2016 Postmortem
Related: About this forumA disturbing trend is emerging from the Clinton campaign and civil rights/race.
Dolores Huerta claims Sander's supporters chanted 'English only'. This was almost immediately proven to be false.
She was forced to backtrack.
John Lewis claimed he met the Clinton's in the 60s and implied Bernie Sanders wasn't there.
He was forced to backtrack.
The photo of Bernie that wasn't Bernie, that was Bernie again.
The reporter was forced to backtrack(in a dickish way).
I hope Clinton supporters are really proud of the campaign she's running. Maybe you should ask yourselves why she's putting good people in these kind of positions where they have to lie and then cover their asses instead of carrying water for a corrupt and dirty campaign.
villager
(26,001 posts)bobbobbins01
(1,681 posts)Its one of the things that separate us from republicans. Facts. It really saddens me to see people who are supposed to be on the same team embrace lies and bullshit just for the sake of winning.
PeteSelman
(1,508 posts)You can't possibly be serious.
bobbobbins01
(1,681 posts)But I've since wised up. I'm just hoping voting for Sanders will cause some kind of course correction to pull us out of the mire, even if only a little bit.
mrmpa
(4,033 posts)you thought. Both parties do not want thinkers, they only want those who will kowtow to those in power.
rhett o rick
(55,981 posts)If we wanted Third Way, lie, cheat and steal principles, we would be Republicons.
Another poster put it well: "Take the chance - accept the challenge - join the movement that can Change the Narrative. "
PeteSelman
(1,508 posts)And who wouldn't want those things?
It's just not realistic to expect them. That isn't how the game is played.
amborin
(16,631 posts)newthinking
(3,982 posts)from people who have worked with her.
I mean having SNOPES point out one's mistake publicly is pretty hard to intellectually dismiss internally.
I don't think that will hurt Bernie at all in the long run.
jfern
(5,204 posts)If Bernie doesn't get the nomination, it will gravely hurt the party.
CorporatistNation
(2,546 posts)Hillary shafting Warren here...
LeFleur1
(1,197 posts)The bill Elizabeth Warren is blabbing about included items detrimental to women, especially divorced women getting child support. When the bill was changed so those detrimental clauses were removed, Hillary voted for it. I see this bit of bitter twist to something true used all the time by the Republicans and now by Independents.
ReallyIAmAnOptimist
(357 posts)...supporting that?
tobefree
(33 posts)waiting...... waiting.......waiting.....
rhett o rick
(55,981 posts)"Take the chance - accept the challenge - join the movement that can Change the Narrative. "
Zorra
(27,670 posts)HooptieWagon
(17,064 posts)They're collecting millions from Wall St to do their bidding...integrity flew out the window 30 years ago.
bobbobbins01
(1,681 posts)And the continued support after multiple and habitual rat-fuckings.
HooptieWagon
(17,064 posts)To the Clintons, minorities are merely a resource to be exploited during an election, and fucked over afterward. IDK why they keep going back.
JRug
(17 posts)I'm concerned with who I'm going to support and I will tell other people why in hopes that they will join me. But if they don't, it's really none of my business why they choose to vote for someone else. And when we keep saying things about black people like "I don't get why they keep going back," that's really insulting to them, like we think they're stupid or something. They're not stupid and we're not smarter or better than they are. They have their reasons for voting the way they do and we should respect that just as I expect other people to respect why I vote the way I do and not tell me that I'm stupid or crazy because I don't agree with them.
bobbobbins01
(1,681 posts)Actually fucking them isn't whats insulting, its pointing it out to them.
HooptieWagon
(17,064 posts)But correct, their vote is theirs. They will reap the benefits or suffer the consequences based on their decision.
bobbobbins01
(1,681 posts)Don't tell black people how to vote, its insulting! Of course they're saying that, they have the majority of the black vote. Its a chilling effect that keeps white Bernie supporters from saying a word to any black people for fear of being labeled racist or hurting the campaign instead of helping. Same with the Bernie Bros lie, its all just a sham to slow the bleed of supporters long enough for Hillary to eek out a win.
bettyellen
(47,209 posts)a good half of them on posters' first visits to the AA forum here. The "chilling effect" didn't keep them from making fools of themselves.
Do you want links?
bobbobbins01
(1,681 posts)You should stop, no one here buys what you're selling.
rhett o rick
(55,981 posts)go with Bernie and fight TPTB to regain our Representative Democracy!"
We in the 99% have lost ground under the control of the current culture that bows to corporate rule. It makes no sense to continue with the existing culture and expect something different.
"Take the chance - accept the challenge - join the movement that can Change the Narrative. "
GoneFishin
(5,217 posts)JRug
(17 posts)But cursing me out isn't going to change the results.
All you're doing is feeding into the stereotype that a lot of people think about us. Being mean, vulgar and out of control isn't going to get one single additional vote for Bernie. And who knows how many people you're driving away. Bernie would probably be disgusted to see his face next to your cursing. I know he's better than that but a lot of people don't and probably think that you represent him when all you're doing is making him look bad.
bobbobbins01
(1,681 posts)Second, stop pretending you support Sanders. You're doing the exact thing I'm calling out and you are incredibly transparent. No one is fooled.
greiner3
(5,214 posts)redruddyred
(1,615 posts)a couple AA posters have been kind enough to engage with me and i appreciate that. there are places where there are legitimate differences of opinion and i am genuinely curious to understand their perspective.
unfortunately a lot of the arguments for hil don't hold water, and it's unfair to respond to criticisms with "bernie supporters are mean to me!11!!". stupid voting hurts us collectively. i respect your right not to engage but there ought to be some accountability.
JRug
(17 posts)argue with them and tell them how wrong they are?
I mean, just look at how people are speaking to me in this thread - cursing at me, etc., just because I said I think we should be more respectful of people we disagree with. And we're on the same side! If I were a person of color, I don't know if I would want to talk with any of us considering the way we treat them and even treat each other.
Why do they need to be "accountable?" And who are they supposed to be accountable to: you? Why? They don't have to justify their vote to you or me or anybody else. Don't you realize that saying things like that is really insulting to people of color (or anybody you say it to), you're talking about them and to them like they're inferior to you and they owe you something when they know better than most of us what's in their own best interests and they don't have to answer to anybody for how they vote.
redruddyred
(1,615 posts)i am so sick and tired of this line. you are not being attacked. no one cursed at you.
