2016 Postmortem
Related: About this forumEstablishment Dems Promise to Block Sanders Proposals, Says They're "DOA"
Despite Dem voter support for Bernie agenda, Obama ally promises DEMS in DC would block it. IOW Establishment Democrats do not represent we the people any more than Republicans do. It doesn't matter what the majority of voters want. The establishment Dems will do what their corporate masters demand and what their corporate masters paid them to do.
And anyone wonders why voter turnout is low or why people are so hungry for a NON-ESTABLISHMENT revolution in the form of Bernie Sanders?
Well there you go. I think people are SICK of having ZERO representation in Washington. The article says that we the people can just go fuck ourselves because we are NOT ABOUT to have ANY representation in our own gov't. Just. Give. Up. and vote for the establishment candidate pre-approved by Wall St. and Big Corprats because you have no other choice, bitches.
Bernie Sanders plans are dead on arrival with Democrats in Congress, Barack Obama campaign strategist David Plouffe told Yahoo last week.
THE WHOLE STINKING THING:
http://www.ibtimes.com/election-2016-do-sanders-economic-plans-add-cost-his-revolution-2326247
Rod Beauvex
(564 posts)Why can't these assholes just go to the Republican party?
cantbeserious
(13,039 posts)eom
jwirr
(39,215 posts)all the crap that group has been pushing off on us since the 90s.
What exactly is the difference between the immediate outcome of R policy and the long run policy of the corporatists? Either way we get screwed - we just don't see it coming with the Ds.
cantbeserious
(13,039 posts)Republican - Corporate - Ownership Obvious
Republican - Teaparty - Funded by O, C, B
Democratic - Corporate - Compromised by O, C, B Through Efforts Of The DNC, DWS, DLC and Third Way
Democratic - Progressive - Sick and Tired of The DNC, DWS, DLC and Third Way
Independent - Sick and Tired of Both Establishment Parties
FreakinDJ
(17,644 posts)FreakinDJ
(17,644 posts)and by all means that seems to be the writing on the wall as GOP turn out in all 4 primaries has eclipsed DEM turn out
Deny and Shred
(1,061 posts)They didn't learn after the '14 midterms. They won't learn if and when Clinton loses and takes down ticket races with her.
What is there to learn? The DNC is there to prevent grassroots candidates from getting anywhere. DWS stated it. That is their rasion d'etre now. Winning or losing to the GOP is secondary. Those in high places in the party will make out just fine in a GOP administration.
Peregrine Took
(7,417 posts)And then we are supposed to fold up and vote for her?
cantbeserious
(13,039 posts)Last edited Sat Feb 27, 2016, 11:09 PM - Edit history (1)
eom
jwirr
(39,215 posts)get out and vote for Bernie. Very sick of business as usual.
highprincipleswork
(3,111 posts)demwing
(16,916 posts)to Independent.
Can't support a party that can't support the people.
yourout
(7,533 posts)Every day it looks more and more hopeless.
Hydra
(14,459 posts)But I think this is the last chance...and I think the GOP is having the same problem, oddly enough.
I keep thinking that if both parties split, the DLC will join with what's left of the Repub establishment. Wouldn't that be pure irony?
Barack_America
(28,876 posts)The party is otherwise dead.
Response to Barack_America (Reply #7)
Name removed Message auto-removed
peacebird
(14,195 posts)Autumn
(45,120 posts)sadoldgirl
(3,431 posts)and independents from voting altogether.
What a stupid remark to make, but then
I have said long ago that the establishment
does not care about the voters.
noretreatnosurrender
(1,890 posts)There is a lot of very good information in this piece. I've bookmarked because the piece is very long and I skimmed through it this time. It deserves a full read.
tk2kewl
(18,133 posts)are you kidding me? they must want to kill the Democratic Party.
perfect representation of what i posted here:
http://www.democraticunderground.com/12511354241
stillwaiting
(3,795 posts)This objective would be the objective of the monied interests that control the Establishment mind you, and the corporate Establishment would simply be doing what they were told to do (their payoff would be tremendous no doubt).
Look at how many people within the Democratic Party know what's going on and are sick of the Establishment. The Establishment runs the very real risk of losing control to the progressive wing in the near future (if not now). I believe they would rather split the Party now before they run the risk of losing to us and losing control of the Party's Leadership (i.e. DNC).
Splitting the Democratic Party in to two would be GREAT for corporate and monied interests. Really great. With 38% of the vote, Canadian Conservatives held power in Canada.
Harry Reid's openly endorsing a Republican, David Plouffe's comment, Hillary, Bill, Chelsea, and Clinton surrogates OPEN disdain for Bernie supporters, and on and on. It's unbelievable what the Establishment is doing this primary (unless their objective is to split the Party).
emsimon33
(3,128 posts)Enough said. We would be rid of them if the Republican Party hadn't gone off the rails!
Triana
(22,666 posts)The ONLY one running on true Democratic principles is Sanders. Establishment has painted him as "crazy" and "outrageous" and "insane".
Most of today's establishment Dems are what *used* to be called Republican. And what Democrats *used* to be like is...Bernie Sanders.
It's all off the rails batshit oligarchy through and through.
Corprat/wealthy takeover of the entire US gov't is complete and TPP codifies it into international law.
We're cooked.
