2016 Postmortem
Related: About this forumNevada Democrats vow legal action against people who falsely register as Dems to support Bernie
After reviewing Nevada law, we believe that registering under false pretenses in order to participate in the Democratic caucuses for purposes of manipulating the presidential nominating process is a felony," state party Chair Roberta Lange said in a statement. "The Nevada State Democratic Party will work with law enforcement to prosecute anyone who falsely registers as a Democrat to caucus tomorrow and subsequently participates in the Republican caucuses on Tuesday.
<...>
The sharply worded statement follows an announcement from the College Republicans at the University of Nevada, Reno, encouraging members to "capitalize on, if they see fit to" on rules that would permit them to caucus Saturday and vote in the GOP primary on Tuesday.
Read more: http://www.politico.com/story/2016/02/nevada-caucus-double-voting-219504#ixzz40eLboowz
This is in response to a story about Republicans in Nevada urging their supporters to vote for Bernie in the Dem caucuses.
From MSNBC:
Ralston noted yesterday that organized Republican efforts to intervene in the Democratic contest are now underway. This includes College Republicans urging members to support the socialist in order to help the GOP candidate prevail in November, and coincided with work from a prominent conservative activist in Nevada encouraging Republicans to intervene with a similar message.
Read more:
http://www.msnbc.com/rachel-maddow-show/nevada-republicans-eye-electoral-mischief-dem-caucuses
Gothmog
(145,345 posts)The Nevada college republicans are going to cheat and vote in the Democratic caucuses for Sanders because he is the weakest possible Democratic nominee http://www.msnbc.com/rachel-maddow-show/nevada-republicans-eye-electoral-mischief-dem-caucuses
Here is the flyer that the Nevada college republicans are using to encourage Nevada college republicans to vote for the socialist
Again and again, it is clear that the GOP and their affiliates want Sanders to be the nominee because he is the weakest possible nominee
mhatrw
(10,786 posts)And nowhere in the press release does this tiny chapter of college Repukes advise Republicans to vote for Sanders!
All this is is Clinton operatives preparing a preposterous narrative for the whipping they know they are facing tomorrow.
Ferd Berfel
(3,687 posts)Gothmog
(145,345 posts)He seems a little old to be a member of this group
mhatrw
(10,786 posts)I thought you could.
litlbilly
(2,227 posts)BlueMTexpat
(15,370 posts)Ever since I heard about the possibility of GOPers being able to vote in BOTH the Dem and the GOPer caucuses, I have been outraged.
I am glad to hear that this is being taken very seriously, as well it should.
Fawke Em
(11,366 posts)We shouldn't be participating in voter suppression.
JimDandy
(7,318 posts)a private corporation..They are not subject to state or federal election laws. Oversight of them is strictly within the purview of the Party. At caucuses I've attended, we simply signed a statement during sign-in attesting that we would not vote in a caucus/primary of any other party. It sounds like it would be a civil matter if someone then violates that written contract.
JimDandy
(7,318 posts)as is the Republican Party. It is unlikely that the caucuses, which are privately held elections run by a private corporation, would be subject to state laws that govern public elections.
Joe the Revelator
(14,915 posts)shameful
geek tragedy
(68,868 posts)of our nominee is a good thing
Joe the Revelator
(14,915 posts)themselves "democrats". The actual title of the article would have been more appropriate.
Jester Messiah
(4,711 posts)That'll get 'em to the polls in November. Fuck's sake, how incredibly stupid can these establishment boneheads get?
Cali_Democrat
(30,439 posts)Jester Messiah
(4,711 posts)Wake up. Or, alternatively, don't piss on my shoes and tell me it's raining.
Cali_Democrat
(30,439 posts)If you're part of the democratic base, wouldn't you have already been registered a democrat?
Jester Messiah
(4,711 posts)But because those folk are gravitating towards Sanders, you see this sudden outbreak of "concern" from the Hillarites.
Cali_Democrat
(30,439 posts)In my opinion, the base refers to the stalwarts of the party, not self-declared independents who "usually" vote Democratic.
I suppose we can agree to disagree.
Jester Messiah
(4,711 posts)geek tragedy
(68,868 posts)Fawke Em
(11,366 posts)First, that they're stupid enough to think he's the unelectable one when he clearly beats all of their candidates with a broom much more than Hillary does; and,
Second, that anyone, including the Democratic Party, thinks they can look at someone and "know" they're falsely registering as a Democrat. What? If you wear a Ralph Lauren golf shirt, talk through your teeth and your girlfriend's name is Muffy, you're disqualified to vote as a Dem?
mythology
(9,527 posts)Somebody voting sincere and somebody voting in an attempt to cause trouble?