PoC are absolutely welcome to ask me why i vote the way i do. i will gladly explain. we live in a democracy. the way we vote effects our neighbor. the way we don't vote effects our neighbor. if i were to vote for Trump, i would absolutely deserve any and all flack for supporting a racist candidate. if there were any evidence that sanders were racist or were engaging in hate speech, i would reconsider my allegience.
believe it or not debate is frequently a rational process and some of us engage in it not to persuade but also to better understand our own positions. if we don't discuss, how do we discover new ideas and perspectives? i am open to being wrong. but it's frustrating to me when i see people making bad, irrational decisions which do effect me, and then choose to be offended when i ask them "why".
Response to JRug (Reply #117)
Post removed
Plucketeer
(12,882 posts)cross your fingers and mind your own damned business??? THAT'S your approach to seeing that we get honest representation?
YOU feel you're well informed and blessed with rational, objective contemplation, so everyone else is too??? I've got NEWS for you. The amount of MIS-information that's out there - and the erroneous choices that'll be made on those bogus facts is going to DIRECTLY IMPACT YOU. So,,,, go ahead. Say it's none of your business. Say it when you're suffering the consequences of someone else's ignorance. If we end up with Trump.... don't be long-faced. Revel in the fact that democracy has triumphed thanks to the stupidity you didn't lift a finger to dispatch.
freebrew
(1,917 posts)even better than the hidden post...
redruddyred
(1,615 posts)obvi cannot confirm one way or another.
MisterFred
(525 posts)redruddyred
(1,615 posts)i'm not aware of the dynamics in the rest of the country
Gene Debs
(582 posts)supporters offer any real, solid justification as to why she should be President? I haven't, only a vague sense the she's "awesome." Have you ever read through the responses to anything posted in the Hillary Clinton group? It's an echo chamber that would rival anything Fox News has ever engineered.
Rosa Luxemburg
(28,627 posts)The Clinton campaign is very nervous. It is using black people for its own ends. It wants voters to think that Bernie hates black people. They have a major plan to come in at all angles so Black people think she is the right one. The Clinton campaign is sleazy and it has the money to pay hit people. Right from the start the meme was Bernie doesn't resonate with Black people and this is very wrong. Of course then they blame the Sanders campaign for being negative!
HooptieWagon
(17,064 posts)I guess AAs are satisfied with the status quo, and are gonna cast their votes for the former supporter of a segregationist. Beats me. It's their vote. At least there's hope with black Millenials, who seem to have figured out the path to a better future. With Clinton, at best things remain the same. If she loses to Any republican, as every poll forecasts, things will be worse. That appears to be their choice.
Rosa Luxemburg
(28,627 posts)HooptieWagon
(17,064 posts)The lies and propaganda from the media don't help. The younger blacks are probably online more, and may be less affected by the M$M spew. I had hoped they were talking to their parents and grandparents, to show them the lies being spread.
TransitJohn
(6,932 posts)Seriously, the Democratic Party is just a political machine that wants to win and keep power and money.
bvar22
(39,909 posts)Talk about no moral compass.
Duckhunter935
(16,974 posts)Is the corrections are never played.
Erich Bloodaxe BSN
(14,733 posts)You think many, if any of those people are going to ever see a retraction? I don't.
Duckhunter935
(16,974 posts)And she will not tweet a correction or better yet another apology
Duval
(4,280 posts)think
(11,641 posts)redruddyred
(1,615 posts)so many of them are so mediocre.
i wonder if it was too soon to try for president and we needed to win some smaller races first. my friends in Maine Greens have apparently been somewhat successful at this.
HooptieWagon
(17,064 posts)Which is better than Trumps plan when he beats Hillary.
Bluenorthwest
(45,319 posts)I usually or formerly respected. Saying a man does not even like his own family is beyond mere political trash talk and enters into the McCarthy Zone. 'He does not like his own father, hates his mother'. Luis will never have my trust again.
whatchamacallit
(15,558 posts)Guess that's the difference between B and H supporters.
Live and Learn
(12,769 posts)renate
(13,776 posts)I think I'm being more forgiving of it when it comes from Hillary's campaign than I would be if it came from Bernie's, since what I like so much about him is that he doesn't do this kind of thing, and would apologize and correct the record if he did.
Chasstev365
(5,191 posts)1. DNC Data breech BS
2. Debbie W Schultz rigging the debate schedule
3.Bernie is not s faithful Jew to Isreal
4. Rep Luis Gutierrez: Berine hates immigrants.
It's disgusting and will cause long term harm.
nashville_brook
(20,958 posts)wonder if it was a carrot or a stick that made him do this.
jfern
(5,204 posts)Live and Learn
(12,769 posts)jfern
(5,204 posts)They care only about their own power, and not the little guy.
hedda_foil
(16,375 posts)I don't think he needed a carrot or a stick. He will always be.found on the establishment side.
dreamnightwind
(4,775 posts)Can't stand him, never could, he has the stench of someone serving monied interests.
nadinbrzezinski
(154,021 posts)Trust me, I am following that for very personal reasons now
JonLeibowitz
(6,282 posts)nadinbrzezinski
(154,021 posts)it is kind of funny. Apparently them liberals are meanies.
bobbobbins01
(1,681 posts)He should be fired. The fact that the washington post hasn't yet speaks volumes about that paper.
redruddyred
(1,615 posts)Joe the Revelator
(14,915 posts)backscatter712
(26,355 posts)dana_b
(11,546 posts)except to "win"!
Joe the Revelator
(14,915 posts)And they accuse Bernie supporters of believing in magic and unicorns.
HooptieWagon
(17,064 posts)Their legacy will be a party split, and a third party formed.
They'll say it's the fault of Bernie and his supporters. Count on that if she (meh) wins the nom and then loses the general.
left-of-center2012
(34,195 posts)nc4bo
(17,651 posts)jillan
(39,451 posts)I am really tired of these "artful smears".
I want Bernie to fight back.
bigtree
(86,005 posts)...that canard doesn't wash.
Joe the Revelator
(14,915 posts)It's obviously something.
bobbobbins01
(1,681 posts)Keep up the good work. Values and integrity be damned.
Fronkonsteen
(75 posts)You get a point for creative use of the word 'canard'. And by 'creative', I mean 'wrong'.
PatrickforO
(14,592 posts)farleftlib
(2,125 posts)Smear, Lie and swiftboat your opponent every chance you get. Never apologize. Wait for the next opportunity and do it again.
Send your surrogates out to spread lies and innuendo. Blame the media, activists or some other scapegoat.
