Instead of having Town Hall debates with undecided voters,

[pnwmom]

why don't they have 1/3 Dem, 1/3 Repub, and 1/3 undecided, Independent, or other?

That would make for more interesting questions.

[nobunnyclue]

1. Vetting "undecided" audience

If the moderator was the chump in debate 1 for not closing down a disrespectful Mitt, I predict it will be the vetting of the audience that gets some special scrutiny tonight.

[pnwmom]

2. Crowley has already said she'll be "culling" questions. Welcome to DU, nobunnyclue! nt

[Bjorn Against]

3. There are no truly undecided voters in the audience at these things

Every four years they tell us it is a crowd of undecided voters, but I doubt a single one of them is truly undecided. If you are interested enough in politics to attend the debate you are probably interested enough to have already made up your mind. In past years it seemed like the "undecided" voters in the town halls were split pretty evenly between Republicans and Democrats, it is usually pretty easy to tell who is who by the questions they ask.

[morningfog]

4. Undecideds, at this point, should not be allowed to vote.

[Tx4obama]

5. The undecided voters that I've been seeing on TV aren't very bright ...

I just wonder what kind of questions they've come up with.

[beyurslf]

6. I don't trust undecided voters.

Anyone who could be convinced to vote for Obama or Romney just doesn't know they believe. Those people scare me.