Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
9 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Question: Why is the MSM coupling NV & SC in their coverage (more SC than NV) ? They didn't do (Original Post) berniepdx420 Feb 2016 OP
Squirrel! nt kristopher Feb 2016 #1
What does squirrel mean ?? berniepdx420 Feb 2016 #2
Hahaha kristopher Feb 2016 #5
thanx berniepdx420 Feb 2016 #6
The PTB are trying to downplay NV. They were convinced they would crush Iowa, that didnt happen so litlbilly Feb 2016 #3
Combination of lazy and evil Cheese Sandwich Feb 2016 #4
Repubnlicans are doing their SC thing earlier than Dems. Erich Bloodaxe BSN Feb 2016 #7
Yes radical noodle Feb 2016 #8
Not sure but likely some sort of conspiracy involving the Clintons, Portland, and the number 23... zappaman Feb 2016 #9
 

litlbilly

(2,227 posts)
3. The PTB are trying to downplay NV. They were convinced they would crush Iowa, that didnt happen so
Fri Feb 19, 2016, 05:45 PM
Feb 2016

here we are.

Erich Bloodaxe BSN

(14,733 posts)
7. Repubnlicans are doing their SC thing earlier than Dems.
Fri Feb 19, 2016, 05:58 PM
Feb 2016

So 'Trumpapolooza' demands that they cover SC more than anything else. Thpbt.

Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»2016 Postmortem»Question: Why is the MSM...