Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
2016 Postmortem
Related: About this forumWeren't most of the Democratic primaries in '08 winner take alll?
In fact, I seem to remember that Hillary's team thought all the states were winner take all, and calculated the states needed to win incorrectly when Obama started surging. This time around, it looks like all the states are awarding delegates proportionally. When and why did that happen?
InfoView thread info, including edit history
TrashPut this thread in your Trash Can (My DU » Trash Can)
BookmarkAdd this thread to your Bookmarks (My DU » Bookmarks)
5 replies, 1236 views
ShareGet links to this post and/or share on social media
AlertAlert this post for a rule violation
PowersThere are no powers you can use on this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
ReplyReply to this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
Rec (0)
ReplyReply to this post
5 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Weren't most of the Democratic primaries in '08 winner take alll? (Original Post)
hedda_foil
Feb 2016
OP
6chars
(3,967 posts)1. i don't suppose this info is available through google
and in less time than it took to post the thread...
pacalo
(24,721 posts)2. Good question.
MohRokTah
(15,429 posts)3. Nope, they've been proportiional for decades.
You must be confusing Democratic primaries for Republican primaries.
Skinner
(63,645 posts)4. No they were not.
in 2008 the delegates were awarded proportionally too. The exact formula varies from state to state.
hedda_foil
(16,375 posts)5. Thanks, Skinner.