Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

TalkingDog

(9,001 posts)
Wed Feb 24, 2016, 04:47 PM Feb 2016

Pretzel Logic: Clinton- I disagree with free college because the rich can already afford it.

CLINTON: And then on the affordability side, I do disagree with Senator Sanders, with his plan about, you know, free college, because I want to have debt-free tuition, but I don't believe that my family or Donald Trump's family or a lot of other families that can afford it should have the advantage of free college. I think they should be contributing on behalf of their children.


http://transcripts.cnn.com/TRANSCRIPTS/1602/23/se.01.html


Ahem..... 2 items

1- Since when did your kid go to a public school?
2- Don't want "free stuff"? Don't take it. Income verification. Problem solved.

22 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Pretzel Logic: Clinton- I disagree with free college because the rich can already afford it. (Original Post) TalkingDog Feb 2016 OP
She needs to drop this lame ass line. azmom Feb 2016 #1
NOT THE ONLY LINES SHE NEEDS TO DROP! CorporatistNation Feb 2016 #5
Hillary: YOU can NOT have free college, because Trumps kids might get free college too. 99th_Monkey Feb 2016 #2
ie Forget the Greater Good and America's future, because NorthCarolina Feb 2016 #3
Means testing is giving the Congress control sadoldgirl Feb 2016 #4
Bernie's plan does not means test MaggieD Feb 2016 #6
The rich go to private k-12, why would they go to a public college? Qutzupalotl Feb 2016 #9
many many rich people go to flagship public schools dsc Feb 2016 #16
means testing is a way to sew division tk2kewl Feb 2016 #10
I get that he doesn't want it to look like welfare MaggieD Feb 2016 #14
rich kids will still have thir private schools tk2kewl Feb 2016 #18
Means testing has a cost, a lot of us think the sheer monetary cost is greater than the savings Fumesucker Feb 2016 #12
It's hardly free college. dogman Feb 2016 #7
As if the Trumps of the world are going to stop sending their kids to private schools, esp jillan Feb 2016 #8
It's pretzel when you have misinterpreted it as you have stevenleser Feb 2016 #11
Everyone including the rich are entitled to free K-12 education shawn703 Feb 2016 #13
I disagree with that, and I think many Hillary Clinton supporters do too MaggieD Feb 2016 #15
grade schools don't have admissions standards dsc Feb 2016 #17
I saw it live Dem2 Feb 2016 #19
For those of us who understand what she is saying, there is nothing wrong with what she said. beaglelover Feb 2016 #20
Nice Steely Dan reference...N/T WiffenPoof Feb 2016 #21
Kicked and recommended. Uncle Joe Feb 2016 #22
 

99th_Monkey

(19,326 posts)
2. Hillary: YOU can NOT have free college, because Trumps kids might get free college too.
Wed Feb 24, 2016, 04:53 PM
Feb 2016

So take on that staggering student load debt and STFU.

 

NorthCarolina

(11,197 posts)
3. ie Forget the Greater Good and America's future, because
Wed Feb 24, 2016, 04:57 PM
Feb 2016

Trumps kids would be free to opt to attend some Community College on the tax payers dime.

Not sure how her supporters rationalize that position with themselves. To me it is utterly repugnant and a clear reflection of precisely the third-way mentality that I despise.

sadoldgirl

(3,431 posts)
4. Means testing is giving the Congress control
Wed Feb 24, 2016, 05:00 PM
Feb 2016

over such a program, just as the repugs want to
do the same with SS.

 

MaggieD

(7,393 posts)
6. Bernie's plan does not means test
Wed Feb 24, 2016, 05:03 PM
Feb 2016

Rich kids would be just as entitled to free college as poor kids (who in many cases didn't go to k-12 schools funded well enough to qualify a kid for college).

Why do you want to tax middle class 401ks to send rich kids to college for free? Makes no sense to me.

Qutzupalotl

(14,316 posts)
9. The rich go to private k-12, why would they go to a public college?
Wed Feb 24, 2016, 05:15 PM
Feb 2016

And risk brushing up against the riffraff?

dsc

(52,162 posts)
16. many many rich people go to flagship public schools
Wed Feb 24, 2016, 05:25 PM
Feb 2016

U of M has one of the best law schools in the country, Berkeley is one of the best schools in the nation, UNC has the top medical school in the south. The notion that the rich would consider these schools beneath them is absurd.

 

tk2kewl

(18,133 posts)
10. means testing is a way to sew division
Wed Feb 24, 2016, 05:15 PM
Feb 2016

Everyone has a right to an education.

Denying that to people who can't afford it b/c a rich kid might also benefit is silly. Do you think we shouldn't provide fire protection equally to all people regardless of income? What about drinking water?

 

MaggieD

(7,393 posts)
14. I get that he doesn't want it to look like welfare
Wed Feb 24, 2016, 05:24 PM
Feb 2016

But welfare for rich people is still welfare. And the worst kind, IMO. Especially since the taxes will also be on middle class 401ks.

 

tk2kewl

(18,133 posts)
18. rich kids will still have thir private schools
Wed Feb 24, 2016, 05:28 PM
Feb 2016

Taxes for water, fire protection, et al also are paid by everyone. The wall st transaction tax will have negligible effect on the middle class and framing it as a tax on 401ks is a bs frame just like the "death tax"

Fumesucker

(45,851 posts)
12. Means testing has a cost, a lot of us think the sheer monetary cost is greater than the savings
Wed Feb 24, 2016, 05:19 PM
Feb 2016

Not to mention the social stigma of being singled out as unworthy because your parents are rich.

dogman

(6,073 posts)
7. It's hardly free college.
Wed Feb 24, 2016, 05:05 PM
Feb 2016

It is free tuition in public colleges. Their are still a lot of costs involved and that will require individual solutions. I'm sure theirs and other wealthy students will still opt for private schools. It's simply increasing K-12 to K-14-16. Community colleges should be tuition free. She has pledged no taxes so she can't pay for anything people want. Her friends need the money more than those students, even thought those students would pay back in taxes if they are more qualified and earn more.

jillan

(39,451 posts)
8. As if the Trumps of the world are going to stop sending their kids to private schools, esp
Wed Feb 24, 2016, 05:05 PM
Feb 2016

when the commoners start filling up the public schools.

shawn703

(2,702 posts)
13. Everyone including the rich are entitled to free K-12 education
Wed Feb 24, 2016, 05:21 PM
Feb 2016

We are talking about extending the right to an education to include additional years, regardless of income. Hillary just looks really bad on this.

dsc

(52,162 posts)
17. grade schools don't have admissions standards
Wed Feb 24, 2016, 05:28 PM
Feb 2016

and the standards colleges have favor the wealthy and middle class at the expense of the poor.

Dem2

(8,168 posts)
19. I saw it live
Wed Feb 24, 2016, 05:29 PM
Feb 2016

You're deliberately taking it out of context. People who need help, get help, it's that simple if you didn't catch it.

beaglelover

(3,486 posts)
20. For those of us who understand what she is saying, there is nothing wrong with what she said.
Wed Feb 24, 2016, 05:30 PM
Feb 2016

The rich should not be eligible for any gov't subsidies to pay for college. That's all she was saying.

Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»2016 Postmortem»Pretzel Logic: Clinton- I...