Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

Cheese Sandwich

(9,086 posts)
Sat Feb 27, 2016, 10:12 AM Feb 2016

Hillary fans erasing history to defend Hillary's racist "super-predator" meme

People on the receiving end of the policy know it was a racist meme used to demonize urban youth and scare white people into supporting brutal, abusive policing.

They wanted to try kids as adults and lock us away for long sentences for petty crimes.

It worked. The results were racist. Hillary was a salesperson for these racist policies.

You can't erase history.

45 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Hillary fans erasing history to defend Hillary's racist "super-predator" meme (Original Post) Cheese Sandwich Feb 2016 OP
super-predator meme was racist pseudo-science invented by right wing to demonize black youth Cheese Sandwich Feb 2016 #1
Hillary accuses OTHERS of having "no conscience, no empathy"?!?!? Divernan Feb 2016 #28
I think she was talking about white gangs. bahrbearian Feb 2016 #2
super-predator was the 1990s version of the knock out game Cheese Sandwich Feb 2016 #3
All just another food fight over semantics....childish. Fred Sanders Feb 2016 #4
Sematics? No, about source materials informing those who employed that brand of negative labeling Bluenorthwest Feb 2016 #7
thanks Cheese Sandwich Feb 2016 #9
Lock'm up and throw away the key Jenny_92808 Feb 2016 #5
absolutely that was it Cheese Sandwich Feb 2016 #8
Some people just don't care about the truth. Broward Feb 2016 #6
What truth are you talking about? Jenny_92808 Feb 2016 #11
Hillary's record of pushing destructive policies Broward Feb 2016 #13
Down the memory hole it goes Mufaddal Feb 2016 #10
"memory hole" Jenny_92808 Feb 2016 #12
I mean that Clinton diehards are ready to rewrite history Mufaddal Feb 2016 #14
Thank you very much Jenny_92808 Feb 2016 #15
They likely have defense contracts they want to secure, jobs in her administration, closeupready Feb 2016 #18
Hillary Clinton is like thmost Orwellian candidate of all time Cheese Sandwich Feb 2016 #19
heck, she probably thinks she can be against gay marriage because she's "the LGBT candidate" MisterP Feb 2016 #27
Are you talking about the legislation that Sanders voted for? George II Feb 2016 #16
You mean re-writing this history? Jitter65 Feb 2016 #17
Good catch. Sanders also voted for the 1994 crime bill. Hillary of course did not. ucrdem Feb 2016 #20
Here are Bernie's comments in full... Luminous Animal Feb 2016 #33
Hillary did not vote for it, but she pushed it for Bill, hence the reason for her predator speech notadmblnd Feb 2016 #34
And Bernie did. ucrdem Feb 2016 #39
Yes, and you are still refusing to acknowledge the truth notadmblnd Feb 2016 #40
Wow. Now THAT is interesting. Number23 Feb 2016 #23
Really. Here is his comments in full. Now, tell me where did he demonize people? Luminous Animal Feb 2016 #29
If I'd said any of that, your typically panicked, nonsensical post would have a point. Number23 Feb 2016 #45
+1 great white snark Feb 2016 #24
Here are Bernie's comments in full... Luminous Animal Feb 2016 #30
Lol, well well well. giftedgirl77 Feb 2016 #26
Here are Bernie's comments in full... Luminous Animal Feb 2016 #31
Hillary's a racist now?? DCBob Feb 2016 #21
Only when it's a political advantage. Cheese Sandwich Feb 2016 #22
Or only in your mind. great white snark Feb 2016 #25
For the OP/preserving history: Bernie Kittycat Feb 2016 #32
Several of us here have posted links to the truth w/video of Sanders uttering the words himself. notadmblnd Feb 2016 #36
No doubt Kittycat Feb 2016 #38
They need to be able to fool themselves in order to justify their defense of the indefensible. notadmblnd Feb 2016 #42
One would presume that black people know better ... Onlooker Feb 2016 #35
Hillary's super-predator sales pitch was a racist sales pitch Cheese Sandwich Feb 2016 #41
You're missing the point Onlooker Feb 2016 #43
You're missing the point: Hillary Clinton's racism Cheese Sandwich Feb 2016 #44
You Cannot Argue With People That Firmily Believe That 2 + 2 = 5... WillyT Feb 2016 #37
 

Cheese Sandwich

(9,086 posts)
1. super-predator meme was racist pseudo-science invented by right wing to demonize black youth
Sat Feb 27, 2016, 10:18 AM
Feb 2016

Don't take my word for it, here are the statements of top scholars and leaders.

