Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

riversedge

(70,253 posts)
Sat Feb 27, 2016, 09:52 AM Feb 2016

The REAL Revolution: New Polls Show Women Supporting #Hillary in Staggering Numbers

I suspect women like to go with the winner




TWEET:
Blue Nation Review ?@BlueNationRev 10h10 hours ago

The REAL Revolution: New Polls Show Women Supporting #Hillary in Staggering Numbers http://bluenationreview.com/the-real-revolution-women-for-hillary/
View summary
74 retweets 75



The REAL Revolution: New Polls Show Women Supporting #Hillary in Staggering Numbers





The REAL Revolution: New Polls Show Women Supporting Hillary in Staggering Numbers


http://bluenationreview.com/the-real-revolution-women-for-hillary/
By Peter Daou


February 26, 2016



We’ve written about the role of men in the virulent personal attacks against Hillary in 2016:

We are witnessing an uprising of straight white males, a revolt from the core of the patriarchy. And their singular target is the woman who is inching closer to the presidency than any other woman in history. Between Trump’s torture-loving armies and Bernie’s brigades of misogynistic trolls, the 2016 electorate feels more like a boiling, churning mob than a political movement, a rage-a-thon more than a revolution.

But perhaps the revolution is not the one everyone is talking about. Perhaps the real revolution is this:

The Quinnipiac University survey shows Clinton with 59 percent support in the Sunshine State, followed by Bernie Sanders, her sole remaining rival, with 33 percent support. Clinton, who is vying to become the first female president, makes strong inroads among women in the state, carrying the demographic by a 69-34 percent margin.


Those are astonishing numbers. And it’s not just Florida:

In Massachusetts, Clinton leads by 21 points among female voters — with a 41-point margin among women over the age of 50.
...............









