an incorrect SC result is being touted on Hillary group, I think.

[grasswire]

HRC, AFIK, did not win 96 percent of the black vote, but rather 96 percent of the the black vote over age 65.

Correct me if I am off. I haven't seen results late tonight.

[JonLeibowitz]

1. I believe you are correct.

It seems a factual accounting is not of interest to certain Hillary supporters. That is not surprising to me, but I think you for pointing it out.

[grasswire]

5. thank you.

I think it's an important point.

[grasswire]

3. well, I am blocked from the Hillary group.

And why are you nannying me? I'll post what I want.

[JonLeibowitz]

7. ....so alert on the post if you don't think it belongs here? Or don't comment?

[Lucinda]

9. Maybe she's got nothing to post about her candidate.

At least she is giving the +65 group in South Carolina a shout out!

[Lucinda]

4. The first post makes it abundantly clear which group that was :)

and isn't it great!

[grasswire]

8. maybe the OP should correct his/her title, then.

In the interest of truth in reporting.

[Lucinda]

11. We are a fairly literate lot in the HRC group!

I don't think the post will confuse us much.

[Codeine]

16. I direct you to this uncorrected whopper;

http://www.democraticunderground.com/?com=view_post&forum=1251&pid=1286344

[MADem]

13. It was corrected in the thread at seven forty five PM eastern time

http://www.democraticunderground.com/110758036#post7

[MisterP]

14. full NYT breakdowns

http://www.nytimes.com/interactive/2016/02/27/us/elections/south-carolina-democrat-poll.html

[Codeine]

15. that was an early stat from the first returns.

It's very clear in the thread what the final numbers are, as you well know.