Sorry for copy and paste but these are facts


For example Michelle Alexander has said

In her support for the 1994 crime bill, for example, she used racially coded rhetoric to cast black children as animals. “They are not just gangs of kids anymore,” she said. “They are often the kinds of kids that are called ‘super-predators.’ No conscience, no empathy. We can talk about why they ended up that way, but first we have to bring them to heel.”
source

And Ta-Nahesi Coates has said
Since the days of slavery, into the days of super-predators, and now the time of the Knockout Game, there has always been a strong need to believe that hordes of young black men will overrun the country in a fit of raping and pillaging. It's how we justify ourselves. Information can't compete with national myth.
source

Ben Jealous has said
The superpredator idea was this notion that a child at age six months could be such a sociopath as to be beyond redemption. And it’s a violation of theology, it’s a violation of basic psychology. It was never used, as far as I know, to describe anyone white. It was always used sort of to describe young black men as a mass. And it made life very tough for us. And it helped push in bills, quite frankly, that have led to the biggest spike in the incarceration of women that we have seen—of, typically, black women.
source

"As Ex-Theorist on Young 'Superpredators,' Bush Aide Has Regrets"
February 9, 2001

PHILADELPHIA, Feb. 8— From his perch as the director of the new White House Office of Faith-Based and Community Initiatives, which he believes will help uplift many needy people but particularly the most troubled teenagers, John J. DiIulio Jr. conceded today that he wished he had never become the 1990's intellectual pillar for putting violent juveniles in prison and condemning them as ''superpredators.''

''If I knew then what I know now, I would have shouted for prevention of crimes,'' Mr. DiIulio said during an interview in the clubby University of Pennsylvania office that he is temporarily vacating to join the White House staff.

Instead, five years ago, Mr. DiIulio created a whole theory around the notion that ''a new generation of street criminals is upon us -- the youngest, biggest and baddest generation any society has ever known.''

''Based on all that we have witnessed, researched and heard from people who are close to the action,'' he wrote with two co-authors, ''here is what we believe: America is now home to thickening ranks of juvenile 'superpredators' -- radically impulsive, brutally remorseless youngsters, including ever more preteenage boys, who murder, assault, rape, rob, burglarize, deal deadly drugs, join gun-toting gangs and create serious communal disorders.''
http://www.nytimes.com/2001/02/09/us/as-ex-theorist-on-young-superpredators-bush-aide-has-regrets.html
 

Cheese Sandwich

(9,086 posts)
3. super-predator was the 1990s version of the knock out game
Sat Feb 27, 2016, 10:32 AM
Feb 2016

Anyone paying attention knew there was no such thing as a "new breed of super-predators".

 

Bluenorthwest

(45,319 posts)
7. Sematics? No, about source materials informing those who employed that brand of negative labeling
Sat Feb 27, 2016, 11:19 AM
Feb 2016

of others, about claiming that 'kids' of a new and vile sort exist who must be spoken of as monsters and dealt with like animals.
If a person uses an obvious slur, are objections to the slur objections to mere semantics, about the choice of the words or are such objections in fact larger than that?

Clinton was using verbiage out of the book 'Body Count' whose authors she and Bill had just recently met with, that book was very popular among the law and order, racism and fear based populations. I doubt you have even heard of that book. Bill Bennett was one of the authors. Do you know who he is? I doubt it.....

Some Bill Bennett 'semantics' for you to consider:
Bennett, who held prominent posts in the administrations of former presidents Ronald Reagan and George Bush, told a caller to his syndicated radio talk show Wednesday: "If you wanted to reduce crime, you could -- if that were your sole purpose -- you could abort every black baby in this country and your crime rate would go down.
http://www.cnn.com/2005/POLITICS/09/30/bennett.comments/

Broward

(1,976 posts)
13. Hillary's record of pushing destructive policies
Sat Feb 27, 2016, 01:03 PM
Feb 2016

that disproportionately affected minorities and her race baiting past.

 

Jenny_92808

(1,342 posts)
12. "memory hole"
Sat Feb 27, 2016, 12:54 PM
Feb 2016

Are you saying this subject is not worthy and should be flushed down the "memory hole?"