73 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
The REAL Revolution: New Polls Show Women Supporting #Hillary in Staggering Numbers (Original Post) riversedge Feb 2016 OP
K&R! stonecutter357 Feb 2016 #1
Coming together! n/t livetohike Feb 2016 #2
Great news and no surprise! MoonRiver Feb 2016 #3
Please pass it around. riversedge Feb 2016 #9
Meh. SujiwanKenobee Feb 2016 #4
Bwah! Apt name. All those Super Delegatecrementalists will steal the vote valerief Feb 2016 #40
That's funny. I don't know of any women that are for Hillary among the ones I know. hobbit709 Feb 2016 #5
Not funny. just sad for you. riversedge Feb 2016 #7
I'm not sad. But you will be. hobbit709 Feb 2016 #32
I think riversedge meant the rock Feb 2016 #52
yup--thanks riversedge Feb 2016 #70
An Austinite from Austria checks in! Loki Feb 2016 #46
Austria is where I was born but I am an American citizen by birth. hobbit709 Feb 2016 #48
If it's about living in Texas, don't bother. Loki Feb 2016 #63
Good. We don't need any more people with your attitude here. hobbit709 Feb 2016 #66
I was a lone Democrat in a very rancid republican area. I stood my Loki Feb 2016 #72
All the older gals in my neighborhood are for Bernie. Duval Feb 2016 #64
Excellent! NurseJackie Feb 2016 #6
If we can keep that gender gap in the GE, the Presidency belongs to the Democrats. NT aaaaaa5a Feb 2016 #8
Especially if it's Trump Freddie Feb 2016 #10
There is audio of Trump on the Howard Stern show aaaaaa5a Feb 2016 #11
Good God. sufrommich Feb 2016 #14
Agreed. They were discussing this on a new Sirius Radio Channel called POTUS aaaaaa5a Feb 2016 #20
I agree,that's why they spending millions sufrommich Feb 2016 #21
It would be "Establishment" vs. Anti-Establishment, she would lose badly! Dustlawyer Feb 2016 #44
Yes, I agree with this assessment artislife Feb 2016 #57
Peter Daou may he have better luck than he had with Kerry and Hillary 08, 3 rd times the charm azurnoir Feb 2016 #12
You "suspect women like to go with the winner"? beac Feb 2016 #13
DU rec for the former PeteNYC... SidDithers Feb 2016 #15
LOVE that image! Stolen! Freddie Feb 2016 #16
pouched or borrowed. but have at it. riversedge Feb 2016 #71
b Fuddnik Feb 2016 #17
Blue Nation Review? Propaganda Rag for the HRC campaign modestybl Feb 2016 #18
Correct the Record UglyGreed Feb 2016 #26
Cool another BS article straight from Hillary's SUPER PAC krawhitham Feb 2016 #19
And I am not one of them. JeaneRaye Feb 2016 #22
Blue Nation Review is Hillary's propaganda website. RiverLover Feb 2016 #23
Hillary's female staff discriminated against Geronimoe Feb 2016 #24
Coronation Of A Female President Trumps All Reason cantbeserious Feb 2016 #25
We, the people! MaggieD Feb 2016 #27
The more anyone repeats "the first woman President" Madam Mossfern Feb 2016 #65
How unfortunate. SheilaT Feb 2016 #28
Apparently that is true. It saddens me as well as infuriates me. Elmer S. E. Dump Feb 2016 #39
I agree. SheilaT Feb 2016 #73
The REAL ho hum typical fact anyone would expect AlbertCat Feb 2016 #29
Two states does not a revolution make. Fantastic Anarchist Feb 2016 #30
This. artislife Feb 2016 #58
I understand women wanting a woman president over any other criteria. nt Logical Feb 2016 #31
It's ALSO because she's a woman. Not ONLY because she's a woman. PeaceNikki Feb 2016 #33
She is not a great Dem. Warren is 1000 times better than her. But Warren is not running. Logical Feb 2016 #34
Ignore polls, vote your conscience, if you still have one DeGreg Feb 2016 #35
If it was "just" because she was a woman... Skid Rogue Feb 2016 #36
Palin was a VP on the ticket Helen Borg Feb 2016 #38
And she want a dem. Apples and oranges Elmer S. E. Dump Feb 2016 #41
Sure, you're right... Skid Rogue Feb 2016 #43
Can you articulate your point? Helen Borg Feb 2016 #45
lol... well I tried... I'm not very good at this posting thing. Skid Rogue Feb 2016 #47
Hmm... davidthegnome Feb 2016 #37
Younger women don't support her californiabernin Feb 2016 #42
The picture will become clearer in the next two weeks IMO. Trust Buster Feb 2016 #49
This woman has more in common with Bernie than with Hillary. Lizzie Poppet Feb 2016 #50
Uh huh... SoapBox Feb 2016 #51
The Women's vote will deliver the White House to Hillary. oasis Feb 2016 #53
Women, Latinos, African-Americans, Democrats book_worm Feb 2016 #54
An unbeatable coalition. oasis Feb 2016 #55
Not this woman elljay Feb 2016 #56
"Women's rights are human rights!" pandr32 Feb 2016 #59
Every woman in our family is an active feminist Greybnk48 Feb 2016 #60
The women in my family support Bernie Sanders. Deadshot Feb 2016 #61
No big news there. I thought it was always known that women only vote for women, and blacks only LiberalArkie Feb 2016 #62
Bernie Sanders' policies (free tuition, Single Payer, $15 min wage) would help more women & men. NT Eric J in MN Feb 2016 #67
Skewed and with little actual meaning. JustAMaverick Feb 2016 #68
going with the winner? ellennelle Feb 2016 #69

Loki

(3,825 posts)
46. An Austinite from Austria checks in!
Sat Feb 27, 2016, 12:03 PM
Feb 2016

LOL, Texas isn't exactly a good place for women. I know, I lived there. Austin is it own country. Very Bernie, I'm sure, but it's not the rest of this country. Good try tho. .

hobbit709

(41,694 posts)
48. Austria is where I was born but I am an American citizen by birth.
Sat Feb 27, 2016, 12:11 PM
Feb 2016

I'll pass your comments on to the women that have lived and worked in Austin for up to 40+years.
Maybe I'll compile their comments and pass them to you.

