Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

2016 Postmortem

thesquanderer

(11,992 posts) Sat Feb 27, 2016, 11:55 PM Feb 2016

Guess it was good that Bernie cut back on SC efforts this week...

...and put more resources elsewhere. I mean really, if he had spent this week totally dedicated to SC, how much would have changed? So maybe he'd be down by 40 instead of 50? What real difference would that make? Minimal in delegates, minimal in public perception. Resources and time are finite, you have to deploy where it is likely to do the most good.

2 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Guess it was good that Bernie cut back on SC efforts this week... (Original Post) thesquanderer Feb 2016 OP

No slight meant to the good people of SC, but I agree . nt 99th_Monkey Feb 2016 #1

Right, it's not a slight on anyone. Good intentions alone don't win elections. (n/t) thesquanderer Feb 2016 #2

99th_Monkey

(19,326 posts)

1. No slight meant to the good people of SC, but I agree . nt

Reply to thesquanderer (Original post)

Sun Feb 28, 2016, 12:08 AM

Feb 2016

thesquanderer

(11,992 posts)

2. Right, it's not a slight on anyone. Good intentions alone don't win elections. (n/t)

Reply to 99th_Monkey (Reply #1)

Sun Feb 28, 2016, 10:04 AM

Feb 2016

Reply to this discussion