Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Tx4obama

(36,974 posts)
Thu Oct 11, 2012, 04:18 PM Oct 2012

1 in 10 debate watchers were 'dual-screeners,' Pew says


1 in 10 debate watchers were 'dual-screeners,' Pew says

While most people who watched the first live presidential debate saw it on TV, 11 percent also had a second debate-related screen going, either on their computer, smartphone or tablet, watching or reading related coverage at the same time.

The finding is from the Pew Research Center for the People & the Press, which said Thursday that younger Americans, those 40 and under, were most likely to be "dual-screeners."

Pew also reports that 3 percent said they watched the debate online only, either on their computer or a mobile device.

-snip-

Full article and Chart here: http://www.nbcnews.com/technology/technolog/1-10-debate-watchers-were-dual-screeners-pew-says-1C6415682




5 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
1 in 10 debate watchers were 'dual-screeners,' Pew says (Original Post) Tx4obama Oct 2012 OP
To me that suggests a major problem..... Swede Atlanta Oct 2012 #1
I see no problem with Tweeting and posting comments on websites during the debate. Tx4obama Oct 2012 #3
Yes, but then again Turbineguy Oct 2012 #2
Not I. I prefer to concentrate on what's actually going on DETAILS & what I think about it.nt patrice Oct 2012 #4
Watch it on C-SPIN.....they just put it out there..... a kennedy Oct 2012 #5
 

Swede Atlanta

(3,596 posts)
1. To me that suggests a major problem.....
Thu Oct 11, 2012, 04:25 PM
Oct 2012

People lack the capacity to observe something objectively without having running commentary whether the commentary be coming from a blog, a website, talking heads, etc. Does that suggest an inability to form independent opinions and assessments?

To me this seems to be a big issue - independent critical thinking. The talking heads have convinced us we are incapable of independent thought and must look to them for their "pearls of wisdom". I have respect for some of the talking heads for their perspectives. I consider it but when it differs from my own personal observations I tend to discount it.

Tx4obama

(36,974 posts)
3. I see no problem with Tweeting and posting comments on websites during the debate.
Thu Oct 11, 2012, 04:35 PM
Oct 2012

Not everyone online during a debate is listening to a talking head.

I know that during the GOP primary debates we had tons of folks here at DU posting comments regarding the debate.
During several of the primary debates I had my TV on, was posting on DU, and watching my Twitter feed all at the same time

Makes it more fun that way

Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»2016 Postmortem»1 in 10 debate watchers w...