Loki

(3,825 posts)
72. I was a lone Democrat in a very rancid republican area. I stood my
Sat Feb 27, 2016, 02:54 PM
Feb 2016

ground and I voted for the Democrats that had the courage to run. Texas has a way of treating Democrats and people like us that is disgusting. They use and abuse people of color and hispanics to their advantage, and then try to make them feel less than human, only good to mow their lawns, clean their houses, and build their high rise buildings. Many hispanics would stand on the corners every day as day laborers looking for work. I've seen men in big white pickups come and take six or seven, work them all day and then not pay them. They know they have no one to complain to. This is your Texas, own it.

Freddie

(9,269 posts)
10. Especially if it's Trump
Sat Feb 27, 2016, 11:03 AM
Feb 2016

ALL the women I know despise him. Sexist comments, trophy wives. Even conservative women hate him.

aaaaaa5a

(4,667 posts)
11. There is audio of Trump on the Howard Stern show
Sat Feb 27, 2016, 11:05 AM
Feb 2016


On the show he discusses the value of women based on their chest bust size.



I'm sure that will play well in the general.

aaaaaa5a

(4,667 posts)
20. Agreed. They were discussing this on a new Sirius Radio Channel called POTUS
Sat Feb 27, 2016, 11:15 AM
Feb 2016

POTUS (Politics of the United States) is a nonpartisan, informational radio station. They have a lot of good information there. That's where I heard about it. There is a treasure trove of info on him. The impartial analysis is that Trump is a very tough GE candidate for the GOP. This is why they are scrambling so much.


Trust me, Hillary becomes a huge favorite if Trump gets the GOP nomination.

Dustlawyer

(10,495 posts)
44. It would be "Establishment" vs. Anti-Establishment, she would lose badly!
Sat Feb 27, 2016, 11:59 AM
Feb 2016

Hillary is the best at Establishment politics and represents the shadow government of the corporations and Plutocrats. While I believe that Trump is a fake populist, most people don't. It is an Anti-Establishment revolt this election, plus people are tired of Hillary's corruption, triangulation, insincerity and lies. Republicans will come off of their death beds to vote against her. It is doubtful that Bernie's younger voters will vote for Hillary.

If Hillary wins the Primary, especially with the help of Superdelegates, Republicans win. Bernie does very well with women, so I think this poll is wrong. I guess we will see!

beac

(9,992 posts)
13. You "suspect women like to go with the winner"?
Sat Feb 27, 2016, 11:07 AM
Feb 2016

Wow.

So, in your opinion, women voters care about "winning" over everything else? Not a very feminist outlook.

 

modestybl

(458 posts)
18. Blue Nation Review? Propaganda Rag for the HRC campaign
Sat Feb 27, 2016, 11:10 AM
Feb 2016

David Brock fired all of the real journalists... after he acquired it.

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/entry/david-brock-blue-nation-review_us_564f0f3de4b0879a5b0a7bc5

You guys are behaving like Fox News viewers...

UglyGreed

(7,661 posts)
26. Correct the Record
Sat Feb 27, 2016, 11:28 AM
Feb 2016

and they use Fox News to slander Sanders propaganda at it's finest ...... enough said

 

Geronimoe

(1,539 posts)
24. Hillary's female staff discriminated against
Sat Feb 27, 2016, 11:21 AM
Feb 2016

Hillary paid her female staff an average of $45K per year, while her male staff made $53K per year.

 

MaggieD

(7,393 posts)
27. We, the people!
Sat Feb 27, 2016, 11:29 AM
Feb 2016

Are going to elect the first woman president. And it's going to be sweet. We've been waiting for over 200 years.

Madam Mossfern

(2,340 posts)
65. The more anyone repeats "the first woman President"
Sat Feb 27, 2016, 12:48 PM
Feb 2016

the less I am likely to support her. Please, if you do support Hillary please do not use that sexist reasoning!

 

SheilaT

(23,156 posts)
28. How unfortunate.
Sat Feb 27, 2016, 11:29 AM
Feb 2016

If that's really true, it means most of those women are blindly voting for another woman, without giving very much thought to what she really represents, what she has done in the past, and what she'll likely do in the future.

