Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

book_worm

(15,951 posts)
Wed Feb 24, 2016, 11:12 AM Feb 2016

Bernie's South Carolina Surrender

COLUMBIA, S.C. — With just a few days left until the South Carolina Democratic primary, Bernie Sanders is all but writing the state off.

He hasn’t said that, of course, but his schedule reflects it.

Sanders was in Massachusetts Monday night and Virginia Tuesday morning. While he attended a televised town hall in South Carolina Tuesday night and followed with an early-morning press conference, his itinerary Wednesday consisted of events in Kansas City, Missouri, and Tulsa, Oklahoma. After that, his schedule called for a trip to Ohio Thursday -- with stops in other March-voting states likely to be added, said an aide.

A candidate’s time is a campaign’s most precious resource, so by spending so much of it somewhere other than South Carolina, the Sanders campaign is engaging in the cold calculus of primary politics – making the tough decision to send the senator to the states where he figures to be the most competitive.

Read more: http://www.politico.com/story/2016/02/bernie-sanders-south-carolina-schedule-219708#ixzz416AWaUkM

Even with the polls overwhelmingly against her in New Hampshire--HRC campaigned hard there.

79 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Bernie's South Carolina Surrender (Original Post) book_worm Feb 2016 OP
well cyberswede Feb 2016 #1
Sound Management Of Bernie's Time And Resources! CorporatistNation Feb 2016 #11
Well, if Sanders is going to pull his resources out of all the States where he won't do well... brooklynite Feb 2016 #16
Good point workinclasszero Feb 2016 #39
Yuge! Firebrand Gary Feb 2016 #76
And Hillary has been off doing fundraisers. Punkingal Feb 2016 #2
these "written off" posts are pretty ridiculous....12 states vote 3 days after SC virtualobserver Feb 2016 #6
...and you begin to see the problem. brooklynite Feb 2016 #17
Clinton has probably surrendered VT, MN, and AK. HooptieWagon Feb 2016 #30
Except that she hasn't... brooklynite Feb 2016 #34
This message was self-deleted by its author stopbush Feb 2016 #49
It isn't a problem, and he didn't withdraw virtualobserver Feb 2016 #56
"Sanders campaign bracing for SC loss" brooklynite Feb 2016 #59
Brace yourself for a surprise. virtualobserver Feb 2016 #60
please explain his visit to KCMo today DrDan Feb 2016 #61
and the Kansas caucus is on the 5th virtualobserver Feb 2016 #64
18 state primary before Missouri - 10 in the South DrDan Feb 2016 #66
12 state primaries before Kansas - and 8 in the South DrDan Feb 2016 #68
Oh my!...... virtualobserver Feb 2016 #69
Things aren't looking good for Bernie. I don't think he's going to win the nomination. NurseJackie Feb 2016 #3
Wow .. Hillary 'campaigned hard' Trajan Feb 2016 #4
I'm assuming her approach HillDawg Feb 2016 #10
This message was self-deleted by its author stopbush Feb 2016 #13
can you elaborate hill2016 Feb 2016 #42
This message was self-deleted by its author stopbush Feb 2016 #45
Great analysis of the importance of Nevada workinclasszero Feb 2016 #43
This message was self-deleted by its author stopbush Feb 2016 #48
Oh you were a local? workinclasszero Feb 2016 #50
This message was self-deleted by its author stopbush Feb 2016 #52
Hillary would have been in serious trouble, agreed. workinclasszero Feb 2016 #55
This message was self-deleted by its author stopbush Feb 2016 #57
SC will be a huge win for her...I can't wait!! workinclasszero Feb 2016 #62
She won by just over 400 votes - that is not a tremendous mandate. flor-de-jasmim Feb 2016 #77
In a state she'd get eviscerated in in November. Lizzie Poppet Feb 2016 #14
SC will be where the "Once they get to know him" argument firebrand80 Feb 2016 #5
"Bernie is wasting his time in SC he can't win"... "Look what a pathetic quitter Sanders is".. whatchamacallit Feb 2016 #7
