Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

alcibiades_mystery

(36,437 posts)
Sun Feb 28, 2016, 12:56 AM Feb 2016

Um, Isn't the Groundswell for Change Supposed to Come from Red States?

Sandersian Groundswell Theory, as I understand it (and Gawd knows I could be wrong) goes something like this: the Political Revolution will be the mass awakening of political actors that will pressure the current entrenched Establishment to Do What's Right, which is to say, to enact these several plans rather than obstruct or ignore them.

Let's say, for sake of argument, that I embrace and accept Sandersian Groundswell Theory. Isn't it essential to this theory of change that it be particularly effective in the states that most need to be changed? That is, aren't all those conservative House districts and Red State senatorial races supposed to be precisely the site where the groundswell needs to be strongest?

I mean, I suppose the groundswell would also put pressure on "conserva-Dems" and other Establishment Types in blue districts and states, but the essential character, the kernel, the hard core and center of the Sandersian Groundswell Theory is that Red State politicians will be forced to act through Political Revolution.

So, to demonstrate the strength of Sandersian Groundswell Theory, shouldn't he be able to produce strong showings precisely in those districts and states?

10 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Um, Isn't the Groundswell for Change Supposed to Come from Red States? (Original Post) alcibiades_mystery Feb 2016 OP
Red states have to make it to this century first. 2pooped2pop Feb 2016 #1
OK, if you say so, but isn't that the whole basis of Sanders campaign? alcibiades_mystery Feb 2016 #4
I don't think Bernie is working heavily on gaining republican support 2pooped2pop Feb 2016 #5
How is Bernie going to get his legislation passed? alcibiades_mystery Feb 2016 #6
Us, voting them out 2pooped2pop Feb 2016 #7
That's the theory, alright alcibiades_mystery Feb 2016 #8
Would help if the democrats were democrats 2pooped2pop Feb 2016 #9
Your theory of change requires Red State voters alcibiades_mystery Feb 2016 #10
It will RobertEarl Feb 2016 #2
I believe that a true revolutionary ushers in change in EVERY state regardless of the demographic Liberal_Stalwart71 Feb 2016 #3
 

alcibiades_mystery

(36,437 posts)
4. OK, if you say so, but isn't that the whole basis of Sanders campaign?
Sun Feb 28, 2016, 01:03 AM
Feb 2016

When you ask him how he'll pass single payer, he says something to the effect that increased participation will force the Congress to act. But those in Congress blocking such laws are mainly from Red States and districts, no?

 

2pooped2pop

(5,420 posts)
5. I don't think Bernie is working heavily on gaining republican support
Sun Feb 28, 2016, 01:11 AM
Feb 2016

But I hear lots of republicans won't mind Hillary policies. Goldman for instance. Increased participation means we plan to vote all of the corporate bottom feeders out and replace them with ones that want to work for the people rather than for their own monetary gain.

 

alcibiades_mystery

(36,437 posts)
6. How is Bernie going to get his legislation passed?
Sun Feb 28, 2016, 01:14 AM
Feb 2016

His answer is simple: pressure on Republicans from the political revolution.

That's his only answer.

If he can't demonstrate that he can put pressure on Republicans, then the whole theory of political change he spouts is worthless.

 

alcibiades_mystery

(36,437 posts)
8. That's the theory, alright
Sun Feb 28, 2016, 01:30 AM
Feb 2016

Would help if Bernie was drawing more than 30% of the Democratic vote in some of those districts, though!



 

alcibiades_mystery

(36,437 posts)
10. Your theory of change requires Red State voters
Sun Feb 28, 2016, 01:33 AM
Feb 2016

At least tonight, Bernie got soaked in a Red State. Soaked. So why should I believe he can get a groundswell of support to vote out Republicans? or even "DINO's."

 

RobertEarl

(13,685 posts)
2. It will
Sun Feb 28, 2016, 01:02 AM
Feb 2016

Right now many people are just now waking up to who Bernie is. We are patient, 46 more states to go.

SC is done. There really was no chance of ever talking SC- the confederate state- into changing. Hell, they just did take down the confederate flag!

 

Liberal_Stalwart71

(20,450 posts)
3. I believe that a true revolutionary ushers in change in EVERY state regardless of the demographic
Sun Feb 28, 2016, 01:02 AM
Feb 2016

make-up and regardless of the presumed outcome in the General Election.

Barack Obama was a revolutionary candidate because he fought for the vote in every state--even in RED states...and even in BLUE states that he was positioned to win.

Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»2016 Postmortem»Um, Isn't the Groundswell...