NY Times: Hillary wins 38 delegates tonight, Sanders gets 14

[wyldwolf]

http://www.nytimes.com/elections/results

[virtualobserver]

1. their numbers aren't right

[Kaleva]

3. A lot of delegates still to be determined

[nadinbrzezinski]

11. Some of them are supers

[Agschmid]

2. I didn't know how small the population of Nebraska was until I just googled it.

I was surprised by that number.

[DLnyc]

4. That's 38 plus 14 = 52 out of 126 available tonight.

Results are not complete yet.

[wyldwolf]

5. thanks for the clarification

[msongs]

6. yes but the revolution swept the millenial bastions! where people don't vote in the general nt

[retrowire]

7. You really love calling a game before it's finished don't you?

You must be a hoot at tailgate parties.

[FourScore]

8. It's staggering how misleading the reporting is on this.

Factoring in super delegates and all.

[ConsiderThis_2016]

9. Hillary wins...

...in conservative states... go figure!

[redstateblues]

13. Massachusetts, NV conservative?

Whoosh

[Alfresco]

10. Now it's 48 Hillary, 37 Bernie

[nadinbrzezinski]

12. current count, per clear politics WITHOUT supers

Delegates Won - 4051

Clinton 644
Sanders 444

[DLnyc]

14. Now at 37 Sanders to 48 so far, out of 109 available tonight, according to RCP

New York Times has 126 available, I have no idea why the two have different numbers. ????

But the numbers are really not in yet. My guess, on incomplete information, is Hillary gets more in Louisiana, Bernie gets more in Kansas and Nebraska, maybe a 10 delegate lead gain for Hillary overall for the day, once everything is counted up sometime tomorrow!

RCP: http://www.realclearpolitics.com/epolls/2016/president/democratic_delegate_count.html
NYT: http://www.nytimes.com/elections/results

[Alfresco]

15. Now it's 51 Hillary, 45 Bernie

[Alfresco]

16. 55, 47