2016 Postmortem
Related: About this forumPost your predictions for Nevada if you're so inclined.
Mine:
53% Sanders
47% Clinton
(Take heart, Clinton voters--I can't predict the future for shit).
Tommy_Carcetti
(43,184 posts)DisgustipatedinCA
(12,530 posts)Tommy_Carcetti
(43,184 posts)As you could see, it didn't amount to much.
DisgustipatedinCA
(12,530 posts)FSogol
(45,492 posts)injustice (real or imagined) and flood GD: P with hysterical nonsense and pitifully naive solutions, generating many hidden posts and timeouts.
What'd I win?
DisgustipatedinCA
(12,530 posts)Kalidurga
(14,177 posts)Qutzupalotl
(14,317 posts)but Clinton gets 6,000 more superdelegates.
DisgustipatedinCA
(12,530 posts)It would serve to tear the party to pieces. But it looks like they're considering all their options. We'll see.
2banon
(7,321 posts)have to laugh at this juncture.. save the crying for later when that actually happens.
berniepdx420
(1,784 posts)winter is coming
(11,785 posts)DisgustipatedinCA
(12,530 posts)Erich Bloodaxe BSN
(14,733 posts)Binkie The Clown
(7,911 posts)The loser, reeling from the shock of it, won't be able to understand how this could have happened to her.
DisgustipatedinCA
(12,530 posts)Thanks for your prediction.
plus5mace
(140 posts)Basis - Hillary's campaign has gone boldly negative, and that seems to be accelerating. This is not necessary or smart unless her internals are telling us something the public polling is not. I don't trust the polling much in primaries. The usual turnout is so low that increased participation can totally throw off the expected result.
Of course I could be wrong. It may be that going fully negative is Hillary's natural campaign style, regardless of whether she is comfortably ahead.
DisgustipatedinCA
(12,530 posts)I'll say that if he wins by 11 points, there will be some serious conversations about her future.
2banon
(7,321 posts)plus5mace
(140 posts)He proved my skepticism was tainted with cynicism by doing what he's done. I still can hardly believe it, and it fills me with an anxious dread. We have always been tended to by our betters - are we truly ready for democracy? And Bernie will face a mutiny in the general election. The other half of the McGovern story is how much of the Democratic party worked against him in the campaign. We have many mountains to climb to reach our destination.
berniepdx420
(1,784 posts)R. Daneel Olivaw
(12,606 posts)DisgustipatedinCA
(12,530 posts)ram2008
(1,238 posts)DisgustipatedinCA
(12,530 posts)49% would still be a great showing for Sanders, but a win would be better, there's no denying it.
dana_b
(11,546 posts)ram2008
(1,238 posts)0rganism
(23,958 posts)hmm, that's not much of a prediction, is it?
ok, here goes: Iowa redux, 49-49, and there will be great wailing and gnashing of teeth in various forums about the unfairness of it all
DisgustipatedinCA
(12,530 posts)0rganism
(23,958 posts)this has been a year of surprises so far, i'm probably just going to stop making predictions about politics and sports entirely pretty soon
frylock
(34,825 posts)DisgustipatedinCA
(12,530 posts)...it may be reflective of something larger happening? I know the rest of the country will never be 85% Sanders like DU apparently is, but a big swing here can often indicate something shifting underfoot in the larger nation, and I wondered if that's what you were getting at. Thanks.
frylock
(34,825 posts)are in the crapper. It looks to me like they're greasing the skids for another loss.
DisgustipatedinCA
(12,530 posts)frylock
(34,825 posts)HooptieWagon
(17,064 posts)DisgustipatedinCA
(12,530 posts)virtualobserver
(8,760 posts)I'm from the future....48 hours in the future.....Bernie wins and there are still no flying cars!
DisgustipatedinCA
(12,530 posts)virtualobserver
(8,760 posts)DisgustipatedinCA
(12,530 posts)speaktruthtopower
(800 posts)I think a lot of progressives want to send a message that they can't be taken for granted.
