Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

AZ Progressive

(3,411 posts)
Sat Feb 20, 2016, 09:03 PM Feb 2016

It would be naive not to think that Harry Reid didn't have a significant role in Hillary's "win"...

in Nevada.

Harry Reid is clearly a top part of the Democratic Party establishment, and he is VERY powerful in Nevada, according to Nevada journalists. Harry Reid is also pretty corrupt. It's clear that Harry Reid has an interest in Bernie not winning the primaries, because Bernie is really fighting not just the corporate establishment, but the political establishment. Reid has made his fortunes in building a political machine and making easy money off of it. Reid like many other corrupt Democrats have a clear interest in Bernie losing. These people are not in politics to "serve the people", they are in it to get more rich.

“You don’t go far in Nevada before you run into Harry Reid, or one of his people, or somebody who he’s helped come along, or someone he’s helping come along,” explained Steve Sebelius, a Nevada political journalist and longtime Reid-watcher. “His reach is pretty far. … He’s at the top of the heap.”

“It’s like an iron fist inside a titanium glove,” said Sebelius of Reid’s control over the state’s Democratic Party. “His people are firmly in control. Who runs is who he wants to run, and who doesn’t run is who he doesn’t want to run. There’s no one on the Republican side with that kind of influence and control.”

Damore suggested that Reid -- because of his extensive in-state political network and status as Senate majority leader -- may be “the most powerful politician in Nevada state history,” an assertion that several other state political experts agreed with (or at least saw some merit in). But Nevada politicos don’t really debate about the degree of Reid’s power. Rather, the question is whether he has always used it appropriately.


Read more: http://www.realclearpolitics.com/articles/2014/04/24/harry_reids_long_steady_accretion_of_power__wealth.html#ixzz40l9KzDWd
Follow us: @RCP_Articles on Twitter
4 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
It would be naive not to think that Harry Reid didn't have a significant role in Hillary's "win"... (Original Post) AZ Progressive Feb 2016 OP
i can't speak for anyone else but no one DesertFlower Feb 2016 #1
Maybe casino bosses moondust Feb 2016 #2
yes, got home from work and husband said harry reid put last minute pressure on amborin Feb 2016 #3
And he Clintons gave him a vast amount of help in his elecgtion 6 years ago. MohRokTah Feb 2016 #4

moondust

(20,006 posts)
2. Maybe casino bosses
Sat Feb 20, 2016, 09:35 PM
Feb 2016

who may be on good terms with the political bosses are promising their employees something if so-and-so wins the caucus. Even a day off would probably be enough to sway some people who might otherwise not vote at all.

amborin

(16,631 posts)
3. yes, got home from work and husband said harry reid put last minute pressure on
Sat Feb 20, 2016, 09:37 PM
Feb 2016

the culinary union and that put it over the top for clinton. does anyone know if this is correct? husband heard it on msnbc

Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»2016 Postmortem»It would be naive not to ...