidacy.



97 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
I'm calling it. Sanders-Gabbard 2016 (Original Post) AtomicKitten Mar 2016 OP
Sadly I think you're right Mufaddal Mar 2016 #1
Would you please briefly explain the "fascist" thing rather than... Peace Patriot Mar 2016 #8
I was misinformed and recalculated; she'll be 35 next month. AtomicKitten Mar 2016 #11
This message was self-deleted by its author ljm2002 Mar 2016 #12
It's no smear Mufaddal Mar 2016 #21
Thank you! So many issues and events to keep track of right now, Peace Patriot Mar 2016 #31
No worries Mufaddal Mar 2016 #89
I think that is troubling. Duval Mar 2016 #54
Tulsi responsed to those allegations Ashish Mar 2016 #97
Well, that is disturbing. passiveporcupine Mar 2016 #63
Thanks, Muffadel, for bringing this to everyone's attention. sus453 Mar 2016 #75
interesting AtomicKitten Mar 2016 #82
Thanks, I think we all need to. passiveporcupine Mar 2016 #83
Actually she has been asked. AJ.Akia Mar 2016 #95
Gabbard not able to be VP no matter age Gwhittey Mar 2016 #2
LOL!!!! jillan Mar 2016 #7
Isn't she only 34? Barack_America Mar 2016 #3
4/12/1981 - Actually she'll be 35 on April 12, 2016. I'll edit. AtomicKitten Mar 2016 #5
dream ticket yourpaljoey Mar 2016 #4
Looks like it to me. AtomicKitten Mar 2016 #33
Did you read the link posted above about her ties to passiveporcupine Mar 2016 #65
maybe a mixed bag, but she has some good points AtomicKitten Mar 2016 #80
i am a huge nina turner fan but gabbard seems to have a bit more experience restorefreedom Mar 2016 #6
I want to see Nina as the assistant to the President :) If not that, something inside of the jillan Mar 2016 #10
I like Nina Turner more for experience and maturity. Peace Patriot Mar 2016 #29
In addition ... Autumn Colors Mar 2016 #36
i like warren in senate but you bring up an important restorefreedom Mar 2016 #41
Do you think Warren is interested in the VP slot? JFKDem62 Mar 2016 #42
Unless Bernie's coattails bring in more Senators, we need Elizabeth right were she is. FailureToCommunicate Mar 2016 #53
Massachusetts voters would replace her with a liberal Dem. Autumn Colors Mar 2016 #55
You have more faith than we do here... FailureToCommunicate Mar 2016 #59
Mr. Centerfold and Mr. Bad Hair! Manifestor_of_Light Mar 2016 #76
nina is a scorcher for sure restorefreedom Mar 2016 #37
Nina Turner for experience? Not much there. (n/t) thesquanderer Mar 2016 #46
Perfect ticket because she has foreign policy experience & she is young. Not to mention jillan Mar 2016 #9
She gives Bernie a great intro at rallies. AtomicKitten Mar 2016 #13
The only time I saw Maddow concerned about Bernie was when Tulsi quit the DNC to support Bernie jillan Mar 2016 #17
I don't recognize the woman on MSNBC anymore. AtomicKitten Mar 2016 #23
My only hope for Rachel is when she sees her ratings in the toilet that she will wake up. jillan Mar 2016 #25
i never thought i'd rather watch brett baier or chris wallace than m$nbclinton restorefreedom Mar 2016 #39
A dramatic descent from what seemed a progressive ozone_man Mar 2016 #66
yes. quite dramatic and quite sad too. nt restorefreedom Mar 2016 #74
I'm afraid Rachel doesn't have much choice in the matter. Enthusiast Mar 2016 #73
Yooge plus one! Enthusiast Mar 2016 #72
Wasn't it though? Duval Mar 2016 #51
She wouldn't be bad TM99 Mar 2016 #14
I have been wondering about her. JonLeibowitz Mar 2016 #71
No thanks to someone that is not pro-LGBT on the ticket dbackjon Mar 2016 #15
As VP she will have to support Bernie's policies. Just as Biden has had to with Obama. jillan Mar 2016 #18
It looked more like Obama was supporting Joe Biden's policy there just sayin Kalidurga Mar 2016 #32
Well he did on same sex marriage - that's for sure. But he didn't on the troop surge in Afghanistan. jillan Mar 2016 #35
Sanders is not pro-LGB? Gwhittey Mar 2016 #20
From a 2012 interview: AtomicKitten Mar 2016 #26
+1 nationalize the fed Mar 2016 #43
yeah, that's a big one for me AtomicKitten Mar 2016 #93
Her Congressional record is very Pro-LGBT AJ.Akia Mar 2016 #96
Yes. That's the Ticket. Literally musiclawyer Mar 2016 #16
And Elizabeth Warren as Attorney General. Elizabeth with subpoena power - be still my heart! AtomicKitten Mar 2016 #19
Think rather see her as Secretary of the Treasury Gwhittey Mar 2016 #22
I prefer either of the African-American ladies mentioned Optimism Mar 2016 #24
Nina Turner and Barbara Lee would be great but they both augment domestic policy. AtomicKitten Mar 2016 #30
i still prefer nina questionseverything Mar 2016 #27
Aloooooooha to Tulsi pdsimdars Mar 2016 #28
I'd love that ticket! tblue Mar 2016 #34
House members are generally a poor electoral choice for VP brooklynite Mar 2016 #38
do any recent examples come to mind? restorefreedom Mar 2016 #40
Mondale/Ferraro brooklynite Mar 2016 #87
yeah. of course it doesnt help restorefreedom Mar 2016 #91
not when they are as impressive as she is virtualobserver Mar 2016 #57
My preference would be Janet Napolitano. phiddle Mar 2016 #44
I would SO love to have Tulsi as this country's First Female Vice President! cherokeeprogressive Mar 2016 #45
She's impressive speaking calmly and clearly. GardeningGal Mar 2016 #47
I prefer Cornel West. fbc Mar 2016 #48
I agree. She would be an outside the box pick that would send the interest level to eleven! FailureToCommunicate Mar 2016 #49
I Like It! joanbarnes Mar 2016 #50
It works for me. I like her! Vinca Mar 2016 #52
I'll let my inner sexist pig loose here and note that in addition to being an all-round ass kicker, Indepatriot Mar 2016 #56
I can't see how being an attractive young lady is a qualification ... grasswire Mar 2016 #70
I never implied it was a qualification. I said it "can't hurt".... Indepatriot Mar 2016 #78
Math is a "real" science Cryptoad Mar 2016 #58
Not a scientist, are ya? The Traveler Mar 2016 #79
No snark, just the facts Cryptoad Mar 2016 #88
I thought we might see Gabbard apointed MrJefe Mar 2016 #60
And we have a WINNER! lastone Mar 2016 #61
she's definitely a contender AtomicKitten Mar 2016 #85
Senate candidates don't get running mates. Bleacher Creature Mar 2016 #62
I thought so the first time I heard her speak. rickford66 Mar 2016 #64
Perfect! n/t ozone_man Mar 2016 #67
From what i know about her, she would be a fine choice. Warren DeMontague Mar 2016 #68
I don't think her geography makes any electoral sense. grasswire Mar 2016 #69
bookmarking... Buzz Clik Mar 2016 #77
.... grossproffit Mar 2016 #94
Why would she say she doesn't fear the Clintons? More "artful" smearing and it's shameful. nt Jitter65 Mar 2016 #81
the Clintons keep a naughty & nice list AtomicKitten Mar 2016 #84
Tulsi is a Rock Star whatchamacallit Mar 2016 #86
I could live with that. Betty Karlson Mar 2016 #90
At first glance, I like it! deutsey Mar 2016 #92