Doctor_J
(36,392 posts)I'll vote for any liberals on my ballot, and leave the rest blank
Bluenorthwest
(45,319 posts)While accusing her campaign of leaking that photo of Obama 'dressed as a Muslim' Plouffe said Hillary was engaged in shameful, offensive fear-mongering" and
This is part of a disturbing pattern that led her county chairs to resign in Iowa, her campaign chairman to resign in New Hampshire and its exactly the kind of divisive politics that turns away Americans of all parties and diminishes respect for America in the world."
http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2008/02/25/obama-camp-slams-clinton-team-on-controversial-photo/
He said she was inept, dishonest and shaming this country, now he wants her to be President. It's nice work if you can get it.
noamnety
(20,234 posts)on DU were saying about her in 2008.
kingCowan
(25 posts)After voting for McGovern, Carter, Carter, Dukakis, Clinton, Clinton, Gore, Kerry, Obama, Obama...I'm on the verge of voting for Trump only because something has to give.
2pooped2pop
(5,420 posts)They are all dem in name only.
mhatrw
(10,786 posts)politicians, and the DNC--who all did yeoman's work to depress the vote, and especially the youth vote, today and in the foreseeable future!
The never ending mantra of Hillary's inevitability and "No We Can't" has won the day! Other than the people who always vote Democratic out of habit, every single other potential voter will stay home.
The best future hope of the Democratic party now doesn't give shit about the political process because they know it is just as rigged as the economy if not moreso. Thanks, Clinton supporters, for doing your small part to ensure the triumph of oligarchy over the insidious threat of democracy!
Triana
(22,666 posts)I guess we needn't bother with anymore campaigning. Bernie should quit (according to establishment & media), and we should just get on with the coronation.
Hydra
(14,459 posts)Jefferson23
(30,099 posts)Republicans to win, will be why they may be shocked in November. Just not the good kind.
Samantha
(9,314 posts)rather than trying to take over the FDR Democrats in the current party. Those of us who have been Democrats for a long time and support, as Bernie says, the government working for all of the people, will never lie down in the dirt with them. We should start making that statement well known - the FDR Dems and the Third-Way Dems cannot peacefully and rightfully co-exist in the same political party. And we were here first.
Sam
Triana
(22,666 posts)They should create their own Republican light party. They're NOT Democrats.
Samantha
(9,314 posts)I am going to be referring to the real Democrats as the FDR Dems and the conservatives Dems as the Third-Wayers. People need to realize there is as much difference between FDR Dems and Third-Way Dems as there is between FDR Dems and Republicans. And I don't think the FDR Dems need to go anywhere. But the Third-Way purloined this party through the Bill Clinton avenue, and it is time to cut that umbilical cord. Politics should not be a masquerade or a sporting event.
Sam
PowerToThePeople
(9,610 posts)eom
VulgarPoet
(2,872 posts)Depaysement
(1,835 posts)"I don't want your vote, Sanders supporters."
cyberswede
(26,117 posts)Dumbshits.
lob1
(3,820 posts)Our politicians don't represent us, they represent money. Fuck 'em all.
Punkingal
(9,522 posts)Nuclear Unicorn
(19,497 posts)MaggieD
(7,393 posts)I don't know if people think folks aren't voting for him because we don't like his hair, or what. But speaking for myself I just think his proposals are bad.
Triana
(22,666 posts)That sort of the point.
MaggieD
(7,393 posts)And neither are most of the AA voters that voted yesterday or the Dems who voted in NV.
Really, his PROPOSALS JUST SUCK.
randomelement
(128 posts)Ya know - stupid fuckers like this should probably rethink using phrases like "dead on arrival" when telling very angry people their concerns don't matter. They're underestimating the level (and kind) of anger that exists at this point in time -
and the tipping point is very near
They're in for a very rude awakening - and it won't be pretty
malletgirl02
(1,523 posts)They think they are entitled to our votes. Our leaders forgot that they need to earn our voters. Their legitimacy comes from we the the people. Our leaders need to wake up before the tipping point is reached.
Todays_Illusion
(1,209 posts)Why surrender your party to them. The Republicans were taken over, the take over of the Democratic Party began in 1985 with that DLC.
I have been wondering why everyone keeps voting for these obviously corporate owned and completely anti-democratic and certainly un-Democratic people.
MaggieD
(7,393 posts)Under the bus he goes. LOL!
Todays_Illusion
(1,209 posts)parties is they are liars and of course the ones in front doing the talking are covering for the ones paying for the take over. Fronts for all the billionaire libertarians that does include Warren Buffett, Bill Gates, and all the tech billionaires and nearly everyone on the Forbes 400 list of richest Americans. And their plan/goals, they really sincerely believe we should just let them manage the nation, the people and our individual lives. Our role is to get out of the way so they can increase their wealth and power.
They do have that major problem, what to do with the 7 billion people on the planet when they really don't need many people for labor anymore, just a few servants.
noamnety
(20,234 posts)Because it sounds so much like the republicans talking about the supreme court nomination.
CentralMass
(15,265 posts)elana i am
(814 posts)oldandhappy
(6,719 posts)Tierra_y_Libertad
(50,414 posts)Or, maybe, they're just assholes.
UglyGreed
(7,661 posts)what the people want and need, business as usual in the USA.
brooklynite
(94,737 posts)I'm not seeing it in your OP or the linked article.
liberal_at_heart
(12,081 posts)The Democratic Party actively works against the will of the people.
great white snark
(2,646 posts)Second, your article shows nothing of your claims.