They are proud of themselves. Winning is the only thing that matters.
amborin
(16,631 posts)MrMickeysMom
(20,453 posts)Machiavellian... a philosophy of winning based on a personality trait...
Machiavellianism .... one of the dark triad personalities, characterized by a duplicitous interpersonal style, a cynical disregard for morality and a focus on self-interest and personal gain.
That explains how the ends have always justified the means... Totally escapes them that this country and the entire world needs solutions and they need it fast.
bettyellen
(47,209 posts)I don't think it was okay. I can't believe people are calling her a liar. Wow.
jillan
(39,451 posts)redruddyred
(1,615 posts)seems like the problem is they weren't listening to her
jillan
(39,451 posts)redruddyred
(1,615 posts)that was my immediate impression.
i doubt he could have heard her from so far back in the room.
Matt_in_STL
(1,446 posts)When that was proven to be a lie she backtracked and admitted the moderator said no translator after the crowd called for a neutral one. Her story was false and she needs to apologize.
bobbobbins01
(1,681 posts)I hope what you're doing feels good.
bettyellen
(47,209 posts)and prevented the translation from happening, and that was plenty ugly. The recording I heard was from all the way in the back, and voices are largely garbled. From that, I would say anyone who thinks they know anything is full of it. There are witnesses making conflicting statements as well.
bobbobbins01
(1,681 posts)But thanks for proving my point.
bettyellen
(47,209 posts)to some angry people. I'm going to guess that precinct was going heavy for Hillary and the CTs were flying.
bobbobbins01
(1,681 posts)But keep telling yourself your side won. Toe that line!
Nanjeanne
(4,979 posts)It should always be an impartial person. It's not a Clinton rally.
She may have misheard. I'll be generous, more generous than her. And say she misheard. It happens. She may be confused. It happens. But she should tweet out her apology to as many people who saw her original tweet.
bettyellen
(47,209 posts)and prevented the spanish translation to happen at all. yeah, she was shouted down from the video I saw.
Nanjeanne
(4,979 posts)Huerta and Ferrera tweeted lies that were debunked. They have yet to tweet apologies.
If people shouted No No they were in heir rights not to want her to be the translator. Their tweets were wrong and I'm shocked that Clinton supporters can't just see that this was inappropriate and caused more harm to Sanders. If that was their intention then shame on them. If it wasn't their intention then shame on Clinton supporters for wanting it to be so.
bettyellen
(47,209 posts)down when she was trying to speak, which was pretty ugly. I have to assume that nastiness was out of anger they were losing that precinct.
redruddyred
(1,615 posts)bettyellen
(47,209 posts)redruddyred
(1,615 posts)bettyellen
(47,209 posts)And as far as I know there has;t been a tape including the moderator saying "no spanish" so we have not heard it all.
which is why a lot of people look like jerks for claiming she is a liar.
redruddyred
(1,615 posts)i'm open to any further evidence. like you i am hoping that she only exaggerated the truth.
the berniefans here i think are a bit upset because they see the process as being very rigged in favor of the party insider. hillary herself is not one to shy away from disingenous statements in order to skew the narrative, and maybe her supporters feel the same.
i also hope this is not malicious, i think that would be very sad.
bettyellen
(47,209 posts)apparently not. stupid and malicious. hopefully people have better audio and it will clear things up.
it doesn't look great if SBS people were being difficult with Hispanic voters because they knew they were breaking for Hillary, which seems to be the case here. rotten sour grapes.
redruddyred
(1,615 posts)sorry but that's just naive
bettyellen
(47,209 posts)works. Naive is accusing Huerta of taking a bribe. She is already firmly Pro-Hillary, has been for years- and that does not make her evil or corrupt. Everyone is not evil and corrupt except for Bernie.
redruddyred
(1,615 posts)you could argue that she was paid for services rendered. then again, you could argue that goldman sachs was collecting IOUs.
and that's not even looking at her list of campaign contributions.
huerta is only being targeted because she is a public figure who said something damaging about a major candidate which doesn't appear to be supported by the evidence. was it malicious? probably not. has she been influenced by her allegiences, financial and otherwise? i'd submit that this is more likely the case.
you're arguing that berniefans are biased in favor of bernie, can you also see how someone of different affiliations might choose to construe events to fit their dominant worldview?
i'm interested in your comment about bernie's people being it it for themselves: are you referring to his staff or to his supporters? i've interacted with both and the sense i get is that they are not working for a fringe candidate in order to improve their standing in the democratic party. even the state reps in new england of all places have to throw their support very quietly.
rhett o rick
(55,981 posts)This is the corruption we are fighting and some here are supporting.
"The choice is stark, keep living under corporate rule under Hillary and watch things get worse, or go with Bernie and fight TPTB to regain our Representative Democracy!"
bobbobbins01
(1,681 posts)Now you said it did happen in the video you saw. Thanks for proving my point again. You appear to have chosen the right candidate for your moral compass.
bettyellen
(47,209 posts)was an ugly scene, I don't know how anyone could pretend it isn't.
Being as that so many words are garbled, I am in no position what was said and what wasn't- and I was pointing out that you are not in any position to say definitively either.
Now you are rude and personally nasty, so it's time to say goodbye and good riddance to the sour grapes.
Those people should have accepted they were losing that precinct big time instead of taking it out on the hispanic voters. Bad form.
bobbobbins01
(1,681 posts)You'll probably get a medal.
bettyellen
(47,209 posts)You got me!
bobbobbins01
(1,681 posts)Keep going.
bettyellen
(47,209 posts)A revolution built on one man's shoulders is a joke. The hatred of everyone not him is absolute poison. Even Elizabeth Warren is getting shoved under the bus.
bobbobbins01
(1,681 posts)I'm sure the going away party will be huge.
bettyellen
(47,209 posts)A most excellent internet past time, when you don't give a flying fuck who wins, LOL.
rhett o rick
(55,981 posts)We are against Citizens United that is helping Clinton. We are against the corrupted DNC that is helping the Powers That Be candidate Clinton. We are against the 16,000,000 children that are living in poverty that Goldman-Sachs doesnt give a crap about.
The Revolution is against the corrupt culture of Big Money in politics that has brought us 50 million living in poverty. A culture that you seem to be supporting.
"The choice is stark, keep living under corporate rule under Hillary and watch things get worse, or go with Bernie and fight TPTB to regain our Representative Democracy!"
