Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

Cali_Democrat

(30,439 posts)
Fri Feb 19, 2016, 05:03 PM Feb 2016

Nevada Democrats vow legal action against people who falsely register as Dems to support Bernie

In an effort to blunt caucus mischief, the state's Democratic Party vowed Friday to pursue legal action against those who "falsely" register as a Democrat to caucus on Saturday and then participate in Tuesday's Republican primary.

“After reviewing Nevada law, we believe that registering under false pretenses in order to participate in the Democratic caucuses for purposes of manipulating the presidential nominating process is a felony," state party Chair Roberta Lange said in a statement. "The Nevada State Democratic Party will work with law enforcement to prosecute anyone who falsely registers as a Democrat to caucus tomorrow and subsequently participates in the Republican caucuses on Tuesday.”

<...>

The sharply worded statement follows an announcement from the College Republicans at the University of Nevada, Reno, encouraging members to "capitalize on, if they see fit to" on rules that would permit them to caucus Saturday and vote in the GOP primary on Tuesday.

Read more: http://www.politico.com/story/2016/02/nevada-caucus-double-voting-219504#ixzz40eLboowz


This is in response to a story about Republicans in Nevada urging their supporters to vote for Bernie in the Dem caucuses.

From MSNBC:

<...>

Ralston noted yesterday that “organized” Republican efforts to intervene in the Democratic contest are now underway. This includes College Republicans urging members to support the “socialist” in order to help the GOP candidate “prevail” in November, and coincided with work from a prominent conservative activist in Nevada encouraging Republicans to intervene with a similar message.

Read more:

