2016 Postmortem
Related: About this forumSo it begins Trump
Begins his attacks on Hillary Clinton E-mails.This is going to be vicious folks.
itsrobert
(14,157 posts)Nobody, with the exception of partisan hacks, care about Hillary's damn emails.
John Poet
(2,510 posts)and the Federal Bureau of Investigation, so it seems...
wyldwolf
(43,870 posts)And Bernie followers...
silenttigersong
(957 posts)Is how you alienate voters -by including all Bernie Sanders supporters into a box.
Glamrock
(11,802 posts)the uninformed independant voter just assumes she's guilty. Thirty years of GOP smears coupled with her flip flopping have done the job. The only people who believe she's innocent are the liberal political junkies...a small percentage of the electorate.
silenttigersong
(957 posts)Emails,he said she has broken the law,it is going to get worse,he will turn out alot of voters because most right wingers keep saying HILLARY FOR JAIL 2016.It's going to be a nasty fight.Dirty.
itsrobert
(14,157 posts)n/t
Politicalboi
(15,189 posts)This is why we need to see them before they cheat Bernie out. If he's out and these e-mails and transcripts are horrid like I think they are, they wonder why we won't support her. And it's not just getting caught with these. What about her actions on those transcripts. She is so dishonest. I don't know who lies more, her or Trump.
FangedNoumenom
(145 posts)itsrobert
(14,157 posts)Remember that one?
DemocratSinceBirth
(99,714 posts)The FBI investigates. The DOJ prosecutes. The Democrats run the DOJ. Consequently, no prosecution.
fun n serious
(4,451 posts)Trump has a lot of things the Clinton machine can go after and believe me. They will.
Henhouse
(646 posts)HRC has been standing up to this stuff for most of her adult life. She has been tested by fire. Politics are not for the weak of heart. Let's not get wobbly....
Purveyor
(29,876 posts)Vote2016
(1,198 posts)alcibiades_mystery
(36,437 posts)PJMcK
(22,050 posts)The multitude of opponents that Donald Trump faced at the beginning of the Republican primary campaign clearly didn't know how to counter Mr. Trump's candidacy. To a man- and a woman- they were left flat-footed. Not one of them could land a serious blow to Mr. Trump's ascendency. But it strikes me that those candidates didn't know how to approach a fight with a professional wrestler, (http://www.democraticunderground.com/1017333852). Hillary Clinton and her team, I believe, will present Mr. Trump with an entirely different approach.
Aside from her professional accomplishments, isn't is reasonable to assume that Mrs. Clinton's team has already assembled a powerful arsenal to target Donald Trump? His entire life and career have been full of questionable judgments and shady business dealings. It's not as if the Clinton political machinery hasn't demonstrated an effective and aggressive strategy in their earlier elections.
As an aside, since Mrs. Clinton has held several governmental positions, does one refer to her by her last appointment, i.e., Secretary Clinton? Or is it more appropriate to address her as Senator Clinton?
In closing and to clarify my personal point of view, I'm agnostic regarding Clinton vs. Sanders. My point here is about Mr. Trump's attacking Hillary Clinton.