WRONG. He addressed it this morning. press meme. nt restorefreedom Feb 2016 #8
Where else was Clinton supposed to go if not New Hampshire? mhatrw Feb 2016 #9
This message was self-deleted by its author stopbush Feb 2016 #53
Sanders needs wins. Adrahil Feb 2016 #12
Hillary does well in red states that she will not win in the general SoLeftIAmRight Feb 2016 #15
And Bernie doesn't. Agschmid Feb 2016 #19
The election will be decided by the swing states. SoLeftIAmRight Feb 2016 #23
Are you sure this season you know exactly which states those are? Agschmid Feb 2016 #25
No - Do you think Hillary can win SC in the general? SoLeftIAmRight Feb 2016 #26
I don't know yet. Agschmid Feb 2016 #27
LOL SoLeftIAmRight Feb 2016 #28
... Agschmid Feb 2016 #36
The primaries and the general election are not the same things. NuclearDem Feb 2016 #31
That's really not a smart post BeyondGeography Feb 2016 #51
Money - Mouth SoLeftIAmRight Feb 2016 #72
Obama won those states and he won the GE BeyondGeography Feb 2016 #74
is that how you say SoLeftIAmRight Feb 2016 #79
It reflects Obama's path to victory Renew Deal Feb 2016 #78
I find it peculiar that bullshit about Sanders surrendering started hitting GD:P yesterday. bobbobbins01 Feb 2016 #18
Or reality. Agschmid Feb 2016 #20
Nah, TV ad spend isn't a sign of surrender bobbobbins01 Feb 2016 #21
It's NOT voter suppression to write an article about how much someone is spending on ads. Agschmid Feb 2016 #24
It absolutely is when you characterize not running TV ads as surrender. bobbobbins01 Feb 2016 #35
It's not voter supression. Agschmid Feb 2016 #37
Of course, there's also the leaving SC to spend your time campaigning elsewhere thing... brooklynite Feb 2016 #47
there were also threads asking for HRC to exit - I guess you missed those DrDan Feb 2016 #40
How did you find out? brooklynite Feb 2016 #41
Everybody knows that DU determines workinclasszero Feb 2016 #44
Looks like he's stepping away from the South. nt kstewart33 Feb 2016 #22
Of course she did...the Democratic Party political establisment has her back... hoosierlib Feb 2016 #29
Unlike HRC... workinclasszero Feb 2016 #46
Blah...blah...blah... hoosierlib Feb 2016 #58
You mean she maintains relationships with democrats... Agschmid Feb 2016 #67
Yup... SidDithers Feb 2016 #32
+1 workinclasszero Feb 2016 #65
+2 Yup. Alfresco Feb 2016 #75
I think DU has become the snark capital of the world. nt ladjf Feb 2016 #33
looks like he has written the south off DrDan Feb 2016 #38
A new Hillary talking point on multiple threads here BernieforPres2016 Feb 2016 #54
yet he goes to Missouri today - primary on 3/15 DrDan Feb 2016 #70
And he was also in South Carolina again today BernieforPres2016 Feb 2016 #71
Sorry, bub. Bernie will not go gently into that good night. Maedhros Feb 2016 #63
538 has a forecast with Bernie winning VT BainsBane Feb 2016 #73

cyberswede

(26,117 posts)
1. well
Wed Feb 24, 2016, 11:17 AM
Feb 2016

I think it demonstrates fiscal responsibility to recognize where your money is better spent.

Hillary campaigned hard in NH because she needed the vote to be as close as possible after Iowa.

And she won the state last time, despite not being the favored winner. I'm sure she hoped for a repeat.

MANCHESTER, N.H. — Sen. Hillary Rodham Clinton won New Hampshire's Democratic primary Tuesday night, pulling out a stunning victory over Sen. Barack Obama in a contest that she had been forecast to lose.

http://www.nbcnews.com/id/22551718/ns/politics-decision_08/t/stunner-nh-clinton-defeats-obama/#.Vs3JIlKuzzM

brooklynite

(94,592 posts)
16. Well, if Sanders is going to pull his resources out of all the States where he won't do well...
Wed Feb 24, 2016, 11:51 AM
Feb 2016

Last edited Wed Feb 24, 2016, 01:45 PM - Edit history (1)

...he should be able to save quite a bit of money.

