HRC Manipulates
Clinton Manipulates Language of Intersectionality To Preserve Support From Minority Voters
by Rania Khalek on March 2, 2016
The presidential campaign of Hillary Clinton has been a master class in how to divorce economic issues from issues of race and gender by pushing the language of intersectionality, which enables the political class to head off threats to their power and protect the status quo. The results in the South Carolina Democratic primary are a clear example of this reality.
Clinton has suggested, If we broke up the big banks tomorrow
would that end racism? Would that end sexism? Her supporters have been led to believe this is a reasonable perspective to hold, and so, as Roqayah Chamseddine has argued, the answer to Sanders economic populism has been relatively easydivert attention to other issues and mislead the public in terms of how anti-capitalism converges with race, gender, and class.
This week on the Unauthorized Disclosure weekly podcast we are joined by Vivek Chibber, a sociology professor at New York University and the author of Postcolonial Theory and the Specter of Capital.
During the interview, he analyzes how neoliberals and the Democratic Party wield identity politics to push citizens to vote against their self-interests. First, he offers a basic explanation of post-colonial theory, and then he talks about how the New Left popularized the political or intellectual thinking prevalent today. The interview pivots to Hillary Clinton and how her campaign deploys the language of radical left-wing politics in order to manage and lower the expectations of voters, especially minorities.
For a link to the episodes (and also to download them as well), go here;
http://raniakhalek.com/2016/03/02/clinton-manipulates-language-of-intersectionality-to-preserve-support-from-minority-voters/