http://www.msnbc.com/rachel-maddow-show/nevada-republicans-eye-electoral-mischief-dem-caucuses
84 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Nevada Democrats vow legal action against people who falsely register as Dems to support Bernie (Original Post) Cali_Democrat Feb 2016 OP
Nevada College Republicans are trying to vote in Democratic caucus to support Sanders Gothmog Feb 2016 #1
LOL. It was RALSTON himself, a Clinton operative, who brought this loophole to their attention! mhatrw Feb 2016 #37
Many of these republicans will probably end up voting for Bernie in the GE too Ferd Berfel Feb 2016 #52
So Ralston is an officer of the Nevada College republicans? Gothmog Feb 2016 #63
Can you read the top of the second page of the image posted below? mhatrw Feb 2016 #71
the corporate hurt is in full bloom. :) litlbilly Feb 2016 #2
Good to hear this. BlueMTexpat Feb 2016 #3
That's a problem with the law, then. Fawke Em Feb 2016 #7
The caucuses are a privately held election run by the Democratic Party, JimDandy Feb 2016 #51
The Nevada Democratic Party is a non-profit corporation. JimDandy Feb 2016 #46
This title is classic voter supression tactics..... Joe the Revelator Feb 2016 #4
suppressing registred Republicans who prefer Ted Cruz from participating in the selection geek tragedy Feb 2016 #40
Thats not what the title says. Its clearly aimed at independents and others who may not consider... Joe the Revelator Feb 2016 #70
Sue the base! Jester Messiah Feb 2016 #5
Republicans aren't the Democratic base. nt Cali_Democrat Feb 2016 #19
Sure... THAT's who this is targeting. Jester Messiah Feb 2016 #78
You're not thinking about this logically Cali_Democrat Feb 2016 #80
Not necessarily. A lot of people prefer to remain Independent but usually align with the dems. Jester Messiah Feb 2016 #81
I suppose we have a difference of opinion Cali_Democrat Feb 2016 #82
It seems so. [nt] Jester Messiah Feb 2016 #84
Why do you consider Republicans to be part of 'the base?' nt geek tragedy Feb 2016 #39
I think this hilarious. Fawke Em Feb 2016 #6
How do you tell the difference between mythology Feb 2016 #8
I think they throw you in a bucket of water and see if you sink or float. Nanjeanne Feb 2016 #22
perfect idea questionseverything Feb 2016 #76
You compare the names of those who attend the Dem Caucus to those who attend the GOP Caucus. eom MohRokTah Feb 2016 #27
Well it is not like they have to show ID's or anything ..... nt kelly1mm Feb 2016 #30
The sign-in sheets aren't public record. The Republican Party, JimDandy Feb 2016 #74
What could be nicer? Tierra_y_Libertad Feb 2016 #9
You win Android3.14 Feb 2016 #29
My money is on trying to INTIMIDATE Republicans who want to vote for Sanders. Skwmom Feb 2016 #10
Good take on this! cui bono Feb 2016 #18
There are plenty of Republicans who would vote for Bernie jfern Feb 2016 #47
Let's keep it clean. Never take your eyes off the GOP; they'll do the dishonorable thing every time. DisgustipatedinCA Feb 2016 #11
Let me guess,this will be the excuse when she loses. libtodeath Feb 2016 #12
Probably one of Clinton's Republican pals started the ball rolling so they could make people afraid Skwmom Feb 2016 #13
I think you nailed it MissDeeds Feb 2016 #15
+ 100000 AtomicKitten Feb 2016 #33
This is beyond desperation. How does someone EVER illegally change parties. libdem4life Feb 2016 #14
From MSNBC: Cali_Democrat Feb 2016 #17
Thanks for the info. I don't support that from either party. libdem4life Feb 2016 #20
I don't either, but i seriously doubt the legal threat has any teeth. kristopher Feb 2016 #28
Yeah...tied up in court until the next election...LOL. n/t libdem4life Feb 2016 #42
Laying the groundwork to excuse Bernie's win I see... cui bono Feb 2016 #16
How do you prove Mr. Smith is part of Op Chaos? nadinbrzezinski Feb 2016 #21
How does one "falsely" register? panader0 Feb 2016 #23
Who fights against voters? SoLeftIAmRight Feb 2016 #24
Conservatives. frylock Feb 2016 #72
Such nonsense. Motown_Johnny Feb 2016 #25
Proof that the republicans are trying to get Bernie workinclasszero Feb 2016 #26
Show us the proof. There is NOTHING here. mhatrw Feb 2016 #36
Good! n/t DesertRat Feb 2016 #31
Another reason to eliminate caucuses and go to primaries. NV Whino Feb 2016 #32
Some primary states are closed nadinbrzezinski Feb 2016 #53
Me too. NV Whino Feb 2016 #59
Called rat****ing. It is Nixonian. And it is on the DU too. applegrove Feb 2016 #34
People at DU are trying to get Republicans to vote in two caucuses? Let me at 'em. Where are they? DisgustipatedinCA Feb 2016 #41
GOP trolls are on the DU creating a climate of hate for Hillary. They were beside themselves applegrove Feb 2016 #44
Well, you're interchanging "Bernie Bros" and "GOP trolls" in your post, and I disagree. DisgustipatedinCA Feb 2016 #45
You talk about a climate of hate jfern Feb 2016 #49
Bernie told the Bernie Bros to behave. applegrove Feb 2016 #50
Bernie Bros is a term invented by Hillary hacks trying to divide and conquer jfern Feb 2016 #54
Bernie told to Bernie Bros to stop it. applegrove Feb 2016 #56
He never said Bernie Bros exist jfern Feb 2016 #64
It's called pandering catnhatnh Feb 2016 #58
Right. So Clinton cannot be for regulations for people's health because you say so. applegrove Feb 2016 #60
The term irony comes to mind here nadinbrzezinski Feb 2016 #66
Zero self-awareness. frylock Feb 2016 #73
LOL. And the "evidence" for this supposed chicanery is an email sent out to 142 people mhatrw Feb 2016 #35
Is this the new excuse for a Hillary loss after 'NV is 80% white' didn't get any traction? frylock Feb 2016 #38
Good ismnotwasm Feb 2016 #43
There may be some felony charges against some members of the College Republicans MohRokTah Feb 2016 #48
What law? The Democratic Party is a private corporation. JimDandy Feb 2016 #62
I've lived in open primary states. Usually, they stamp your card with the party of the winter is coming Feb 2016 #55
Political party caucuses are not considered public elections JimDandy Feb 2016 #65
so much for democracy! oldandhappy Feb 2016 #57
LLLLOOOOLLLL Bohemianwriter Feb 2016 #61
Who doesn't remember all of these: Cheese Sandwich Feb 2016 #67
How in the world is that going to be proved??? Matariki Feb 2016 #68
Its 2008 all over again. basselope Feb 2016 #69
Good KingFlorez Feb 2016 #75
Sounds like an excuse Uponthegears Feb 2016 #77
Bernie's campaign is surging on the merits in NV Ken Burch Feb 2016 #79
'08 Recycled-Obama Accuses Clinton of Suppressing Nevada Vote Bluenorthwest Feb 2016 #83

