Should Bernie ask Hillary to be Vice President or in his Cabinet if he is the nominee?

[kentuck]

And vice-versa?

Would that help to bring the Party together?

[EdwardBernays]

1. No

[-none]

2. NO!

We've has enough with the 3rd Way. Bernie will find another actual Democrat to be his Vice-President.

[lob1]

3. No.

[CaliforniaPeggy]

4. Nope. Neither one would accept such a position.

She's part of the 1% and he's part of the 99%.

Never the twain shall meet.

[peacebird]

18. ^^^this^^^

[tazkcmo]

55. You are so correct

And even if she would accept, I'd never vote for sen Sanders for asking her.

[PowerToThePeople]

5. No.

[Impedimentus]

6. Elizabeth Warren for VP

No Clintons in the Cabinet, no Clinton Neocons and Wall Street bansters in the cabinet !

[noamnety]

8. No.

A handshake isn't going to fix the fundamental problems with the DNC.

[book_worm]

9. No--she needs a younger VP as would he if he were the nominee.

Cabinet? I doubt it. I think he should continue to be a strong and assertive US Senator. Take on the administration where he sees fit and support it where he sees fit.

[BlueMTexpat]

49. Spot on, imo! eom

[djean111]

10. No. n/t

[nichomachus]

11. OMG - NO, NO, a thousand times NO

You do not want someone with her blind ambition and lack of ethics breathing down your neck.

Obama tried to play nice by naming her Secretary of State and look where that got him. The whole mideast is in flames thanks to her warmongering and bumbling.

[peacebird]

17. ^^^this!^^^

[Jester Messiah]

28. Seriously. n/t

[CentralMass]

12. No.

[Chasstev365]

13. HELL NO!

She'd probably work to undermined what was rightfully "HERS."

[TM99]

14. Hell fucking no! n/t

[Warren Stupidity]

15. No. And wouldn't ever be considered by either side.

[peacebird]

16. Hell no!

[NV Whino]

19. No.

[flor-de-jasmim]

20. No, thanks.

[jehop61]

21. Don't think that's a good idea

Bernie will be 75 and Hillary 70. A VP should be younger.

[fleur-de-lisa]

22. No.

[RichGirl]

23. If they weren't competing with each other...

....in the biggest race of their lives...they'd agree on more things than disagree.

[kentuck]

24. I can't say that I expected any other response...

Does that mean you would not vote for Bernie if he were the nominee? Or vice-versa?

[sufrommich]

25. Two similarly aged people from the same area of the U.S.?

No.

[DinahMoeHum]

26. No.

n/t

[Jester Messiah]

27. If asked he should decline. Don't legitimize her corporate ass-kissery. [nt]

[bigwillq]

29. No

No

Unlikely

[2pooped2pop]

30. Fuck no

Obama already did that with the SOS appoint. And her "experience" caused death, wars, and a general clusterfuck of poor decisions . she shouldn't ever be allowed to hold s position of power again. Not even the local pta.

[jmowreader]

31. No...

If Hillary is the nominee, Julian Castro would be her best bet.

For Bernie...Tulsi Gabbard is just barely old enough, so she might be good. However, I don't think she would; she is nowhere near liberal enough for him.

[BillZBubb]

32. NO!

[jwirr]

33. And maybe they can arm wrestle to decide which direction

the country should go. This is not about Bernie or Hillary. This is about changing the direction our country is going in.

[Mike Nelson]

34. Curiously...

...Bernie's supporters might reject Bernie if he were to pick Hillary as VP. I'm beginning to wonder if maybe Bernie doesn't "respect" Hillary as much as he claims...

[PonyUp]

35. Hell no. nt

[Politicalboi]

36. No, she's not qualified

And he would always have to watch his back.

[Le Taz Hot]

37. The party is irreperably damaged.

There will be no coming back from this and since both parties represent the same .01%, they really don't care.

[Tierra_y_Libertad]

38. No. No more Clintons.

[JaneyVee]

40. What if in 15 years Michelle O decided to run.

Would you say no more Obamas?

[Tierra_y_Libertad]

46. I have no idea. It would depend on what she stands for then.

And, seeing as I would be 87, I might be a little cranky or more mellow or have moved to Andorra. But, do get back to me in 15 years.

[bigwillq]

53. ....

[Vote2016]

39. He should ask someone from the Democratic wing of the Democratic Party

[kennetha]

41. Pointless hypothetical

Bernie is not going to be nominated. If by some miracle he were, he would lose in a landslide.

[SamKnause]

42. No.

Hell no !!!!

[felix_numinous]

43. No her moneyed interests run counter to everything Sanders

represents. I believe people invested in the Third Way should start their own party because they have a profound philosophical difference with Social Democrats. This has to be settled sooner or later or the party will lose coherence and influence from infighting.

I say, allow everyone to proudly declare what they believe up front and stop pretending to be a Democrat when you are a Republican or Third Way candidate. It is in itself dishonest.

[HooptieWagon]

44. Good God, get a grip on yourself!

She made a mess of State Dept.

[onecaliberal]

45. Fuck no

[cherokeeprogressive]

47. Nnnnnnnnnope.

The phrase I'm thinking of is "put out to pasture".

[malokvale77]

48. No way in hell. nt

[demwing]

50. regardless of what everyone else is saying

I say fuck no, are you crazy?

[desmiller]

51. Hell no

w/ authority. A VP needs to original, not hiding behind other people's name and ambitions.

[arcane1]

52. We made that mistake once already n/t

[tazkcmo]

54. Not just no. n/t

[hollowdweller]

56. No I want a large liberal block in the senate.

[PyaarRevolution]

57. NO!!!

We need Bernie fighting for us, either as President or Senator. If he's the VP he will be impotent. There's a reason one of the previous VP's likened being VP to "a bucket of warm spit".

[senz]

58. Cannot imagine Bernie appointing Goldman Sachs to his cabinet.

Bernie and Hillary are on the opposite sides of the spectrum. Hillary represents the 1%, Bernie the 99%.

[840high]

59. No. NO.