Mufaddal

(1,021 posts)
1. Sadly I think you're right
Sun Mar 13, 2016, 04:15 PM
Mar 2016

I say sadly because of her links to Modi & the fascist BJP/RSS.

But I've been saying for at least the last week that I would expect Gabbard to be in the VP slot if he wins the nomination.

Peace Patriot

(24,010 posts)
8. Would you please briefly explain the "fascist" thing rather than...
Sun Mar 13, 2016, 04:22 PM
Mar 2016

...make us chase down your link? I don't understand your post--it seems to be a smear of Gabbard--and you ought to explain yourself here.

Anyway, if she's not 35 before the inauguration, I'm pretty sure she is disqualified.

Response to Peace Patriot (Reply #8)

Mufaddal

(1,021 posts)
21. It's no smear
Sun Mar 13, 2016, 04:31 PM
Mar 2016

I don't know what to say if you can't be bothered to click a link and read one article which would have answered your question.

Leaders in the BJP and their paramilitary wing, the RSS, have repeatedly praised and promoted Hitler. They are a hardline Hindu nationalist, neo-fascist organization. When bipartisan legislation was raised to point to the need for improved human rights in India, Gabbard opposed it in a move designed to help Modi's electoral chances. She takes money from BJP supporters and PACs. This is no more a "smear" than pointing out Hillary's Wall St. connections; it is simply her record.

Peace Patriot

(24,010 posts)
31. Thank you! So many issues and events to keep track of right now,
Sun Mar 13, 2016, 04:47 PM
Mar 2016

and I didn't know it was just one article. I didn't want to be click-baited into a smear site.

Thank you again! You got my click. I'm going to read it now.

Mufaddal

(1,021 posts)
89. No worries
Mon Mar 14, 2016, 01:31 AM
Mar 2016

I would like to believe she can be moved on that issue and made to see the light. Of course, that's rarely how things work in politics. I still think she would be a strong option as a VP pick or cabinet position. She would bring a lot to the ticket. I personally like Nina Turner more. I'd settle for Keith Ellison, too. But I agree, I think Gabbard is an obvious shortlist VP slot candidate.

Ashish

(6 posts)
97. Tulsi responsed to those allegations
Wed Mar 30, 2016, 03:22 AM
Mar 2016

She was asked for a response to those allegations in this interview by Aziz Haniffa

Here's what she said in regards to her BJP ties

As a member of the US Congress, my interest is in helping cultivate a closer relationship between the US and India, not just between the US and one political party of India.

Both in India and here in the US, I have held meetings with members of both the BJP and the Congress party. I am known in America for being nonpartisan -- I successfully work with Democrats and Republicans alike to get things done for the people.