Gothmog

(145,345 posts)
1. Nevada College Republicans are trying to vote in Democratic caucus to support Sanders
Fri Feb 19, 2016, 05:08 PM
Feb 2016

The Nevada college republicans are going to cheat and vote in the Democratic caucuses for Sanders because he is the weakest possible Democratic nominee http://www.msnbc.com/rachel-maddow-show/nevada-republicans-eye-electoral-mischief-dem-caucuses

Ralston noted yesterday that “organized” Republican efforts to intervene in the Democratic contest are now underway. This includes College Republicans urging members to support the “socialist” in order to help the GOP candidate “prevail” in November, and coincided with work from a prominent conservative activist in Nevada encouraging Republicans to intervene with a similar message.

Here is the flyer that the Nevada college republicans are using to encourage Nevada college republicans to vote for the socialist



Again and again, it is clear that the GOP and their affiliates want Sanders to be the nominee because he is the weakest possible nominee

mhatrw

(10,786 posts)
37. LOL. It was RALSTON himself, a Clinton operative, who brought this loophole to their attention!
Fri Feb 19, 2016, 06:49 PM
Feb 2016

And nowhere in the press release does this tiny chapter of college Repukes advise Republicans to vote for Sanders!

All this is is Clinton operatives preparing a preposterous narrative for the whipping they know they are facing tomorrow.

Gothmog

(145,345 posts)
63. So Ralston is an officer of the Nevada College republicans?
Fri Feb 19, 2016, 08:35 PM
Feb 2016

He seems a little old to be a member of this group

BlueMTexpat

(15,370 posts)
3. Good to hear this.
Fri Feb 19, 2016, 05:09 PM
Feb 2016

Ever since I heard about the possibility of GOPers being able to vote in BOTH the Dem and the GOPer caucuses, I have been outraged.

I am glad to hear that this is being taken very seriously, as well it should.

JimDandy

(7,318 posts)
51. The caucuses are a privately held election run by the Democratic Party,
Fri Feb 19, 2016, 08:15 PM
Feb 2016

a private corporation..They are not subject to state or federal election laws. Oversight of them is strictly within the purview of the Party. At caucuses I've attended, we simply signed a statement during sign-in attesting that we would not vote in a caucus/primary of any other party. It sounds like it would be a civil matter if someone then violates that written contract.

JimDandy

(7,318 posts)
46. The Nevada Democratic Party is a non-profit corporation.
Fri Feb 19, 2016, 08:02 PM
Feb 2016

as is the Republican Party. It is unlikely that the caucuses, which are privately held elections run by a private corporation, would be subject to state laws that govern public elections.

 

geek tragedy

(68,868 posts)
40. suppressing registred Republicans who prefer Ted Cruz from participating in the selection
Fri Feb 19, 2016, 07:41 PM
Feb 2016

of our nominee is a good thing

 

Joe the Revelator

(14,915 posts)
70. Thats not what the title says. Its clearly aimed at independents and others who may not consider...
Fri Feb 19, 2016, 09:10 PM
Feb 2016

themselves "democrats". The actual title of the article would have been more appropriate.

 

Jester Messiah

(4,711 posts)
5. Sue the base!
Fri Feb 19, 2016, 05:12 PM
Feb 2016

That'll get 'em to the polls in November. Fuck's sake, how incredibly stupid can these establishment boneheads get?

 

Jester Messiah

(4,711 posts)
78. Sure... THAT's who this is targeting.
Sat Feb 20, 2016, 08:52 AM
Feb 2016

Wake up. Or, alternatively, don't piss on my shoes and tell me it's raining.