 

Elmer S. E. Dump

(5,751 posts)
39. Apparently that is true. It saddens me as well as infuriates me.
Sat Feb 27, 2016, 11:45 AM
Feb 2016

That's not going to be good for anyone but Her Hindness.

 

SheilaT

(23,156 posts)
73. I agree.
Sun Feb 28, 2016, 12:41 AM
Feb 2016

At my age (67) I'm older than a lot here on DU, and older than a lot of voters. While I would love to see a woman President in my lifetime, I understand very clearly that Hillary Clinton is absolutely not that one. And far too many who support her are simply in the OMG! A WOMAN PRESIDENT! OF COURSE I WILL VOTE FOR HILLARY!! category.

She is such a bad choice, and for so many reasons, that I am very saddened by the prospect of her as our nominee.

 

AlbertCat

(17,505 posts)
29. The REAL ho hum typical fact anyone would expect
Sat Feb 27, 2016, 11:31 AM
Feb 2016

Women voting for a woman.



It's still a lousy reason to choose a nominee.


But I think women are smarter than this.

Fantastic Anarchist

(7,309 posts)
30. Two states does not a revolution make.
Sat Feb 27, 2016, 11:33 AM
Feb 2016

And one of the gaps is for women over 50 - nothing wrong with that, just you also need to account for women under 50, too, especially millennials.

 

DeGreg

(72 posts)
35. Ignore polls, vote your conscience, if you still have one
Sat Feb 27, 2016, 11:39 AM
Feb 2016


I want a WOMAN PRESIDENT
too, but not a woman president
who thinks exactly like the MEN
who got us into this MESS.


Skid Rogue

(711 posts)
36. If it was "just" because she was a woman...
Sat Feb 27, 2016, 11:41 AM
Feb 2016

women would have supported McCain/Palin. It's this particular woman we like.

Skid Rogue

(711 posts)
43. Sure, you're right...
Sat Feb 27, 2016, 11:59 AM
Feb 2016

but my point is, women vote for the male candidate over the female candidate all the time. Women in NYC chose Chuck Schumer over Geraldine Ferraro. That's why all the "vagina voter" garbage has no effect on us. Yes, I'm supper proud to be voting for the first woman president. I'm very proud of Hillary. However, I would never vote for a woman if I didn't think she were the best candidate, too. Women really believe Hillary will be a better president than Bernie. The fact that's she's Hillary and not Henry is just amazing icing on the cake.

Skid Rogue

(711 posts)
47. lol... well I tried... I'm not very good at this posting thing.
Sat Feb 27, 2016, 12:06 PM
Feb 2016

but I'm excited about the race. I'm happy to be electing the first female president. Cheers.

davidthegnome

(2,983 posts)
37. Hmm...
Sat Feb 27, 2016, 11:41 AM
Feb 2016

So, what is the revolution here? What are the intended goals of the Clinton campaign? I see several broad brush, ignorant statements in the OP, but I'm not seeing any actual substance as regards the concept of revolution. It would indeed be revolutionary for a woman to win the Presidency - and hey, I'm all for that. Just not for Clinton. I'd be happy to vote for Elizabeth Warren, I believe she would be capable of leading a real revolution.

Your candidate though, has a history of supporting the wrong policies, of praising and supporting corporate influence and greed, of taking from the rich to give to the rich - and from the poor to give to the rich, too.

We could go over the specifics of her policies, of her actual votes in the past... her actions, her speeches, etc.... but what is new, different... revolutionary about her campaign or candidacy? Let's see here...

"We are witnessing an uprising of straight white males, a revolt from the core of the patriarchy. And their singular target is the woman who is inching closer to the presidency than any other woman in history. Between Trump’s torture-loving armies and Bernie’s brigades of misogynistic trolls, the 2016 electorate feels more like a boiling, churning mob than a political movement, a rage-a-thon more than a revolution. "

Interesting assertions. Very interesting. What about all the women supporting Sanders? What about all the African Americans, Latinos, members of the GLBT community? Are they misogynistic trolls too? I mean, correct me if I'm wrong, but it looks to me like Sanders won the Latino vote in Nevada. Are they the core of the patriarchy?

