Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Recursion

(56,582 posts)
Mon Feb 22, 2016, 10:06 PM Feb 2016

I don't really get any of the Warren endorsement talk

Warren brings by my count exactly zero new voters to Sanders, so it does no good for Warren to endorse Sanders. Warren could conceivably bring some votes from Sanders to Clinton, but the only time that would be useful would be as a coup de grace if she thought Sanders's campaign was dragging out past its viability and damaging the party (and even that's questionable because that effect would be strongest in MA, where Sanders is probably going to dominate). It would make zero sense for Warren to endorse Sanders before he's nominated, and the only way she would endorse Clinton before she's nominated would be to end the whole thing.

It's kind of the same reason people talking about a Sanders/Warren ticket is pretty silly: she brings absolutely nothing new, ideologically or geographically, to Sanders.

7 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
I don't really get any of the Warren endorsement talk (Original Post) Recursion Feb 2016 OP
Elizabeth is perfect right where she is. padfun Feb 2016 #1
Sanders will dominate in Mass? It's pretty much tied right now I believe. DrDan Feb 2016 #2
I can see several benefits to her endorsement revbones Feb 2016 #3
she was a Republican until the late 1980's dsc Feb 2016 #4
Well, the same folks who like Sanders, like Warren. longship Feb 2016 #5
The most interesting suggestion I've heard is Landrieu Recursion Feb 2016 #6
However, a rather bizarre suggestion. longship Feb 2016 #7

padfun

(1,787 posts)
1. Elizabeth is perfect right where she is.
Mon Feb 22, 2016, 10:09 PM
Feb 2016

Well, maybe the Senate Majority Leader. (I do believe that Dems will narrowly win back the Senate)

 

revbones

(3,660 posts)
3. I can see several benefits to her endorsement
Mon Feb 22, 2016, 10:29 PM
Feb 2016

Most notably given the respect she has within the party, it would be pretty huge. She has incredible gravitas due to her popularity among progressives. She could also offer a sort of legitimization for Bernie to those who's line of attack pertains to the whole party-faithful angle of Democrat vs. Independent. It also would provide a huge counter to those people who are voting for Hillary simply because she is a woman. That also doesn't include the various other benefits like having another senator endorse him, etc...

While it would be a risk of political capital and retaliation from the Clinton machine, it could lend a significant hand to Bernie. Probably more so than most any other endorsement outside of Obama or Biden right now.

dsc

(52,166 posts)
4. she was a Republican until the late 1980's
Mon Feb 22, 2016, 10:34 PM
Feb 2016

I have no idea why that would be considered a help in regard to charges that Sanders is a Johnnie come lately.

longship

(40,416 posts)
5. Well, the same folks who like Sanders, like Warren.
Mon Feb 22, 2016, 11:09 PM
Feb 2016

But like you wrote, adding Warren to a Sanders ticket does nothing. Some people here are just really naïve.

Like those who want Scalia's SCOTUS seat filled by Elizabeth Warren, or Michelle Obama, or Barack Obama, or whoever is on top of the Democratic hit parade this week. (I think it is safe to presume that it will be none of them.)

But if Bernie obtains the nomination he will likely select a running mate who is younger than he is; comes from an area not near New England; and fills in a gap in his expertise, E.G., possibly foreign policy?

Regardless, it will not be another New England liberal.

My best.

Recursion

(56,582 posts)
6. The most interesting suggestion I've heard is Landrieu
Mon Feb 22, 2016, 11:36 PM
Feb 2016

Female, southern, from the opposite wing of the party, crucial to ACA's passage.

longship

(40,416 posts)
7. However, a rather bizarre suggestion.
Mon Feb 22, 2016, 11:41 PM
Feb 2016

And almost a complete opposite of Bernie. In other words, why would he select her?

I think he would pick somebody young, a female, a progressive, and from a state he needs to win.

Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»2016 Postmortem»I don't really get any of...