My feeling about politics in India is similarly nonpartisan


As for the contention that she takes money from BJP supporters: To my knowledge many Indian-Americans support her and many of them are surely supporters of BJP's opposition parties as well. The USINPAC supports many Indian American candidates. USINPAC has been supporting better US-India ties since 2002 - long before BJP was in power.

In regards to the Human rights resolution: The opposition to it was bipartisan from House Foreign Affairs House (of which Tulsi is a member). Besides Tulsi, Rep. Ed Royce (R-CA), Chairman of the House Foreign Affairs Committee, and Rep. Eni Faleomavaega (D-AS), the Ranking Member of the House Subcommittee on Asia and the Pacific opposed it for being harmful to US-India relationship. Dem Rep. Mike Honda (a member of the Tom Lantos Human Rights Commission) also refused to sign it.

passiveporcupine

(8,175 posts)
63. Well, that is disturbing.
Sun Mar 13, 2016, 06:50 PM
Mar 2016

And I seriously doubt Bernie would even consider her for VP, if he knows this about her, and it is true.

sus453

(164 posts)
75. Thanks, Muffadel, for bringing this to everyone's attention.
Sun Mar 13, 2016, 08:16 PM
Mar 2016

The BJP is an ultra-nationalist party that has played a big role in inciting violence against Indians of the Muslim faith. This is indeed troubling, and I'm disappointed to hear this.

passiveporcupine

(8,175 posts)
83. Thanks, I think we all need to.
Sun Mar 13, 2016, 10:02 PM
Mar 2016

Most of what I'm seeing is a recycled version of the same story as in the link in this thread. From Alternet. And it's floating around.

The least biased source I have found is this:

http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2015/feb/28/tulsi-gabbard-rising-dem-star-committed-mortal-sin/

I'm not sure how I feel about this, but I find it disturbing that she has questioned Obama's terminology of calling ISIS terrorists, and instead she wants them to be called Extremist Muslims. She wants terrorist to be tied to the religion for religious reasons.

Personally, I feel the leaders of ISIS may be doing this for religious (extreme) reasons, but the people who are sucked into it are not necessarily. I think most people get sucked into extremist ideas because they are fearful and they find some kind of "fix" for dealing with their fear by becoming an extremist and blaming others for things they cannot control. Vulnerable people are vulnerable to religion.

I certainly hope she does not think all Muslims are extremists, or even possibly inclined that way.

This may be being blown into something bigger than it is, but I am concerned about her supporting India's Prime Minister, Narendra Modi, who seems to be OK with Muslims (a minority) being attacked, raped, and killed.

I wish someone would ask her about this so she can say on the record how she feels about this and why she seems to have connections to Modi. And why did she stand against a bill in congress which called on India to improve the human rights situation of its religious minorities. She claims it was intended to defeat Modi's reelection I think...if I'm reading this right.

I don't know for sure what is going on, but it is not leaving me with a good feeling.

 

AJ.Akia

(38 posts)
95. Actually she has been asked.
Tue Mar 29, 2016, 10:36 PM
Mar 2016

Last edited Wed Mar 30, 2016, 06:50 AM - Edit history (1)

Several articles written address the issue directly. I found this particular article to be very helpful. This is but an excerpt; details on spiritual Islam vs political Islamism are in the article linked below:

What is your response to social media attacks against you, including by groups alleging that you are Islamophobic? Of fomenting fear or hatred against someone based upon religion?

"I am a very firm believer in the Aloha spirit -- respect and love for everyone, irrespective of their religion, race, gender, or any other external differences.

In my view, the essence of religion means love for God and trying to serve God by working for the well-being of others.

The essence of the Hinduism that I practice is Karma Yoga and Bhakti Yoga, which means to love God and all of His children, regardless of their race, religion, etc, and to use my life working for the well-being of everyone.

I do not see religion as something that involves different teams or an 'us versus them' mentality.

Whether we are Muslims, Christians, Hindus, Buddhists, any other faith, or atheists, we are all children of God and we should love and respect each other as brothers and sisters."

(Source: http://www.rediff.com/news/interview/exclusive-why-tulsi-gabbard-doesnt-want-hillary-as-prez/20160309.htm)
 

Gwhittey

(1,377 posts)
2. Gabbard not able to be VP no matter age
Sun Mar 13, 2016, 04:15 PM
Mar 2016

-Have resided in the U.S. at least 14 years.

And last 8 years has shown me Hawaii is not part of the US, Just ask Trump.

passiveporcupine

(8,175 posts)
65. Did you read the link posted above about her ties to
Sun Mar 13, 2016, 06:54 PM
Mar 2016

a group that advocates hatred of Muslims?

I think this is very important. I didn't know this about her, and if true, it should disqualify her from ever running for POTUS or VPOTUS as a progressive dem.

 

AtomicKitten

(46,585 posts)
80. maybe a mixed bag, but she has some good points
Sun Mar 13, 2016, 09:43 PM
Mar 2016

Last edited Mon Mar 14, 2016, 06:26 PM - Edit history (1)

I'll look into this further.

cheers.

restorefreedom

(12,655 posts)
6. i am a huge nina turner fan but gabbard seems to have a bit more experience
Sun Mar 13, 2016, 04:21 PM
Mar 2016

plus, i want to see rw heads do this

when they lose to a jewish/hindu ticket

jillan

(39,451 posts)
10. I want to see Nina as the assistant to the President :) If not that, something inside of the
Sun Mar 13, 2016, 04:25 PM
Mar 2016

Bernie administration.

