Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

laserhaas

(7,805 posts)
Sun Mar 13, 2016, 02:55 PM Mar 2016

Sanders v Romney: Who Gets to Pick USAG

There's going to be much debate, between now and july, until the dust settles, where both sides learn who is their POTUS race guy. In the interim, we banter and sling mud, to the joy of Clear Channel (now iHeart) and the rest of MSM. For they, by law, get top $ rate, filling in dead air time, with billions of banter dollars, about the issues of the 2016 POTUS race.

Arguably, the 2016 POTUS race boils down to the issue, of who gets to pick the next USAG.
[r]
[center]

[br] (Carton by Prize Winner Steve Sack
Tribune has it no longer
so you can go - HERE)
[br]
[font size=5]
Fighting Wall Street Fraud, To No Avail, Since 2001
[/font][/center]
As some of you may know (my having posted a hundred threads about the topic, here, at DU), I've been fighting Mitt Romney and Goldman Sachs power centers/Wall Street Frauds, since 2001, when I blew the whistle on a bribe offer, to become partners with Mitt's gang.

Obviously, as most argue, one can't fight city hall; and, even more so, you purportedly can't fight those who buy off city hall.
.
Be that as it may, I'm never going to give up, nor surrender. It is a moral imperative, to not stand idle by, when tax paid public servants are taking your dollars and helping organized criminals steal your pensions.
.
We can prove that there are more than 100 crimes, including Perjury, Bribery, Intimidation of Victim/Witness, Mail & Wire Fraud, Retaliation, Conspiracy to Defraud, Corruption, Attempted Murder (and homicides complete, beneficial), Bankruptcy Fraud, Grand Larceny (over a Billion), Scheme to Fix Fees - in federal cases, Collusion, Obstruction and more.

Also, I'm one of Romney's "retroactive" secrets, so is his MNAT law firms former (presumably) partner, Colm F Connolly.

How Bain Capital and Goldman Sachs deliberately destroyed our eToys public company, and have gotten away (thus far) totally 'Scot Free', is the fact that Colm Connolly came from the Department of Justice (where he failed to prosecute Romney and Bain Capital for ripping off Mattel investors of $3 Billion, 1999, of 'The Learning Company' merger with Mattel) and then Colm was made a partner of the MNAT law firm (that Connolly was supposed to be investigating). When we reported a bribe offer, in eToys case, Colm Connolly became the prosecutor and Mitt Romney "retroactively" resigned. (See Colm Connolly's resume - HERE)

It's a simple question - Could Al Capone "retroactively" retire from his organized crimes?

Therefore, the reason protest parties are put in jail, and the Wall Street fraudsters are able to stay 'Scot Free', is because the authorities are abusing their power, by punishing the victims/ whistleblowers/ protest parties, and granting the Capone/Nitti's their very own Justice Department "get out of jail free cards".
[br][center]

[/center][br]
This can stop, but only if Bernie Sanders becomes president.

My concern is that Hillary or Romney will become POTUS; and that doesn't bode well for those of U.S. who know that the Wall Street fraudsters have never faced justice.

You can argue that I'm wrong - but why?

Yeah, I know, everyone believes Trump is on top, on his own, and that Romney's Clear Channel Communications (renamed iHeart Radio) with its shows of Mark Levine, LameBlah, Ham'itup'ity and Bleech, have absolutely nothing to do with it.

REALLY!?!?!?

Even if I'm wrong, as I've been saying for a year now, and Mitt is more unpopular than Trump, or Romney doesn't have enough power, any more, to broker the GOP convention, do you really believe the other candidates will actually pick a USAG that will do the right thing, against Wall Street fraudsters, such as Bain Capital and Goldman Sachs?

One thing for sure, Hillary's loyalties are divided, between U.S. and Sachs.

But, if Bernie Sanders were to get elected, and have the chance to be the POTUS, this could change everything. Most certainly, we couldn't count on RMoney, if he does steal the WH, instead of HRC, to investigate Bain Capital.

After all, Mitt knows he didn't do it

If Senator Sanders succeeds and becomes President of the United States,
----------------------------------who do you suggest, or think, he will/should pick as USAG?

just askin...................
[br]

4 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Sanders v Romney: Who Gets to Pick USAG (Original Post) laserhaas Mar 2016 OP
It's a special question. We all believed Obama was change, then he picked Holder laserhaas Mar 2016 #1
Romney? Ruby the Liberal Mar 2016 #2
Do you really think that Trump is on top - because he's the best the GOP has to offer? laserhaas Mar 2016 #3
Truth be told, it is the best of both worlds, for me, to risk Romney's dance chance. laserhaas Mar 2016 #4
 

laserhaas

(7,805 posts)
1. It's a special question. We all believed Obama was change, then he picked Holder
Sun Mar 13, 2016, 03:31 PM
Mar 2016

Who could Bernie pick that would do the job, knowing the appointment means shaking up the DOJ?

We have hopes for a new Supreme Court, not so corporate bent.

 

laserhaas

(7,805 posts)
3. Do you really think that Trump is on top - because he's the best the GOP has to offer?
Sun Mar 13, 2016, 03:35 PM
Mar 2016

Or, could it just be possible that Mitt's Clear Channel/iHeart Radio stations, with Rush Limbaugh, Hannity, BEck, Handler the Law, Mark Levine, and 100 million listeners, were being coaxed to adore a bore...

so that the clean Romney, with only months of media scrutiny, could steal the show?

Just sayin.....

..........................it's possible.

 

laserhaas

(7,805 posts)
4. Truth be told, it is the best of both worlds, for me, to risk Romney's dance chance.
Sun Mar 13, 2016, 03:39 PM
Mar 2016

No person exemplifies - better - everything that Bernie Sanders cries a loud foul about, than Wall Street Mitt.

And there's no better, polar opposite, to give the people a clear choice, than Sanders v Romney.

Plus, there's hope the corruption that has buried our eToys case, and the corruption thereof, would garner some attention.

It, sad to say, also comes with the risk, Mitt might rip it off.....

We'll ........ soon ......see

Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»2016 Postmortem»Sanders v Romney: Who Get...