Nanjeanne
(4,961 posts)questionseverything
(9,656 posts)worked so well with witches
MohRokTah
(15,429 posts)kelly1mm
(4,733 posts)JimDandy
(7,318 posts)whose caucus isn't until Tuesday, is under no obligation to give the Democrats their caucus sign-in sheets.
Tierra_y_Libertad
(50,414 posts)Republicans vote for Bernie.
Republicans get sued.
It's a twofer!
Android3.14
(5,402 posts)If Clever were a country you would be monarch.
Skwmom
(12,685 posts)And this is this attempted cover by Team Clinton.
cui bono
(19,926 posts)I'm betting with you.
By hook or by crook... who cares what the voters actually want.
.
jfern
(5,204 posts)in the general. That's why he polls better than Hillary in the general election. But the Democratic party seems determined to shrink the party rather than grow it.
DisgustipatedinCA
(12,530 posts)libtodeath
(2,888 posts)Skwmom
(12,685 posts)to vote for Sanders.
In the GE they can hammer Clinton for voter suppression.
MissDeeds
(7,499 posts)Building an excuse in advance.
AtomicKitten
(46,585 posts)libdem4life
(13,877 posts)And then prosecute?
However, after Bernie wins, they will have a lot of time on their hands. Bluster and Cow Pies.
Cali_Democrat
(30,439 posts)So: A Republican registered by Feb. 13 could show up at a Democratic caucus site on Saturday, switch to the Democratic Party, vote and then still participate on Tuesday because the party switch would not show up on the GOP caucus rolls.
Clark County Voter Registrar Joe Gloria confirmed Monday that this could happen. And he also pointed out that the Republican-become-Democrat could switch back to the GOP in time to vote in the June primary.
<...>
Ralston noted yesterday that organized Republican efforts to intervene in the Democratic contest are now underway. This includes College Republicans urging members to support the socialist in order to help the GOP candidate prevail in November, and coincided with work from a prominent conservative activist in Nevada encouraging Republicans to intervene with a similar message.
Read more:
http://www.msnbc.com/rachel-maddow-show/nevada-republicans-eye-electoral-mischief-dem-caucuses
libdem4life
(13,877 posts)kristopher
(29,798 posts)Tempest in a teapot to give Hillary cover for a loss.
libdem4life
(13,877 posts)cui bono
(19,926 posts)nadinbrzezinski
(154,021 posts)Mind scanners, what you wear? What?
For the record, I expect some of this dirty trickery. But like voting multiple times, (and voter ID laws) this is going to be mostly mythical
panader0
(25,816 posts)SoLeftIAmRight
(4,883 posts)...
frylock
(34,825 posts)Motown_Johnny
(22,308 posts)If an eligible voter registers as a Democrat then they are registered as a Democrat and can participate in the caucus.
How is anyone going to prove "falsely registering"?
workinclasszero
(28,270 posts)the democratic nomination because he would be an incredibly weak push over in the GE!
mhatrw
(10,786 posts)There in NO organized effort to get Republicans to vote for Sanders that I can tell.
If you can present some evidence to this effect, please do so.
DesertRat
(27,995 posts)NV Whino
(20,886 posts)The parties should have thought of the problems, and solved them, long ago.
And if the Republicans think skewing the dem caucus to Bernie will give them the GE, they are going to be very surprised.
nadinbrzezinski
(154,021 posts)some primary states are open.
Thankfully I live in an open primary state. Ergo I can proudly be a member of the fastest growing "party" in the state. INDIES
That said, I think the caucus system is highly undemocratic and that goes for both parties.
NV Whino
(20,886 posts)applegrove
(118,696 posts)DisgustipatedinCA
(12,530 posts)applegrove
(118,696 posts)with seething when Hillary went to Flint. One would think 'FLINT WATER BAD, HELP PEOPLE OF FLINT' would be a settled issue on the DU. But no. Bernie Bros were quite apoplectic.