The real revolution is going to come from a corporate financed campaign? Financed by the very same sorts of people who gleefully campaign and lobby in favor of the oppression of minorities? You know, like the for profit prison industry?

Rather than a revolution demanding campaign finance reform, greater wealth equality, universal healthcare, publically funded higher education... and so on and so forth... apparently, the revolution will be led by a member of the 1% who has spent her whole life supporting... well, the 1%.

See, what you call revolution, I call a continuation of business as usual in Washington.

 

californiabernin

(421 posts)
42. Younger women don't support her
Sat Feb 27, 2016, 11:49 AM
Feb 2016

and they are the future.

I supported Obama, but while his election was of great historical significance it was no revolution.

To call the potential election of the first female, Jewish , Hindu, Hispanic, whatever president a revolution is silly.

 

Trust Buster

(7,299 posts)
49. The picture will become clearer in the next two weeks IMO.
Sat Feb 27, 2016, 12:12 PM
Feb 2016

Hillary is perfectly positioned. I can't wait for her to be standing on a stage with Trump. She has more guts and brains then all of the lame Republican candidates put together.

 

Lizzie Poppet

(10,164 posts)
50. This woman has more in common with Bernie than with Hillary.
Sat Feb 27, 2016, 12:12 PM
Feb 2016

Countless policy similarities trump lack of a Y chromosome for me. It's not even close...although it should be mentioned that I'm a socialist. A strong preference for a democratic socialist candidate is hardly surprising.

SoapBox

(18,791 posts)
51. Uh huh...
Sat Feb 27, 2016, 12:16 PM
Feb 2016

Guess they left out the staggering numbers of my female neighbors and co-workers that cannot stand her.

oasis

(49,393 posts)
53. The Women's vote will deliver the White House to Hillary.
Sat Feb 27, 2016, 12:19 PM
Feb 2016

Because women know this incredibly remarkable woman can get things done.

Greybnk48

(10,168 posts)
60. Every woman in our family is an active feminist
Sat Feb 27, 2016, 12:32 PM
Feb 2016

and we support women vehemently, but not irrationally. To my knowledge we are ALL voting for Bernie Sanders for very good reasons that have nothing to do with his gender biology or hers.

LiberalArkie

(15,720 posts)
62. No big news there. I thought it was always known that women only vote for women, and blacks only
Sat Feb 27, 2016, 12:37 PM
Feb 2016

vote for blacks, and whites only vote for whites and men only vote for men.

 

JustAMaverick

(35 posts)
68. Skewed and with little actual meaning.
Sat Feb 27, 2016, 12:59 PM
Feb 2016

Florida is the land of corruption and ignorance. Any rational person would expect those misinformed seniors to rush out to Hillary in droves as well. As far as Massachusetts goes...last I heard Bernie had taken the lead there. Not to mention the minor detail of half a dozen national polls which all agree Bernie is now in the lead. You see the younger demographics grew up during this age of corporate and wall street consolidation. They smell the fascism...and they will rebel. Bernie is actually the peaceful solution. 8 years of more of the same and there will be blood in the streets. Wake up people. 60 percent of this country has less then 600 in the bank. Think about that...that means we are much closer to Guatemala then to Germany. We are now a banana republic and you are now all wage slaves. I am sure toiling longer for less will be so much more liberating with a woman as the figure head of the multi-nationals.

ellennelle

(614 posts)
69. going with the winner?
Sat Feb 27, 2016, 01:00 PM
Feb 2016

is that the criterion?

as a mental health professional, i can tell you straight up, that is the same attitude way too many young women have when they select a mate/husband, only to face abuse before it's all over.

i'll go with the decent, steady, modest, consistent, honest, and unwaveringly principled gentleman, thank you; in a heartbeat.

Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»2016 Postmortem»The REAL Revolution: New ...