Please reject the corrupt culture that is represented by the Wealthy 1% and their candidate HRC. Join the People's Movement.
bettyellen
(47,209 posts)Maybe his supporters screwed him over by going negative out of the gate? Negative toward everyone else aside from Bernie? Hell have to be his own running mate at this point!
Nice cut and paste. I'd almost believe you wrote that for me!
bobbobbins01
(1,681 posts)But keep pushing that line. Voter suppression helps you win!
bettyellen
(47,209 posts)bobbobbins01
(1,681 posts)You hit all the talking points perfectly and your ability to stay the course despite all evidence against you is impressive.
frylock
(34,825 posts)rhett o rick
(55,981 posts)A year ago we didn't even have a viable movement and now we do. We might not be strong enough to beat the Big Money but we will fight on. We are fighting to reduce poverty and not increase Goldman-Sachs' profits.
"The choice is stark, keep living under corporate rule under Hillary and watch things get worse, or go with Bernie and fight TPTB to regain our Representative Democracy!"
noretreatnosurrender
(1,890 posts)I don't know why you can't believe it. You can clearly see there have been people baiting people all night to do that very thing. I mean think about that. Is that how we use our heroes? We use them as bait to get some fool on the other side to attack them so you can point to it and dis everyone who supports Bernie? It's disgusting.
bettyellen
(47,209 posts)people's best moment, that is for sure. Looked like foolish shenanigans from jerks who knew Hillary was sweeping the precinct.
noretreatnosurrender
(1,890 posts)I don't think it was okay. I can't believe people are calling her a liar. Wow.
I'm talking about all the threads at DU not the Caucus.
uponit7771
(90,364 posts)TDale313
(7,820 posts)It's gotten really ugly. They are determined, not to win, but to absolutely destroy a good man and anyone who dares to support him.
NCTraveler
(30,481 posts)I'm also proud to be supporting the same person as Dolores Huerta and John Lewis.
bobbobbins01
(1,681 posts)I'd be ashamed and embarrassed.
frylock
(34,825 posts)Armstead
(47,803 posts)Insulting statements and apologies
leftofcool
(19,460 posts)Armstead
(47,803 posts)But you have a point.
Personally, I think all of the references to body parts are uncalled for and tasteless.
If Killer Mike had simply used the phrase ''not just because a candidate is a woman' it wouldn't have raised any eyebrows.
bobbobbins01
(1,681 posts)Clinton appreciates your help.
plus5mace
(140 posts)If she had guts she'd go after the woman he was quoting. They go after the man because they can falsely slime him as a sexist.
d_legendary1
(2,586 posts)desmiller
(747 posts)[link:
|bobbobbins01
(1,681 posts)JRug
(17 posts)What a hero. I knew he had been arrested but I didn't know he had been arrested 40 times. He's so soft-spoken.
I'm glad that Bernie was part of this movement. He didn't sacrifice as much as John Lewis, but everybody who was there did their part in the way that they could and he didn't have to do anything at all if he didn't want to since it was probably really easy for white people to not get involved.
I feel like I've been shortchanged because I didn't learn about all of this in school and I have to learn about it now as an adult. Thank you for letting us see this video. I learned a lot.
desmiller
(747 posts)I'm not trying to remind people who John Lewis is. I'm trying to get people to see how far this hero has fallen. *hint* logo @ lower right screen.
JRug
(17 posts)I don't think John Lewis has fallen at all. And even if he has, he could fall and fall and fall and still be a stratosphere higher than most of us.
I think there are very few people who can justifiably criticize him for not being good enough on civil rights. If he said something you don't like, ok, he said something you don't like. I think Bernie is strong enough and cool enough to let it roll off of his back. I don't think he's even said anything about it so even if it bothered him he's not making a big deal of it. Bernie is a tough and smart guy. He doesn't need our protection and, even if he did, it doesn't do him any good for us to go around beating up on people, especially people like John Lewis who a lot of people including me have a lot of respect for.
Why is it necessary for us to tear people down? Even if we think they did something wrong, aren't we just turning into what we say we hate?
desmiller
(747 posts)It's great that he's telling his story. I'm not questioning him about that. My question is this:
WHY THE HELL HE HAS TO TELL IT THROUGH THE ENEMY?!!!!!
THE SAME DAMN BUSINESS WHO ARE SCREWING OUR ECONOMY!!!!
bettyellen
(47,209 posts)It certainly sound like one to me.
desmiller
(747 posts)the people. The big banks, unemployment, student debt, and others are categories that are affecting them.
I find something funny myself, betty. The funny thing is that Hillary shows us how much she cares about people and that's by doing this:
desmiller
(747 posts)[link:http://
|JRug
(17 posts)aren't so upset. Life is stressful enough without being yelled and cursed at by people I don't even know on an anonymous message board.
Have a good evening. I hope you have a better day tomorrow.
bettyellen
(47,209 posts)Welcome to DU.
bobbobbins01
(1,681 posts)The perpetrators pretending to be the victims. I've noticed that is something Hillary does an awful lot.
desmiller
(747 posts)the republicans.
frylock
(34,825 posts)that's the common denominator.
side note: Aqua teen hunger force frylock.
frylock
(34,825 posts)redruddyred
(1,615 posts)berniefan up there is expressing a general frustration with goldman sachs.
it has nothing to do with you. peace.
bobbobbins01
(1,681 posts)Its what they do.
desmiller
(747 posts)Thx pal.
jfern
(5,204 posts)She has earned her 67% not honest and trustworthy rating.
Peregrine Took
(7,417 posts)leftofcool
(19,460 posts)And she has the entire Democratic Party working for her. Your concern is noted though.
frylock
(34,825 posts)1StrongBlackMan
(31,849 posts)he/she is talking about the millions and millions of non-voters that must be waiting to suddenly appear for the General Election ... because they, certainly, aren't showing up for the Democratic Primaries.
Herman4747
(1,825 posts)Republicans, Democrats, AND INDEPENDENTS. To win the presidency the Democratic candidate must win a notable portion of the Independents, as they comprise a significant sum of voters.
And Independents may, just may, value HONESTY from a candidate more so than do Hillary's acolytes.
What do you think?
Oh, and by the way, could you please explain why that arrow in the H points not to the left but to the right? You see, I find its direction just a bit ominous.
