Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
48 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Adam McKay at Oscars: "Don't Vote For Candidates That Take Money From Big Banks" (Original Post) UglyGreed Feb 2016 OP
Thats Donald Trump Also isn't it? ... seems weird YCHDT Feb 2016 #1
Well if that was your first thought UglyGreed Feb 2016 #2
he also said something like "or crazy billionaires" unblock Feb 2016 #4
Trump isn't taking money from bankers but Hillary is. Loudestlib Feb 2016 #42
Crazy Trump doesn't have to take money, Duppers Feb 2016 #44
Those who take money from big banks.. LiberalLovinLug Feb 2016 #46
He and DiCaprio gave the LibDemAlways Feb 2016 #3
Leo is a maxed out Hillary donor. K and R. JaneyVee Feb 2016 #9
I don't care who Leo is LibDemAlways Feb 2016 #16
Exactly! NWCorona Feb 2016 #21
Indeed they did. Duppers Feb 2016 #43
Adam McKay's net worth is $40 Million. n/t R B Garr Feb 2016 #5
So what???? UglyGreed Feb 2016 #7
Now $40 Million is "so what"...... R B Garr Feb 2016 #11
Keep on going UglyGreed Feb 2016 #15
lol, LOVE the constant "evolving" on the 1%'ers. R B Garr Feb 2016 #19
Thanks for the kick UglyGreed Feb 2016 #22
Does he run a multi-million corporation that ruins lives? nt. polly7 Feb 2016 #23
lol, so now $40 Million is "so what".... R B Garr Feb 2016 #12
Nobody has a thing against anyone who has money ......... it's how they get it and polly7 Feb 2016 #24
The argument is not "everyone who has money is evil" genius. gcomeau Feb 2016 #13
LOL! I love the "evolving" that always happens when a 1%'er is found to R B Garr Feb 2016 #17
What "evolving"? gcomeau Feb 2016 #20
They're just making up bullshit to hide the fact that they have nothing intelligent to offer n/t arcane1 Feb 2016 #27
Makes you wonder just how desperate some are. nt. polly7 Feb 2016 #25
It's not about people being wealthy. It's about the ongoing corrupt behavior think Feb 2016 #28
Yet Bernie talks nonstop about the 1%'ers. Hillary is lambasted for Hollywood R B Garr Feb 2016 #29
Do you feel the 1% pay their fair share of taxes? How many small donors does Hillary think Feb 2016 #31
Does this mean that Adam McKay is Bad now? R B Garr Feb 2016 #32
Feel free to explain the logic of your question. think Feb 2016 #35
It's obvious. So obvious it needs no explaining and that's why you R B Garr Feb 2016 #36
The thread is about taking money from banks. Who changed the subject? think Feb 2016 #37
As someone who works in the industry... JaneyVee Feb 2016 #6
How many lives have they ruined? polly7 Feb 2016 #26
This makes total sense, and that's why Bernie's talking points take a total leap of R B Garr Feb 2016 #30
Brought to you by corporate Paramount Pictures, a subsidiary of frazzled Feb 2016 #8
There it is^^^^^^ R B Garr Feb 2016 #33
Some rich guys are cool UglyGreed Feb 2016 #10
Yes, Bernie Sanders' Millionaires are super cool! R B Garr Feb 2016 #14
Thanks for the kick UglyGreed Feb 2016 #18
It's not whose millionaires are better, as you well know. Gary 50 Feb 2016 #41
Bull. Just saw a Bernie ad where Bernie himself refers to the "top 1%" R B Garr Feb 2016 #47
K&R kgnu_fan Feb 2016 #34
Some have no choice - they do not have the people SoLeftIAmRight Feb 2016 #38
K & R AzDar Feb 2016 #39
K&R Good for McKay & others speaking out like Nick Hanauer of Seattle. appalachiablue Feb 2016 #40
K & R! TIME TO PANIC Feb 2016 #45
Kick UglyGreed Mar 2016 #48

Loudestlib

(980 posts)
42. Trump isn't taking money from bankers but Hillary is.
Mon Feb 29, 2016, 03:43 PM
Feb 2016

In fact, Hillary made it into the .01% by telling bankers what they want to hear.

Duppers

(28,127 posts)
44. Crazy Trump doesn't have to take money,
Mon Feb 29, 2016, 03:51 PM
Feb 2016

he has enough to run his own campaign.


He was talking about Hillary and the rethugs.


LibDemAlways

(15,139 posts)
16. I don't care who Leo is
Mon Feb 29, 2016, 01:32 PM
Feb 2016

voting for. I commented that I thought his acceptance speech was good and left it at that.

UglyGreed

(7,661 posts)
7. So what????
Mon Feb 29, 2016, 01:22 PM
Feb 2016

Meme of the day it seems. First Grayson and now McKay Was that the marching orders in this morning's email????

UglyGreed

(7,661 posts)
15. Keep on going
Mon Feb 29, 2016, 01:30 PM
Feb 2016

did this guy's greed cause people to lose their homes??? Or kill people abroad???? Or make seniors lose their pensions and eat cat food????

