2016 Postmortem
Related: About this forumVT Public Radio, Dec, 2008. Bernie and Leahy support auto bailout.
They speak against the financial industry bailout but support the bailing out of the auto industry.
Leahy, Sanders reluctantly support auto industry rescue
12/11/08 5:50PM By Bob Kinzel
(Host) Vermont's two U.S. Senators, Patrick Leahy and Bernie Sanders, say they're reluctantly supporting a $15 billion rescue package for the nation's auto industry.
Both senators say that allowing Ford, General Motors or Chrylser to fall into bankruptcy could affect a lot of auto related jobs in Vermont.
Senator Patrick Leahy says he's reluctantly supporting the bill because millions of jobs could be lost if the car companies go under:
(Leahy) "You can't have the most powerful nation on earth you can't have the automobile industry go belly up to some extent there's a national security component of the automobile industry...I look at the millions of jobs throughout America including a whole lot in Vermont connected to the automobile industry manufacturing type jobs and on top of that you have all of the dealers."
Senator Bernie Sanders voted against the $700 billion bail out of the financial services industry but he says this package is different:
(Sanders) "The problem is if you don't act in the midst of a growing recession what does it mean to create a situation where millions of more people become unemployed and that could spread and I have serious concerns about that I think it would be a terrible idea to add millions more to the unemployment rolls."
madfloridian
(88,117 posts)jillan
(39,451 posts)Of 3 Clinton supporters. Non stop talking about it.
SunSeeker
(51,658 posts)The $82 billion that helped finance the bankruptcy of General Motors, Chrysler, their finance subsidiaries -- GMAC and Chrysler Financial -- and a handful of large suppliers were part of a much larger Troubled Asset Relief Program (TARP) that covered more than $700 billion that went to bailout the largest banks, and AIG, the insurance giant that has issued credit default swaps that came due when the banks could not cover their losses on mortgage-backed securities.
http://www.freep.com/story/money/cars/general-motors/2016/03/06/explaining-hillary-clintons-bernie-sanders-votes-auto-bailout/81419564/
madfloridian
(88,117 posts)SunSeeker
(51,658 posts)He can try to spin that No vote all he wants, it still doesn't change the fact that he voted No.
senz
(11,945 posts)CNN Money gives a very good explanation.
What Sanders should have said to Clinton about the auto bailout
General Motors (GM) and Chrysler were actually bailed out using money from TARP, the $700 billion bank bailout that passed during the financial crisis in the fall of 2008. When it was originally proposed, there were no plans to use the money to save the auto industry.
The fact that Sanders voted against TARP gave Clinton the ability to say, "If everybody had voted the way he did, I believe the auto industry would have collapsed, taking four million jobs with it."
President Bush asked Congress to authorize a bailout for the auto industry in December of 2008. It had the support of a majority of the Senate, including Sanders and Clinton. But Republican opposition blocked it from passing.
So when it came time to give the automakers the money, first Bush and then Obama simply tapped into TARP.
Sanders first opposed TARP when it passed in October 2008. He also joined with Republicans who sought to stop the distribution of TARP funds in January 2009, at which point it had been determined that some TARP funds would go to the auto bailout. But that effort failed, and the auto-industry rescue became part of TARP.
"In terms of the auto bailout, of course that made sense...and I strongly supported President Obama's position on that," Sanders said in Flint, Mich.. He said he would have funded an auto bailout out of the stimulus package, rather than TARP.
Hillary's complete lack of integrity, ethics, and honesty is absolutely shocking to me. I cannot see it in a President of the United States.
pat_k
(9,313 posts)saltpoint
(50,986 posts)Vermont were doing their job.
Looks like Senator Sanders makes a good point about the balance between employment and economic hardship framed with compassion for working people.
Looks like everything I never trusted about the mainstream media distorting the facts continues to be their mode of operation.
Hillary Clinton, herself a former Senator from New York, would have access to those voting records. Perhaps she can do a bit of checking and get her facts straight, if that isn't asking too much.
madfloridian
(88,117 posts)saltpoint
(50,986 posts)you've provided the actual factual.
You own this one, madfloridian. Thank you. Let the doubters wail in the rain.
amborin
(16,631 posts)madfloridian
(88,117 posts)saltpoint
(50,986 posts)awkward choices by the Clinton campaign, namely, did she pounce on Sanders without knowing how or why he voted as he did?
Did she trust her campaign strategists on this point without checking it herself?
Or did she know how and why he voted as he did but threw the spitball anyway?
What would she have us believe?
senz
(11,945 posts)She does this sort of thing all the time.
saltpoint
(50,986 posts)territorial against more progressive Democrats.
She lost to Obama and Edwards both in Iowa last time she ran.
She only barely beat Sanders in Iowa time.