Demsrule86
(68,689 posts)I don't have time to post very often...but I am always interested in primaries. I will support anyone who is the Democratic candidate...honestly this Bernie vs Hillary should end...one will be the Democratic candidate. It looks like it will be Hillary to me but I would support Bernie as well. You want the right wing picking as many as four judges? The important thing is to elect a Democrat. I tell,you nothing will get done...as we have a Gerrymandered House...the court is what is important. I worked for President Obama both times...He is a decent guy...I am more left than he is no doubt. But I am proud of what he has accomplished with a hostile Congress...we need to vote in state elections before 2020 if we have any chance of ending the gerrymander. WE need to vote in every election...the president is one man or woman and can not do anything without a willing congress. Let's stop with the hostile comments on both sides and remember we all want the same thing...or we should ...a Democrat in the White House.
jwirr
(39,215 posts)vs Wall Street" argument should also end? The argument is not just about two nice Democratic candidates running against each other. It is about the future of the party - which way are we going to go? It is about staying the course or changing directions - and it must be fought.
Demsrule86
(68,689 posts)No doubt Wall Street could use some regulation and taxes...why should work be taxed more than gambling? However, many Americans have money in Wall Street and since pensions don't exist these days...more will be invested in the years to come. They are nice Democratic candidates as a matter of face, and either of them beat Trump or Cruz hands down...how about the courts? You allow the GOP to put four candidates on SCOUTS, you might as well stay home for a generation...because it won't matter. I will vote either candidate period. But I don't get this Hillary hatred. As far as I am concerned she is fine as is Bernie...( I worry that he can't win but hope for the best) thus I don't see why you folks are turning this into a bloody battle on both sides...damaging either candidate only helps the GOP.
JRug
(17 posts)I wouldn't want to be blamed for the things that some Bernie people say.
It's really sad to see everybody fighting and tearing each other down instead of talking about our candidates and why we think they should be the next president. We shouldn't be calling them names and questioning their integrity. They're both good people who care about the country and want to make it better. We're all Democrats and are really all on the same side and are going to have to come together to keep Donald Trump or Ted Cruz from becoming president. If we're fighting so much that we can't get it together to have a unified general election campaign we're all in trouble and no one will care who said what to who in February because the country will be in terrible trouble.
bobbobbins01
(1,681 posts)She lies, her campaign lies, and supporting her at this point is just plain wrong. It can't be dismissed anymore, it happens over and over and over...it happened in 2008, its happening now. The two campaigns cannot be compared...and supporting what she stands for makes a person part of the problem.
JRug
(17 posts)You do not know me. I addressed you respectfully and I expect to be treated the same.
bobbobbins01
(1,681 posts)Go disrupt elsewhere. No one wants to play your game.
jaded_old_cynic
(190 posts)AUTOMATED MESSAGE: Results of your Jury Service
Mail Message
On Sat Feb 20, 2016, 10:50 PM an alert was sent on the following post:
Fuck that...she's running on lies.
http://www.democraticunderground.com/?com=view_post&forum=1251&pid=1291748
REASON FOR ALERT
This post is disruptive, hurtful, rude, insensitive, over-the-top, or otherwise inappropriate.
ALERTER'S COMMENTS
This is vulgar, mean-spirited, rude and inappropriate flamebait
You served on a randomly-selected Jury of DU members which reviewed this post. The review was completed at Sat Feb 20, 2016, 10:57 PM, and the Jury voted 2-5 to LEAVE IT.
Juror #1 voted to HIDE IT
Explanation: No explanation given
Juror #2 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE
Explanation: The post merely states the truth. The list of lies and "shenanigans" grows with each passing moment.
Juror #3 voted to HIDE IT
Explanation: No explanation given
Juror #4 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE
Explanation: Well reasoned post.
Juror #5 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE
Explanation: Really?
Juror #6 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE
Explanation: No explanation given
Juror #7 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE
Explanation: No explanation given
Thank you very much for participating in our Jury system, and we hope you will be able to participate again in the future.
bobbobbins01
(1,681 posts)I must have pissed someone off.
hifiguy
(33,688 posts)of one's own integrity.
noretreatnosurrender
(1,890 posts)It's not all Hillary supporters doing this.
bobbobbins01
(1,681 posts)Sort of like not all Trump supporters are raging racists, but voting for him helps put a racist in charge of our country.
Waiting For Everyman
(9,385 posts)Something tells me the list will get longer.
I'd just as soon have all the sell out Dems do the same and become known though. It hurts, but it's sanitizing.
bobbobbins01
(1,681 posts)Bernie's campaign takes it on the nose, this shit needs to be called out for what it is instead of each of these incidences being treated as separate...its part of the whole...one big nasty campaign that just fucks everyone.
Waiting For Everyman
(9,385 posts)and goes to her basic unworthiness to be President.
Odin2005
(53,521 posts)We get accused of not showing "proper reverence" for them. Shady as fuck.
bobbobbins01
(1,681 posts)If we call them out, the campaign throws the race card. There has to be a way to combat this type of coordinated attack. I hope the Sanders campaign can find a way to turn the tables on this shenanigans.
Skwmom
(12,685 posts)jfern
(5,204 posts)merrily
(45,251 posts)Armstead
(47,803 posts)merrily
(45,251 posts)Armstead
(47,803 posts)Bernie doesn't care about social justice and has a problem with black people and women and Latinos, then people who support her can get carried away in spreading it in the heat of a campaign.
They shouldn't be let off the hook, but I suspect if the Clinton message was simply focusing on her own positives, they would have been less inclined to spout off such nonsense.
bobbobbins01
(1,681 posts)I'm not saying those people aren't accountable for the part they have in this shit show, but the one constant is Hillary Clinton. She represents what I abhor.
merrily
(45,251 posts)AzDar
(14,023 posts)Hissyspit
(45,788 posts)A pattern is emerging from Hillary's campaign. It's heartbreaking.
http://www.democraticunderground.com/1251129171
First send out a surrogate who is beloved by the Democratic party, an icon, let them say something negative about her opponent. Then a warning that we must not be negative in return because that person is treasured by the party.
Of course we as his supporters defend him on that given attack and POW! we are trolling, hating Hillary, hating the party, we are not Democrats.
Lately the worst part has been that most of the attacks have a theme of Bernie not supporting one race or the other. They have been pitting races against each other.
And thus the waters are muddied, and if we try to clear things up we become the enemy.
bobbobbins01
(1,681 posts)Its a pattern, and it shouldn't be rewarded, it should be detested and fought against tooth and nail by anyone who cares about this country, this party, and the direction both are heading in.
cui bono
(19,926 posts)Hope it is her undoing this time as it was last time.
.
silvershadow
(10,336 posts)flesh. Sadly, but predictably.
PatrynXX
(5,668 posts)sadoldgirl
(3,431 posts)Cut it out!
