Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

peacebird

(14,195 posts)
Sat Feb 27, 2016, 08:21 AM Feb 2016

Hillary DID call black kids Super Predators, here is a Wash Po article that covers it all

"Of course, every part of Williams’s short-lived protest was a reference to actual language that Clinton used in another speech. That one happened in 1996 when Clinton was on the stump advancing President Bill Clinton’s criminal justice reforms. That’s true of the “super-predator” language Williams mentioned. That’s true of the phrase, “We have to bring them to heel.” And although, Williams didn't mention it, Clinton’s 1996 speech included some language about these so-called super-predators implying that they were a generation of guilt- and compassion-free sociopaths who, in the interest of society, simply had to be contained."

https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/the-fix/wp/2016/02/26/why-hillary-clintons-super-predator-apology-is-such-a-big-moment-for-political-protest/

Includes a link to ViDEO of Clinton back in the day saying it

77 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Hillary DID call black kids Super Predators, here is a Wash Po article that covers it all (Original Post) peacebird Feb 2016 OP
More and more I see people lying in the face of truth Fairgo Feb 2016 #1
I hardly see any difference between the psyche and tactics of Hillary supporters Broward Feb 2016 #3
I agree... sad how some here put winning over principled debate. InAbLuEsTaTe Feb 2016 #5
I join you in Jenny_92808 Feb 2016 #54
A beautiful and eye opening way to say it. libtodeath Feb 2016 #9
Compelling Wisdom - Vs - Disheartening Cynicism - The Choice Is Clear cantbeserious Feb 2016 #2
Call me old fashioned, but my sympathy has always been for the victims oasis Feb 2016 #4
Yeah. And on occasion I like peanut butter and jelly sandwiches. ret5hd Feb 2016 #6
Sure. Call me progressive, but I've always felt sympathy for kids growing up in horrible conditions. eomer Feb 2016 #10
If growing up in horrible conditions is the excuse, 7962 Feb 2016 #33
People who continually offend are often a result of systems we could change. eomer Feb 2016 #60
Out-of-school suspension is BS for sure. Kids view it as a vacation. 7962 Feb 2016 #72
Me, too. hamsterjill Feb 2016 #12
Some find it more useful to address the "language" Hillary used 20 years ago. oasis Feb 2016 #19
Actually, it's about reduction of recidivism rates and crime itself -nt Bradical79 Feb 2016 #29
So you think that the Jenny_92808 Feb 2016 #13
Drive by shootings also "ruined so many lives" and ended many others. oasis Feb 2016 #17
I am a victim of a drive by shooting localroger Feb 2016 #24
I'm glad you survived, others did not. oasis Feb 2016 #32
It's about generalization of blame and three-strikes laws localroger Feb 2016 #34
So if you are black, Jenny_92808 Feb 2016 #41
It's obvious you've ignored the post you're referring to. oasis Feb 2016 #47
Ruined many lives! Dustlawyer Feb 2016 #35
Don't forget the victims are on both sides of that divide. A Simple Game Feb 2016 #21
During that period, minority communities plagued with widespread murder, oasis Feb 2016 #23
And they needed a quick fix at the time, but sadly long term solutions A Simple Game Feb 2016 #31
I lived in one such minority community during that period-North Minneapolis azurnoir Feb 2016 #37
Sorry son, it was a myth. TM99 Feb 2016 #52
#1. If you have any offspring on DU, great , but I am NOT one of them. oasis Feb 2016 #58
Listen buddy TM99 Feb 2016 #62
I read your OP "buddy" and I soundly reject it. oasis Feb 2016 #68
It is irrelevant that you lived in LA. TM99 Feb 2016 #70
One of the many people I've work with over the Years Mbrow Feb 2016 #22
True, it was a sad situation for all concerned. While I understand oasis Feb 2016 #26
It's hard to believe you understand that when you support non-solutions Bradical79 Feb 2016 #38
I am for workable solutions for today's problems. It's hard to find oasis Feb 2016 #40
Me too. tazkcmo Feb 2016 #55
But that's exactly the solution needed noiretextatique Feb 2016 #75
kick kgnu_fan Feb 2016 #7
It appears they don't care what she called them or that they were ordered "brought to heel." Vinca Feb 2016 #8
I think it is because Jenny_92808 Feb 2016 #14
"brought to heel" Jenny_92808 Feb 2016 #44
I'm aware of the useage in dog training. And that doesn't bother people of color??? Vinca Feb 2016 #69
You would think it does. TM99 Feb 2016 #71
Did the WP also print this? Jitter65 Feb 2016 #11
What is the point of this post? ybbor Feb 2016 #15
Without any context, I can't imagine why the WP would print it. Gore1FL Feb 2016 #18
'Hard-working' Americans don't care what she called other people's kids HereSince1628 Feb 2016 #16
This is posted in GDP while the pro-Hillary argument is posted in a protected HRC fan group Feeling the Bern Feb 2016 #20
Coronation interruption. N/T NRaleighLiberal Feb 2016 #25
The Hillary group banned me Jenny_92808 Feb 2016 #46
What did you say to the repukes Loki Feb 2016 #27
100% EdwardBernays Feb 2016 #28
Many of her supporters could care less what she says or what she stands for. Broward Feb 2016 #30
It's about working with what we have, not someone we wish we had. randome Feb 2016 #36
"the only hope"--that's why they're always attacking Trump, MisterP Feb 2016 #73
Did Hillary give Ashley UglyGreed Feb 2016 #39
if she got a refund I'm sure it was prorated krawhitham Feb 2016 #43
Saying “We have to bring them to heel.” is worse than calling them Super Predators, right? krawhitham Feb 2016 #42
I agree Jenny_92808 Feb 2016 #49
If you repeat a lie often enought, people will believe it? Amimnoch Feb 2016 #45
She didn't use the word "black". She didn't say "African American". She used the word "gangs". Nye Bevan Feb 2016 #48
You are right, Jenny_92808 Feb 2016 #51
if that is what you have to tell yourself in order to be able to sleep with your decision notadmblnd Feb 2016 #56
You are absolutly correct but... 40RatRod Feb 2016 #61
Yes, there are all sorts of gangs in this country.. not just black. DCBob Feb 2016 #66
One of my favorite movies, "Goodfellas", opens with..... Nye Bevan Feb 2016 #67
Who was she trying to pander to at that time? Rosa Luxemburg Feb 2016 #50
Yep Jenny_92808 Feb 2016 #57
I am offended by what Hillary said and Jenny_92808 Feb 2016 #53
Worse, Clinton participated in a pattern of manufactured fear. DirkGently Feb 2016 #59
The superpredator myth of the 1990's TM99 Feb 2016 #63
Thank you Jenny_92808 Feb 2016 #64
K & R AzDar Feb 2016 #65
Kick azmom Feb 2016 #74
The voters in South Carolina don't seem to be concerned n;t doc03 Feb 2016 #76
Can't find "black kids" anywhere in the speech? MadDAsHell Feb 2016 #77