 

virtualobserver

(8,760 posts)
6. these "written off" posts are pretty ridiculous....12 states vote 3 days after SC
Wed Feb 24, 2016, 11:22 AM
Feb 2016

Is Bernie supposed to focus exclusively on SC, then visit 12 states in 2 days?

brooklynite

(94,592 posts)
17. ...and you begin to see the problem.
Wed Feb 24, 2016, 11:54 AM
Feb 2016

He had nine months to build up strength and support in IA and NH. Now, the States get bigger (more expensive to campaign in) and come more quickly. Almost all of the large ones seem to be heading Hillary's way.

I don't criticize him for withdrawing from a State where he won't do well; I note it an another example of his apparent limited ability to find a path to the nomination.

 

HooptieWagon

(17,064 posts)
30. Clinton has probably surrendered VT, MN, and AK.
Wed Feb 24, 2016, 12:18 PM
Feb 2016

It's no big deal...you're harping on about nothing. All the time candidates will write off states where they're well ahead or behind, and focus their resources on states with a narrow gap. To claim a candidate should concentrate on a state where they're 20 points behind is just plain ignorance of how campaigns are run.

brooklynite

(94,592 posts)
34. Except that she hasn't...
Wed Feb 24, 2016, 12:23 PM
Feb 2016

...she'll definitely "lose" Vermont, she may "lose" MN and Alaska...

...but she's actively campaigning in all of them, to get a share of the delegates. She's learned the lesson from 2008 about blowing off low-delegate States.

Response to brooklynite (Reply #34)

 

virtualobserver

(8,760 posts)
56. It isn't a problem, and he didn't withdraw
Wed Feb 24, 2016, 02:31 PM
Feb 2016

He is spreading his time among all of the states.

In my home state of Texas he has been building an organization for months....

You might be in for a surprise on Super Tuesday.....It might not be as super as you expect.

You might be surprised in SC as well.

brooklynite

(94,592 posts)
59. "Sanders campaign bracing for SC loss"
Wed Feb 24, 2016, 02:34 PM
Feb 2016
COLUMBIA - Bernie Sanders’ campaign is bracing for a loss in South Carolina’s Democratic presidential primary Saturday.

“I wouldn't focus on the margin because it's not going to be that close,” Ben Tulchin, Sanders’ pollster, said Tuesday of Saturday’s primary. “But we're going to make it as close as we can. ... If we had three more months, we could close the gap more.”
 

virtualobserver

(8,760 posts)
64. and the Kansas caucus is on the 5th
Wed Feb 24, 2016, 02:47 PM
Feb 2016

It's a two-fer. Bernie is trying to win the election.

He is not running for President of South Carolina.

NurseJackie

(42,862 posts)
3. Things aren't looking good for Bernie. I don't think he's going to win the nomination.
Wed Feb 24, 2016, 11:19 AM
Feb 2016
Go, Hillary! We love you!
 

Trajan

(19,089 posts)
4. Wow .. Hillary 'campaigned hard'
Wed Feb 24, 2016, 11:20 AM
Feb 2016

In a state she was expected to win ....

Is it really wise to 'campaign hard' in a state you are expected to win, especially after your competitor has left the state? ...

She will have her glorious victory in South Carolina ... In fact, she should win every republican state in the south ... But even then, there will be other contests in other, more populous states where her success is seriously in question ...

So, get your jollies now ... Enjoy the Super Tuesday states, because we are preparing for the big crush after Super Tuesday ...

Go Bernie! ....

 

HillDawg

(198 posts)
10. I'm assuming her approach
Wed Feb 24, 2016, 11:31 AM
Feb 2016

is more about narrative than anything else. She wants to run up the score, so she can get a good chunk of delegates and also steal the headlines. There is no Republican things until Super Tuesday, so her dominating SC would steal the headlines, and it would also continue to raise the question about support from the black community. Plus, she has the money so her spending money there really isn't going to hurt her.

Response to Trajan (Reply #4)

 

hill2016

(1,772 posts)
42. can you elaborate
Wed Feb 24, 2016, 01:49 PM
Feb 2016

what were his mistakes in Nevada?

