2016 Postmortem

votesparks

(1,288 posts) Mon Feb 29, 2016, 11:50 AM Feb 2016

Alan Grayson Endorses Bernie Sanders

Just got the email from him announcing his endorsement.

Go Grayson!

8 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Alan Grayson Endorses Bernie Sanders (Original Post) votesparks Feb 2016 OP

This message was self-deleted by its author Cali_Democrat Feb 2016 #1

Nice...K&R datguy_6 Feb 2016 #2

Meh, he is kinda suspicious and possibly corrupt himself JonLeibowitz Feb 2016 #3

We know... ScreamingMeemie Feb 2016 #4

Alan gets smeared by Third Way just like Bernie does. He must be doing something right. Zorra Feb 2016 #5

K&R nt. NCTraveler Feb 2016 #6

K & R Thanks for the news. appalachiablue Feb 2016 #7

Poor Bernie, having the endorsement of a phony huckster like Grayson can only hurt him. tritsofme Feb 2016 #8

Response to votesparks (Original post)

Cali_Democrat This message was self-deleted by its author.

datguy_6

(176 posts)

2. Nice...K&R

Reply to votesparks (Original post)

Mon Feb 29, 2016, 11:51 AM

Feb 2016

JonLeibowitz

(6,282 posts)

3. Meh, he is kinda suspicious and possibly corrupt himself

Reply to votesparks (Original post)

Mon Feb 29, 2016, 11:54 AM

Feb 2016

ScreamingMeemie

(68,918 posts)

4. We know...

Reply to votesparks (Original post)

Mon Feb 29, 2016, 11:56 AM

Feb 2016

http://www.democraticunderground.com/12511371106

Zorra

(27,670 posts)

5. Alan gets smeared by Third Way just like Bernie does. He must be doing something right.

Reply to votesparks (Original post)

Mon Feb 29, 2016, 02:09 PM

Feb 2016

NCTraveler

(30,481 posts)

6. K&R nt.

Reply to votesparks (Original post)

Mon Feb 29, 2016, 02:09 PM

Feb 2016

appalachiablue

(41,177 posts)

7. K & R Thanks for the news.

Reply to votesparks (Original post)

Mon Feb 29, 2016, 02:27 PM

Feb 2016

tritsofme

(17,403 posts)

8. Poor Bernie, having the endorsement of a phony huckster like Grayson can only hurt him.

Reply to votesparks (Original post)

Mon Feb 29, 2016, 02:30 PM

Feb 2016

Reply to this discussion