Fairgo

(1,571 posts)
1. More and more I see people lying in the face of truth
Sat Feb 27, 2016, 08:24 AM
Feb 2016

Approaching the fight for democracy as if it were a game, and a game without honor. It is quite disturbing to watch.

Broward

(1,976 posts)
3. I hardly see any difference between the psyche and tactics of Hillary supporters
Sat Feb 27, 2016, 08:46 AM
Feb 2016

and former GWB supporters that were once roundly mocked around here.

ret5hd

(20,501 posts)
6. Yeah. And on occasion I like peanut butter and jelly sandwiches.
Sat Feb 27, 2016, 09:08 AM
Feb 2016

Don't know what either of our replies have to do with the OP though.

eomer

(3,845 posts)
10. Sure. Call me progressive, but I've always felt sympathy for kids growing up in horrible conditions.
Sat Feb 27, 2016, 09:22 AM
Feb 2016

Call me liberal too.

But unlike Hillary, I don't ask to be called progressive, moderate, and conservative all at the same time. (Or maybe it's at different times as the situation/audience calls for).

 

7962

(11,841 posts)
33. If growing up in horrible conditions is the excuse,
Sat Feb 27, 2016, 10:31 AM
Feb 2016

then violent crime should have been through the roof in the 30s, 40s, 50s & 60s when poverty was a helluva lot WORSE. Not to mention legalized discrimination. Yet it wasnt.

I'm not a hillary supporter, but I'm not going to blast her for saying something thats true either. People who continually offend and have records of violence as long as your arm ARE different from the run-of-the-mill crook.

eomer

(3,845 posts)
60. People who continually offend are often a result of systems we could change.
Sat Feb 27, 2016, 12:19 PM
Feb 2016

End the fraudulent War on Drugs, spend the money saved on education and jobs, end privatized incarceration and along with it the over-criminalization of our society - in other words, fulfill our responsibilities as a decent society - and then we can see what else we need to do to help keep kids out of trouble. Oh, and where I live the schools have been putting kids on out-of-school suspension at the drop of a hat, and of course with a racial bias, which is a recipe for getting kids into trouble. There are a lot of things we ought to do to help kids. The right wing position that the Clintons have pushed along with Republicans is obviously designed to foster this problem and profit from it, along with the byproduct of disenfranchising millions of people's voting rights.

