Has the world turned upside down?
Yesterday the Weasel King, Ted Cruz, fired a lead spokesman for disseminating false information about Marco Rubio. A couple of months ago, the Weasel Queen, Debbie Wasserman Schultz, ignored warnings from Bernie's tech people that a digital door was left open, and caught a Sanders staffer peeking where he ought not to have been peeking. He, too, was dismissed. Peekability extended both ways in that situation, but even though there was circumstantial evidence that Clinton staffers also peeked, the mere suggestion unleashed a fusillade of denials and outrage.
So here's the thing: Clinton staffers, surrogates, and SuperPAC Chairmen have committed an ever-growing litany of transgressions every bit as questionable as what Cruz's spokesman did – save your indignation, Hillarites; this stuff has been documented – and yet, none of the perpetrators of dirty tricks or artful smears has been told to clean out their desks.
So... are we to believe that the smarmy Weasel King of the Far Right is more honorable than You-Know-Who?
Damn, I would hate to think so. I get dizzy when the world is upside down.
P.S. It is not my intention to be disruptive - that is a term open to very broad interpretation - but simply posing a legitimate question.
= new reply since forum marked as read
... I definitely have socialist tendencies, and, if Heaven is reserved for the likes of Ted Cruz and his ilk, I'd prefer the Warm Place; I expect I'll meet a better class of people. 
...
I'm sure they'll get right onto firing the imaginary staffers who committed those imaginary 'transgressions' you say are documented.
Cruz is pandering to 'evangelicals.' What's the parallel in your camp?
A maneuver straight out of the Karl Rove handbook; make a general accusation along with a claim of "we documented it", yet fail to show said documentation alongside the accusation. That way, the slur sticks in the reader's mind, and they glaze over the fact that it was unsubstantiated.