Peace Patriot

(24,010 posts)
29. I like Nina Turner more for experience and maturity.
Sun Mar 13, 2016, 04:44 PM
Mar 2016

Gabbard is great, and has done a great and courageous thing in resigning from the DNC and backing Sanders! But she not only IS younger--and probably not qualified because her birth date is after the inauguration--she looks younger, and speaks with less confidence and rousing power. Turner can't be beat for confidence and rousing power. And talk about seeing RW heads !

I think Turner would not only be better on the campaign trail in the fall, she would be better as VP in the role of president's lobbyist to the Senate and the House. That swamp really needs to be purged from top to bottom. Turner is a scorcher.

NOT saying Gabbard wouldn't be good. She has many points in her favor, including her military experience in Iraq and her passionate advocacy for diplomacy first and war as only a last resort. But I tend to think that the first issues of a Sanders administration will be domestic and will involve challenging Congress on that score and very actively working against Republicans and for non-corporate Democrats in the next congressional election. Turner is more of a "barn-burner" type of political activist. That will be needed.

That said, neither of these women is very experienced, in terms of having the entire burden of the Presidency--not to mention a presidential revolution-- fall on them, should Sanders die. If the choice were mine--given all issues--I'd prefer Elizabeth Warren for the role of VP.

 

Autumn Colors

(2,379 posts)
36. In addition ...
Sun Mar 13, 2016, 04:56 PM
Mar 2016

I hate to be so cynical that I think this way, but Elizabeth Warren is also the best insurance against "accidents" or assassination.

For that, it would be best to have a VP who Wall St. and the powers-that-be would want LESS to be in the White House than Sanders.

Sanders/Warren 2016

restorefreedom

(12,655 posts)
41. i like warren in senate but you bring up an important
Sun Mar 13, 2016, 05:10 PM
Mar 2016

and frightening strategic point. tptb are not going to be happy with bernie.

FailureToCommunicate

(14,014 posts)
53. Unless Bernie's coattails bring in more Senators, we need Elizabeth right were she is.
Sun Mar 13, 2016, 06:32 PM
Mar 2016

If we have a majority, then she could get tapped for one of several cabinet positions where she could really kick some butt.

restorefreedom

(12,655 posts)
37. nina is a scorcher for sure
Sun Mar 13, 2016, 05:05 PM
Mar 2016

she can bring it, sell it, and get you to sign for perpetual deliveries. she rocks!

good point about either of them needing to take on the presidency, gods forbid.

i like warren but she will be needed in the senate imo. ellison is great but will be needed in the house.

om would be perfect veep with executive experience and is young. i don't know if the "both are from the northeast" thing is a problem anymore. i think bernie will win the ge based on his message, not the state his veep comes from.

jillan

(39,451 posts)
9. Perfect ticket because she has foreign policy experience & she is young. Not to mention
Sun Mar 13, 2016, 04:23 PM
Mar 2016

her conviction and clarity when she speaks.

I know she has baggage but it is nothing compared to baggage from ALL the other candidates.

jillan

(39,451 posts)
17. The only time I saw Maddow concerned about Bernie was when Tulsi quit the DNC to support Bernie
Sun Mar 13, 2016, 04:29 PM
Mar 2016

And then she had Tulsi on her show.
Rachel was trying to see if she was open to Hillary and Tulsi shut her down.

It 'twas a thing of beauty!

 

AtomicKitten

(46,585 posts)
23. I don't recognize the woman on MSNBC anymore.
Sun Mar 13, 2016, 04:33 PM
Mar 2016

Whoever kidnapped the real Rachel Maddow needs to return her immediately.

jillan

(39,451 posts)
25. My only hope for Rachel is when she sees her ratings in the toilet that she will wake up.
Sun Mar 13, 2016, 04:39 PM
Mar 2016

It doesn't matter if I am here, twitter, fb - people are done with her.

People are done with msnbc.

They turned into a propaganda machine during this primary season and people are not having it.

I never thought I would see the day when I'd rather watch Wolf Blitzer than msnbc.

ozone_man

(4,825 posts)
66. A dramatic descent from what seemed a progressive
Sun Mar 13, 2016, 06:59 PM
Mar 2016

position. I'd put her in the same group as Chris Mathews, just another centrist talking head.

The raging moderate is the death to any real change.

Enthusiast

(50,983 posts)
73. I'm afraid Rachel doesn't have much choice in the matter.
Sun Mar 13, 2016, 07:25 PM
Mar 2016

She knows she must uphold the official corporate narrative or join Thom on RT.

JonLeibowitz

(6,282 posts)
71. I have been wondering about her.
Sun Mar 13, 2016, 07:21 PM
Mar 2016

It's clear that she intends to endorse Bernie ahead of the California primary; I read in Politico a few weeks ago that she was at one of the very first strategizing meetings, before Sanders had decided to run. Electorally, Barbara Lee makes more sense and especially due to the BJP connection of Gabbard pointed out upthread I'd prefer Lee.