You heard our former President: You are all
teapartiers, for crying out loud!
And you know that he would never lie!
(sarc)
Pauldg47
(640 posts)senz
(11,945 posts)She needs AA and Latino support, so her campaign plays dirty to create artificial divisions between Bernie Sanders and people of color.
Bernie has done a thousand times more for minorities and the working poor than Clinton ever has and ever will.
Her supporters are very much like her: the only thing they care about is getting Hillary into the White House, and they do not care who they hurt in the process.
It is useless to confront them with ethical concerns. They will just laugh at that.
The best we can do is call out their lies, correct the record, and let people know who Bernie is and what he stands for.
nolabels
(13,133 posts)And thanks for being there
senz
(11,945 posts)Glad you're there, too!
Agony
(2,605 posts)leaving us with a giant tragedy.
at any rate YOU have nailed it.
jfern
(5,204 posts)Is part of the problem. It's time to clean house.
Hoyt
(54,770 posts)way the wind blows.
Jitter65
(3,089 posts)up their behaviors. I think the lady misheard what was being shouted. Both candidates have much to be proud of and they both were involved in civil rights movements early on. Both campaigns' supporters ought to consider that they represent their candidate out in public and act accordingly. There ought to be a stark difference between us and the GOP.
This site was recommended to me but it is getting really hurtful to be here and see how we are treating each other.
redruddyred
(1,615 posts)by exploiting and inflaming racial tensions.
NEITHER of these are good for the country.
it hurts to watch all the hate. nothing good can come of this.
Oilwellian
(12,647 posts)Goldwater was a flaming segregationist. What are you talking about? Hillary was never involved in the Civil Rights movement.
jillan
(39,451 posts)Stop it - please!!
leftofcool
(19,460 posts)frylock
(34,825 posts)feel free to provide some examples.
bettyellen
(47,209 posts)she is lying. I hear her getting shouted down, but can't hear the exact words- not sure how anyone here can say with certainty who said what, or whether words are repeated or said once.
Despite no one knowing for certain- they are posting here she was paid off. To lie, for Hillary.
Yesterdays "lie" was SBS is a one issue candidate! I have to laugh.
bobbobbins01
(1,681 posts)Sacred cows...they can lob as many attacks as they want, but call them on it and you're the one to blame. Clinton campaigning 101. Hide behind legitimacy while flinging as much shit as humanly possible.
nsd
(2,406 posts)But his remark about Sanders was clearly a smear. I have a lot of respect for John Lewis in general, but not in this particular instance. He let us down -- he let himself down -- with that remark. I don't want to blow this out of proportion. In the grand scheme of things, it's trivial. But it was a disappointment.
Turning that around to criticize Sanders supporters is unfair.
noretreatnosurrender
(1,890 posts)They have also been holding Delores Huerta up as a pinata all night long baiting people to take a whack at her. That is not how you treat our heroes. That is how you use her good work for your own ends.
Lizzie Poppet
(10,164 posts)Huerta blatantly lied for pure political purposes. She earned every bit of bashing.
Hoyt
(54,770 posts)when she was just trying to help. Shouting "English Only," or "No, No, No" doesn't make much difference when you are elderly, nervous, have been beaten by racists, and are just trying to help.
While we are on the topic of bashing civil rights icons, how come all the gun lovers here say they support Sanders?
Lizzie Poppet
(10,164 posts)I'd argue that it makes an enormous difference, given that the former (which did not in fact occur) would be flagrant racism.
Hoyt
(54,770 posts)We have a very different opinion of what constitutes racism, or at least disrespect.
DonCoquixote
(13,616 posts)and Madeline Albright...
to which I say, there is a special place in hell for anyone that lies (not that she did not earn it by killing several hundred thousand Iraqi children.)
Steinem, some said that the kindest thing to say is that the feminist movement you started in the 60's did so well out outgrew you. The Millennials will take it far past where Hillary and all the other privileged member of your generation will.
hifiguy
(33,688 posts)before the truth can get out of bed and put on its pants.
This is all very deliberate.
Fearless
(18,421 posts)On Sat Feb 20, 2016, 11:54 PM an alert was sent on the following post:
A disturbing trend is emerging from the Clinton campaign and civil rights/race.
http://www.democraticunderground.com/12511291477
REASON FOR ALERT
This post is disruptive, hurtful, rude, insensitive, over-the-top, or otherwise inappropriate.
ALERTER'S COMMENTS
This post is very offensive and inappropriate! Calling the Democratic Party's frontrunning candidate's campaign "corrupt and dirty"? This type of post is not permitted on DU, it should be hidden.
You served on a randomly-selected Jury of DU members which reviewed this post. The review was completed at Sun Feb 21, 2016, 12:05 AM, and the Jury voted 1-6 to LEAVE IT.
Juror #1 voted to HIDE IT
Explanation: No explanation given
Juror #2 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE
Explanation: No explanation given
Juror #3 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE
Explanation: The OP is correct.
Juror #4 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE
Explanation: Some here seem to be alerting on everything positive about Sanders. Now that's getting crappy.
Juror #5 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE
Explanation: better get use to it.
Juror #6 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE
Explanation: Request to hide DENIED. Reason: The Democratic Party's current frontrunner is, in fact, corrupt and dirty. They'll lie, cheat and steal to get ahead. I suggest to the alerter to go whine at http://www.hillaryclintonsupporters.com some more.
Juror #7 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE
Explanation: It says corrupt and dirty campaign
Thank you very much for participating in our Jury system, and we hope you will be able to participate again in the future.
bobbobbins01
(1,681 posts)I knew the alerts were coming. I'm sure it won't be the last one I get tonight, but its time to call a spade a spade.
Fearless
(18,421 posts)liberalhistorian
(20,819 posts)considering how she continually smeared Obama in '08. She gladly gave the right the ideas for some of their most vicious attacks on him, including that he was not a Christian (code word-he's a Muslim), knowing how that would play out. The code words and dog whistles flew freely from her camp during that time, and the worse she did, the angrier and more vindictive she became. So this should be no surprise at all, what she's doing here. This time, I hope people are wise to it.
Ken Burch
(50,254 posts)God knows what they'd try to make Cesar Chavez or Coretta Scott King or Harvey Milk say if those giants were still with us.
I still remember them sending a dying Barbara Jordan out on stage to tell the '92 convention we had to repent everything we'd been fighting for for decades and essentially endorse Reaganism. It was unforgiveable for them to treat her like that.
