Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
2016 Postmortem
Related: About this forumAnother Endorsement for Clinton
From former first lady, Nancy Reagan.
http://nationalreport.net/nancy-reagan-want-hillary-win/
For me, this is another reason NOT to vote for Clinton!
InfoView thread info, including edit history
TrashPut this thread in your Trash Can (My DU » Trash Can)
BookmarkAdd this thread to your Bookmarks (My DU » Bookmarks)
16 replies, 806 views
ShareGet links to this post and/or share on social media
AlertAlert this post for a rule violation
PowersThere are no powers you can use on this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
ReplyReply to this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
Rec (1)
ReplyReply to this post
16 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Another Endorsement for Clinton (Original Post)
RoccoR5955
Feb 2016
OP
Thanks for the laugh. The deal for her run was struck in 2008. That is why he picked Biden.
Skwmom
Feb 2016
#4
tk2kewl
(18,133 posts)1. Just say no
Armstead
(47,803 posts)2. Interesting tidbit from Ron Jr, in that article...
Asked about his mothers endorsement of Hillary Clinton, Reagan thought it showed how little America actually knew about the woman behind the Republican icon. She wants people to know that the First Ladies are tight. They get together once a year to support each other. In fact, Hillary had no interest in running until both Laura and Barbara Bush cornered her at their get-together in May 2013 and talked her into at least thinking about it! So, in a sense, if Mrs. Clinton does run and win, you can blame the Bush family. - See more at: http://nationalreport.net/nancy-reagan-want-hillary-win/#sthash.rBQQxm6l.dpuf
Skwmom
(12,685 posts)4. Thanks for the laugh. The deal for her run was struck in 2008. That is why he picked Biden.
The fact that Biden would never run for President, leaving it open for Clinton was discussed.
No interest in running
Do you believe that?
SCantiGOP
(13,871 posts)7. Use all the little yellow rolling laughers you want
But it is your post that is hilarious.
Did Glenn Beck tell you that this conspiracy was worked out 8 years ago?
Skwmom
(12,685 posts)11. No. I was talked about on this board 8 years ago. n/t
GreatGazoo
(3,937 posts)8. It is not just the ladies that are "tight"...
Skwmom
(12,685 posts)12. As GW says, Hillary is his sister-in-law.
sufrommich
(22,871 posts)3. Do you also believe " Feeling the Bern is linked to exposure
to cat feces"? Because that's being reported at your source too:
http://nationalreport.net/feeling-the-bern-linked-to-prolonged-exposure-to-cat-feces/
RoccoR5955
(12,471 posts)16. What's the matter...
Can't take a joke?
bunnies
(15,859 posts)5. Thats a fake news site.
Armstead
(47,803 posts)10. Well if its good enough to fool Bloomberg good enough to fool DU
Skwmom
(12,685 posts)13. Doesn't matter that it's fake. They will still spread it like it is the gospel. n.t
I cant believe the OP hasnt deleted yet.
uponit7771
(90,359 posts)6. Come on people, republicans fall for sarcasm not us
SidDithers
(44,228 posts)9. ...
Hey, did you know the word "gullible" isn't in the dictionary?
Sid
Codeine
(25,586 posts)15. Hooooooo boy. nt