 

7962

(11,841 posts)
72. Out-of-school suspension is BS for sure. Kids view it as a vacation.
Sat Feb 27, 2016, 04:20 PM
Feb 2016

We havent had that around here for years now, unless the student has been violent.
The bigger problem is the sorry parents. Kids who have parents who dont give a shit are a lot more likely to not care about school. A friend of mine who teaches was telling me how he's had to explain to his 3rd graders that cussing a blue streak isnt allowed in school, regardless of how much its done at home. And that you cant leave trash on the floor at school either!!

hamsterjill

(15,222 posts)
12. Me, too.
Sat Feb 27, 2016, 09:24 AM
Feb 2016

I understand your reply perfectly. It's very telling that some others around here don't get the meaning, isn't it?

I guess some believe that those who commit crimes against others should not be held accountable. Have we really sunk to that level of mentality???!!! That scares the hell out of me.

 

Jenny_92808

(1,342 posts)
13. So you think that the
Sat Feb 27, 2016, 09:26 AM
Feb 2016

three strikes law that Hillary helped champion was a great success? It was an abysmal failure that has ruined so many lives.

localroger

(3,629 posts)
24. I am a victim of a drive by shooting
Sat Feb 27, 2016, 10:17 AM
Feb 2016

I do not need people who shoplift pizzas going to jail for the rest of their lives because it happened, thank you very much.

oasis

(49,393 posts)
32. I'm glad you survived, others did not.
Sat Feb 27, 2016, 10:26 AM
Feb 2016

If you want to make this about shoplifting pizzas, we have nothing further to discuss.

localroger

(3,629 posts)
34. It's about generalization of blame and three-strikes laws
Sat Feb 27, 2016, 10:33 AM
Feb 2016

The "super predator" label is a smear that was used to sell policies that hurt a lot of young black people who never committed a drive by shooting. One infamous case was a guy who went away for the rest of his life for shoplifting a pizza. There is a direct line between the "super predator" rhetoric and that young man's sorry fate.

An entire generation was "brought to heel" because they were portrayed as being so dangerous that these crazy outcomes were an acceptable side effect of what "had to be done." And in the end, the crazy policies didn't really have much of an effect on the real problem of gang violence, but they ruined the lives of a hell of a lot of people who never touched a gun.

Dustlawyer

(10,495 posts)
35. Ruined many lives!
Sat Feb 27, 2016, 10:34 AM
Feb 2016

Hillary remarks that "...the causes for why these "kids" become Super Preditors need to be looked at..." she never did address the causes except to lock them up and throw away the keys! So yes, everyone old enough remembers the crack epidemic and the resulting violence, nothing was ever done to prevent it except a war on drugs to lock up black people!

A Simple Game

(9,214 posts)
21. Don't forget the victims are on both sides of that divide.
Sat Feb 27, 2016, 10:01 AM
Feb 2016

One side is systemic and the other individual.

oasis

(49,393 posts)
23. During that period, minority communities plagued with widespread murder,
Sat Feb 27, 2016, 10:13 AM
Feb 2016

armed robbery, witness intimidation and crack cocaine distribution, were pleading for immediate solutions.

A Simple Game

(9,214 posts)
31. And they needed a quick fix at the time, but sadly long term solutions
Sat Feb 27, 2016, 10:25 AM
Feb 2016

were sacrificed in the name of profits for prisons.

Wish that there was a profit to be made feeding the poor, continuing education for drop outs, and jobs for the youth. If all of those and other endeavors had a profit motive they would soon have funding instead of prison construction.

azurnoir

(45,850 posts)
37. I lived in one such minority community during that period-North Minneapolis
Sat Feb 27, 2016, 10:44 AM
Feb 2016

the problem was everyone was considered guilty no innocent vs guilty no good guy bad guy , sometimes the police would simply cordon off a block or 2 of a residential street, not projects mind you it was a mixture of owner occupied houses and rental properties and if you were walking down the street you were face down and usually cuffed - didn't matter whether you 8 or 80

eta suspected crack houses were simply attacked using front end loaders or bulldozers that was the MPD version of a no knock raid, one such house was raided in such a manner a few doors down from me-it shuck our whole and knocked me down I thought the furnace had exploded

 

TM99

(8,352 posts)
52. Sorry son, it was a myth.
Sat Feb 27, 2016, 11:25 AM
Feb 2016

Violent crime was no more or no less about these 'superpredators' then as it is now.

http://www.democraticunderground.com/12511341383

It tells me an awful lot about you that you still believe this racist myth today. You might want to look at that with some deep self-awareness.

oasis

(49,393 posts)
58. #1. If you have any offspring on DU, great , but I am NOT one of them.
Sat Feb 27, 2016, 11:51 AM
Feb 2016

So please, get that straight right now.

