Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

cannabis_flower

(3,764 posts)
Wed Feb 24, 2016, 06:40 PM Feb 2016

I'm wondering if the reason for small Democratic turnout

is simply because Democratic voters for the most part, don't care if Hillary or Bernie are facing the Republican in November and would be happy to vote for either one. If you like them both you might not be motivated to vote in the primary.

9 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
I'm wondering if the reason for small Democratic turnout (Original Post) cannabis_flower Feb 2016 OP
That's actually a pretty smart observation. And pretty damn simple. blm Feb 2016 #1
My guess is Control-Z Feb 2016 #2
I agree sadly. nt m-lekktor Feb 2016 #3
Add to that voter restrictions, long working hours, etc Fearless Feb 2016 #5
Doubtful. Fearless Feb 2016 #4
the rest of the nation is not as polarized as DU, that's for sure. bettyellen Feb 2016 #6
Forget all else. Turnout is THE issue. Rs have it, we don't WhaTHellsgoingonhere Feb 2016 #7
The way I see it, there were a lot more choices in 2008. OZi Feb 2016 #8
or the inevitability meme worked as intended. bunnies Feb 2016 #9

Fearless

(18,421 posts)
5. Add to that voter restrictions, long working hours, etc
Wed Feb 24, 2016, 07:38 PM
Feb 2016

And a lack of faith in government... It's what you get.

 

WhaTHellsgoingonhere

(5,252 posts)
7. Forget all else. Turnout is THE issue. Rs have it, we don't
Wed Feb 24, 2016, 07:55 PM
Feb 2016

Another historic primary. You've got a Democratic woman from the "Stay the course even if it means nothing gets done" Party vs an Independent hell bent on "blowing it all the fuck up even if it means nothing gets done."

It has nothing to do with primaries in general. 2008 was another historic Primary but today's turnout is nowhere near those numbers, state after state. You're argument falls apart because the same could have been said of 2008.

There seems to be some paralysis on the part of the Democratic electorate. Is it learned helplessness? Watching your Hope and Change get obstructed for 7 years could cause PTSD...???

At the same time, this primary has the Rs energized. They are setting turnout records state after state.

Something is going on and it's not good. This is a BFD, too.

OZi

(155 posts)
8. The way I see it, there were a lot more choices in 2008.
Wed Feb 24, 2016, 08:30 PM
Feb 2016

This year it's "inevitable" vs "unelectable" and no other choices. Where is the momentum to come from when the ONLY 2 choices are still stuck orbiting each other and where will it go once 1 breaks free?

"At the same time, this primary has the Rs energized. They are setting turnout records state after state."

Trump plus how many candidates still in it until S.C? When was the last time either party had as many candidates still in it through S.C?

I believe I heard that 60% of Republicans polled in Nevada want a candidate that's an "outsider" and Trump has gotten plenty of free advertising.
 

bunnies

(15,859 posts)
9. or the inevitability meme worked as intended.
Thu Feb 25, 2016, 03:24 PM
Feb 2016

If people believe its a foregone conclusion, why bother?

Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»2016 Postmortem»I'm wondering if the reas...