He seems to had a good ground operations set up

Response to hill2016 (Reply #42)

 

workinclasszero

(28,270 posts)
43. Great analysis of the importance of Nevada
Wed Feb 24, 2016, 01:52 PM
Feb 2016

It will be looked at in the future as Bernie's Waterloo, I bet.

Really enjoy your insights and comments on the primaries.

I hope you will be breaking down South Carolina and the Super Tuesday contests as well.

Response to workinclasszero (Reply #43)

Response to workinclasszero (Reply #50)

 

workinclasszero

(28,270 posts)
55. Hillary would have been in serious trouble, agreed.
Wed Feb 24, 2016, 02:25 PM
Feb 2016

That was Bernies one shot to take over the race and make the revolution a reality but he put all his eggs in the youth basket.

The most unreliable voters did what they always do except in rare cases like Obama in 2008.

They didn't show up at the voting booth/caucus. And his campaign is over, whether he or his supporters know it or not.

It will be become readily apparent real soon.

Hey you been around politics 40 years, so I still would like to hear your breakdown of SC and Super Tuesday.

Response to workinclasszero (Reply #55)

 

workinclasszero

(28,270 posts)
62. SC will be a huge win for her...I can't wait!!
Wed Feb 24, 2016, 02:43 PM
Feb 2016
"Super Tuesday will be a Bernie blood bath"...Yes totally.
 

Lizzie Poppet

(10,164 posts)
14. In a state she'd get eviscerated in in November.
Wed Feb 24, 2016, 11:37 AM
Feb 2016

It's a primary-winning, GE-losing strategy: pander to AA voters in Southern states that aren't in play in November. The problem with this strategy can be summed up in two words: "President Trump."

whatchamacallit

(15,558 posts)
7. "Bernie is wasting his time in SC he can't win"... "Look what a pathetic quitter Sanders is"..
Wed Feb 24, 2016, 11:26 AM
Feb 2016

The weathervane squeaks.

mhatrw

(10,786 posts)
9. Where else was Clinton supposed to go if not New Hampshire?
Wed Feb 24, 2016, 11:29 AM
Feb 2016

Harry Reid was taking care of Nevada for her and she already had South Carolina won.

And the is more of the puerile "analysis" our corporate media loves. All about the horse race and nothing about the ideas or the records of the horses or how these ideas and records would affect the people the "horses" are supposedly racing for.

Response to mhatrw (Reply #9)

 

Adrahil

(13,340 posts)
12. Sanders needs wins.
Wed Feb 24, 2016, 11:33 AM
Feb 2016

Let's be honest. He's going to lose in SC< probably by a large margin. OTOH, he does have a good chance to win MA. If he wants to have a narrative of viability, he needs wins on Tuesday.

I suspect that he knows the best he can do in SC is to try and get it closer. Now he still gets proportional delegates, so even losing he gets delegates, but he needs to win the narrative. And to do that, he needs some W's on Tuesday. At least 4.

 

SoLeftIAmRight

(4,883 posts)
15. Hillary does well in red states that she will not win in the general
Wed Feb 24, 2016, 11:45 AM
Feb 2016

A smart person would understand what this reflects

Agschmid

(28,749 posts)
25. Are you sure this season you know exactly which states those are?
Wed Feb 24, 2016, 12:08 PM
Feb 2016

There has been almost nothing predictable in this election so far... I'd be careful calling states swing states anymore.

 

SoLeftIAmRight

(4,883 posts)
72. Money - Mouth
Thu Feb 25, 2016, 01:36 AM
Feb 2016

Want to make a bet - I will give you a three for

Alabama - Mississippi - South Carolina

1 to 3

Hillary will win none of these in the general

She wins even one you get 3
She wins none I get 1

BeyondGeography

(39,374 posts)
74. Obama won those states and he won the GE
Thu Feb 25, 2016, 06:17 AM
Feb 2016

Without winning the South and a host of other deep red states that he didn't contest in the general, he never would have been the nominee. His dependence on those states had nothing to do with his ability to win in Nov.