#2. Try asking the residents of the minority communities who lived through that period, if murders, armed robberies, witness intimidation and widespread crack distribution, was only a "myth".

 

TM99

(8,352 posts)
62. Listen buddy
Sat Feb 27, 2016, 12:45 PM
Feb 2016

I am a minority. I worked with the kids from those communities. I was in the trenches. Where the fuck were you?

You obviously didn't read my thread or you wouldn't have made such a boneheaded reply.

oasis

(49,393 posts)
68. I read your OP "buddy" and I soundly reject it.
Sat Feb 27, 2016, 02:32 PM
Feb 2016

I lived in LA during that time period and I know what the hell I' m talking about. I know actual victims and families whole suffered from gang criminality.

Your perspective is exactly your own, The trenches you claim to have worked in must have been comfortably far from the front lines I have operated in on a daily basis.

 

TM99

(8,352 posts)
70. It is irrelevant that you lived in LA.
Sat Feb 27, 2016, 04:13 PM
Feb 2016

I actually worked in the psychology field and still do. I worked with gang members, drug addicts, young kids with crime sheets, etc.

No one disputes that gang violence isn't real. Guess what? It is as real today as it was in the 1990's. Why? Because Clinton's superpredator myth fueled crime bill did shit to stop it. There was zero impact from the racist laws that came from this myth.

So your's is the biased perception based only on some anecdotal experiences that fly in the face of research evidence and professional experience.

Mbrow

(1,090 posts)
22. One of the many people I've work with over the Years
Sat Feb 27, 2016, 10:05 AM
Feb 2016

Was a gang member growing up, and while he had stepped away from it i will never forget the conversations we had about living that life. One of the main points i remember so clearly was him saying, "in my hood you were either a member or a victim,i'm not a victim."
But as soon as he was able to leave that life, he did.

oasis

(49,393 posts)
26. True, it was a sad situation for all concerned. While I understand
Sat Feb 27, 2016, 10:20 AM
Feb 2016

how adverse social conditions have forced many to turn to violent crime, my sympathy will always be for the actual victims.

 

Bradical79

(4,490 posts)
38. It's hard to believe you understand that when you support non-solutions
Sat Feb 27, 2016, 10:45 AM
Feb 2016

The so called "tough on crime" stance you support is not an effective solution. It's very profitable and emotionally satisfying for certain people, but really has no positive effect that I can tell. It's been a pretty devastating mentality that's created a lot more victims.

oasis

(49,393 posts)
40. I am for workable solutions for today's problems. It's hard to find
Sat Feb 27, 2016, 10:52 AM
Feb 2016

ANY solution for what has already occurred 20 years back.

tazkcmo

(7,300 posts)
55. Me too.
Sat Feb 27, 2016, 11:32 AM
Feb 2016

Not repeating past mistakes as electing Sec Clinton would be. She had a chance to make a big difference and went with treating symptoms while ignoring the cause.

Which Hillary should I vote for? 3 strikes Hillary? Welfare Reform Hillary? Progressive Hillary? Moderate Hillary? So many candidates!

Reminds me of the schizophrenic neighbor I had in KC who would tell the hostess when asked how many in his party, "Party of 7, table for 1."

noiretextatique

(27,275 posts)
75. But that's exactly the solution needed
Sat Feb 27, 2016, 09:49 PM
Feb 2016

gangs did not just appear out of some mysterious vacuum. the problems of entrenched racism, isolation, poverty, lack of opportunity, pooe education, and various law enforcement schemes DO go back over 20 years and more. yo cannot fix a problem by ignoring its cause.

Vinca

(50,285 posts)
8. It appears they don't care what she called them or that they were ordered "brought to heel."
Sat Feb 27, 2016, 09:19 AM
Feb 2016

There's an underlying something going on here and I'd love to know what it is. You don't dismiss a person promoting everything that would benefit you and who fought for civil rights in favor of a person who has called you names and supported her husband's bills that hurt you unless there's a reason no one is talking about.

