2016 Postmortem
Related: About this forumThe dude abides - four states for Sanders & MA still in the air.
Okay, looking bad for a Sanders win in MA, but the gap keeps closing. 78% reporting, it's 50.7 to 48.1 and the western part of the state (Sanders territory) is still coming in. Only FOXNEWS has called the state (like they did in the 2000 presidential for Bush).
So what if there's a SOLID NORTH for Sanders? Note that he won OK as well as MN, CO and VT. What matters more for Democrats in November, North and West or South? Hello?
krispos42
(49,445 posts)Funny how that worked out.
Adrahil
(13,340 posts)VulgarPoet
(2,872 posts)Response to JackRiddler (Original post)
Post removed
msanthrope
(37,549 posts)JackRiddler
(24,979 posts)They can call MA all they like, it's still being counted.
I acknowledged that the likelihood is Clinton wins it. So?
msanthrope
(37,549 posts)took MA......you know...the Confederacy.
JackRiddler
(24,979 posts)Google says Sanders "won." It's wrong, they display him at 48.3 vs. 50.5, but there it is.
Split is fine for MA. This is the Secretary's territory, after all.
msanthrope
(37,549 posts)JackRiddler
(24,979 posts)It was actually displaying that, there's another thread about it.
Delegate count, 44-41. In Clinton territory! Where Warren hesitated to remain consistent to her creed, sadly.
kstewart33
(6,551 posts)She showed she can win up north.
JackRiddler
(24,979 posts)You stick with that.
What's Oklahoma, is that more northern liberals not being intersectional enough?
msanthrope
(37,549 posts)JackRiddler
(24,979 posts)The majority of what's coming is western MA.
In any case, a delegate split in MA and four states for Sanders.
msanthrope
(37,549 posts)JackRiddler
(24,979 posts)I'm fine with the delegate split in the great northern commonwealth of Massachusetts, after the bullshit polls predicting a big Clinton victory.
Agschmid
(28,749 posts)That should just about do it!