Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Fawke Em

(11,366 posts)
Fri Feb 19, 2016, 11:47 PM Feb 2016

Clinton Emails: Secret Negotiations With New York Times, Trade Bill Lobbying Revealed

An email Oct. 8, 2011, to Clinton from her aide Huma Abedin gave notes about the state of play in Congress on the proposed trade pacts. The notes provided Clinton “some background before you make the calls” to legislators.

Two days later in an email titled “FTA calls,” Clinton wrote to aides indicating she had spoken to Sens. Jack Reed of Rhode Island and Jim Webb of Virginia, both Democrats. She told the aides she had talked with “Webb who is strong in favor of all 3” trade agreements, and then asked, “So why did I call him?” — indicating she was otherwise phoning to try to convince wavering lawmakers to support the deals.

Only three years earlier, Clinton wooed organized labor during her presidential campaign with promises to oppose those same deals. She called the South Korea agreement “inherently unfair.” She also said, “I will do everything I can to urge the Congress to reject the Colombia Free Trade Agreement.” Clinton has lately courted organized labor’s support for her current presidential bid by pledging to oppose the 12-nation Trans-Pacific Partnership agreement, a deal she repeatedly touted while secretary of state.


http://www.ibtimes.com/hillary-clinton-emails-secret-negotiations-new-york-times-trade-bill-lobbying-2315809



And people are supposed to believe her new position on TPP? I hope labor unions' rank and file see this.
10 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Clinton Emails: Secret Negotiations With New York Times, Trade Bill Lobbying Revealed (Original Post) Fawke Em Feb 2016 OP
"Only three years earlier..." tk2kewl Feb 2016 #1
Did you notice those eyebrows? grasswire Feb 2016 #2
i also noticed she shakes her head no and shrugs tk2kewl Feb 2016 #3
Condi Rice does that, as well. grasswire Feb 2016 #5
Jesus wept. AzDar Feb 2016 #4
The Union Leaders who endorse Clinton are selling out their workers. This email just confirms Skwmom Feb 2016 #6
They should be ashamed. eom Fawke Em Feb 2016 #8
Good God, We'll Lose in November with her as the Nominee with this Piece of Human Waste... andrewv1 Feb 2016 #7
K&R CharlotteVale Feb 2016 #9
y,know, I get a clue from the high paid speeches, the graft, the payola. delrem Feb 2016 #10
 

tk2kewl

(18,133 posts)
1. "Only three years earlier..."
Fri Feb 19, 2016, 11:58 PM
Feb 2016

"Only three years earlier, Clinton wooed organized labor during her presidential campaign with promises to oppose those same deals."

She tried to tell the truth to those unions... she really did

grasswire

(50,130 posts)
2. Did you notice those eyebrows?
Sat Feb 20, 2016, 12:16 AM
Feb 2016

She raised her eyebrows as far as they could go, to imply openness and honesty.

It's one of her tricks. I suspect she's been coached in body language.

grasswire

(50,130 posts)
5. Condi Rice does that, as well.
Sat Feb 20, 2016, 12:20 AM
Feb 2016

When she is lying, Rice shakes her head "no"

I have noticed Jeb doing the same thing.

Skwmom

(12,685 posts)
6. The Union Leaders who endorse Clinton are selling out their workers. This email just confirms
Sat Feb 20, 2016, 01:50 AM
Feb 2016

Last edited Sat Feb 20, 2016, 02:37 AM - Edit history (1)

what many already knew - she made a qualified statement against TPP so she could reverse it later on.

andrewv1

(168 posts)
7. Good God, We'll Lose in November with her as the Nominee with this Piece of Human Waste...
Sat Feb 20, 2016, 02:27 AM
Feb 2016

She's almost indistinguishable from the Republican Candidates.

delrem

(9,688 posts)
10. y,know, I get a clue from the high paid speeches, the graft, the payola.
Sat Feb 20, 2016, 03:29 AM
Feb 2016

Everyone should.

Bill Clinton's Ties To Colombia Trade Deal Stronger Than Even Penn's
04/16/2008 05:12 am ET | Updated May 25, 2011
Sam Stein

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2008/04/08/bill-clintons-ties-to-col_n_95651.html

I remember noting it back in the time, when I heard in passing that Bill Clinton was giving a speech to an audience in Columbia in favor of a US/Columbia free trade deal. I shuddered and wondered why people don't pay much attention to this, don't understand what's going on. After all, it's important to pay attention and read the signs. Bill SO fulfills my definition of a bag of political sleaze (I don't really like his personal/sexual morality either - it goes totally against my grain and I don't want my nose pushed in THAT again. But that's another topic).

So I googled it and 10 seconds later I got the link above to an article written in 2008, when Hillary was, as usual, lying through her teeth about what she represents.

The Clintons won't change, folks. They won't "evolve". They're highly paid hucksters.

Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»2016 Postmortem»Clinton Emails: Secret Ne...