I think this is a VERY important subject. Please explain what you meant. TIA

Mufaddal

(1,021 posts)
14. I mean that Clinton diehards are ready to rewrite history
Sat Feb 27, 2016, 01:38 PM
Feb 2016

as well as ignore anything remotely inconvenient from her past. For them, by and large the only Hillary is today's Hillary.

 

closeupready

(29,503 posts)
18. They likely have defense contracts they want to secure, jobs in her administration,
Sat Feb 27, 2016, 05:12 PM
Feb 2016

that kind of political patronage which is actually illegal in places where it once flourished, like Chicago.

 

Cheese Sandwich

(9,086 posts)
19. Hillary Clinton is like thmost Orwellian candidate of all time
Sat Feb 27, 2016, 05:34 PM
Feb 2016

We're not supposed to remember all of her current statement are the opposite of her past statements.

She got mad when Terri Gross reminded her she was against gay marriage until very recently. Like she couldn't admit the truth and just asserted an alternate historical reality.

MisterP

(23,730 posts)
27. heck, she probably thinks she can be against gay marriage because she's "the LGBT candidate"
Sat Feb 27, 2016, 07:31 PM
Feb 2016

and therefore anything that advances her career advances their cause--eggs and omlets, of course

(Honduran and MENA LGBTs aside)

 

Jitter65

(3,089 posts)
17. You mean re-writing this history?
Sat Feb 27, 2016, 05:08 PM
Feb 2016

(SOUNDBITE OF ARCHIVED RECORDING)
SANDERS: Clearly there are people in our society who are horribly violent, who are deeply sick and sociopathic, and clearly these people must be put behind bars in order to protect society from them.
KEITH: The early 1990s were a very different time. America was coming out of the crack epidemic. Violent crime was at its peak. News reports led with carjackings and gang violence. Again, Nicholas Turner.


(SOUNDBITE OF ARCHIVED RECORDING)
CLINTON: They are not just gangs of kids anymore. They are often the kinds of kids that are called superpredators - no conscious, no empathy. We can talk about why they ended up that way, but first we have to bring them to heel.
KEITH: Bring them to heel - as in force to obey. Nicholas Turner is the director of the Vera Institute of Justice which researches crime policy. He says the term superpredator was coined by a professor at Princeton.

Senate, starring Biden, Kerry Boxer and a galaxy of yes votes! See Ted Kennedy's 'Lion of the Senate' Yes vote-
https://www.govtrack.us/congress/votes/103-1994/s295

ucrdem

(15,512 posts)
20. Good catch. Sanders also voted for the 1994 crime bill. Hillary of course did not.
Sat Feb 27, 2016, 05:38 PM
Feb 2016

Speaking of revisionist history.

Luminous Animal

(27,310 posts)
33. Here are Bernie's comments in full...
Sat Feb 27, 2016, 07:53 PM
Feb 2016

No dehumanizing language. No racist dog whistle.


“Mr. Chairman, let me begin with a profound remark: Two plus two equals four.

In other words, there is a logical and rational process called cause and effect. In terms of Newtonian physics, that means that every action causes an equal and opposite reaction. In other words, fellow members of the House, there are reasons why things happen, as controversial as that statement may be.

A farmer neglects to tend and care for his fields— it is likely that the crop will fail.

A company neglects to invest in research and development— it is likely that company will not be profitable.

In a similar way, a society which neglects, which oppresses and which disdains a very significant part of its population—which leaves them hungry, impoverished, unemployed, uneducated, and utterly without hope, will, through cause and effect, create a population which is bitter, which is angry, which is violent, and a society which is crime-ridden. That is the case in America, and it is the case in other countries throughout the world.

Mr. Chairman, how do we talk about the very serious crime problem in America without mentioning, without mentioning, that we have the highest rate of childhood poverty in the industrialized world, by far, with 22 percent of our children in poverty and 5 million kids hungry today?

Do you think maybe that might have some relationship to crime?

How do we talk about crime when this Congress is prepared, this year, to spend 11 times more for the military than for education; when 21% of our kids drop out of high school; when a recent study told us that twice as many young workers now earn poverty wages as 10 years ago; when the gap between the rich and the poor is growing wider, and when the rate of poverty continues to grow?

Do you think maybe that might have some relationship to crime?

Mr. Chairman, it is my firm belief that clearly, there are people in our society who are horribly violent, who are deeply sick and sociopathic, and clearly these people must be put behind bars in order to protect society from them.

