2016 Postmortem
Related: About this forumBING predicts Hillary Clinton to win every contest tomorrow but Vermont
http://tinyurl.com/j7ho99w
Update 5:04 P.M. Bing moved CO to the Sanders column
SidDithers
(44,228 posts)I think tomorrow is going to be a very good day for the Clinton campaign.
And maybe the nail in the coffin of the Sanders campaign.
Sid
DemocratSinceBirth
(99,714 posts)We can not allow a racist, nativist, anti-semitic, homophobic, mobbed up, Klan lover to sit in Abraham Lincoln's chair.
BlueMTexpat
(15,373 posts)MynameisBlarney
(2,979 posts)I may not be particularly fond of Hillary, but if it's a choice between Hillary and Trump for prez.
Hillary gets my vote. GLADLY.
This Bernie supporter will not be staying home, voting 3rd party or voting for Trump if Sanders doesn't get the nomination.
There's just too damn much at stake.
greiner3
(5,214 posts)DemocratSinceBirth
(99,714 posts)The peer reviewed research suggests asking voters who they think will win is the best predictor of electoral success, ergo:
Simple surveys that ask people who they expect to win are among the most
accurate methods for forecasting U.S. presidential elections
https://forecasters.org/wp-content/uploads/gravity_forms/7-2a51b93047891f1ec3608bdbd77ca58d/2013/07/Graefe_vote_expectations_ISF.pdf
Studies of prediction market accuracy for election forecasting commonly compare the
daily market forecasts to results from polls published the same day. These studies generally find
that prediction markets yield more accurate forecasts than single polls.
https://forecasters.org/wp-content/uploads/gravity_forms/7-2a51b93047891f1ec3608bdbd77ca58d/2013/07/Graefe_vote_expectations_ISF.pdf
Hillary Clinton is a 10/11 favorite at the offshore betting sites and the VT senator is a 7-1 underdog
http://www.oddschecker.com/politics/us-politics/us-presidential-election-2016/winner
If you bet on Hillary you have to put up $1,100 to win $1,000.00
If you bet on Bernie you have to put up $145.00 to win $1,000.00.
The efficacy of polls nine months out in predicting a general election winner is essentially null:
intend to vote if the election were held today. That is, polls do not provide predictions; they
provide snapshots of public opinion at a certain point in time. However, this is not how the
media commonly treat polls. Polling results are routinely interpreted as forecasts of what will
happen on Election Day (Hillygus 2011). This can result in poor predictions, in particular if the
election is still far away, because public opinion can be difficult to measure and fragile over the
course of a campaign. However, researchers found ways to deal with these problems and to
increase the accuracy of poll-based predictions
https://forecasters.org/wp-content/uploads/gravity_forms/7-2a51b93047891f1ec3608bdbd77ca58d/2013/07/Graefe_vote_expectations_ISF.pdf
stonecutter357
(12,697 posts)LexVegas
(6,101 posts)iandhr
(6,852 posts)AlbertCat
(17,505 posts)If she wins by the tiny sliver of a margin she has in all but 1 state she's won.... perhaps.
JaneyVee
(19,877 posts)She's running a 50 state strategy.
BlueMTexpat
(15,373 posts)She is running as a President for ALL Americans.
JaneyVee
(19,877 posts)Joe the Revelator
(14,915 posts)no snark intended, but I mean, I would think that even her staunchest of supporters wouldn't actually believe that Hillary was about Love and Unity.
Historic NY
(37,453 posts)its one of her credos she has lived by her entire life.
marions ghost
(19,841 posts)--rhetoric is cheap.
JaneyVee
(19,877 posts)And optimism. You should check it out some time.
auntpurl
(4,311 posts)I do believe her, and I believe IN her.
Recursion
(56,582 posts)I think she genuinely loves the country and the people of the country and believes that she can unify at least the party if not the nation as a whole.
This is approaching "Obama derangement syndrome" levels of absurdity...
Logical
(22,457 posts)Iliyah
(25,111 posts)JaneyVee
(19,877 posts)Hekate
(90,829 posts)... instead of waiting for big daddy from the DNC to trot out and do it for them, and then complaining how they are suppressed and oppressed.
JURY: http://www.democraticunderground.com/12511363331
k8conant
(3,030 posts)what's with that?
thesquanderer
(11,993 posts)BlueMTexpat
(15,373 posts)But CO has a sizable Hispanic minority. http://quickfacts.census.gov/qfd/states/08000.html I don't imagine that the sad experience of Dolores Huerta in NV will help Bernie with Latino voters anywhere in the West.
CO voters also have many of the same land/water use issues and concerns as NV voters. Judging by his responses to questions about those issues in NV, Bernie does not actually understand how they resonate in the West.