 

Cali_Democrat

(30,439 posts)
80. You're not thinking about this logically
Sat Feb 20, 2016, 08:58 AM
Feb 2016

If you're part of the democratic base, wouldn't you have already been registered a democrat?

 

Jester Messiah

(4,711 posts)
81. Not necessarily. A lot of people prefer to remain Independent but usually align with the dems.
Sat Feb 20, 2016, 09:00 AM
Feb 2016

But because those folk are gravitating towards Sanders, you see this sudden outbreak of "concern" from the Hillarites.

 

Cali_Democrat

(30,439 posts)
82. I suppose we have a difference of opinion
Sat Feb 20, 2016, 09:04 AM
Feb 2016

In my opinion, the base refers to the stalwarts of the party, not self-declared independents who "usually" vote Democratic.

I suppose we can agree to disagree.

Fawke Em

(11,366 posts)
6. I think this hilarious.
Fri Feb 19, 2016, 05:13 PM
Feb 2016

First, that they're stupid enough to think he's the unelectable one when he clearly beats all of their candidates with a broom much more than Hillary does; and,

Second, that anyone, including the Democratic Party, thinks they can look at someone and "know" they're falsely registering as a Democrat. What? If you wear a Ralph Lauren golf shirt, talk through your teeth and your girlfriend's name is Muffy, you're disqualified to vote as a Dem?

 

mythology

(9,527 posts)
8. How do you tell the difference between
Fri Feb 19, 2016, 05:14 PM
Feb 2016

Somebody voting sincere and somebody voting in an attempt to cause trouble?

 

MohRokTah

(15,429 posts)
27. You compare the names of those who attend the Dem Caucus to those who attend the GOP Caucus. eom
Fri Feb 19, 2016, 05:47 PM
Feb 2016

JimDandy

(7,318 posts)
74. The sign-in sheets aren't public record. The Republican Party,
Fri Feb 19, 2016, 09:45 PM
Feb 2016

whose caucus isn't until Tuesday, is under no obligation to give the Democrats their caucus sign-in sheets.

Skwmom

(12,685 posts)
10. My money is on trying to INTIMIDATE Republicans who want to vote for Sanders.
Fri Feb 19, 2016, 05:16 PM
Feb 2016

And this is this attempted cover by Team Clinton.

cui bono

(19,926 posts)
18. Good take on this!
Fri Feb 19, 2016, 05:27 PM
Feb 2016

I'm betting with you.

By hook or by crook... who cares what the voters actually want.

.

jfern

(5,204 posts)
47. There are plenty of Republicans who would vote for Bernie
Fri Feb 19, 2016, 08:05 PM
Feb 2016

in the general. That's why he polls better than Hillary in the general election. But the Democratic party seems determined to shrink the party rather than grow it.

Skwmom

(12,685 posts)
13. Probably one of Clinton's Republican pals started the ball rolling so they could make people afraid
Fri Feb 19, 2016, 05:19 PM
Feb 2016

to vote for Sanders.

In the GE they can hammer Clinton for voter suppression.
 

libdem4life

(13,877 posts)
14. This is beyond desperation. How does someone EVER illegally change parties.
Fri Feb 19, 2016, 05:25 PM
Feb 2016

And then prosecute?

However, after Bernie wins, they will have a lot of time on their hands. Bluster and Cow Pies.

 

Cali_Democrat

(30,439 posts)
17. From MSNBC:
Fri Feb 19, 2016, 05:27 PM
Feb 2016
Republicans closed their registration rolls on Feb. 13, and that is the file that will be used on Feb. 23. Democrats are allowing same-day registration on Saturday.

So: A Republican registered by Feb. 13 could show up at a Democratic caucus site on Saturday, switch to the Democratic Party, vote and then still participate on Tuesday because the party switch would not show up on the GOP caucus rolls.


Clark County Voter Registrar Joe Gloria confirmed Monday that this could happen. And he also pointed out that the Republican-become-Democrat could switch back to the GOP in time to vote in the June primary.


<...>

Ralston noted yesterday that “organized” Republican efforts to intervene in the Democratic contest are now underway. This includes College Republicans urging members to support the “socialist” in order to help the GOP candidate “prevail” in November, and coincided with work from a prominent conservative activist in Nevada encouraging Republicans to intervene with a similar message.