There was no excuse for those tactics then.
There is no excuse for them now.
Carol Morgan
(11 posts)I wonder which Democratic icon they will use as the sacrificial lamb in the next primary?
Bill and Hillary Clinton remind me of Tom and Daisy in The Great Gatsby:
"They were careless people, Tom and Daisy -- they smashed up things and creatures and then retreated back into their money or their vast carelessness, or whatever it was that kept them together, and let other people clean up the mess they made."
The Clintons are like a demolition company. They barrel in, use others and throw them away, not even bothering to look back.
bobbobbins01
(1,681 posts)That sums them up perfectly.
Skid Rogue
(711 posts)bobbobbins01
(1,681 posts)Is this a game where we take turns naming groups we're members of or something?
SciDude
(79 posts)Democrat. I will not vote for an oligarch, like Clinton, ever again. For the first time I'm (I) Independent!
It feels pretty good since I almost always felt slimy after voting in the past (i.e. Clinton I). I think this presidential primary is far from over but should Clinton win the nomination I have to decide to vote Green or write-in Sanders.
In any case we fight on. I feel the only other option should Clinton or Trump (or some other oligarch) win the presidency again is revolution and turmoil in the streets of America. Should be interesting no matter how this election turns out. One thing I know for sure, if people think Clinton will get eight years to cement this oligarchy further (like the Obama years) I think they are in for a big surprise. There simply are not enough middle-class people left for our cannibal style oligarchy to continue as it has.
anotherproletariat
(1,446 posts)I've only heard of two of these stories on cable news networks (and obviously not on the network news), and even then very briefly. You really don't have to worry about these events (no matter if they were mistakenly or purposefully begun and/or perpetuated) swaying the general electorate.
bobbobbins01
(1,681 posts)This is what gets reported and the general electorate only hears the lies...and they compound. Even if they only catch a small part of it...if its repeated it gets absorbed. This is a HUGE worry and discounting it would be a critical mistake.
bettyellen
(47,209 posts)Bernblu
(441 posts)and that is why most people distrust her.
Enthusiast
(50,983 posts)Think the worst and you'll be close to the truth.
MisterP
(23,730 posts)just buttons to be pushed for more poker chips to tumble out, cashed in later
they're turned into campaign arms--"you're an X? your only priority is getting OUR candidate elected: Y is the X candidate"
BainsBane
(53,072 posts)There is a video. Huerta is of unimpeachable character. It is unfathomable to me that anyone who claims to be on the left would treat her that way.
https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/the-fix/wp/2016/02/20/dolores-huerta-says-she-was-shouted-down-with-english-only-chants-from-a-sanders-crowd/
I hope you are proud for showing your contempt for racial equality and that you insult a civil rights legend who is on par with MLK in terms of the migrant workers she represents. This vicitimization complex by the self entitled is one of the ugliest things I have seen in my life. Defending racism, claiming it doesn't exist, making excuses for it, that is all racism. That is what you chose to champion.
Huerta has nothing to be ashamed of. No one of any integrity would call her a liar, particularly when there is video evidence backing up her account.
The Democratic Party is not the party of self-entitled white rage, of people who feel victimized by brown women who dare to speak out against racism directed at them. That kind of comment is commonplace in the GOP. We will not allow our party to become like the GOP.
I never in my life dreamed I would see so much hateful racism among people who claim to be on the left. It is not leftist. It is reactionary, ultra right wing. Clearly they are not comfortable with a party that represents people of color. The GOP exists precisely for people who hold that mindset. The Democratic Party does not, not since 1965.
Response to BainsBane (Reply #205)
Name removed Message auto-removed
BainsBane
(53,072 posts)However, having viewed the video there is no evidence to indicate she is lying. Nor does she have any reason to do so.
People here dismiss it because they feel some compulsion to believe that anyone associated in anyway, even as a supporter, with the Sanders campaign must be infallible. Well people are racist. It could be dismissed as behavior by a few unpleasant individuals, except that Sanders supporters all around the country feel compelled to double down on it by doing exactly what the right wing does: denying racism, insisting people of color make it up to persecute white people. The whole business is incredibly ugly, the worst time I have ever witnessed in the Democratic Party.
Response to BainsBane (Reply #209)
Name removed Message auto-removed
SoLeftIAmRight
(4,883 posts)A Saint Huerta would have never tweeted what seems to be a lie.
But Dolores Huerta is just a fine woman who made a mistake.
To many there she was just another Clinton supporter - not a saint or a god or just a fine lady - what people saw was a Clinton supporter - serving as an "unbiased speaker"
nothing evil - nothing personal - simple balance was asked for
The issue would have ended there if a terrible thing did not follow
She tweeted a lie and has now taken it back
A fine lady would take the next step and work to resolve this situation well.
bobbobbins01
(1,681 posts)Shame on you.
Sad
Bluenorthwest
(45,319 posts)courage and did not have good judgement. She also said that Obama and his supporters aggressively oppressed and suppressed the Latino vote in Nevada 08. So do you agree with all of that, Obama disrespects Latinos, lacks courage and judgement and was suppressing minority votes? To hold that her words are of sterling integrity you pretty much have to agree with all she said about Obama and his supporters.
In actual reality, Huerta's electoral verbiage is consistently accusatory and this is the second cycle in which she is making the same claims against Hillary's rivals. Same claims, no matter who the rival is.
Unimpeachable character does not mean flawless behaviors. It does not mean 'that which she says is truth'.
"And its interesting that in Nevada, where she got almost 59 percent of the Latino vote, in spite of the oppression and the voter suppression and huge intimidation on the part of the Obama supporters of the Latino casino workers, they voted for Hillary."-Huerta 08.
I assume you agree with her about Obama.
". These people here actually went to see Obama, Senator Obama. So I dont believe that he has that kind of courage and that kind of judgment. Or lets say, is it judgment or is it wisdom or whatever? But he chose not to be associated with one of the biggest causes that we have in our community, the cause of Elvira Arellano, the cause of these two young men, where he could have stepped in. They were ultimately freed, by the way, but not with his help."
http://www.democracynow.org/2008/2/1/democratic_presidential_nomination_could_hinge_on
Some very strong and negative statements about Barack Obama, craven, hapless suppressor of votes. You agree with those statements or not?
ksc
(10 posts)Have you watched the video? The Washington Post has backpedaled their story-as usual -read it again. You do realize it was the Washington Post that ran the story about the photos that have been proven false with a contact sheet. They used a 40 year old memory as proof, and ignored the information from the esteemed Civil Rights photographer Danny Lyon.