 

Jenny_92808

(1,342 posts)
14. I think it is because
Sat Feb 27, 2016, 09:32 AM
Feb 2016

many AA's do not know Bernie. They are just now being introduced to him. I would say that AA's have good reason to Not want a republican to win, so they are voting for the democrat that they think has the best shot to win. Just my theory.

 

TM99

(8,352 posts)
71. You would think it does.
Sat Feb 27, 2016, 04:15 PM
Feb 2016

But apparently only PoC who support Sanders are troubled by it, whereas those that support Clinton are rationalizing it, justifying it, and explaining it away because otherwise it would be quite uncomfortable psychologically speaking.

Go figure! Amazing what some will do and believe and deny to support a candidate like her.

 

Jitter65

(3,089 posts)
11. Did the WP also print this?
Sat Feb 27, 2016, 09:24 AM
Feb 2016

(SOUNDBITE OF ARCHIVED RECORDING)
SANDERS: Clearly there are people in our society who are horribly violent, who are deeply sick and sociopathic, and clearly these people must be put behind bars in order to protect society from them.
KEITH: The early 1990s were a very different time. America was coming out of the crack epidemic. Violent crime was at its peak. News reports led with carjackings and gang violence. Again, Nicholas Turner.

ybbor

(1,554 posts)
15. What is the point of this post?
Sat Feb 27, 2016, 09:35 AM
Feb 2016

Bernie is stating the truth.

He did not call them names, nor did he use dehumanizing terms to discuss punishment.

I don't see your point.

Nor do I disagree or find offensive anything he said.

Gore1FL

(21,132 posts)
18. Without any context, I can't imagine why the WP would print it.
Sat Feb 27, 2016, 09:42 AM
Feb 2016

I'd like to know what he said for the whole conversation in order to have valid context. I know who Sanders is. Who is Keith? The only Nicholas Turner I am aware of is the college football player who died.

Fundamentally, there actually are "Clearly there are people in our society who are horribly violent, who are deeply sick and sociopathic, and clearly these people must be put behind bars in order to protect society from them. "

I can list a few people to validate this:
Terry Nichols
Ted Kaczynski
Dennis Rader
?Dzhokhar Tsarnaev

Can you post a link to the entire text?

HereSince1628

(36,063 posts)
16. 'Hard-working' Americans don't care what she called other people's kids
Sat Feb 27, 2016, 09:37 AM
Feb 2016

Super-predator would -never- have implications for the safety and futures of their kids.

They've got nothing to worry about, so why would they worry... oh, ya, that election year thingy. They would worry their candidate of choice would be sullied.

 

Feeling the Bern

(3,839 posts)
20. This is posted in GDP while the pro-Hillary argument is posted in a protected HRC fan group
Sat Feb 27, 2016, 09:52 AM
Feb 2016

that banned differing opinions.

What are HRC fans afraid of?

 

Jenny_92808

(1,342 posts)
46. The Hillary group banned me
Sat Feb 27, 2016, 11:03 AM
Feb 2016

and I didn't do anything wrong. It appears that they want their echo chamber to themselves.

Loki

(3,825 posts)
27. What did you say to the repukes
Sat Feb 27, 2016, 10:20 AM
Feb 2016

when they kept repeating Senator Robert Byrd, a great gentleman and a very fine Democratic Senator from West Virginia, a member of the KKK? Did you say, that was a long time ago, and he has changed? This argument is become stale and stupid and disingenuous.

Broward

(1,976 posts)
30. Many of her supporters could care less what she says or what she stands for.
Sat Feb 27, 2016, 10:24 AM
Feb 2016

It's just about getting her elected.

 

randome

(34,845 posts)
36. It's about working with what we have, not someone we wish we had.
Sat Feb 27, 2016, 10:36 AM
Feb 2016

[hr][font color="blue"][center]TECT in the name of the Representative approves of this post.[/center][/font][hr]

MisterP

(23,730 posts)
73. "the only hope"--that's why they're always attacking Trump,
Sat Feb 27, 2016, 04:46 PM
Feb 2016

rather than even bragging that she could beat him: the DNC isn't well-known for garnering victories in GEs, now is it?

krawhitham

(4,645 posts)
42. Saying “We have to bring them to heel.” is worse than calling them Super Predators, right?
Sat Feb 27, 2016, 10:55 AM
Feb 2016

or is it just me

 

Amimnoch

(4,558 posts)
45. If you repeat a lie often enought, people will believe it?
Sat Feb 27, 2016, 11:01 AM
Feb 2016

Or something like that. Who was it that used that quote again?