I read her wikipedia page and was discussing this with my girlfriend -- but has she ever been married? I see she has two children. Are there any potential pitfalls there when the Republicans try to attack her?

Incidentally the conversation my girlfriend and I were having was whether it is possible or common for women to attain sustained positions of political power while being unmarried. Tulsi, Lee, and Elise Stefanik (who doesn't really count as both a freshman and the youngest ever congress critter) all made the list, as does Tammy Baldwin (for, ahem, other reasons). But there are not very many.

jillan

(39,451 posts)
35. Well he did on same sex marriage - that's for sure. But he didn't on the troop surge in Afghanistan.
Sun Mar 13, 2016, 04:54 PM
Mar 2016

nt

 

AtomicKitten

(46,585 posts)
26. From a 2012 interview:
Sun Mar 13, 2016, 04:41 PM
Mar 2016
Tulsi Gabbard's Moment Of Truth
http://www.expression808.com/home/2012/7/5/tulsi-gabbards-moment-of-truth.html

Rumor is that your support of the LGBT community is not genuine. Given your (and your father’s) statements against LGBT rights in the past, why should people believe you've changed?

Tulsi: I've gone through some extraordinary experiences over the last decade, which have led me to realize that I could not, in good conscience, fight for liberty and freedom overseas while advocating something less than that here at home. That was an important decision for me and, in that context, I fully recognize that protecting the equal rights of all Americans, including those in the LGBT community, is an obligation we must strive to fulfill. This personal journey makes sense to most people I talk to.

This election is real—it's not just philosophical. In less than three months from now, people will be deciding whether I or Mayor Hannemann will have an office in Congress. I have promised that my door will always be open and I will always listen with respect and aloha to people from the LGBT community. So on a practical level what this means is that if you or any other leaders of the LGBT community were to come to Washington DC for a visit, I would do my best ensure that you will always feel comfortable coming to speak about issues of concern to you or just drop by for a friendly chat. You have to ask yourself if you think that would be the case if Mayor Hannemann is in that congressional office. Does anyone in the LGBT community really feel that they would be welcomed by Mayor Hannemann?

And I've said many times before, I am committed to working for equal rights, will work for the repeal of DOMA, and will support and co-sponsor the Respect for Marriage Act. Has Mayor Hannemann made such commitments? The answer is no. So in a sense, this election is not about Mayor Hannemann or myself. It's about you. It's about which of us—Mayor Hannemann or myself—would make you feel more respected and comfortable expressing your concerns to.


You served two tours in Iraq. What was your MOS, and what insights/observations did you bring back from those tours?

Tulsi: I was Patient Administration (91G) and Medical Logistics (91J) on my first tour of duty to Iraq. For my second tour of duty to Kuwait, I served as a Military Police Platoon Leader, and later a Company Commander. Currently working as a Security Officer in the unit headquarters Operations Section.

During my tours of duty in the Middle East, I saw firsthand the tragedy that occurs when a government tries to act as the moral arbiter of its people, and does so with the force of law. I saw women forced to cover themselves from head to toe. As a woman, I, too, was ignored and treated like dirt. A Kuwaiti man once refused to shake my hand because he did not want to dirty himself. I saw people punished merely for enjoying "western" music. Iraqis civilians with whom I had become friends confided to me that they feared for their lives because they belonged to the "wrong" religious sect. Personal behavioral choices, such as chastity or sexual identity, that do not conform to government edicts carry the risk of extreme punishment. Though I did not personally witness any stoning or beheading, I was fully aware that these are the usual forms of punishment meted out for the "crimes" of adultery and homosexuality.

My experience in the Middle East touched the very core of my being, causing me to seriously reflect on my own views of the role of government in our personal lives and decisions. After much soul-searching, I came to realize that many of the staunch positions I once held on social issues were flawed.

Over time, I came to a fuller understanding of what our Founders were trying to achieve by drafting a constitution that would protect the rights and liberties of all people to live the way they choose without interference from an overarching government. It became clear to me that as an elected official I would have to publicly admit that I had been wrong. Even more difficult, I would have to publicly reject positions held by my parents, whom I respect and love dearly. But I had no choice; it was the right thing to do.

Once again, let me state unequivocally my belief that government has no business interfering with the choices a woman makes about her reproductive rights; nor should the government have a say in who a person is to love, marry, or spend the rest of their lives with. As a member of Congress, I give my solemn word of honor that:

(1) I will fight any effort to undermine women's reproductive freedom;

(2) I will fight for the repeal of DOMA; and,

(3) I will support the Respect For Marriage Act.

My life has been a 30-year-long journey that has spanned many continents and the full spectrum of political thought—a journey that has finally come to rest on the shore of personal freedom. Nothing is more important to me than freedom. Freedom is the reason we wear the uniform, and why we fight. Freedom is what makes America great.

Our freedom is precious and must be protected. Allowing government to dictate these most personal aspects of our lives is diametrically opposed to what makes America great: individual liberty and equal rights for everyone.


Can you name one life-changing experience?

Tulsi: One of my responsibilities in Iraq was to go over the list of troops who had been injured or killed and identify Hawai'i soldiers so that I could make sure they were receiving proper care. With each name from Hawai'i came names of family members or loved ones whose paths I may have crossed, streets or neighborhoods in which I might have played. This experience had a profound effect on me.