She's got some wins, to be sure, but Sanders would not be enjoying the following he has if Hillary were not vulnerable.
It sure does feel like an attitude problem to me.
As a candidate, there is something wrong. Everything about her history points to neocon/ neoliberal but she mouths the old Democratic platitudes, and the cognitive dissonance is deafening.
At this time in our history, it matters how we choose.
saltpoint
(50,986 posts)long lines at Sanders appearances.
I don't know anybody personally in those lines. But at the same time I feel like I know them all.
Sanders' campaign has been as inspiring as Trump's has been appalling.
senz
(11,945 posts)On a very deep level we all share similar, crucially important, values. It might be different for younger people vs. older people but there is something -- common humanity? -- that coalesces at this time around this person.
Sanders vs. Trump is a real crossroads. Incredible that it boiled down to these choices.
Wish it weren't so nerve-wracking.
ucrdem
(15,512 posts)madfloridian
(88,117 posts)The TARP was the huge bank bailout. He said he did not support it.
ucrdem
(15,512 posts)senz
(11,945 posts)People of Bernie's moral rectitude never expect the ugliness that is the norm for the morally depraved.
madfloridian
(88,117 posts)SunSeeker
(51,658 posts)Bernie voted No. That is an odd way to show your support.
metroins
(2,550 posts)People can argue the merits of the bills, but they funded the bailouts and Bernie voted Nay.
Fairgo
(1,571 posts)The behaviour of right wing democrats suggests that they have no boundaries, no rules past "winning"
madfloridian
(88,117 posts)Hillary chose her words carefully, but in effect she lied.
Fairgo
(1,571 posts)Which is my great concern.
You and me both.
Major Hogwash
(17,656 posts)Not unusual for her at all.
The only thing she has left is a warehouse of kitchen sinks!!!
kennetha
(3,666 posts)She told the truth
ecstatic
(32,727 posts)Especially when he holds Clinton's feet to the fire regarding her past votes. Clinton was actually against pre-emptive military action when she voted for the IWR. Bush and Co didn't use the IWR the way they said they would. Are you going to give her a pass? I don't think so. You can't have it both ways.
madfloridian
(88,117 posts)Major Hogwash
(17,656 posts)There is no doubt anymore about who is lying and who is not lying.
kennetha
(3,666 posts)madfloridian
(88,117 posts)madfloridian
(88,117 posts)12/11/08 5:50PM By Bob Kinzel
(Host) Vermont's two U.S. Senators, Patrick Leahy and Bernie Sanders, say they're reluctantly supporting a $15 billion rescue package for the nation's auto industry.
Both senators say that allowing Ford, General Motors or Chrylser to fall into bankruptcy could affect a lot of auto related jobs in Vermont.
It's so obvious they both supported bailing out the auto industry. How can someone with conscience say they did not.
Fuddnik
(8,846 posts)She just keeps pulling shit out of her ass, hoping something will stick,
She can't run on her record, so she has to try to destroy his.
kennetha
(3,666 posts)Sanders was the one who panicked when Clinton lowered the boom on him.
Just think of what the Republicans would do to him in a general election.
kennetha
(3,666 posts)Sanders turned all moral purist, as he always, does, and was willing to cast the industry and its workers into the abyss rather than stop the world economy from collapsing. Just so he could rail against the millionaires and billionaires.
madfloridian
(88,117 posts)To her it's all about winning, truth be damned.
Enthusiast
(50,983 posts)The volume of misinformation is staggering.
How could anyone support a candidate that relies entirely on falsehoods and smears?
kennetha
(3,666 posts)Enthusiast
(50,983 posts)madfloridian
(88,117 posts)And because Hillary crossed some truth lines.
KoKo
(84,711 posts)on the campaign trail didn't make it clear. But, then, I've given up on MSM Cables doing any fact checking. They ignore Bernie for the most part unless its something they can wrongly report about what he says.
madfloridian
(88,117 posts)I can't even stand to watch her anymore.
kennetha
(3,666 posts)He didn't support it
madfloridian
(88,117 posts)senz
(11,945 posts)This is how crooks try to trip up honest people.
AzDar
(14,023 posts)senz
(11,945 posts)Hillary, in typical disingenuous manner, obscured this fact.
Armstead
(47,803 posts)I
am
so
Sick
of
goddamn
lies
and/or
distortions
amborin
(16,631 posts)madfloridian
(88,117 posts)madfloridian
(88,117 posts)fredamae
(4,458 posts)Educate. Educate. Educate.
That's all "we" can do to neutralize the toxicity of cheating.
madfloridian
(88,117 posts)fredamae
(4,458 posts)Want to be right. And it's sad Dems have stooped to GOP bs during the last few elections...but then, maybe I wasn't as aware of it before.