2016 Postmortem
Related: About this forumAgschmid
(28,749 posts)Avalux
(35,015 posts)Agschmid
(28,749 posts)JaneyVee
(19,877 posts)Agschmid
(28,749 posts)It didn't happen.
The expectations were not met.
Avalux
(35,015 posts)msanthrope
(37,549 posts)Grassy Knoll
(10,118 posts)Adrahil
(13,340 posts)According to Nate Silver's model, he needed to win MA by 11 points to be "on track."
IN fact, in his analysis of tonights results, Sanders is well behind his targets for tonight, and the analysis indicates an overall advantage for Clinton of +16.
In other words, a bad night for Bernie. But not as disastrous as it could have been.
JaneyVee
(19,877 posts)ChiciB1
(15,435 posts)done something there! WIN?? If that's what you want to call it!
Adrahil
(13,340 posts)Lose gracefully FFS.
Codeine
(25,586 posts)You really think the Big Dog wandering into a polling station for a while changed a statewide election result?
KingFlorez
(12,689 posts)Sanders should have won big there, yet Clinton pulled an upset.
Chasstev365
(5,191 posts)Bernie has won CO, VT, & OK and could win MN. Hillary only seems to be winning tbe Red States handily and they will vote Republican in NOV. Doesn't that concern you?
grossproffit
(5,591 posts)brer cat
(24,591 posts)OK hasn't voted dem since 1964 and now they are blue. Nice paint job going on here.
votesparks
(1,288 posts)GREAT NIGHT FOR BERNIE!
jillan
(39,451 posts)itsrobert
(14,157 posts)First woman President or a real liberal President.
JaneyVee
(19,877 posts)CajunBlazer
(5,648 posts)alcibiades_mystery
(36,437 posts)That was the last really big chunk that could have made up the 25,000 vote difference.
That's why they called.
It looked early to me until Wuh-stah showed up reporting.
Grassy Knoll
(10,118 posts)Beacool
(30,250 posts)Bjornsdotter
(6,123 posts)Adrahil
(13,340 posts)Bjornsdotter
(6,123 posts)....and corrected my posts.