This experience has never left me. And it's one of the main reasons I'm running for Congress.

It makes me angry that our country, which my brothers and sisters in uniform have sacrificed for, is being destroyed from within by self-serving politicians, big corporations, and Wall Street banks.

This is why in Congress I will fight to put Congress back in the hands of the people by breaking up the big banks, reining in financial institutions that engage in risky trading, ending subsidies for oil companies and other big corporations, and demanding greater transparency in the dealings between lobbyists, politicians and contributors.


Let's talk about issues important to military personnel, including LGBT personnel (ending DADT, treating PTSD, unemployment, education, treatment of female service members etc.).

Tulsi: It is time for people to realize that patriots come in all shapes, colors, and sizes—and sexual orientation. Every American has the right to serve their country. I was in favor of ending DADT because I know that LGBT personnel are just as proud of their country as anyone else, and the blood they shed in service to their country is just as valuable. I was therefore honored to be responsible for implementing the repeal of Don't Ask Don't Tell in my Army Guard unit.

As for differences between male and female service members—such differences are superficial. The debate over whether women should be assigned combat roles has already become irrelevant because of the very nature of warfare today. Everyone in a war zone is on the front line. You can get killed just as easily riding in a helicopter or in a convoy as on a search and destroy mission. Whether it is in the work place or in a war zone, I believe that everyone—male or female, should be treated equally. In the military, that would mean uniformed personnel are assigned duties based solely on their qualification and level of training, without regard to race, gender or sexual orientation.

While we're on the subject of the role of women in combat, I should point out that never in our nation's history has a woman combat veteran ever served in Congress. Close to two million women have served in our military, hundreds of whom have made the ultimate sacrifice, but the voice of a female combat veteran has yet to be heard on the floor of Congress. As a woman and war veteran, I hope to be that voice in Congress.


LGBT people have the same concerns as Straight folks when it comes to jobs, the environment, the homeless population and most of all, traffic! What can you do for us in these regards?

Tulsi: The first order of business is the economy. You know, it wasn’t so long ago that this country had a balanced budget and zero deficit. That tells me that getting our economy back on track is not an impossible dream. We just need to stop the partisan bickering and take some necessary and decisive action.

In Congress, I will work to inject fairness and common sense into our federal budget, by making sure that huge corporations and the ultra-rich do not get special treatment or extra tax breaks, while working class people struggle to make ends meet. I will also fight to eliminate cronyism, and the rampant waste and abuse that is sapping our fiscal strength and eroding the people’s trust in their government.

Our country is headed for another economic meltdown—but it will be even worse than the last one. This is because the banks that were "too big to fail" in 2008 are even bigger now. The only way to prevent this is serious Wall Street reform.

I completely agree with former Senator Bryon Dorgon who concludes that in order to save our country's economy we must do three things:

1. Restore the Glass-Steagall Act

2. Ban naked credit default swaps

3. Get rid of "too big to fail"

In addition, we need to end oil speculation. By the one simple act of ending oil speculation, oil and gas prices will be drastically reduced. This will help our economy on every single level. So long as oil and gas prices are high, our economic recovery will be anemic at best. Oil speculation and high gas prices will continue so long as members of Congress are more concerned about the interests of the giant corporations and Wall Street banks than they are in the interests of our country.

The measures described above, combined with increased support for small businesses, will solve our unemployment problem. It is outrageous and astonishing to me that while big corporations and Wall Street banks are basically allowed to do whatever they want without much meaningful regulation, small businesses, which are the true engine for growth in our country, are overburdened with bureaucratic red tape. This has to change. But it's not going to change so long as the voice of small businesses are not heard in Congress because they are drowned out by the powerful voices of big business.

I find it impossible to talk about jobs and the economy without talking about ending the war in Afghanistan. We are literally pouring $2.5 billion dollars a week into a corrupt government. This is absolutely mindboggling to me, considering what we could do with all that money here at home to rebuild our economy and create good jobs. This is one of the main reasons I’m offering to serve in Congress. It is absolutely crucial for our economy, for our national defense, and for our troops and their families, that we immediately withdraw from Afghanistan in a safe and orderly fashion.

Our brave men and women in uniform have served this nation honorably and sacrificed tremendously. We have decimated al Qaeda in Afghanistan, we have killed Osama bin Laden, and we have provided the Afghan people and government with the tools they need to succeed. In order for Afghanistan to achieve stability and peace, the Afghan people must stand up and determine the direction of their future. We must take the $2.5 billion a week we are pouring into Afghanistan to prop up a corrupt government and invest those dollars here at home — to rebuild Hawai'is economy and create good jobs.

As a lifelong environmentalist, I will continue to fight to preserve and protect our precious 'aina—not only so that we can enjoy clean air and water ourselves, but for future generations.

I believe that protecting the environment must go hand-in-hand with building the economy and creating jobs. That is why I am a strong and fervent proponent for developing clean, green, renewable energy resources, for which Hawai'i is already uniquely positioned to become a world leader. In Congress I would strive to create incentives to attract such industries to set up business in Hawai'i. This would have a three-pronged effect of providing jobs, a boost to the economy, and helping to preserve the environment, all at the same time.

