Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

TroyD

(4,551 posts)
Thu Oct 11, 2012, 03:13 AM Oct 2012

Brown vs. Warren, Round Three: A Good Night for the Professor

WED OCTOBER 10, 2012

The US Senate debate that just wrapped up in Springfield bore a striking resemblance to the presidential debate that took place last week. Elizabeth Warren was energetic, aggressive, and dictated the terms from the outset — just like Mitt Romney. And Scott Brown seemed simultaneously lethargic and peevish — much like Barack Obama. (Brown wasn't quite as bad as Obama, who seemed genuinely not to want his current job. But for much of the evening, he was pretty close.)

One exchange in particular defined the night. Touting his record on women's issues, Scott Brown identified himself as pro-choice, referenced his wife and daughters, and said (as he had in the first debate) that he'd been fighting for women since he was six — a reference to his defense of his mother from an abusive boyfriend at that tender age. Warren responded, in essence: I believe Scott Brown is a good father and a good husband. But every time he's had a chance to cast a single, defining vote on issues involving women — whether it's abortion rights or equal pay — he's voted the wrong way. My paraphrased recap really doesn't do justice to the power of Warren's riposte; after she delivered it, Brown looked both disoriented and demoralized.

Also noteworthy: by my count, it took Brown more than half an hour to tout his own record of bipartisanship, which is far and away his greatest political asset. He came back to that theme in his closing statement, noting that he actually votes across the aisle far more than Dick Lugar — whom Warren had identified, in the previous debate, as a Republican senator she'd be able to work well with. Taken in isolation, Brown's Lugar line was a winner. But it should have been delivered far, far earlier.

By the same token, when Brown jabbed at Warren's past litigation for some questionable clients early on, Warren simply brushed Brown's attacks away. In the past few weeks, Warren has struggled mightily to explain, in terms comprehensible to ordinary people, why her work for Traveler's Insurance and LTV Steel was morally sound. I had wondered if she'd fare better tonight. As it turned out, she didn't have to, because Brown simply couldn't make the subject stick.

-

More:

http://wgbhnews.org/post/brown-vs-warren-round-three-good-night-professor

3 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Brown vs. Warren, Round Three: A Good Night for the Professor (Original Post) TroyD Oct 2012 OP
Video of the debate below Tx4obama Oct 2012 #1
Why on earth did they have four debates when all they do is talk the same thing in each debate bigdarryl Oct 2012 #2
Free Kittens? torotoro Oct 2012 #3
Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»2016 Postmortem»Brown vs. Warren, Round T...