Read more:

http://www.msnbc.com/rachel-maddow-show/nevada-republicans-eye-electoral-mischief-dem-caucuses

kristopher

(29,798 posts)
28. I don't either, but i seriously doubt the legal threat has any teeth.
Fri Feb 19, 2016, 05:48 PM
Feb 2016

Tempest in a teapot to give Hillary cover for a loss.

 

nadinbrzezinski

(154,021 posts)
21. How do you prove Mr. Smith is part of Op Chaos?
Fri Feb 19, 2016, 05:33 PM
Feb 2016

Mind scanners, what you wear? What?

For the record, I expect some of this dirty trickery. But like voting multiple times, (and voter ID laws) this is going to be mostly mythical

 

Motown_Johnny

(22,308 posts)
25. Such nonsense.
Fri Feb 19, 2016, 05:43 PM
Feb 2016

If an eligible voter registers as a Democrat then they are registered as a Democrat and can participate in the caucus.


How is anyone going to prove "falsely registering"?







 

workinclasszero

(28,270 posts)
26. Proof that the republicans are trying to get Bernie
Fri Feb 19, 2016, 05:43 PM
Feb 2016

the democratic nomination because he would be an incredibly weak push over in the GE!

mhatrw

(10,786 posts)
36. Show us the proof. There is NOTHING here.
Fri Feb 19, 2016, 06:45 PM
Feb 2016

There in NO organized effort to get Republicans to vote for Sanders that I can tell.

If you can present some evidence to this effect, please do so.

NV Whino

(20,886 posts)
32. Another reason to eliminate caucuses and go to primaries.
Fri Feb 19, 2016, 06:29 PM
Feb 2016

The parties should have thought of the problems, and solved them, long ago.

And if the Republicans think skewing the dem caucus to Bernie will give them the GE, they are going to be very surprised.

 

nadinbrzezinski

(154,021 posts)
53. Some primary states are closed
Fri Feb 19, 2016, 08:17 PM
Feb 2016

some primary states are open.

Thankfully I live in an open primary state. Ergo I can proudly be a member of the fastest growing "party" in the state. INDIES

That said, I think the caucus system is highly undemocratic and that goes for both parties.

applegrove

(118,696 posts)
44. GOP trolls are on the DU creating a climate of hate for Hillary. They were beside themselves
Fri Feb 19, 2016, 07:54 PM
Feb 2016

with seething when Hillary went to Flint. One would think 'FLINT WATER BAD, HELP PEOPLE OF FLINT' would be a settled issue on the DU. But no. Bernie Bros were quite apoplectic.

 

DisgustipatedinCA

(12,530 posts)
45. Well, you're interchanging "Bernie Bros" and "GOP trolls" in your post, and I disagree.
Fri Feb 19, 2016, 07:56 PM
Feb 2016

Awhile back, I decided that if defending my candidate from smears made me a Bernie Bro, I'd wear the label, and in so doing, weaken it. I like to think of myself as a middle aged regular sort of person, but some like to call me a Bernie Bro. But I dont', and won't, have relations with the grand old party, thanks.

jfern

(5,204 posts)
49. You talk about a climate of hate
Fri Feb 19, 2016, 08:06 PM
Feb 2016

And then smear Bernie supporters with the insulting "Bernie Bros" label. Talk about hypocritical.

jfern

(5,204 posts)
54. Bernie Bros is a term invented by Hillary hacks trying to divide and conquer
Fri Feb 19, 2016, 08:18 PM
Feb 2016

I do not vote for candidates of hate.

catnhatnh

(8,976 posts)
58. It's called pandering
Fri Feb 19, 2016, 08:22 PM
Feb 2016

...anyone here recall that she was also going to whip autism and Alzheimer's???You know who does-credulous people who's lives are negatively affected by these diseases. Typical bullshit trying to get people to believe you want to help them when it's really about hustling votes on the cheap.

mhatrw

(10,786 posts)
35. LOL. And the "evidence" for this supposed chicanery is an email sent out to 142 people
Fri Feb 19, 2016, 06:44 PM
Feb 2016

saying that is they do this they WILL get arrested.