Building the economy, creating jobs, and protecting the environment are some of the basic tasks that our representatives in Congress are supposed to be doing. Unfortunately, too many of them have stopped caring about the needs of our working families, and are only looking out for the interests of giant corporations and Wall Street banks which fund their campaigns.

Finally, you asked what I would do about our homeless population. There are many reasons why people are homeless. From my point of view, the most important reason is Hawai'i's high cost of living. People are struggling just to pay for the basic needs of housing, food, and gasoline. Many of us in Hawai'i are not that far from being homeless ourselves. I don’t believe that we should be resigned to the prospect that nothing can be done to drastically lower the cost of living. For one thing, as I've already mentioned, we can reduce the cost of energy. We need to end oil speculation, which will immediately reduce gas prices. This will in turn reduce not only the cost of our transportation, but will reduce the cost of everything else we need, including food, whether imported or grown here, construction, etc.--all which depend on gas and oil.

Secondly, we need to take steps to end land and housing speculation in Hawai'i. The combination of land and housing speculation, along with the shortage of available rentals is a problem. We need to take drastic steps on the federal, state, and city level to rectify this situation, By reducing the cost of housing and food, people won't be forced into homelessness. We need some serious long-term solutions. Until then, I will continue my efforts to help the homeless, by securing federal funding to build more temporary housing, and to provide counseling, education and training, and job placement. As a city councilwoman I worked to get $8.6 million in federal grants to fund 22 homeless assistance programs, but I know that this is not nearly enough.

These are just a few of the reasons I’m offering to serve in Congress. If the people of Hawai'i give me the honor of serving them in Congress, I will fight for equal rights for those in the LGBT community and all Americans and to put an end to the culture of greed and corruption that pervades Washington.


nationalize the fed

(2,169 posts)
43. +1
Sun Mar 13, 2016, 05:28 PM
Mar 2016

"Changing your mind" just like Clinton

And just like Obama did about mandatory insurance.

Tulsi cares about the 4th amendment, something neither Obama or Clinton do



She doesn't want big banks bailed out on the backs of the middle class either



Sanders/Gabbard 2016!
 

AtomicKitten

(46,585 posts)
93. yeah, that's a big one for me
Mon Mar 14, 2016, 06:23 PM
Mar 2016

John Oliver did a brilliant bit on encryption and privacy. I think it's important we protect and preserve the 4th amendment.

 

AJ.Akia

(38 posts)
96. Her Congressional record is very Pro-LGBT
Tue Mar 29, 2016, 10:46 PM
Mar 2016
Recent Actions for LGBT Rights and Marriage Equality

Co-sponsored the Employment Non-Discrimination Act
Co-sponsored the Restore Honor to Service Members Act
Co-sponsored the Respect for Marriage Act
Co-sponsored the Repeal of the Defense of Marriage Act
Co-sponsored the Military Spouses Equal Treatment Act
Co-sponsored the Safe Schools Improvement Act
Co-sponsored the Equality Act
Co-sponsored the Healthy Families Act
Co-sponsored the Equality for All Resolution
Signed the Marriage Equality Amicus Briefs
Advocated for LGBT Housing / Privacy Rights
Advocated to End Bullying and Harassment in Schools




Source: https://www.votetulsi.com/vision#equality

musiclawyer

(2,335 posts)
16. Yes. That's the Ticket. Literally
Sun Mar 13, 2016, 04:28 PM
Mar 2016

Tulsi is arguably too conservative but she has a mentor now and hits the sweet spots on Foreign policy. SHE is the first female president.

That's how these things work. She probably never thought of being anything but a senator until Bernie called her.

Nina is better as the domestic policy leader. Probably Chief of Staff. A kick ass Chief of staff unlike that Republican that Obama appointed

 

Gwhittey

(1,377 posts)
22. Think rather see her as Secretary of the Treasury
Sun Mar 13, 2016, 04:33 PM
Mar 2016

Is there many people that you could trust in this spot other than her?

Optimism

(142 posts)
24. I prefer either of the African-American ladies mentioned
Sun Mar 13, 2016, 04:35 PM
Mar 2016

But I think Tulsi would be the far stronger Veep candidate.

This ticket MUST happen!

Sixteen years of Hawaiians in the White House!!

 

AtomicKitten

(46,585 posts)
30. Nina Turner and Barbara Lee would be great but they both augment domestic policy.
Sun Mar 13, 2016, 04:45 PM
Mar 2016

Tulsi covers foreign policy eloquently and knowledgeably. I think she would really round out the ticket.

tblue

(16,350 posts)
34. I'd love that ticket!
Sun Mar 13, 2016, 04:51 PM
Mar 2016

She doesn't have to be my ideological twin. Just be honest and a real fighter on the side of the 99%.