His gun stance may help him there. But CO will certainly not be a lock for him.
thesquanderer
(11,993 posts)BlueMTexpat
(15,373 posts)Logical
(22,457 posts)thesquanderer
(11,993 posts)almost a 60/40 split. But also it was interesting that the support was pretty widespread, except near the eastern border of the state. I guess that may bode poorly for him in Kansas. Western border was strong, so maybe stronger in Utah? Or maybe those states can shift colors toward their own opposite ends!
http://elections.huffingtonpost.com/2016/primaries/2016-03-01#CO-Dem
BlueMTexpat
(15,373 posts)No question about it.
w4rma
(31,700 posts)as if the Super-delegates are pledged delegates, already. So, if Bing is getting something that simple wrong, I'm going to take the rest of their predictions with a huge grain of salt, too.
DemocratSinceBirth
(99,714 posts)Their findings are confirmed by 538 and Predictit but never let the facts get in the way of a tendentious argument.
Agnosticsherbet
(11,619 posts)Then on to other states.
sufrommich
(22,871 posts)I'm just curious,I didn't know Bing was even making predictions.
CBGLuthier
(12,723 posts)I wonder why no one boycotted the democratic primary for being the whitest and most rigged contest on earth?
Oh yeah, guess more important things to worry about like how white the Oscars were.
Priorities. Diversions. Task accomplished.
JaneyVee
(19,877 posts)BlueMTexpat
(15,373 posts)will of those who actually turn out to vote in caucuses/elections?
auntpurl
(4,311 posts)We've had two good candidates fighting it out in every state. Good Democrats have voted, and Hillary is winning (at the moment; that still might change). It is the will of the American Democratic electorate.
How is that a coronation? Sincerely asking.
jakeXT
(10,575 posts)Bing is owned by Microsoft. Make of that what you will.
Chichiri
(4,667 posts)Microsoft gave up its share in MSNBC in 2012. So it's just NBC's parent company of GE now.
OkSustainAg
(203 posts)Oklahoma
Response to DemocratSinceBirth (Original post)
Name removed Message auto-removed
DemocratSinceBirth
(99,714 posts)If I sat on my hands or voted for anybody else I would be S O L and so would millions like me.
I have walked this earth long enough tp know not to let the perfect be the enemy of the good.
Cryptoad
(8,254 posts)now has subtitles in Brail. How long will the BernBots be allowed to attack The Democratic Nominee
Hiraeth
(4,805 posts)Joe the Revelator
(14,915 posts)Moostache
(9,897 posts)March 1st has been a special day for me ever since March 1, 1998.
That was the day I became a father, the day my baby girl was born by emergency C-section and I had to face the reality that I was responsible for raising that 6lb. 2oz. baby girl, to rear her to adulthood.
I think her mother and I have done an adequate job. She is about to finish in the top 5 of her graduating class of 800 students. She has been accepted to 2 colleges (though the paying for it part makes me feel like a failure). She has never been arrested or driven a spike through her cheek to make me mad. All in all, she was a great kid and I believe she is poised to become a great woman in her own way and in due time.
I just had hoped there would be a country and a future as bright as her smile when that time came...
When Hillary loses to that boob Trump in November, that future is looking like something more like Mad Max: Fury Road than I had ever dreamed possible.
Hillary Clinton will lose the general election and she will lose royally. She is a horror show candidate and that is on the DEMOCRATIC PRIMARY SIDE!!! She stunk as a candidate against Barrak Obama and she has somehow managed to be just as bad against Sanders 8 years later.
Despite 30 years of being attacked by the right wing, she STILL finds new ways to stoke their anger and boost the heat of their fire among their bloodless "base". She is reviled and loathed like no one else on the right, and while the barbs jabs she gets hit with from Sanders might be damaging, the haymakers and uppercuts she will face in the general will knock her out.
The country is going to see major consequences from this election. The balance of the Supreme Court is going to end up 7-2 one way or the other by 2019, before the next election cycle.
Congratulations Team Hillary...you will get the great honor of backing the first major party woman candidate for the presidency....I am sure she'll have an awesome concession speech.
Hiraeth
(4,805 posts)renate
(13,776 posts)Most Republican voters may not particularly want a President Trump, and many would probably stay home if Bernie Sanders were the Democratic nominee, but they will come out in vast thundering droves to vote against a President Hillary Clinton. And that affects every other race all the way down the ticket.
Moostache
(9,897 posts)The GOP hate for Clinton is extreme and motivation to their zealot base in ways many seem on tent to ignore. It's a huge problem. No pun intended.
marions ghost
(19,841 posts)I totally agree.
People underestimate the 'anyone (or T-rump thing) but Hillary" fervor.
SHRED
(28,136 posts)PatrynXX
(5,668 posts)and CO and IL cant' imagine but we'll see. MN very blue though. Mondale country Mondale Bernie made of the same stuff.. but Bernie is way more popular
PatrynXX
(5,668 posts)O_O
riversedge
(70,307 posts)oldandhappy
(6,719 posts)Her sideswipe at Bernie in SC riled me! So unnecessary. She can afford to be gracious.