R B Garr

(16,985 posts)
12. lol, so now $40 Million is "so what"....
Mon Feb 29, 2016, 01:28 PM
Feb 2016

Next we'll hear that being photographed with people worth lots of money really is no big deal after all!

polly7

(20,582 posts)
24. Nobody has a thing against anyone who has money ......... it's how they get it and
Mon Feb 29, 2016, 01:45 PM
Feb 2016

use it to control and destroy the lives of others that counts.

That seems like a no-brainer, don't it?

 

gcomeau

(5,764 posts)
13. The argument is not "everyone who has money is evil" genius.
Mon Feb 29, 2016, 01:29 PM
Feb 2016

It matters HOW THE FUCK THEY GOT IT and WHAT THEY DO WITH IT.

R B Garr

(16,985 posts)
17. LOL! I love the "evolving" that always happens when a 1%'er is found to
Mon Feb 29, 2016, 01:33 PM
Feb 2016

be even remotely hinting at Bernie Sanders.

 

gcomeau

(5,764 posts)
20. What "evolving"?
Mon Feb 29, 2016, 01:35 PM
Feb 2016

If you an find anywhere where we were arguing, ever, that all people who have money are evil... point me at it doofus.

 

arcane1

(38,613 posts)
27. They're just making up bullshit to hide the fact that they have nothing intelligent to offer n/t
Mon Feb 29, 2016, 01:50 PM
Feb 2016
 

think

(11,641 posts)
28. It's not about people being wealthy. It's about the ongoing corrupt behavior
Mon Feb 29, 2016, 01:57 PM
Feb 2016

Of these banks.

That's the issue.

R B Garr

(16,985 posts)
29. Yet Bernie talks nonstop about the 1%'ers. Hillary is lambasted for Hollywood
Mon Feb 29, 2016, 02:08 PM
Feb 2016

fund raisers. The hypocrisy is not lost on people, and that's why Bernie's message only goes so far. It takes a complete leap of logic to start slicing and dicing millionaires into camps you like or don't like. It makes no sense, and people see that.

 

think

(11,641 posts)
31. Do you feel the 1% pay their fair share of taxes? How many small donors does Hillary
Mon Feb 29, 2016, 02:17 PM
Feb 2016

have?

How many $2700 invite only events has Hillary done.? How many has Bernie done?

R B Garr

(16,985 posts)
36. It's obvious. So obvious it needs no explaining and that's why you
Mon Feb 29, 2016, 02:44 PM
Feb 2016

are changing the subject. Read post no. 8. It's an excellent post, as is no. 6.


Ciao. Have a great day.

 

JaneyVee

(19,877 posts)
6. As someone who works in the industry...
Mon Feb 29, 2016, 01:22 PM
Feb 2016

I can tell you that 99% of movies made are done so by millionaire capitalists who inject capital into investments derived from the banking sector. Few people have 10s of millions just laying around under their mattresses.

R B Garr

(16,985 posts)
30. This makes total sense, and that's why Bernie's talking points take a total leap of
Mon Feb 29, 2016, 02:12 PM
Feb 2016

logic to embrace, which makes them appear phony to non-believers.

Interesting post! Movie profits are also the first thing reported on after a movie premieres, so making money is a definite priority.

frazzled

(18,402 posts)
8. Brought to you by corporate Paramount Pictures, a subsidiary of
Mon Feb 29, 2016, 01:22 PM
Feb 2016

the giant media conglomerate Viacom. Just a bit of irony, for humor's sake.

R B Garr

(16,985 posts)
14. Yes, Bernie Sanders' Millionaires are super cool!
Mon Feb 29, 2016, 01:29 PM
Feb 2016

Only his, though. Not anyone else's Millionaires....

Gary 50

(382 posts)
41. It's not whose millionaires are better, as you well know.
Mon Feb 29, 2016, 03:43 PM
Feb 2016

It's about who is corrupt. Hillary is corrupt. Bernie is not. Spin that any way you want but in the end you are supporting a phony who pretends to care about the middle class and poor but who thoroughly represents the one percent, the status quo. You dream of incremental change, we dream of a revolution where the government represents us, the people, instead of the billionaires.

R B Garr

(16,985 posts)
47. Bull. Just saw a Bernie ad where Bernie himself refers to the "top 1%"
Mon Feb 29, 2016, 09:34 PM
Feb 2016

and how they are held in place by a corrupt campaign finance system. So he's targeting the 1%. You can't separate your own special 1%ers as if the rest of us don't notice the hypocrisy. The top 1% are deemed the enemy. Remember?

And if I said Bernie was corrupt, my post would get hidden, but you can apparently malign Hillary with impunity just because it's a cool thing to do for the "revolution:. I don't believe Bernie's simplistic platform, and am constantly perplexed that so many people fall for his phony ##@%&***.

Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»2016 Postmortem»Adam McKay at Oscars: "Do...