DisgustipatedinCA
(12,530 posts)Awhile back, I decided that if defending my candidate from smears made me a Bernie Bro, I'd wear the label, and in so doing, weaken it. I like to think of myself as a middle aged regular sort of person, but some like to call me a Bernie Bro. But I dont', and won't, have relations with the grand old party, thanks.
jfern
(5,204 posts)And then smear Bernie supporters with the insulting "Bernie Bros" label. Talk about hypocritical.
applegrove
(118,696 posts)jfern
(5,204 posts)I do not vote for candidates of hate.
applegrove
(118,696 posts)jfern
(5,204 posts)catnhatnh
(8,976 posts)...anyone here recall that she was also going to whip autism and Alzheimer's???You know who does-credulous people who's lives are negatively affected by these diseases. Typical bullshit trying to get people to believe you want to help them when it's really about hustling votes on the cheap.
applegrove
(118,696 posts)nadinbrzezinski
(154,021 posts)And it is actually quite funny
frylock
(34,825 posts)mhatrw
(10,786 posts)saying that is they do this they WILL get arrested.
And a press release from a College Republican chapter that does not advise Republicans to on who to vote for?
frylock
(34,825 posts)ismnotwasm
(41,993 posts)because that's some bullshit right there. There is nothing wrong with being independent, no one should resort to dishonesty.
MohRokTah
(15,429 posts)Whomsoever put out the fliers encouraging people to engage in this felonious activity is just as guilty under the law that they will prosecute the miscreants who commit voter fraud by voting in both caucuses. Simply encouraging others to do it is also a felony.
JimDandy
(7,318 posts)Like a union, their caucuses and elections are usually not subject to state election laws. But, if they have participants attest in writing, when they sign in at the caucus, that they will not participate in any other political party's primary/caucus, then they may have a civil case against anyone who they later find has provably done so. I could be wrong. If you know of a specific law that states doing so is a crime, would you please cite it. As a long-time election protection activist, I'd be very interested in learning about any such law.
winter is coming
(11,785 posts)primary you voted in, to keep people from voting in more than one primary (or from voting in the other party's run-off election if there is one). Surely, Nevada's got some mechanism in place to ensure one voter, one primary.
JimDandy
(7,318 posts)since they are run by a private corporation. Both the Republican and Democratic parties have caucuses in Nevada, so I don't see how this could violate any state or federal law. Might be a violation of a civil contract law though if the caucus participants state they will not participate in another political party's elections snd then in fact do so.
oldandhappy
(6,719 posts)Bohemianwriter
(978 posts)Seems like another 2008 tactics are being used with a new twist.
Contest any vote for Bernie!
This is so special
...Or shall we say...fail to epic fail?
DNC and DLC do take after their ideological cousins in GOP...
Cheese Sandwich
(9,086 posts)Matariki
(18,775 posts)basselope
(2,565 posts)Clinton made these IDENTICAL accusations that people were crossing over to vote for Obama.
http://www.nytimes.com/2008/05/03/us/politics/03crossover.html?_r=0
http://www.nbcnews.com/id/23394070/ns/politics-decision_08/t/texas-republicans-cross-over-vote-obama/#.Vse4IPkrKUk
Does Clinton have no shame at all???
Don't bother with an answer.. we all know it.
KingFlorez
(12,689 posts)Republicans have no business trying to manipulate the results of the Democratic primary process.
Uponthegears
(1,499 posts)For Hillary's party operatives to try to intimidate/hassle Pro-Bernie caucus attendees. This isn't like a primary with a secret ballot. Hillary's people will know exactly who to target. It reminds me of right wing poll watchers trying to intimidate PoC in Philadelphia.
Ken Burch
(50,254 posts)Every vote for Bernie in NV is just as legitimate as every vote for HRC.
Bernie is gaining because DEMOCRATS agree with his message.
Bluenorthwest
(45,319 posts)Since last Saturday's Caucus, the Obama campaign has logged 1,000 complaints -- including tactics by Clinton supporters that interfered with voting.
David Plouffe-
"We currently have reports of over 200 separate incidents of trouble at caucus sites, including doors being closed up to thirty minutes early, registration forms running out so people were turned away, and ID being requested and checked in a non-uniform fashion. This is in addition to the Clinton campaign's efforts to confuse voters and call into question the at-large caucus sites which clearly had an affect on turnout at these locations. These kinds of Clinton campaign tactics were part of an entire week's worth of false, divisive, attacks designed to mislead caucus-goers and discredit the caucus itself."
Hillary- "Sen. Obama lost and now his campaign is acting out."
http://www.alternet.org/story/74840/obama_accuses_clinton_of_suppressing_nevada_vote