Old Codger
(4,205 posts)"She can afford to be gracious." She doesn't know the meaning of the word, what she does is condescend.
Gamecock Lefty
(700 posts)BS supporters talking 'popular vote' since SC! Hmm . . .
angrychair
(8,733 posts)Than Sanders wins three fourths of all states.
Chichiri
(4,667 posts)And the 8th was Ted Cruz winning Iowa. On the Democratic side, it's 4 for 4.
Interesting that they use their own data gathering services and algorithms.
NoMoreRepugs
(9,470 posts)is disheartening. So few of the disagreements are intelligent and civil, most are... well
childish - name calling and sniping.... T_Rump has managed to lower the bar for the country maybe...
just one old geezers opinion....
Yo_Mama_Been_Loggin
(108,228 posts)beachbum bob
(10,437 posts)in 2008 from hillary supporters against obama and yet in the fall, they all coalesced for obama. The same will happen here with all the sander supporters who actually are democrats, progressives and liberals....not those who rather sit and watch their own house burn down and CHEER types similar to the Nader supporters in 2000...in the end the true democrats, progressives and liberals will vote for hillary and vote in large numbers to stop the conservative blight from annihilating our country
George II
(67,782 posts)retrowire
(10,345 posts)Thinkingabout
(30,058 posts)Pisces
(5,602 posts)Gothmog
(145,618 posts)awake
(3,226 posts)Because if Bing is wrong then the game must be over
Orrex
(63,225 posts)Can we expect to read that primary results unfavorable to Sanders don't matter, as we read about South Carolina?
awake
(3,226 posts)Bernie wins more than VT.
Deal?
Orrex
(63,225 posts)awake
(3,226 posts)awake
(3,226 posts)awake
(3,226 posts)Orrex
(63,225 posts)Vermont-only is pretty low risk. How about Vermont and at least one other state?
awake
(3,226 posts)Enjoy your victories today and remember that "it is not over till it is over" this contest will continue and it will be the will of he people who deside not Microsoft.
Orrex
(63,225 posts)You asked a silly question and made a pointless assertion. I called you on it, and you immediately turned it into a wager. Who does that?
If Clinton wins all the states except Vermont, then practically speaking it's over for Sanders as of tonight.
If Sanders wins Vermont and only one other state, then practically speaking it's still over for Sanders as of tonight.
Even if Sanders wins Vermont and two other states, then practically speaking it's over for Sanders in the next week or so.
Your silly wager is is of no value, since you're placing undue emphasis on an essentially meaningless result. Namely, whether or not Bing has chosen correctly among several outcomes with substantially identical results.
I've made no claim as to whether or not Bing is correct, and I am not invested in their correctness.
Also, if you think that Sanders can't pull in two states, then what does that tell us about your candidate's chances?
awake
(3,226 posts)By the way with Bernie raising over $42,000,000 in Feb. so he will not be going away anytime soon. I will continue to trust people not Microsofts BING. Thanks for you concern about whether I have a "gambling problem" no worry I am fine. Do enjoy yourself I am sure Hillery will make you proud today, and tomorrow I and a lot more people will still have Bernie's back berceuse he truly works for us not Wall Street unlike most of Washington.
Orrex
(63,225 posts)Last edited Tue Mar 1, 2016, 09:36 AM - Edit history (2)
You imagine that my support of Clinton is based on the same profound personal investment you've made in your own candidate, so you foolishly attack me on that false assumption. I've seen this time and again, so often in fact that I wonder if Sanders' supporters compare notes at their rallies.
I support Clinton because she strikes me as the stronger candidate with the better chance to win in November. I don't pretend that she's perfect, nor do I agree with all of her choices, but in the long run it's about retaining control of the Whitehouse, and I conclude that she's more likely to succeed.
I like Sanders and just about everything I've heard him say, but I'm not convinced that he can win the general election.
If he makes it to the ballot, you can be assured that I will support him whole-heartedly and will happily vote for him.
So you can content yourself in the interim with your silly gambles and your canned slogans. Like your wagers, your insults are meaningless.
R B Garr
(16,985 posts)INdemo
(6,994 posts)Hillay cant win...You evidently dont get out much and talk to people...
Cobalt Violet
(9,905 posts)Cobalt Violet
(9,905 posts)Bing... Bing... Bing...
Attorney in Texas
(3,373 posts)Hell Hath No Fury
(16,327 posts)Crappy search engine, worse prognosticator.
Matariki
(18,775 posts)noamnety
(20,234 posts)AgingAmerican
(12,958 posts)INdemo
(6,994 posts)AgingAmerican
(12,958 posts)INdemo
(6,994 posts)with viruses that almost crashed my computer.
I use firefox with minimum problems now
Google seems to be the worse though