But it is also my view that through the neglect of our government and through a grossly irrational set of priorities, we are dooming today tens of millions of young people to a future of bitterness, misery, hopelessness, drugs, crime, and violence. And Mr. Speaker, all the jails in the world, and we already imprison more people per capita than any other country, and all of the executions in the world… will not make that situation right.

We can either educate or electrocute. We can create meaningful jobs, rebuilding our society, or we can build more jails. Mr. Speaker, let us create a society of hope and compassion, not one of hate and vengeance. Thank you.”

notadmblnd

(23,720 posts)
34. Hillary did not vote for it, but she pushed it for Bill, hence the reason for her predator speech
Sat Feb 27, 2016, 08:03 PM
Feb 2016

Now- Sanders voted for the bill because it included the Violence Against Women Act in it. The words you read above was part of his admonishment for the crime bill wanting to lock up and throw away the key for her so called "super predators" But don't take my word for it. Listen to him yourself- if you can handle the truth. http://www.vox.com/2016/2/26/11116412/bernie-sanders-mass-incarceration



While the Clintons have defended the 1994 crime law until quite recently, Sanders was always careful to point out that he saw the law as a compromise — and regularly stated his concerns with mass incarceration.

In 1994, for example, he said that he would support it because it included the Violence Against Women Act, which helped crack down on domestic violence and rape. Sanders said: "I have a number of serious problems with the crime bill, but one part of it that I vigorously support is the Violence Against Women Act. We urgently need the $1.8 billion in this bill to combat the epidemic of violence against women on the streets and in the homes of America." Earlier in the year, Sanders suggested that he did not see the tough-on-crime parts of the bill as the right solution to crime:"

"It is my firm belief that clearly there are people in our society who are horribly violent, who are deeply sick and sociopathic, and clearly these people must be put behind bars in order to protect society from them.

But it is also my view that through the neglect of our government and through a grossly irrational set of priorities, we are dooming today tens of millions of young people to a future of bitterness, misery, hopelessness, drugs, crime, and violence. And, Mr. Speaker, all the jails in the world — and we already imprison more people per capita than any other country — and all of the executions … in the world will not make that situation right.


We can either educate or electrocute. We can create meaningful jobs, rebuilding our society, or we can build more jails. Mr. Speaker, let us create a society of hope and compassion, not one of hate and vengeance."


So you tell me- who is attempting to revise history now?

notadmblnd

(23,720 posts)
40. Yes, and you are still refusing to acknowledge the truth
Sat Feb 27, 2016, 08:18 PM
Feb 2016

Obviously, there are some reading comprehension issues going on here.

I understand dyslexia, my son grew up with it. However, there are some wonderful decoding methods that one can utilize to understand and comprehend what they read if they bother to try.

Luminous Animal

(27,310 posts)
29. Really. Here is his comments in full. Now, tell me where did he demonize people?
Sat Feb 27, 2016, 07:45 PM
Feb 2016

Where did he use racially coded language?

“Mr. Chairman, let me begin with a profound remark: Two plus two equals four.

In other words, there is a logical and rational process called cause and effect. In terms of Newtonian physics, that means that every action causes an equal and opposite reaction. In other words, fellow members of the House, there are reasons why things happen, as controversial as that statement may be.

A farmer neglects to tend and care for his fields— it is likely that the crop will fail.

A company neglects to invest in research and development— it is likely that company will not be profitable.

In a similar way, a society which neglects, which oppresses and which disdains a very significant part of its population—which leaves them hungry, impoverished, unemployed, uneducated, and utterly without hope, will, through cause and effect, create a population which is bitter, which is angry, which is violent, and a society which is crime-ridden. That is the case in America, and it is the case in other countries throughout the world.

Mr. Chairman, how do we talk about the very serious crime problem in America without mentioning, without mentioning, that we have the highest rate of childhood poverty in the industrialized world, by far, with 22 percent of our children in poverty and 5 million kids hungry today?

Do you think maybe that might have some relationship to crime?

How do we talk about crime when this Congress is prepared, this year, to spend 11 times more for the military than for education; when 21% of our kids drop out of high school; when a recent study told us that twice as many young workers now earn poverty wages as 10 years ago; when the gap between the rich and the poor is growing wider, and when the rate of poverty continues to grow?

Do you think maybe that might have some relationship to crime?