It's not that I have ideological disagreements with HC, altho I do. It's her family's extensive, complicated financial ties to titans of industry and geopolitical power that make me very concerned and skeptical about where her true allegiance lies. Her flip-flopping is no accident. It's her way of covering her tracks. She's just in way too deep to ever be transparent.

restorefreedom

(12,655 posts)
40. do any recent examples come to mind?
Sun Mar 13, 2016, 05:09 PM
Mar 2016

i never really thought about it, house v senate v governor, is there a ticket you can think of that you didn't care for? might help with context


 

virtualobserver

(8,760 posts)
57. not when they are as impressive as she is
Sun Mar 13, 2016, 06:39 PM
Mar 2016

she takes total command when she appears on the political shows

phiddle

(789 posts)
44. My preference would be Janet Napolitano.
Sun Mar 13, 2016, 05:43 PM
Mar 2016

Whip smart, tremendously authoritative, very hard working, seasoned politician who many Americans could see as commander in chief. From her years at Homeland security she knows the players in the security establishment and could watch Bernie's back there, and she would help him seal the electoral deal in the Southwest, which the Repubs have to have.

 

cherokeeprogressive

(24,853 posts)
45. I would SO love to have Tulsi as this country's First Female Vice President!
Sun Mar 13, 2016, 05:59 PM
Mar 2016

And then First Female President!

GardeningGal

(2,211 posts)
47. She's impressive speaking calmly and clearly.
Sun Mar 13, 2016, 06:08 PM
Mar 2016

I'd be happy to see her on the ticket but I trust Bernie to do what he thinks is right and will support his choice.

FailureToCommunicate

(14,014 posts)
49. I agree. She would be an outside the box pick that would send the interest level to eleven!
Sun Mar 13, 2016, 06:21 PM
Mar 2016

Aloha Bernie/Tulsi 2016 !


?w=300&quality=75&strip=color&h=225

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Tulsi-gabbard-promoted-major.jpg

?quality=75&strip=color&w=1680

 

Indepatriot

(1,253 posts)
56. I'll let my inner sexist pig loose here and note that in addition to being an all-round ass kicker,
Sun Mar 13, 2016, 06:38 PM
Mar 2016

intelligent, funny, media savvy, and a veteran, she is also very attractive young lady......that can't hurt...

grasswire

(50,130 posts)
70. I can't see how being an attractive young lady is a qualification ...
Sun Mar 13, 2016, 07:14 PM
Mar 2016

....for POTUS. Because we have to consider the veep always that way. A heartbeat away.

 

Indepatriot

(1,253 posts)
78. I never implied it was a qualification. I said it "can't hurt"....
Sun Mar 13, 2016, 08:33 PM
Mar 2016

Most of the women I know think Obama is a handsome guy and more than a few have mentioned that over the years. It can't hurt.

Cryptoad

(8,254 posts)
58. Math is a "real" science
Sun Mar 13, 2016, 06:42 PM
Mar 2016

and it says there is no path to victory for Bern...... somebody never needs to mock the GOP ever again for not following the science.

 

The Traveler

(5,632 posts)
79. Not a scientist, are ya?
Sun Mar 13, 2016, 08:39 PM
Mar 2016

To be sure, the path to victory is narrow and pretty much requires a collapse of support for Clinton in the late state primaries.

Fortunately for Sanders supporters, the Clintons appear determined to oblige.

Math is, by the way, not science. Not at all. While math is, of course, used extensively in the sciences, math is not constrained and shaped by the mandates of the scientific method. For example, there are systems of math that have no known relationship to any real world phenomena. In science, all assertions must be eventually subject to the test of experiment. We must look to see if the real world produces the behaviors we predict, and only the behaviors we predict, before we can develop confidence in an hypothesis.

So, alas, your snark attempt fails rather hilariously.

Cheers

Trav

Cryptoad

(8,254 posts)
88. No snark, just the facts
Mon Mar 14, 2016, 12:09 AM
Mar 2016

u aint gotta know the square root of minus one to count up how many delegates Bern needs and how many delegates are left to be won and see it aint going to happen.

MrJefe

(7 posts)
60. I thought we might see Gabbard apointed
Sun Mar 13, 2016, 06:46 PM
Mar 2016

as Secretary of Defense. It would be nice to see someone with combat experience in that position.

 

lastone

(588 posts)
61. And we have a WINNER!
Sun Mar 13, 2016, 06:48 PM
Mar 2016

Let's start a draft Tulsi petition people - this is the best idea I've heard of in a LONG time (apart from Sanders policies) true GENIUS!

And lookie here - these domains are no longer available, perhaps it's being worked on already!
Sorry, sandersgabbard.com is taken
Sorry, sandersgabbard2016.com is taken

Atomic Kitten you freaking ROCK!







rickford66

(5,524 posts)
64. I thought so the first time I heard her speak.
Sun Mar 13, 2016, 06:51 PM
Mar 2016

My buddy and I quickly GOOGLED her to see if she was 35. Taking a quote from the right ... GOD works in mysterious ways.

grasswire

(50,130 posts)
69. I don't think her geography makes any electoral sense.
Sun Mar 13, 2016, 07:12 PM
Mar 2016

I think she's impressive, but I don't think she's "seasoned" enough yet, either.

I don't really have a pick for veep yet.

deutsey

(20,166 posts)
92. At first glance, I like it!
Mon Mar 14, 2016, 10:08 AM
Mar 2016

I don't know a whole lot about her (beyond what was reported when she resigned from the DNC), so I'd like to look into her record more closely.

From what I know at the moment, however, I'd get behind this ticket.

Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»2016 Postmortem»I'm calling it. Sanders-...