You have no point of value to make here.

bobbobbins01

(1,681 posts)
18. I find it peculiar that bullshit about Sanders surrendering started hitting GD:P yesterday.
Wed Feb 24, 2016, 11:57 AM
Feb 2016

And today politico has a whole article about it. Marching orders maybe?

bobbobbins01

(1,681 posts)
21. Nah, TV ad spend isn't a sign of surrender
Wed Feb 24, 2016, 12:03 PM
Feb 2016

I'm a volunteer for Sanders, and we're still very active in all the states listed as him "surrendering". Its nothing but a bullshit attempt at voter suppression.

Agschmid

(28,749 posts)
24. It's NOT voter suppression to write an article about how much someone is spending on ads.
Wed Feb 24, 2016, 12:07 PM
Feb 2016

What a frivilous line.

You want to know what is voter supression?

- Caucuses
- Voter ID Laws
- Registration Requirements
... Etc.

Not an article which says Sanders is spending less money in certain states. You assertion is pure hyperbole, and what good is a revolution if it can be suppressed by this article.

bobbobbins01

(1,681 posts)
35. It absolutely is when you characterize not running TV ads as surrender.
Wed Feb 24, 2016, 01:33 PM
Feb 2016

And its not just one article, its many small things that add up to surpress the vote overall.

brooklynite

(94,592 posts)
41. How did you find out?
Wed Feb 24, 2016, 01:46 PM
Feb 2016

Yes, we ALL get a private text message on our Clinton-issued smartphones directing us what to post each day on an anonymous blogsite. Because, as DU goes.....

 

hoosierlib

(710 posts)
29. Of course she did...the Democratic Party political establisment has her back...
Wed Feb 24, 2016, 12:18 PM
Feb 2016

When things got tight in NV, she called on Harry Reid and James Clyburn and John Lewis to shore up SC.

Bernie's campaign is based on the grassroots and time, money and resources are finite.

Unlike HRC, he doesn't have union leaders or a Super PAC to call on for reinforcements...

 

workinclasszero

(28,270 posts)
46. Unlike HRC...
Wed Feb 24, 2016, 02:00 PM
Feb 2016

Bernie doesn't have many friends in the party because he slammed it for decades and refused to lift a finger for democrats ever.

Oh wait....until a few months ago.

Who knew that would ever come back and bite him in the ass eh?

 

hoosierlib

(710 posts)
58. Blah...blah...blah...
Wed Feb 24, 2016, 02:31 PM
Feb 2016

You know he caucused for them in Congress and the Senate and the he has supportrd and endorsed numerous candidates nationally.

His main critque is that elements of the Democratic political establishment are a) too cozy with business and b) too hawkish...

I agree with him on both and will continue to support him and other candidates that share his beliefs...

BernieforPres2016

(3,017 posts)
54. A new Hillary talking point on multiple threads here
Wed Feb 24, 2016, 02:24 PM
Feb 2016

I was at Bernie's campaign rally in Greenville, SC on Sunday night, less than 72 hours ago. So let's start the story on Monday. South Carolina is followed closely by how many states on Super Tuesday, 14? Bernie would have to be an idiot to campaign exclusively in South Carolina right up to the primary with all the primaries that are right behind it.

BernieforPres2016

(3,017 posts)
71. And he was also in South Carolina again today
Wed Feb 24, 2016, 09:27 PM
Feb 2016

Kansas City is on the state line of Missouri and Kansas. The Kansas caucuses are on 3/5.

Do you Clintonistas have any new talking points now after Bernie was in SC again today?

 

Maedhros

(10,007 posts)
63. Sorry, bub. Bernie will not go gently into that good night.
Wed Feb 24, 2016, 02:47 PM
Feb 2016

He, and his supporters, will fight and claw and scrape to beat Hillary until the convention. We don't want a corporate war hawk as President.

BainsBane

(53,035 posts)
73. 538 has a forecast with Bernie winning VT
Thu Feb 25, 2016, 01:43 AM
Feb 2016

The rest through March 8 (as far as I checked) all go to Clinton. Except for Mass (61% Clinton to 39 Sanders), the rest are all 98 or 99 % for Clinton to win.

http://projects.fivethirtyeight.com/election-2016/primary-forecast/south-carolina-democratic/

Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»2016 Postmortem»Bernie's South Carolina S...