Mr. Chairman, it is my firm belief that clearly, there are people in our society who are horribly violent, who are deeply sick and sociopathic, and clearly these people must be put behind bars in order to protect society from them.

But it is also my view that through the neglect of our government and through a grossly irrational set of priorities, we are dooming today tens of millions of young people to a future of bitterness, misery, hopelessness, drugs, crime, and violence. And Mr. Speaker, all the jails in the world, and we already imprison more people per capita than any other country, and all of the executions in the world… will not make that situation right.

We can either educate or electrocute. We can create meaningful jobs, rebuilding our society, or we can build more jails. Mr. Speaker, let us create a society of hope and compassion, not one of hate and vengeance. Thank you.”

Number23

(24,544 posts)
45. If I'd said any of that, your typically panicked, nonsensical post would have a point.
Sat Feb 27, 2016, 09:54 PM
Feb 2016

And seeing you type that mess to every single person that dared to respond to that person's post doesn't seem panicky at all. Not one bit.

Luminous Animal

(27,310 posts)
30. Here are Bernie's comments in full...
Sat Feb 27, 2016, 07:46 PM
Feb 2016
“Mr. Chairman, let me begin with a profound remark: Two plus two equals four.

In other words, there is a logical and rational process called cause and effect. In terms of Newtonian physics, that means that every action causes an equal and opposite reaction. In other words, fellow members of the House, there are reasons why things happen, as controversial as that statement may be.

A farmer neglects to tend and care for his fields— it is likely that the crop will fail.

A company neglects to invest in research and development— it is likely that company will not be profitable.

In a similar way, a society which neglects, which oppresses and which disdains a very significant part of its population—which leaves them hungry, impoverished, unemployed, uneducated, and utterly without hope, will, through cause and effect, create a population which is bitter, which is angry, which is violent, and a society which is crime-ridden. That is the case in America, and it is the case in other countries throughout the world.

Mr. Chairman, how do we talk about the very serious crime problem in America without mentioning, without mentioning, that we have the highest rate of childhood poverty in the industrialized world, by far, with 22 percent of our children in poverty and 5 million kids hungry today?

Do you think maybe that might have some relationship to crime?

How do we talk about crime when this Congress is prepared, this year, to spend 11 times more for the military than for education; when 21% of our kids drop out of high school; when a recent study told us that twice as many young workers now earn poverty wages as 10 years ago; when the gap between the rich and the poor is growing wider, and when the rate of poverty continues to grow?

Do you think maybe that might have some relationship to crime?

Mr. Chairman, it is my firm belief that clearly, there are people in our society who are horribly violent, who are deeply sick and sociopathic, and clearly these people must be put behind bars in order to protect society from them.

But it is also my view that through the neglect of our government and through a grossly irrational set of priorities, we are dooming today tens of millions of young people to a future of bitterness, misery, hopelessness, drugs, crime, and violence. And Mr. Speaker, all the jails in the world, and we already imprison more people per capita than any other country, and all of the executions in the world… will not make that situation right.

We can either educate or electrocute. We can create meaningful jobs, rebuilding our society, or we can build more jails. Mr. Speaker, let us create a society of hope and compassion, not one of hate and vengeance. Thank you.”

Luminous Animal

(27,310 posts)
31. Here are Bernie's comments in full...
Sat Feb 27, 2016, 07:46 PM
Feb 2016
“Mr. Chairman, let me begin with a profound remark: Two plus two equals four.

In other words, there is a logical and rational process called cause and effect. In terms of Newtonian physics, that means that every action causes an equal and opposite reaction. In other words, fellow members of the House, there are reasons why things happen, as controversial as that statement may be.

A farmer neglects to tend and care for his fields— it is likely that the crop will fail.

A company neglects to invest in research and development— it is likely that company will not be profitable.

In a similar way, a society which neglects, which oppresses and which disdains a very significant part of its population—which leaves them hungry, impoverished, unemployed, uneducated, and utterly without hope, will, through cause and effect, create a population which is bitter, which is angry, which is violent, and a society which is crime-ridden. That is the case in America, and it is the case in other countries throughout the world.

Mr. Chairman, how do we talk about the very serious crime problem in America without mentioning, without mentioning, that we have the highest rate of childhood poverty in the industrialized world, by far, with 22 percent of our children in poverty and 5 million kids hungry today?

Do you think maybe that might have some relationship to crime?