And a press release from a College Republican chapter that does not advise Republicans to on who to vote for?

ismnotwasm

(41,993 posts)
43. Good
Fri Feb 19, 2016, 07:47 PM
Feb 2016

because that's some bullshit right there. There is nothing wrong with being independent, no one should resort to dishonesty.

 

MohRokTah

(15,429 posts)
48. There may be some felony charges against some members of the College Republicans
Fri Feb 19, 2016, 08:05 PM
Feb 2016

Whomsoever put out the fliers encouraging people to engage in this felonious activity is just as guilty under the law that they will prosecute the miscreants who commit voter fraud by voting in both caucuses. Simply encouraging others to do it is also a felony.

JimDandy

(7,318 posts)
62. What law? The Democratic Party is a private corporation.
Fri Feb 19, 2016, 08:31 PM
Feb 2016

Like a union, their caucuses and elections are usually not subject to state election laws. But, if they have participants attest in writing, when they sign in at the caucus, that they will not participate in any other political party's primary/caucus, then they may have a civil case against anyone who they later find has provably done so. I could be wrong. If you know of a specific law that states doing so is a crime, would you please cite it. As a long-time election protection activist, I'd be very interested in learning about any such law.

winter is coming

(11,785 posts)
55. I've lived in open primary states. Usually, they stamp your card with the party of the
Fri Feb 19, 2016, 08:19 PM
Feb 2016

primary you voted in, to keep people from voting in more than one primary (or from voting in the other party's run-off election if there is one). Surely, Nevada's got some mechanism in place to ensure one voter, one primary.

JimDandy

(7,318 posts)
65. Political party caucuses are not considered public elections
Fri Feb 19, 2016, 08:41 PM
Feb 2016

since they are run by a private corporation. Both the Republican and Democratic parties have caucuses in Nevada, so I don't see how this could violate any state or federal law. Might be a violation of a civil contract law though if the caucus participants state they will not participate in another political party's elections snd then in fact do so.

 

Bohemianwriter

(978 posts)
61. LLLLOOOOLLLL
Fri Feb 19, 2016, 08:27 PM
Feb 2016

Seems like another 2008 tactics are being used with a new twist.
Contest any vote for Bernie!

This is so special

...Or shall we say...fail to epic fail?

&list=WL&index=17

DNC and DLC do take after their ideological cousins in GOP...
 

Uponthegears

(1,499 posts)
77. Sounds like an excuse
Fri Feb 19, 2016, 10:18 PM
Feb 2016

For Hillary's party operatives to try to intimidate/hassle Pro-Bernie caucus attendees. This isn't like a primary with a secret ballot. Hillary's people will know exactly who to target. It reminds me of right wing poll watchers trying to intimidate PoC in Philadelphia.

 

Ken Burch

(50,254 posts)
79. Bernie's campaign is surging on the merits in NV
Sat Feb 20, 2016, 08:56 AM
Feb 2016

Every vote for Bernie in NV is just as legitimate as every vote for HRC.

Bernie is gaining because DEMOCRATS agree with his message.

 

Bluenorthwest

(45,319 posts)
83. '08 Recycled-Obama Accuses Clinton of Suppressing Nevada Vote
Sat Feb 20, 2016, 09:44 AM
Feb 2016

Since last Saturday's Caucus, the Obama campaign has logged 1,000 complaints -- including tactics by Clinton supporters that interfered with voting.
David Plouffe-
"We currently have reports of over 200 separate incidents of trouble at caucus sites, including doors being closed up to thirty minutes early, registration forms running out so people were turned away, and ID being requested and checked in a non-uniform fashion. This is in addition to the Clinton campaign's efforts to confuse voters and call into question the at-large caucus sites which clearly had an affect on turnout at these locations. These kinds of Clinton campaign tactics were part of an entire week's worth of false, divisive, attacks designed to mislead caucus-goers and discredit the caucus itself."
Hillary- "Sen. Obama lost and now his campaign is acting out."

http://www.alternet.org/story/74840/obama_accuses_clinton_of_suppressing_nevada_vote

Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»2016 Postmortem»Nevada Democrats vow lega...