Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
2016 Postmortem
Related: About this forumQuestion: Why is the MSM coupling NV & SC in their coverage (more SC than NV) ? They didn't do
with IA & NH.
InfoView thread info, including edit history
TrashPut this thread in your Trash Can (My DU » Trash Can)
BookmarkAdd this thread to your Bookmarks (My DU » Bookmarks)
9 replies, 798 views
ShareGet links to this post and/or share on social media
AlertAlert this post for a rule violation
PowersThere are no powers you can use on this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
ReplyReply to this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
Rec (2)
ReplyReply to this post
9 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Question: Why is the MSM coupling NV & SC in their coverage (more SC than NV) ? They didn't do (Original Post)
berniepdx420
Feb 2016
OP
kristopher
(29,798 posts)1. Squirrel! nt
berniepdx420
(1,784 posts)2. What does squirrel mean ??
kristopher
(29,798 posts)5. Hahaha
berniepdx420
(1,784 posts)6. thanx
litlbilly
(2,227 posts)3. The PTB are trying to downplay NV. They were convinced they would crush Iowa, that didnt happen so
here we are.
Cheese Sandwich
(9,086 posts)4. Combination of lazy and evil
Erich Bloodaxe BSN
(14,733 posts)7. Repubnlicans are doing their SC thing earlier than Dems.
So 'Trumpapolooza' demands that they cover SC more than anything else. Thpbt.
radical noodle
(8,003 posts)8. Yes
Republican primary is in SC tomorrow.
zappaman
(20,606 posts)9. Not sure but likely some sort of conspiracy involving the Clintons, Portland, and the number 23...