How do we talk about crime when this Congress is prepared, this year, to spend 11 times more for the military than for education; when 21% of our kids drop out of high school; when a recent study told us that twice as many young workers now earn poverty wages as 10 years ago; when the gap between the rich and the poor is growing wider, and when the rate of poverty continues to grow?

Do you think maybe that might have some relationship to crime?

Mr. Chairman, it is my firm belief that clearly, there are people in our society who are horribly violent, who are deeply sick and sociopathic, and clearly these people must be put behind bars in order to protect society from them.

But it is also my view that through the neglect of our government and through a grossly irrational set of priorities, we are dooming today tens of millions of young people to a future of bitterness, misery, hopelessness, drugs, crime, and violence. And Mr. Speaker, all the jails in the world, and we already imprison more people per capita than any other country, and all of the executions in the world… will not make that situation right.

We can either educate or electrocute. We can create meaningful jobs, rebuilding our society, or we can build more jails. Mr. Speaker, let us create a society of hope and compassion, not one of hate and vengeance. Thank you.”

Kittycat

(10,493 posts)
32. For the OP/preserving history: Bernie
Sat Feb 27, 2016, 07:46 PM
Feb 2016

Since others were quick to point to Bernie already on this thread. For the sake of preserving history and Bernie's stance on the issue, at the link are several quotes and videos on how he believed that mass incarceration was wrong. How his vote was a compromise to get funding for another key provisions approved, like the 10yr assault weapons ban and the Violance Against Women act.


http://www.vox.com/2016/2/26/11116412/bernie-sanders-mass-incarceration

notadmblnd

(23,720 posts)
36. Several of us here have posted links to the truth w/video of Sanders uttering the words himself.
Sat Feb 27, 2016, 08:08 PM
Feb 2016

Those that came here pointing the finger at Sanders saying- "he voted for the crime bill, Hillary did not" will completely ignore the truth.

Kittycat

(10,493 posts)
38. No doubt
Sat Feb 27, 2016, 08:12 PM
Feb 2016

It was posted all over this week. I'm not sure who people are trying to fool, except themselves.

 

Onlooker

(5,636 posts)
35. One would presume that black people know better ...
Sat Feb 27, 2016, 08:07 PM
Feb 2016

... since most blacks apparently support Clinton, we can presume they have a greater understanding of the issues than other people. Perhaps you're black, and if so you ought to offer some insight into why blacks are not supporting Bernie. But, if you're white, you ought to ask intelligent questions as to why blacks are supporting Clinton more than Bernie. Perhaps your bias is distorting your thinking, or perhaps you don't understand the fact that the Clintons despite their mistakes have done more than blacks than Bernie has.

 

Cheese Sandwich

(9,086 posts)
41. Hillary's super-predator sales pitch was a racist sales pitch
Sat Feb 27, 2016, 08:19 PM
Feb 2016

For the prison industrial complex.

The whole point was to scare middle class white people into supporting long prison terms, excessive policing, the drug war, and even jailing kids like adults. Feeding the prison industry machine. It's always hungry, never satisfied. The more it has the more it wants. It runs on pure greed.

 

Onlooker

(5,636 posts)
43. You're missing the point
Sat Feb 27, 2016, 08:29 PM
Feb 2016

Yes, Hillary has said and done some bad things, but you have to factor that in in terms of what she's done what's right. I mean, Bernie didn't fight the fight except as a young man. He went off to all white, liberal Vermont, while Hillary stayed in the trenches, in Arkansas, NY, and DC actually doing battle. My guess is that blacks understand that when battling racists, you can't always be pure as the driven snow. Bernie stayed away from the frontlines and had a largely homogeneous electorate so was always able to do the right thing.

 

Cheese Sandwich

(9,086 posts)
44. You're missing the point: Hillary Clinton's racism
Sat Feb 27, 2016, 09:31 PM
Feb 2016

She ran a racial campaign against Obama in 2008. She called kids superpredators in the 90s. She said Iraqi's should be thankful because we gave them the gift of freedom. She said child refugees from Honduras should be rejected to "send a message" to their families. She defends Rahm Emanuel who covers up Chicago police crime. She helped sell welfare cuts. She helped sell job killing trade deals thathit black communities hard. She defends Wall Street banks that caused the financial collapse and housing crisis, which devastated black communities. The point is all this racist violence.

Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»2016 Postmortem»Hillary fans erasing hist...