Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
6 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
I Hate Having The First Four Threads But The Great Nate Bumped Up Obama's Reelect To 66% (Original Post) DemocratSinceBirth Oct 2012 OP
66% Dawson Leery Oct 2012 #1
"The Great and Powerful Nate has spoken!" regnaD kciN Oct 2012 #2
PPP Is A Robocaller DemocratSinceBirth Oct 2012 #3
True... regnaD kciN Oct 2012 #4
I Think PPP Was The Third Or Fourth Public Pollster To Show O Holding On To A OH Lead, However Small DemocratSinceBirth Oct 2012 #5
PPP was bad for Obama last week. geek tragedy Oct 2012 #6

DemocratSinceBirth

(99,711 posts)
3. PPP Is A Robocaller
Mon Oct 15, 2012, 10:55 PM
Oct 2012

PPP is a robocaller and consequently has to weight their polls to reflect a cell phone using population they samply can't reach, Peter Miller, a recent president of the American Association for Public Opinion Research, points out the root problem with weighting: “The more you rely on weights, the more you risk being wrong for reasons you don’t understand.”

regnaD kciN

(26,045 posts)
4. True...
Mon Oct 15, 2012, 11:25 PM
Oct 2012

...but Mr. Silver has certainly shown a predilection for taking dodgy polls (Exhibit A: Gravis) at face value -- and PPP is cetainly more credible than some of them.

Besides, if PPP is such an utterly-unreliable pollster, shouldn't we have shrugged-off their O+5 (and with a 50-point lead among the 19% who have supposedly voted) Ohio poll from a couple of days ago, instead of clinging to it like a lifeline?

Still, Kos's "warning," combined with his contrast between their national and state results, does sound like it might carry a subtext of doubt about their results. DKos hasn't exactly had good luck with their polling firms -- remember that they dumped their previous pollster, Research2000, after uncovering evidence suggesting that R2K was "cooking" their results. So I would think that Kos would be super-sensitive to any anomalies with this one as well.

DemocratSinceBirth

(99,711 posts)
5. I Think PPP Was The Third Or Fourth Public Pollster To Show O Holding On To A OH Lead, However Small
Mon Oct 15, 2012, 11:31 PM
Oct 2012

If you asked Nate why he agrees to include all poll even crappy ones he would say because the law of large numbers assumes good data will cancel out bad data.


I just think it's silly to obsess over this poll or that poll instead of looking at all the polls.

As to Markos Moulitsas it must be mortifying to have to publish a national poll that is more GOP friendly than Rasmussen.

 

geek tragedy

(68,868 posts)
6. PPP was bad for Obama last week.
Mon Oct 15, 2012, 11:33 PM
Oct 2012

24 hours from now we'll know who's going to win.

Obama needs more than to show up--he needs something interesting to say. Content and delivery both matter.

Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»2016 Postmortem»I Hate Having The First F...