Caucuses are unpredictable.
DisgustipatedinCA
(12,530 posts)benny05
(5,322 posts)But I'm hopeful for Bernie!
DisgustipatedinCA
(12,530 posts)I posted a guess of Sanders by 3 points, but that doesn't mean I'm certain, and I'm not. But yes, I'm very hopeful too.
Attorney in Texas
(3,373 posts)Nebraska, Maine, Michigan, Missouri, Arizona, Idaho, Utah, Alaska, Hawaii, Washington, Wisconsin, and Wyoming).
That takes through the next two months.
These results over the next two months will so significantly change the landscape that it is too difficult to predict how the states will play out from that point forward.
DisgustipatedinCA
(12,530 posts)I hope you're right.
Attorney in Texas
(3,373 posts)groundswell for Sanders in these states.
In Nevada, I think Sanders' win will be closer than in New Hampshire but not tied like Iowa was (that gives me a 22% margin of error - I'm pretty comfortable with that).
Response to Attorney in Texas (Reply #36)
Name removed Message auto-removed
Live and Learn
(12,769 posts)DisgustipatedinCA
(12,530 posts)Chichiri
(4,667 posts)Given how hard it is to poll Nevada, my guess is as good as anyone's.
That said, and for what it's worth, 538 projects Hillary 52, Sanders 46. Very weak confidence, though.
DisgustipatedinCA
(12,530 posts)TSIAS
(14,689 posts)I'll admit that's not based on a whole lot of evidence. Just speculating based on the attitudes of the respective campaigns.
DisgustipatedinCA
(12,530 posts)So I was totally pulling numbers out of my...ear. I just like to make the prediction anyway. Thanks for your prediction--I hope we're both right.
Matariki
(18,775 posts)Well actually, probably close to a tie. But my tea leaves said 'yuuuge' this morning. We'll know soon enough.
geek tragedy
(68,868 posts)Bernie's supporters are a lot more motivated and he overperforms polls while Clinton underperforms. There's just not that much enthusiasm for a candidate running as a cautious legacy keeper.
DisgustipatedinCA
(12,530 posts)It was about the union that isn't making an endorsement this time around because their leadership wants to endorse Clinton, but their rank-and-file don't. I can't translate that into some number of votes, but it made my ears perk up. Thanks for the reply.
morningfog
(18,115 posts)DisgustipatedinCA
(12,530 posts)To be clear, I still think South Carolina will go for Clinton, but it may become very tight.
morningfog
(18,115 posts)If more than 15 point spread in SC, the story will be "his problem with African Americans."
DisgustipatedinCA
(12,530 posts)I arrived at that number by carefully studying the recesses of my brain and then making up a number I thought sounded about right.
berniepdx420
(1,784 posts)DisgustipatedinCA
(12,530 posts)Note: we're still looking for a benefactor to dole out the prize money.
CentralMass
(15,265 posts)CoffeeCat
(24,411 posts)so I am doing better than most polls.
I'll say, Sanders by 6.5 percent.
Here was my NH prediction:
http://www.democraticunderground.com/?com=view_post&forum=1251&pid=1179773
DisgustipatedinCA
(12,530 posts)SoLeftIAmRight
(4,883 posts)...
Hassin Bin Sober
(26,330 posts)dana_b
(11,546 posts)I do think it will be a nail biter but she may just pull it out. I hope that I am wrong!!!
fingers crossed...
DisgustipatedinCA
(12,530 posts)Here's hoping he blows it away and we don't all chew our nails off hoping he edges her out.
BainsBane
(53,035 posts)DisgustipatedinCA
(12,530 posts)BainsBane
(53,035 posts)With 95% of precincts reporting, Clinton is up 5.5 points.
Btrain
(6 posts)6%.
tgards79
(1,415 posts)...because we nailed it!
http://www.borntorunthenumbers.com/2016/02/nevada-d-and-south-carolina-r-go.html
SidDithers
(44,228 posts)Sid