The cherry picked clip from a speech on GANG (something that isn't, and wasn't at that time even majority black statistically), yet your side seems VERY interested in MAKING and altering the argument that was being made.

Nye Bevan

(25,406 posts)
48. She didn't use the word "black". She didn't say "African American". She used the word "gangs".
Sat Feb 27, 2016, 11:06 AM
Feb 2016

So unless you think "gang" implies "black" (which is not only an inaccurate assumption but a racist one) she never called "black kids" anything at all, let alone "super predators".

notadmblnd

(23,720 posts)
56. if that is what you have to tell yourself in order to be able to sleep with your decision
Sat Feb 27, 2016, 11:42 AM
Feb 2016

by all means- proceed.

40RatRod

(532 posts)
61. You are absolutly correct but...
Sat Feb 27, 2016, 12:39 PM
Feb 2016

...you will never be able to convince Bernie's supporters. Facts don't mean a lot on DU.

DCBob

(24,689 posts)
66. Yes, there are all sorts of gangs in this country.. not just black.
Sat Feb 27, 2016, 01:13 PM
Feb 2016

Seems like manufactured outrage to me.

Nye Bevan

(25,406 posts)
67. One of my favorite movies, "Goodfellas", opens with.....
Sat Feb 27, 2016, 01:47 PM
Feb 2016

..... "as far back as I can remember, I always wanted to be a gangster". If this is the best ammunition Hillary's opponents have, it's not looking good for them.

 

Jenny_92808

(1,342 posts)
53. I am offended by what Hillary said and
Sat Feb 27, 2016, 11:28 AM
Feb 2016

Last edited Sun Feb 28, 2016, 12:57 PM - Edit history (1)

I am of Scandinavian ancestry.

"...a generation of guilt- and compassion-free sociopaths who, in the interest of society, simply had to be contained." ~ Hillary

from the article (regarding Clinton crime bill) -
"To be clear, it made the nation’s already-elevated incarceration rate far, far worse. It stripped those convicted of drug crimes of all sorts of post-prison help, including federal student loans, making recidivism all the more likely."

DirkGently

(12,151 posts)
59. Worse, Clinton participated in a pattern of manufactured fear.
Sat Feb 27, 2016, 12:13 PM
Feb 2016

“The super-predator theory was alway bullshit,” criminal justice researcher Franklin Zimring of the University of California, Berkeley, told BuzzFeed News. “It was political rhetoric cloaking a movement that wanted to lock more people up.”
Even in 1996, when Clinton made her remarks, Zimring and other criminologists suggested that the idea of an ever-increasing homicide rate was based on a fallacy that somehow some kids were just born criminals, and that children under 13 were somehow included in this cohort of super-criminals. “They are worried about desperados in diapers,” he wrote that year in the Los Angeles Times.

http://www.buzzfeed.com/danvergano/superpredator-theory

It's a pattern I associate with conservatives.

1. Find / create bogeyman, preferably an outsider / "other" suitable for framing.

2. Whip up hysteria, utilizing false information and preying on the human foible of imagining monsters under the bed.

3. Use this as a basis to increase police power, curtail personal freedom, and most importantly,

4. FUNNEL LOTS OF MONEY TO PRIVATE INTERESTS.

5. When it begins to become obvious the threat never existed, declare victory, claiming the abusive, exploitive "cure" is what worked.

6. Wash, rinse, repeat.

What bothers me most is that it demonstrates that Clinton's leadership "style" is to simply exploit whatever is available to gain and hold power. She does not swim upstream, but rather finds the current and jumps in.

This is not leadership. It's exploitation and power mongering. It's exactly why things improve so slowly, and sometimes get worse. People who think this way and utilize these techniques are not trying to actually accomplish anything but negotiating power structures for their own benefit. If allies need money, a reason to send them money will present itself. If a vulnerable population can be demonized to generate the fear / repression / profit model noted above, they will be so demonized.

It's not uniquely Hillary Clinton. She is not especially awful. But she is not any different or any better, either.
 

TM99

(8,352 posts)
63. The superpredator myth of the 1990's
Sat Feb 27, 2016, 12:47 PM
Feb 2016

was for neoliberal like the white Clintons and Gores what the Satanic Panic was in the 1980's for the born-again Christians.

There is no difference between the two.

Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»2016 Postmortem»Hillary DID call black ki...