Huerta did this same thing to Obama--she is not above reproach. Sadly- I did not know this until now. I walked the picket lines in the 80s with her, and had high opinion of her over the years. Last night a hero of mine died- she could have misperceived things, but she kept on in the press with the lies after we all had watched the video.
Here she is asserting more fabricated lies on the campaign against Obama in '08
Dolores Huerta went further, accusing the Culinary Workers Union of intimidating Clinton supporters and keeping them away from the caucuses. Union leaders are telling Clinton backers if they dont vote for Obama, they wont get transportation, they will be fired, Huerta said.
http://www.salon.com/2008/01/19/huerta_obama/
This is how the Clinton campaign operates
http://lasvegassun.com/news/2008/jan/18/democrats-toughen/#/Obama_at_Culinary_Union_226/
In case you want all of the caucus video -- exchange is at the 53:30 mark
https://www.ustream.tv/embed/recorded/83452078?html5ui
Huerta has had ample time to delete her tweet- but it remains up there and she has done interviews supporting these claims...the damage is done.
RATM435
(392 posts)Classic rovian tactics attack your opponent on their strengths bernie sanders is a now racist fuck you the democratic party and your goldwater girl.
Loki
(3,825 posts)many in the Bernout Campaign promote republican lies. That's disturbing.
betsuni
(25,630 posts)Tarc
(10,476 posts)Because they can never admit that their supporters have done something bad.
Locrian
(4,522 posts)but to HRC and supporters - that's a GOOD thing. For them, it's the way to "get things done".
Slimey but effective. Win at any cost, etc, etc.
Bluenorthwest
(45,319 posts)materials. Compare and contrast:
" I have been to Chicago many times for many different campaigns that the community there - the Latino community was there. I have, to this day, to meet Mr. Obama. I have never encountered him in any of these big campaigns that we have done in Chicago on different issues. And, as I say, I have never yet to meet the man."
""Well, to be very frank, I'm going to cut you off, but I never saw him, I never met him. I'm a chairman of the Student Nonviolent Coordinating Committee for three years, from 1963 to 1966. I was involved in the sit-ins, the freedom rides, the March on Washington, the march from Selma to Montgomery, and directed their voter education project for six years. But I met Hillary Clinton. I met President Clinton."
http://www.democracynow.org/2008/2/1/democratic_presidential_nomination_could_hinge_on
http://www.motherjones.com/mojo/2016/02/john-lewis-bernie-sanders-civil-rights
Every year I'm told that some famous person not having met a candidate is deeply meaningful but I don't really get that. Trashed Obama, now she trashes Sanders. It's just material, a trope, template style, paint by numbers politics of destruction.
Delores never met Obama so she said he lacked judgement, had no courage and suppressed the Latino vote in Nevada. All that and more she said about Obama. Was any of it the truth?
The UFW was not exactly a pro-immigration outfit back in the day either.
vi5
(13,305 posts)Once it's out there, and given a couple of days of news cycle, even after it's proven blatantly false it's already been out there, and the gullible will continue to cite it as "evidence".
INdemo
(6,994 posts)in order to win. After all Hillary has wanted this for 30 years and she has the team to help her.
DWS..set the State Parties up to cause chaos in Iowa and Nev.
In iowa the State Democratic refused to audit 1664 precincts because 14 had revealed Bernie Sanders had made gains
In NH DWS quickly made it show that Hillary had more Delegates and awarded her Super Delegates which was meaningless.
So one has to ask knowing how bad Hillary wants this would the Hillary supporters still back her even though her campaign cheats to assure her a Victory.'
DWS is now funneling funds from the DNC to the Hillary's Campaign
http://www.democraticunderground.com/12511277476
So this becomes a legitimate question
Is David Brock the Karl Rove of the Clinton campaign or
Is Debbie Wasserman Schultz
MyNameGoesHere
(7,638 posts)Of disturbing trends I mean.
monicaangela
(1,508 posts)as they try to swing votes of minority communities into the Clinton column. Minority communities were hurt tremendously by the Clinton administrations policies. Policies of which Hillary approved of and was a part of helping to get implemented. Welfare Reform, Three Strikes, Glass Steagall and more have been more detrimental to minority communities since the 90's than any republican legislation, and continue to wreak havoc.
Duval
(4,280 posts)I can no longer sit and watch her when she's on TV. I feel a sense of revulsion.
blondie58
(2,570 posts)A Coin toss in Iowa. Drawing the high Card in Las Vegas.
Very Lucky and Quite peculiar.
PonyUp
(1,680 posts)JGug1
(320 posts)While it is mostly true that the fish rots from the head, in other words, she is responsible for stuff like that, I did say MOSTLY.
There are reports of some Sanders' supporters not being upstanding and some of the name calling on this very blog by Sanders supporters is unseemly, indeed, and undemocratic. I'm certain that some Clinton supporters are equally bad. I try to not read the CRAP. I am opposed to that sort of thing. I don't care where it comes from. It always surprised me that some people cannot be trusted to count the paper ballots honorably and honestly. Just call me naive.
tk2kewl
(18,133 posts)Eom
DeeDeeNY
(3,356 posts)On many levels
im1013
(633 posts)That received a $100,000 grant/ donation from the Clinton Foundation?
I'd post a screenshot if I could figure out how, but it is supposedly public info.
johnlucas
(1,250 posts)Throw away the integrity & respect your earned for your part is social movements just to win favor or pay back favors for someone like Hillary???
Can't let yourself be owned like that.
Hillary ain't worth it folks.
Keep it real. Always.
Tell the truth.
John Lucas
azmom
(5,208 posts)johnlucas
(1,250 posts)Oh well.
That's why it's important for the newer generations to refreshen the air.
The Youth Vote has to come out big for Bernie to correct the mistakes of their elders.
Age doesn't ALWAYS bring wisdom.
John Lucas
humbled_opinion
(4,423 posts)ends justifies any means she will tear the party down grass root by grass root telling lie after lie just so she can lead the blindly led sycophants to her ultimate GE failure... I guarantee that Donald Trump already has recordings of her comments to Goldman Sachs execs and it is going to tear our party apart when he goes public with them... I for one will never forgive her that lie when I hear her schmoozing with Wall Street execs and knowing that our true champion got snookered because she is a liar and a thief who would steal this election hiding behind her millions in contributions from wall street.
fun n serious
(4,451 posts)That was very deceptive and pro Bernie.